Acoustic Signature Optimisation for Bioinspired Flapping-Wing Micro Aerial Vehicles
Abstract
Flapping-wing micro air vehicles are prized for quiet flight, yet the few existing measurements show engineered wings to be 15-30 dB louder than the animals they imitate. This paper investigates two passive geometric approaches to reduce the acoustic signature of a flapping membrane wing, and applies these to an exemplary wing. A significant sound source in flapping wings is the impulsive click radiated at stroke reversal, when a slack membrane snaps between two curvatures. Our first noise-reduction approach optimises the wing's venation layout, based on an analytical model of the reversal click as a dynamic snap-through of the membrane. The optimised venation pattern was manufactured and resulted in a reduction of up to 8 dB during the reversal snap in experiments. During testing, the venation was found to be sensitive to orientation rather than thickness. Secondly, an additive trailing-edge fringe inspired by hummingbird feathers was shown to further reduce the broadband swoosh by 3-4 dB at no lift cost, matching a cut serration wing without removing lifting area.
Figures & tables
| dBA | (dB) | Lift | |||
| Wing | overall | (N) | |||
| B0 | ref | ref | ref | ref | 0.102 |
| M1 | 0.112 | ||||
| M1-adverse | n/a | ||||
| A negative value is a reduction. is the peak reduction in the – band at each microphone position, and lift is the cycle-averaged vertical force. | |||||
| (dB) | Lift | |||||
| Wing | (mm) | (mm) | (N) | |||
| B0 (plain) | – | – | ref | ref | ref | 0.102 |
| F0 (short, fine) | 5 | 7 | 0.113 | |||
| F1 (tall, fine) | 13 | 7 | 0.077 | |||
| F2 (short, coarse) | 5 | 14 | 0.100 | |||
| F3 (tall, coarse) | 13 | 14 | 0.091 | |||
Aerial Robotics
Aerial robotics studies the design, perception, control, and coordination of flying robots for navigation, inspection, transport, and physical interaction.
See all 343 papers