Compliant Legged Locomotion

We present a learning-based framework that enables a full-scale bipedal humanoid to sprint at over 7 m/s with motion-prior-guided gait and perform aggressive cornering at high speed with a pronounced trunk lean of up to $25^\circ$. Achieving this combination is challenging: above approximately 4 m/s, periodic foot impacts induce severe, high-frequency yaw-rate oscillations intrinsic to high-speed gaits. This high-frequency temporal structure corrupts the history of proprioceptive feedback that flat-MLP policies rely on, while rendering conventional yaw-rate tracking rewards counterproductive, as they fight against the robot's natural oscillatory dynamics. Moreover, a single style prior shared across skills cannot tell which skill is commanded and inherently compromises the low-speed skill fidelity. To overcome these limitations, we adopt a causal multi-head attention (MHA) module to explicitly model the high-frequency temporal feedback. In place of the oscillatory yaw rate, we design a heading-direction reward that supervises only the low-frequency velocity direction, allowing agile turning at high speed without suppressing natural gait oscillations. We further introduce skill-conditioned multi-adversarial-motion-prior (MAMP) discriminators that condition the style reward on the commanded skill. Ablation experiments confirm that each mechanism is essential: replacing structured temporal encoding with a flat-history MLP caps the top speed; reverting to yaw-rate tracking prevents high-speed turning; and a single shared discriminator makes in-place turning collapse into a quasi-static stance. Our framework bridges the gap between raw sprinting speed and reference-motion fidelity, demonstrating stable high-speed sprinting and aggressive cornering in both simulation and real-robot deployment.

Quadrupedal robots are increasingly deployed in environments where locomotion must remain robust to disturbances and constrained terrain. Gait type, such as walking or trotting, is commonly used to characterize quadrupedal locomotion. However, gait type does not uniquely define locomotion, as parameters such as duty factor, speed, and stance width can vary within a single gait type. In this work, we investigate the relationship between these gait parameters using three distinct quadrupedal locomotion control approaches. First, using whole body trajectory optimization with LQR feedback, we show that duty factor is a stronger predictor of local error convergence than nominal gait type. Second, we investigate duty factor selection with a learned locomotion controller, suggesting how duty factor may serve as a low-dimensional parameter for adapting locomotion robustness in narrow-terrain environments. Finally, we show that these trends persist under a centroidal model predictive control framework and validate them through narrow-terrain experiments on a physical quadruped. These results show that duty factor provides a simple and effective basis for understanding and selecting robust quadrupedal locomotion across gait types and control architectures.

Passive mechanical interfaces offer a lightweight alternative to actuated manipulators for quadruped payload carrying, but their impedance directly couples the payload dynamics with the locomotion pattern. This paper analyzes how passive-arm stiffness-damping selection affects payload-carrying locomotion under different gait and payload conditions. We compare damped and underdamped passive-arm impedance configurations in simulation during flat-ground locomotion. For crawl gaits, where the support polygon remains well defined, the results show that underdamped impedance increases passive-joint oscillations and can reduce the ZMP margin with respect to the support polygon. Trot is retained as a dynamic excitation case for the passive arm, but it is not used for direct ZMP-margin stability comparison. The results are summarized in gait-payload-stiffness-damping maps, where ZMP-margin reduction is evaluated for crawl gaits and trot is retained only as a passive-arm excitation case.

Achieving biological-level running speeds has largely been pursued through advances in control algorithms, which improve the utilization of existing hardware. However, the ultimate speed limits remain governed by the underlying force and torque requirements of rapid locomotion, which are typically addressed through increased actuator capacity. Inspired by Huygens' coupled pendulums, we demonstrate that superior locomotion can emerge from principled exploitation of intrinsic dynamics rather than brute-force hardware scaling. Inter-limb inertial coupling redistributes energy across the gait cycle and reduces peak joint torque required for rapid periodic motion, thereby expanding the achievable speed without proportional increases in actuator capability. Incorporating hardware parameters as additional design variables further extends this analysis into a co-optimization framework, enabling the systematic utilization of inertial coupling in robot design. Guided by this framework, a quadruped robot achieves a running speed of 10.74 m/s (Froude number 21.4) and completes a 100-meter sprint in 12.2 seconds, representing the first legged robot to surpass 10 m/s. These results establish inertial coupling as an underlying mechanism governing high-speed legged locomotion and highlight its role in reducing force requirements, offering new insights into the design of agile robotic systems.

Legged robots deployed in planetary exploration and other remote environments must maintain reliable locomotion despite actuator failures and challenging terrain conditions. Although reinforcement learning has achieved strong results in legged locomotion, monolithic policies can struggle to efficiently represent the diverse control strategies required to compensate for different fault conditions. In this work, we propose a fault-aware modular control architecture that explicitly leverages fault-diagnosis information to activate specialized control experts associated with distinct actuator failure modes. Experimental results show that explicit fault-conditioned modular policies consistently outperform monolithic policies of comparable size, achieving higher locomotion performance across failure scenarios. Moreover, the proposed modular architecture retains competitive performance even under significantly reduced network capacity, highlighting its suitability for compute-constrained robotic platforms, such as those typically employed in space applications. The code associated with this work is available at: https://github.com/iit-DLSLab/fault-locomotion-isaaclab.

Foothold selection on structured terrain requires explicit reasoning about contact planarity, surface steepness, and kinematic reachability, properties not captured by a single height-based terrain signal. We propose a multi-channel terrain cost combining flatness, steepness, and velocity-aware height feasibility, plus a forward climb reward, that simultaneously drives a GPU-parallel divergent component of motion (DCM) foothold planner and shapes a dense per-step affordance reward for an asymmetric actor-critic policy trained with proximal policy optimization (PPO) from depth images. A Bézier swing trajectory with adaptive apex bias extends foothold tracking to joint position-and-orientation, using the arc tangent to guide sole orientation through riser crossings and tread landings. To support payload tasks, we introduce a lower-body compliance training procedure in which a virtual wrench is injected at a sampled load attachment point, generating physically consistent force and moment; wrench-aware compliance targets replace rigid pose penalties, and the policy learns to yield to load-induced perturbations without force sensing. The full system trains end-to-end with standard PPO, no distillation, and no teacher-student staging, and is deployed on a humanoid directly from simulation with configuration changes only. In simulation, the policy reaches $1.0~\mathrm{m/s}$ on stairs with risers up to $0.20~\mathrm{m}$ and improves payload robustness up to ${\sim}15~\mathrm{kg}$ centered load and for moment-dominated wrist loads without fine-tuning. We also provide a qualitative hardware demonstration on structured terrain. Project website: https://fai-rl-tech.github.io/tact-locomotion.github.io/

Quadruped robots are often designed with rigid feet to simplify control and maintain stable contact during locomotion. While this approach is straightforward, it limits the ability of the legs to absorb impact forces and reuse stored elastic energy, leading to higher energy expenditure during locomotion. To explore whether compliant feet can provide an advantage, we integrate foot compliance into a reinforcement learning (RL) locomotion controller and study its effect on walking efficiency. In simulation, we train eight policies corresponding to eight different spring stiffness values and then cross-evaluate their performance by measuring mechanical energy consumed per meter traveled. In experiments done on a developed quadruped, the energy consumption for the intermediate stiffness spring is lower by ~ 17% when compared to a very stiff or a very flexible spring incorporated in the feet, with similar trends appearing in the simulation results. These results indicate that selecting an appropriate foot compliance can improve locomotion efficiency without destabilizing the robot during motion.

Quadruped mammals coordinate sagittal spinal bending with axial extension and compression during dynamic locomotion. Yet most robotic quadrupeds use rigid trunks, passively compliant spines with fixed properties, or actively controlled spines that track prescribed trajectories. Whether actively regulated spinal compliance can support faster dynamic locomotion remains unclear. We present SPARC, a compact 1.26-kg, 3-DoF sagittal-plane spine that combines revolute and prismatic motion with independently tunable task-space stiffness and damping. A floating-base impedance controller renders the desired task-space compliance, and benchtop tests show that the fitted axial stiffness matches commanded values within 1.5%. We integrate SPARC into an 8-DoF quadruped and evaluate it across 97 bounding trials under three spine configurations: impedance-controlled SPARC, the same SPARC module held near a fixed pose using position control, and a lightweight rigid spine. Impedance-controlled SPARC reaches 1.029 m/s, compared with 0.769 m/s for position-controlled SPARC and 0.673 m/s for the rigid spine. Impedance-controlled SPARC reaches higher speeds with larger axial motion and greater mechanical power exchange, while at matched speed it has a higher electrical cost of transport than the rigid spine, revealing an energetic trade-off. Code and hardware are available at: https://github.com/YueWang996/sparc