Credit Assignment in RL

Autonomous agents operating in continuous environments must decide not only what to do, but when to act. We introduce a lightweight adaptive temporal control system that learns the optimal interval between cognitive ticks from experience, replacing ad hoc biologically inspired timers with a principled learned policy. The policy state is augmented with a predictive hyperbolic spread signal (a "curvature signal" shorthand) derived from hyperbolic geometry: the mean pairwise Poincare distance among n sampled futures embedded in the Poincare ball. High spread indicates a branching, uncertain future and drives the agent to act sooner; low spread signals predictability and permits longer rest intervals. We further propose an interval-aware reward that explicitly penalises inefficiency relative to the chosen wait time, correcting a systematic credit-assignment failure of naive outcome-based rewards in timing problems. We additionally introduce a joint spatio-temporal embedding (ATCPG-ST) that concatenates independently normalised state and position projections in the Poincare ball; spatial trajectory divergence provides an independent timing signal unavailable to the state-only variant (ATCPG-SO). This extension raises mean hyperbolic spread (kappa) from 1.88 to 3.37 and yields a further 5.8 percent efficiency gain over the state-only baseline. Ablation experiments across five random seeds demonstrate that (i) learning is the dominant efficiency factor (54.8 percent over no-learning), (ii) hyperbolic spread provides significant complementary gain (26.2 percent over geometry-free control), (iii) the combined system achieves 22.8 percent efficiency over the fixed-interval baseline, and (iv) adding spatial position information to the spread embedding yields an additional 5.8 percent.

Reinforcement learning (RL) shows promise for enhancing LLM agentic reasoning, yet sparse terminal rewards hinder fine-grained optimization. Process reward modeling offers an alternative but incurs high computational costs, reward hacking risks, and annotation bottlenecks. We introduce RewardFlow, a lightweight method for estimating state-level rewards in agentic reasoning. By constructing state graphs that capture the intrinsic topological structure of trajectories, RewardFlow performs topology-aware propagation to estimate each state's contribution to success, yielding principled, annotation-free dense rewards. Used for RL optimization, RewardFlow substantially outperforms prior baselines across four agentic benchmarks: +6.2% average success rate on text-based tasks, +29.7% on visual reasoning over the strongest baseline across three model scales, and +10% accuracy on DeepResearch, with superior robustness and training efficiency. The implementation of RewardFlow is publicly available at https://github.com/tmlr-group/RewardFlow.

While large language models excel in diverse domains, their performance on complex longhorizon agentic decision-making tasks remains limited. Most existing methods concentrate on designing effective reward models (RMs) to advance performance via multi-turn reinforcement learning. However, they suffer from delayed propagation in sparse outcome rewards and unreliable credit assignment with potentially overly fine-grained and unfocused turnlevel process rewards. In this paper, we propose (HISR) exploiting Hindsight Information to modulate Segmental process Rewards, which closely aligns rewards with sub-goals and underscores significant segments to enhance the reliability of credit assignment. Specifically, a segment-level process RM is presented to assign rewards for each sub-goal in the task, avoiding excessively granular allocation to turns. To emphasize significant segments in the trajectory, a hindsight model is devised to reflect the preference of performing a certain action after knowing the trajectory outcome. With this characteristic, we design the ratios of sequence likelihoods between hindsight and policy model to measure action importance. The ratios are subsequently employed to aggregate segment importance scores, which in turn modulate segmental process rewards, enhancing credit assignment reliability. Extensive experimental results on three publicly benchmarks demonstrate the validity of our method.

Large Language Model (LLM) agents often face significant credit assignment challenges in long-horizon, multi-step tasks due to sparse rewards. Existing value-free methods, such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), encounter two fundamental bottlenecks: inaccurate step-level Q-value estimation and misaligned value baselines for intermediate states. To address these limitations, we introduce HCAPO, the first framework to integrate hindsight credit assignment into LLM agents. HCAPO leverages the LLM itself as a post-hoc critic to refine step-level Q-values through hindsight reasoning. Furthermore, HCAPO's multi-scale advantage mechanism effectively supplements the inaccurate value baselines at critical decision states. Evaluations across three challenging benchmarks, including WebShop and ALFWorld, demonstrate that HCAPO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art RL methods. Notably, HCAPO achieves a 7.7% improvement in success rate on WebShop and a 13.8% on ALFWorld over GRPO using the Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model. These results indicate that HCAPO significantly enhances exploration efficiency, promotes concise decision-making, and ensures scalability in complex, long-horizon tasks.

Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) has shown strong performance in single-turn tasks, but extending it to multi-turn interaction remains challenging due to sparse rewards and poor per-turn credit assignment. In emotional support dialogues, responses shape future user states, so matched-state step-wise comparison is unavailable, while trajectory-level supervision is insufficient. We propose MICA (Multi-granularity Intertemporal Credit Assignment), a critic-free RL framework for multi-turn emotional support tasks. MICA derives both immediate and delayed credit from a shared potential function over the user's structured support state. Incremental Distance Reward measures the per-turn decrease in residual distance to the target state, while its Monte Carlo return captures delayed effects. After scope-specific normalization, the two signals form a mixed advantage for stable per-turn optimization without matched-state comparisons, rollout trees, or a learned critic. On EMPA, EQ-Bench, and EmoBench with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and Qwen3-8B/14B/32B, MICA consistently outperforms GRPO and REINFORCE++, achieving up to +42.5 on EMPA, while adding no rollout cost and remaining robust to reward judges. These results show that turn-aware credit assignment enables effective and practical multi-turn RL for interactive LLMs.

Optimizing large language models for industrial sales requires balancing long-term commercial objectives (e.g., conversion rate) with immediate linguistic constraints such as fluency and compliance. Conventional reinforcement learning often merges these heterogeneous goals into a single reward, causing high-magnitude session-level rewards to overwhelm subtler turn-level signals, which leads to unstable training or reward hacking. To address this issue, we propose Dual-Horizon Credit Assignment (DuCA), a framework that disentangles optimization across time scales. Its core, Horizon-Independent Advantage Normalization (HIAN), separately normalizes advantages from turn-level and session-level rewards before fusion, ensuring balanced gradient contributions from both immediate and long-term objectives to the policy update. Extensive experiments with a high-fidelity user simulator show DuCA outperforms the state-of-the-art GRPO baseline, achieving a 6.82% relative improvement in conversion rate, reducing inter-sentence repetition by 82.28%, and lowering identity detection rate by 27.35%, indicating a substantial improvement for an industrial sales scenario that effectively balances the dual demands of strategic performance and naturalistic language generation.

To promote cooperation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning, the reward signals of all agents can be aggregated together, forming global rewards that are commonly known as the fully cooperative setting. However, global rewards are usually noisy because they contain the contributions of all agents, which have to be resolved in the credit assignment process. On the other hand, using local reward benefits from faster learning due to the separation of agents' contributions, but can be suboptimal as agents myopically optimize their own reward while disregarding the global optimality. In this work, we propose a method that combines the merits of both approaches. By using a graph of interaction between agents, our method discerns the individual agent contribution in a more fine-grained manner than a global reward, while alleviating the cooperation problem with agents' local reward. We also introduce a practical approach for approximating such a graph. Our experiments demonstrate the flexibility of the approach, enabling improvements over the traditional local and global reward settings.

Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown promise for complex tasks, yet current training methods lack principled ways to connect system-level evaluation with agent- and message-level learning. We propose a theoretical framework that unifies cooperative game-theoretic attribution with process reward modeling to transform system evaluation to agent credit to response-level signals. Unlike prior approaches that rely only on attribution (Shapley) or step-level labels (PRM), our method produces local, signed, and credit-conserving signals. In success cases, Shapley-based credit assignment fairly allocates outcomes across agents and is refined into per-message rewards that promote cooperation while discouraging redundancy or sabotage; in failure cases, first-error localization yields repair-aware preferences that penalize harmful steps while rewarding corrective attempts. The resulting signals are bounded, cooperative, and directly compatible with reinforcement- or preference-based post-training, providing a unified and auditable pathway from global evaluation to local supervision in LLM multi-agent training. Our contribution is conceptual: we present a theoretical foundation and training signals, leaving empirical validation for future work.

Ensuring safe behavior in reinforcement learning (RL) is challenging when safety constraints are implicit and cannot be densely measured. In many settings, supervision is limited to coarse approvals or rejections of whole trajectories (e.g., whether a rollout remained within an unknown safety threshold). We propose TraCeS (Trajectory-based Constraint Estimation for Safety), a method for learning per-timestep violation credit from such sparse trajectory-level labels. TraCeS trains a sequential violation estimator whose per-step credits factorize the predicted probability that a trajectory has not yet violated the constraint, and integrates this learned signal into constrained policy optimization. The method requires neither a known cost function nor a known threshold, and remains compatible with standard continuous-control algorithms. We provide a theoretical analysis of the approximation gap introduced by the learning objective, and demonstrate empirically that TraCeS improves constraint satisfaction and feedback efficiency over baselines across multiple continuous-control benchmarks, including long-horizon tasks and settings with noisy or inconsistent labels.