AtomicRL: Atomic Reinforcement Learning for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation
Organizations: Sun Yat-sen University · JD Explore Academy · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Abstract
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown promise in robotic manipulation, but imitation learning (IL) alone often struggles to master complex long-horizon skills. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers an effective avenue for further improving VLA policies. However, existing VLA-RL methods typically suffer from delayed and biased credit assignment due to trajectory-level sparse rewards, while imbalanced subtask mastery creates bottlenecks that limit overall performance. To address these challenges, we propose AtomicRL, an RL post-training framework that leverages atomic task structures for reliable credit assignment and adaptive exploration. AtomicRL introduces Semantic-Aware Policy Optimization (SAPO), which uses semantic-aware gating to constrain TD residuals from failed atomic subtasks from propagating across task boundaries, mitigating credit contamination while preserving intra-subtask credit assignment and value bootstrapping. In addition, Bottleneck-Adaptive Target Exploration (BATE) dynamically coordinates task sampling and local exploration incentives based on the mastery of individual atomic subtasks, directing learning toward the remaining bottlenecks. Finally, we develop a Real2Sim2Real pipeline that bridges online RL in simulation with real-world deployment, facilitating practical transfer to physical robots. On LIBERO-LONG, AtomicRL achieves absolute performance gains of 3.6% and 4.0% over PPO across two VLA architectures. On CALVIN ABC-D, it improves full-task performance by up to 9.5% over PPO. Combined with the Real2Sim2Real pipeline, AtomicRL further improves real-world task performance by an average of 21.3%. These results demonstrate that AtomicRL effectively improves the learning efficiency and manipulation performance of VLA policies on long-horizon tasks.
Figures & tables
| Backbone | Method | SR (%) | (pp) |
| SFT | 89.0 | – | |
| + PPO | 95.4 | – | |
| + AtomicRL (Ours) | 99.0 | +3.6 | |
| OpenVLA-OFT | SFT | 86.5 | – |
| + PPO | 94.8 | – | |
| + AtomicRL (Ours) | 98.8 | +4.0 |
| Method | Task | Tasks Completed in a Row | Avg. Len | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| SFT | ABC D | 92.8 | 83.5 | 73.2 | 61.5 | 45.3 | 3.56 |
| + PPO | ABC D | 99.2 | 95.7 | 89.8 | 81.2 | 70.6 | 4.36 |
| + AtomicRL (Ours) | ABC D | 99.4 | 97.0 | 92.6 | 87.3 | 80.1 | 4.56 |
| Method | BP | WD | TC | Avg. SR |
| SFT | 60 | 52 | 32 | 48.0 |
| + PPO | 68 | 64 | 52 | 61.3 |
| + AtomicRL | 76 | 72 | 60 | 69.3 |
| Reward | PPO | SAPO |
| 0/1 | 78.2 | 87.8 |
| SubR | 80.2 | 89.4 |
| PBSR | 81.8 | 89.0 |
| Ours | – | 89.6 |
| Category | Metric | Value |
| Prediction quality | Accuracy | 95.92% |
| False detection rate | 4.08% | |
| Recall | 89.20% | |
| Efficiency | Trainable Parameters | 28.8 M |
| Inference latency | 42.4 ms |
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Success Rate | |
| 0.0 | 87.2% |
| 0.3 | 87.8% |
| 0.5 | 85.0% |
| 0.8 | 81.2% |
| 1.0 | 78.2% |
RL for Robotics
Reinforcement learning for robotics trains robots to act through interaction, from locomotion and navigation to dexterous manipulation.
See all 252 papers