Uncertainty-aware Coarse-to-Fine Main Pancreatic Duct Segmentation for Width Measurement in 3D MRCP
Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Finland · Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Finland · Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland
Abstract
Assessment of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) from volumetric magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) scans is an essential task for ductal dilatation diagnosis and pancreatic cancer analysis. However, manual assessment is affected by reader variability in which automated analysis may assist. Nevertheless, fully automated and uncertainty-aware MPD analysis from volumetric MRCP remains underexplored area of research. In this study, we propose an automatic and uncertainty-aware deep learning-based pipeline for MPD segmentation and maximum-width analysis from MRCP scans. A coarse localisation model first identifies the ductal region-of-interest, followed by a fine model that segments the MPD within the region. The dataset consists of 256 MPD-segmented MRCP scans from 69 patients. A randomly selected holdout test subset of 14 patients with 55 MRCP volumes was used for evaluation. We employed a five-model cross-validation ensemble for improved performance and uncertainty estimation. The best MPD segmentation performance was 0.634 DSC, 0.744 precision, and 0.593 recall. The mean absolute error for maximum MPD width prediction was 0.355~mm and dilated MPD (~mm) was detected with 75.0% sensitivity and 74.4% specificity. These novel results suggest that automated MPD segmentation can be used to aid MRCP-based duct measurements.
Figures & tables
| Characteristics | Development Dataset | Test Dataset |
|---|---|---|
| Number of MRCP volumes | 201 | 55 |
| Patient demographics | ||
| Number of individuals | 55 | 14 |
| Age, mean (SD), years | 72.4 (9.3) | 75.6 (7.9) |
| Male : Female | 44 (80.0%) : 11 (20.0%) | 5 (35.7%) : 9 (64.3%) |
| Normal MPD | 44 (80.0%) | 10 (71.4%) |
| Method | DSC | Precision | Recall | ASSD (mm) | HD95 (mm) | Zero prediction mask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DynUNet | 0.579 | 0.613 | 0.583 | 3.50 | 23.7 | 0 ( 0.00% ) |
| 3D U-Net + 3D U-Net | 0.629 | 0.717 | 0.585 | 4.65 | 32.0 | 0 ( 0.00%) |
| 3D U-Net + Swin UNETR | 0.516 | 0.634 | 0.479 | 11.7 | 45.5 | 1 (1.82%) |
| 3D U-Net + 3D SegResNet | 0.634 | 0.744 | 0.593 | 4.18 | 22.9 | 1 (1.82%) |
Medical Image Segmentation
Medical image segmentation delineates organs, lesions, and other structures in scans to support measurement, diagnosis, treatment planning, and research.
See all 796 papers