Cross-Asset Knowledge Transfer for Early Fault Detection of Data-Scarce Assets Without Target Fault Data

Bearing fault diagnosis faces critical challenges when dataset heterogeneity, operating condition variations, and limited labeled data occur simultaneously in industrial environments. Existing approaches address these issues in isolation and rely on implicit feature alignment, limiting effectiveness under concurrent challenges. This paper proposes a knowledge-guided two-stage transfer learning framework that employs a lightweight GPT-2-style Transformer with causal self-attention for hierarchical feature extraction from vibration signals, establishing explicit pathways where pre-trained encoder weights and fault prototype embeddings serve as knowledge carriers from multi-source pre-training to target adaptation. The framework addresses the dual-shift challenge through multi-source learning for generalizable representations, prototype-based knowledge modulation for target adaptation, and taxonomy-adaptive classification for seamless transfer across heterogeneous fault categories. Experimental validation on four real-world datasets demonstrates 92.61% average accuracy with only 10% labeled target data, outperforming state-of-the-art methods by 17.24 percentage points, establishing a practical pathway toward cost-effective predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0 applications.

Mechanical equipment forms the critical backbone of modern industrial production, yet domain shift severely limits the generalization of deep learning based fault diagnosis models across different equipment and operating conditions.Inspired by the success of foundation models in achieving zero-shotgeneralization, we propose YOTOnet (You Only Train Once), a novel architecture specifically designed for cross-domain fault diagnosis in mechanical equipment.YOTOnet comprises three core components: (1) a physics-aware Invariant Feature Distiller that extracts domain-agnostic representations using multi-scale dilated convolutions and FFT-based time-frequency fusion,(2) Domain-Conditioned Sparse Experts (DC-MoE) that adaptively route inputs to specialized processors via learned gating without external meta-data, and (3) a dual-head classification system with auxiliary supervision.Extensive validation on five public bearing datasets (CWRU, MFPT, XJTU,OTTAWA, HUST) through 30 cross-dataset protocols demonstrates the superiority of YOTOnet compared with other state-of-the-art methods. Critically, we observe a clear scaling effect-average test F1 improves from 0.5339(1 training dataset) to 0.705 (4 datasets), with a clear gain when moving from 3 to 4 datasets. These findings provide empirical evidence that foundation model principles can enable robust, train-once deployment for industrial fault diagnosis.

Diagnosing rolling-element bearing faults from vibration is a canonical physical-sensing task and a widely used benchmark for domain adaptation under operating-condition shift. Accuracies above 99 percent are commonly reported, but under evaluation splits that place the same physical bearing in both training and test. We revisit the task under a held-out-bearing protocol, assigning every bearing unit entirely to either the training or the test set, and find that source-only transfer is far weaker than such numbers suggest: on a change of shaft speed it reaches only $0.36$, against a target-supervised ceiling of 0.97. We then study what governs transfer. Treating computed order tracking, a shaft-angle resampling that places fault frequencies at fixed shaft orders independent of running speed, as a controlled change of representation, we find that a Fourier Neural Operator raises source-only transfer from $0.36$ to $0.61$ on the speed shift, where the fault peaks move, while a convolutional network of matched feature dimension stays near chance in both representations. The representation also decides whether unsupervised alignment can work: with the same normalized RBF-MMD loss and no target labels, the operator reaches 0.71 in the frequency domain but 0.95 in the order domain, within 0.02 of the target-supervised ceiling and above $0.86$ on every held-out bearing fold. Once the representation is right, a small label budget adds little. These results indicate that, for this task, the input representation rather than the alignment method decides whether adaptation helps. A second dataset, whose held-out units are fault diameters rather than bearings, shows that the same protocol exposes failures that even a target-supervised model cannot avoid.