Making Self-Driving Laboratories Auditable:A Unified Framework for Hybrid Actions,Measurements, and Safe Execution

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) combine automated experimentation with adaptive decision-making to accelerate scientific discovery. Their operation nevertheless often depends on human specialists who translate scientific objectives into executable closed-loop campaigns. Specialists adjust them as data and operating conditions change. Here, we present La Agente Óptima, an agentic framework that constructs and supervises Bayesian optimization campaigns across computational and experimental systems while maintaining a persistent optimization state. By separating large language model (LLM) reasoning from executed campaigns, Óptima runs repetitive optimization loops consistently, returns control to the agent only when progress requires interpretation or campaign revision, and keeps every decision auditable. We evaluate Óptima across ablation studies, five digital discovery tasks, and two physical platforms. Throughout, Óptima maintained executable campaigns as both the scientific problem and execution environment evolved. In a closed-loop contact angle optimization campaign, Óptima identified and corrected a mid-run measurement failure, bringing the contact angle from 71.4 to 67.8 degrees, just above the 64-66 degree range. From this result, Óptima correctly inferred that the target was likely unattainable with the available reagents and recommended changing the formulation. In a five-day multi-objective flow-chemistry campaign, Óptima increased the yield from 30% to 59% over 23 experiments. Despite substantial inference costs, it cost less and used substantially less starting material than a human-directed campaign, while selecting a more mass-efficient operating point. These results show that LLM-based agents can make rigorous, long-running optimization campaigns accessible to domain scientists without specialist setup, expanding the scope of SDLs.

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) accelerate scientific discovery by automating experimental execution and optimization. AI agents can increasingly propose new experiments, but existing SDLs can only run the procedures they were built for. Adapting them to a new experiment still takes extensive manual engineering, which makes laboratory flexibility the bottleneck for scaling discovery. We introduce the self-building laboratory (SBL), which designs, configures, and operates its own laboratory setup given a high-level scientific goal. SBL starts from whatever already exists, from an empty room to a working SDL, and builds the missing capabilities: the lab layout, its digital twin, robot skills, and experimental workflows. We demonstrate the system working across different robots and setups, scaling from a single workstation to laboratories with several robots working together. We validate SBL's end-to-end capabilities through a real-world quantum-dot synthesis experiment. By shifting the role of human researchers from manually configuring and programming device automation to specifying scientific objectives, SBL makes scientific automation more accessible, flexible, and scalable. Project website: https://self-building-labs.github.io/

Physical Unified Device Architecture (PUDA) is an AI-native hardware harness for self-driving laboratories (SDLs). Rather than building a human-centered graphical user interface (GUI) orchestration layer, PUDA creates a command-line runtime environment that lets agents observe, orient, decide, and act over experiments while hardware execution remains deterministic, atomic, and auditable. Headless by design, devices appear through discoverable command-line interfaces, JSON protocols are routed through a distributed messaging system, and command responses, data products, and reports are preserved as structured records. PUDA organizes protocols, runs, samples, measurements, and command logs into an AI-native data structure linked by run identifiers and timestamps, preserving provenance from submitted protocol through hardware response to resulting data products. PUDA separates scientific orchestration from physical operation and data telemetry: agents choose experiments, while PUDA executes validated commands and captures provenance-linked state, responses, and data. The contribution is not another optimizer, orchestrator, or recipe language. It is a practical execution and data environment for agentic SDLs; the broader physical AI implication is that PUDA provides an AI-native hardware harness for AI systems to interact with physical tools.