Recent multi-view Transformers (e.g., DUSt3R and VGGT) have advanced 3D reconstruction by scaling training data and model capacity from two views to many views and long sequences, subsuming the classical SfM/SLAM pipeline of feature extraction, matching, and pose estimation in a single feed-forward pass. Yet this subsumption hides the interfaces between pipeline stages---correspondences, geometry, and pose are entangled in a single forward pass, leaving supervised fine-tuning as the major path to improvement and offering no mechanism to correct predictions from geometric evidence at test time. We propose PosePlaner to close this gap by reviving the classical coupling between correspondences and pose via flow matching, treating pose refinement as a conditional generation problem that takes coarse geometric matches and initial pose as input condition and fuses the resulting pose hypotheses into a single refined estimate, providing a continuous, data-driven analog of RANSAC voting. Our method is trained efficiently on two-view data, yet serves as a periodic refiner for streaming n-view pose estimators with no retraining. Empirically, it corrects failures of feed-forward predictors, substantially improves correspondence-based solvers, and reduces accumulated drift in long streaming sequences.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Our proposed PosePlaner refines any feed-forward pose in one Euler step of a plane-embedded diffusion adapter, and extends to n -view streaming via per-edge view-graph refinement aggregated by rotation averaging and a Glomap -style positioner. Left: Tinit ( blue ) drifts from GT ( black ). Middle: conditioned on per-view planar primitives, the refiner yields Trefine=Tinit⋅ΔTθ(Tinit∣planes) ( red ) in one step. Right: refined trajectory ( red ), raw feed-forward ( blue ), GT ( black ).
Figure 2: PosePlaner pipeline. A per-view local-frame plane head produces M geometry tokens {gm} (paired plane primitives across the two views) and a global pose token c that encodes the initial relative pose Tinit . The multi-query diffusion Transformer denoises Tinit in a single Euler step under these conditioning tokens, yielding M hypothesis frustums h1,…,hM . A score head softly fuses the hypotheses into the final refined pose Trefined , used to align the two-view reconstruction.
Method
ScanNet1500
7Scenes †
R@5
R@10
t@5
t@10
Valid
R@5
R@10
t@5
t@10
Valid
Correspondence-based solvers
SuperGlue ( Sarlin et al., 2020 )
43.9
62.4
21.3
39.6
1427/1500
42.3
65.9
18.9
37.6
4014/4070
SuperGlue + NopeSAC head
34.9
58.7
7.4
19.9
34.3
61.5
7.1
19.9
SuperGlue + PosePlaner
48.9
68.9
21.5
40.4
45.8
69.7
19.0
37.6
LoFTR ( Sun et al., 2021 )
11.5
25.0
2.1
5.6
1028/1500
17.7
34.2
3.7
10.1
3585/4070
Table 1: Two-view pose refinement on ScanNet1500 ( Dai et al., 2017 ) and 7Scenes ( Shotton et al., 2013 ) . R/t: rotation/translation-direction AUC at 5∘ and 10∘ (%, higher is better). Valid gives the common evaluation subset within each block. PosePlaner uses MASt3R conditioning throughout (Tab. 9 ). Best per block in bold . † Tested zero-shot.
Initialization / refinement
ScanNet1500
7Scenes
R@5
R@10
R@20
R@5
R@10
R@20
LoFTR (pre-BA)
11.5
25.2
44.1
17.8
34.3
53.4
+ BA
13.4
26.5
44.9
24.4
39.6
56.7
+ PosePlaner
29.5
53.1
70.7
31.2
56.8
75.4
MASt3R (pre-BA)
66.0
82.1
90.9
49.6
72.7
86.1
+ BA
66.5
82.4
91.1
50.6
73.3
86.4
Table 2: Controlled comparison with bundle adjustment. BA and PosePlaner use the same initial poses and MASt3R correspondences. R@5, R@10, and R@20 are rotation AUC at 5∘ , 10∘ , and 20∘ (%, higher is better). Best results in each initialization group are bold . Table 1 ’s correspondence-based initializations have already undergone BA.
Figure 3: Planar primitives as a stand-alone match filter. Three 7Scenes pairs, LoFTR ( Sun et al., 2021 ) upstream. Top: raw LoFTR matches. Bottom: matches surviving the cut ∥Δn∥+∣Δd∣≤1 . Green / red mark RANSAC inliers/outliers; top-left numbers are inlier ratio and pose error.
Method
N=200
N=500
N=2000
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
ScanNet
CUT3R
23.3
65.0
4.1
24.0
16.5
55.7
2.2
19.0
17.3
53.4
1.0
13.2
CUT3R + PosePlaner
40.5
80.3
7.7
38.0
37.3
78.9
6.3
38.4
37.3
79.8
3.4
31.2
TTT3R
46.2
83.1
11.1
42.7
36.1
79.3
8.0
38.7
27.5
72.5
3.4
28.6
TTT3R + PosePlaner
50.7
85.6
10.8
45.9
47.1
84.3
10.8
47.3
48.2
85.0
10.4
41.8
Table 3: n -view pose accuracy on streaming ScanNet ( Dai et al., 2017 ) and 7Scenes ( Shotton et al., 2013 ) . Pairwise R and t AUC at 5∘ and 20∘ over the (2100) pairs in the refined tail. Higher is better. † Tested zero-shot.
Figure 4: Streaming pose refinement on a representative ScanNet ( Dai et al., 2017 ) sequence (Scene0757_00). Left: sample frames. Right three panels: estimated camera trajectories under CUT3R ( Wang et al., 2025b ) , TTT3R ( Chen et al., 2025 ) , and WinT3R ( Li et al., 2025 ) . Black : ground-truth; blue : raw baseline; red : after PosePlaner refinement. ∙ start, × end.
Method
N=200
N=500
N=2000
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
Oxford Spires †
CUT3R
59.1
85.1
28.9
66.2
35.5
75.7
8.1
52.5
34.0
70.1
11.6
46.5
CUT3R + PosePlaner
65.8
90.8
33.5
70.5
50.4
82.8
22.4
64.1
53.3
85.8
22.7
67.4
TTT3R
73.6
92.7
45.8
77.3
59.7
88.5
27.5
74.9
37.2
76.5
11.4
53.2
TTT3R + PosePlaner
72.3
92.5
42.0
74.9
62.9
89.2
29.8
74.0
51.3
85.6
19.9
67.9
Table 4: Zero-shot outdoor multi-view refinement. R@5/R@20 and t@5/t@20 are rotation and translation-direction AUC at 5∘ / 20∘ (%, ↑ ). Better results within each pair are bold . † Tested zero-shot.
Variant
Init: SuperGlue
Init: LoFTR
R@5
R@10
R@20
t@5
t@10
t@20
R@5
R@10
R@20
t@5
t@10
t@20
Full (ours)
48.9
68.9
82.1
21.5
40.4
59.5
29.4
52.9
70.6
3.5
9.0
18.4
w/o {gm}
43.0
61.7
76.0
21.3
39.6
58.0
11.5
25.1
44.2
2.1
5.6
13.0
w/o c
17.4
36.2
54.5
2.1
5.0
10.9
17.4
36.2
54.5
2.1
5.0
10.9
w/o score head
48.0
68.1
81.6
21.4
40.4
59.4
26.5
50.4
69.0
3.2
8.7
17.9
w/o translation
40.5
61.1
77.3
21.0
39.7
58.7
16.4
36.1
58.4
2.3
6.7
15.9
Table 5: Ablation study on ScanNet1500 with SuperGlue and LoFTR upstream. R and t AUC at τ∈{5,10,20}∘ ; higher is better, best per column in bold . Removing the pose token c forces the model to estimate pose without the upstream init, so the SuperGlue and LoFTR blocks of that row are identical by construction.
Appendix figures & tables9 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 5: Refinement collapses the plane-warping residuals. (a) ScanNet1500 and (b) 7Scenes, LoFTR upstream. Each sub-figure: ∥Δn∥2 (left) and ∣Δd∣ (right, scene-normalized) over all matched plane pairs; blue = raw, red = after PosePlaner ; dashed lines mark means.
Dataset
Type
# Pairs
ScanNetV2 ( Dai et al., 2017 )
Indoor / Real
610 K
ScanNet++ ( Yeshwanth et al., 2023 )
Indoor / Real
810 K
ARKitScenes ( Dehghan et al., 2021 )
Indoor / Real
2,400 K
Habitat ( Savva et al., 2019 )
Indoor / Synthetic
120 K
Total
∼3,940 K
Appendix
Table 6: Training data and sample sizes. Same mixture used by Plana3r ( Liu et al., 2025a ) .
Figure 6: Predicted plane primitives and matched patch correspondences. Three 7Scenes pairs (columns). Top : input RGB (view 1 ∣ view 2). Bottom : PlanarSplatting -rasterized normal from our plane head with the 24×32 patch grid (white); yellow lines connect MASt3R ’s matched patch centers, which form {gm}m=1M in Eq. ( 3 ).
Method
LoFTR ( Sun et al., 2021 )
SuperGlue ( Sarlin et al., 2020 )
R@5
R@10
R@20
Valid
R@5
R@10
R@20
Valid
init
10.7
18.8
30.6
4385/7996
38.3
53.5
66.7
6853/7996
+ PosePlaner
20.2
36.0
52.8
40.8
57.2
70.6
Appendix
Table 7: Two-view rotation refinement on Matterport3D. Evaluated zero-shot on the 7996 -pair test set of SparsePlanes ( Jin et al., 2021 ) . Rotation AUC@ τ∘ for two upstream matchers in two configurations: init and + PosePlaner . The Valid column counts pairs with a valid upstream pose; AUC is computed only on this subset. Higher is better; best per block in bold .
Method
N=200
N=500
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
R@5
R@20
t@5
t@20
CUT3R
20.5
55.2
22.6
64.6
11.7
42.7
5.1
45.0
CUT3R + PosePlaner
20.3
60.9
24.6
68.4
12.1
44.5
5.7
48.1
TTT3R
26.0
69.6
33.3
73.5
20.5
70.9
24.8
73.6
TTT3R + PosePlaner
26.2
70.0
29.6
65.9
25.1
73.0
28.2
75.0
Appendix
Table 8: Zero-shot multi-view refinement on CrossLoc drone sequences. R@5/R@20 and t@5/t@20: rotation/translation-direction AUC at 5∘ / 20∘ (%, ↑ ). Better results within each pair are bold .
Conditioning match
Upstream: SuperGlue
Upstream: LoFTR
R@5
R@10
R@20
R@5
R@10
R@20
init (no refinement)
43.9
62.4
76.4
11.5
25.0
44.0
+ PosePlaner , SuperGlue ( Sarlin et al., 2020 ) match
45.1
64.1
78.0
17.8
38.8
59.5
+ PosePlaner , LoFTR ( Sun et al., 2021 ) match
43.5
62.6
76.8
14.5
31.1
50.5
+ PosePlaner , ROMA ( Edstedt et al., 2024 ) match
49.8
69.6
82.5
32.9
56.3
72.8
+ PosePlaner , MASt3R ( Leroy et al., 2024 ) match
48.9
68.9
82.1
29.4
52.9
70.6
Appendix
Table 9: Sensitivity to the external match source. Two-view rotation AUC on ScanNet1500 with the upstream pose fixed to SuperGlue or LoFTR , while the matcher used to produce patch correspondences for PosePlaner ’s conditioning is varied across four options. The init row reports each upstream’s raw pose accuracy from Tab. 1 . Higher is better.
Figure 7: Additional streaming trajectories on ScanNet. Each row is one 200 -frame sequence refined by PosePlaner in the same 100 -frame sliding-window scheme as Fig. 4 ( 50 -frame overlap). Right three columns plot the estimated camera trajectory under CUT3R , TTT3R , and WinT3R ; black is ground truth, blue is the raw baseline, and red is after PosePlaner refinement.
Method
R@5
R@10
R@20
t@5
t@10
t@20
LoFTR init
11.5
25.0
44.0
2.1
5.6
13.0
Direct- x0
14.8
30.3
49.2
2.3
6.6
14.5
DDPM pred- x0
16.7
33.2
51.8
2.2
6.5
14.6
Flow matching
29.4
52.9
70.6
3.5
9.0
18.4
Appendix
Table 10: Training objective comparison on ScanNet1500. LoFTR initialization, 1028 valid pairs. R@ θ /t@ θ : rotation/translation-direction AUC at θ∘ (%, ↑ ). Best results are bold .
Plane source
R@5
R@10
R@20
LoFTR init (no refinement)
11.5
25.0
44.0
MoGe + RANSAC
27.1
50.4
69.2
Learned planes (ours)
29.4
52.9
70.6
Appendix
Table 11: Alternative plane source on ScanNet1500. Rotation AUC at 5∘/10∘/20∘ (%, ↑ ) on the same 1028 valid LoFTR pairs. Best results are bold .
We present PnP-Transformer, a neural pose solver designed as an iterative-free, differentiable alternative to classical PnP-RANSAC algorithms. PnP-Transformer regresses the 6D object pose by processing predicted semi-dense 2D-3D correspondence fields alongside confidence scores, while mapping geometric inputs into a continuous latent space. To evaluate its practical utility, we integrate PnP-Transformer into a zero-shot 6D pose estimation pipeline, where the correspondence module and pose solver are trained separately. PnP-Transformer achieves a 41.2% mean AR score with low latency (0.46 s/obj) on seven core BOP benchmark datasets, surpassing all prior baselines (such as RayPose with 39.1% AR) but one (Co-op with 58.4% AR). When the pose solver is replaced with EPnP-RANSAC (similar to Co-op) while keeping the correspondence module unchanged, the RANSAC alternative outperforms PnP-Transformer on six of the seven datasets by reaching 52.2% mean AR at a cost of an additional 60 ms per object, revealing an accuracy-latency trade-off. Code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/ebylmz/pnp-transformer.
Emirkan Burak Yilmaz, Yakup Genc
Computer Engineering Dept., Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Türkiye
Feed-forward reconstruction recovers camera poses and dense geometry from image sets whose views are assumed to come from a single scene. In practice, uncurated image collections often contain views from disjoint scenes, and reconstructing these views jointly can corrupt camera poses and geometry. Existing pipelines typically resolve view associations in separate stages before final reconstruction, leaving view graph initialization and reconstruction inference only loosely coupled. We introduce Graph3R, which unifies view graph initialization with feed-forward reconstruction through a shared geometric representation. A lightweight verification head predicts pairwise covisibility from the multi-view features of π3 to construct a view graph. This graph classifies the input views into scene groups. For each group, we mask the shared features before decoding camera poses and dense geometry. Reusing the multi-view features allows Graph3R to reconstruct disjoint scenes separately with a single backbone pass. Across three benchmarks, Graph3R improves average maximum recall at 100% precision by upto 8.99 percentage points over the baseline, while improving reconstruction quality on mixed-scene inputs. Regarding the multi-session mapping task, Graph3R improves cross-session localization and achieves competitive pose estimation accuracy, while delivering a runtime speedup of approximately 35.9× over the baseline when reconstructing the query group. By integrating learned view association with geometric inference, our approach takes a step toward end-to-end reconstruction from uncurated image collections.
Jingwen Yu, Hengli Wang, Jianhao Jiao +3
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Southern University of Science and Technology · China Merchants Group, LionRock AI Lab +1
Pose-Free Feed-forward 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for fast scene reconstruction. However, its performance degrades significantly in long image sequences due to cumulative camera pose estimation drift, which propagates errors into geometric modeling and severely limits rendering fidelity. In this work, we revisit the long-sequence bottleneck and identify pose drift as the primary factor restricting reconstruction quality. Furthermore, while SfM-based pseudo ground-truth poses introduce sensor noise, purely rendering-based supervision often leads to optimization instability and local minima due to the entangled optimization of geometry and pose. To address the challenges, we propose a synergistic pose-free framework that explicitly couples geometry and appearance via a Raymap-Guided Coupling Module (RGC). Concretely, we anchor Gaussian centers to raymap-induced geometry and jointly optimize RGB reconstruction, raymap consistency, and camera regularization under a unified objective, yielding a bidirectional feedback loop: stronger geometry improves rendering, and appearance supervision in turn refines geometry and pose. To further stabilize learning across wide temporal ranges, we introduce a Dual-Frequency Viewpoint Scheduling strategy that combines easy-to-hard interval expansion with replay of short-interval pairs. Extensive experiments across in-domain and cross-domain datasets show consistent gains in both rendering and pose estimation, with notably improved robustness on long sequences. Ablation studies validate our central insight: explicitly designed geometry-appearance synergy is the key to scalable and drift-robust pose-free feed-forward 3D reconstruction.
Xiangyu Sun, Liu Liu, Seungkwon Yang +4
Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea · ⋆Intern at Horizon Robotics · Horizon Robotics, China +1