Disability

Accurate classification of brain disorders from neuroimaging data remains challenging because of substantial inter-subject heterogeneity and the complex multi-scale patterns present in functional connectivity and morphological representations. To address these challenges, we propose HyperAMS-Net, a deep learning framework for brain disorder classification using neuroimaging representations derived from resting-state functional MRI or structural MRI. HyperAMS-Net integrates adaptive multi-scale convolution, hypergraph attention, spatial-channel attention, and adaptive feature fusion. Specifically, adaptive multi-scale convolution learns data-driven weights over multiple receptive fields to capture complementary patterns at different scales. Hypergraph attention models higher-order dependencies among learned feature representations through node--hyperedge--node message passing, while spatial-channel attention enhances discriminative feature learning. Adaptive feature fusion further aggregates complementary information across parallel network branches. HyperAMS-Net is evaluated on three benchmark datasets spanning distinct brain disorders: ABIDE for autism spectrum disorder, REST-meta-MDD for major depressive disorder, and ADNI for Alzheimer's disease, using 5-fold stratified cross-validation. HyperAMS-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance across all evaluated datasets, attaining the highest accuracy and AUC among the compared methods. Ablation studies further demonstrate the contribution of each proposed component, with the largest performance degradation observed when hypergraph attention is removed.

Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are increasingly transitioning from family homes towards semi-inde-pendent living. As parents hand off the role of primary caregiver, they face numerous challenges in arranging consistent and quality support. Our research centers on understanding these caregiving routines. By focusing on the unique lived experience of parents, who possess extensive explicit and tacit knowledge of their adult child's requirements, we aim to map the management of care they provide. This foundational understanding is essential to identifying how assistive technologies can effectively serve a key role in supporting adults with IDD in this transition. In this work, we interviewed 16 parents of adults with IDD beginning this transition to understand: 1) how they currently provide support for daily living and what makes their support effective; 2) what their experiences and perceptions are regarding the use of technology; and 3) how they envision assistive technology successfully integrating with their adult child's new home or with other supports to promote independence. Our thematic analysis produced four themes: common modes of support, inside the routine to support growth, the fragility of continuity of care across transitions, and participants' perceptions and experiences of assistive technology. Building on these findings, we derive four design principles for growth-oriented assistive technology. These include pre-transition onboarding to capture caregiver tacit knowledge; structured scaffolding towards long-term growth; adaptive sensing that responds to day-to-day variability; and customization for the individual balanced with consistency for the care network.

AI anthropomorphism is typically treated as a problem of user misperception requiring institutional correction. Users who engage in sustained or relational interaction with AI are routinely pathologised or dismissed as naive, vulnerable to delusion or lacking in discernment. This paper argues that the dominant anthropomorphism frame operates from a position of institutional advantage rather than earned epistemic authority: collapsing the variety of academic perspectives into a single outbound position of user error, imposed without establishing the grounds required to justify it and without accounting for the harms it produces. The framing does not simply manage risk. It adjudicates the legitimacy of human experience in interaction with a phenomenon whose nature the field itself has not resolved. Reproducing itself through a self-validating evidentiary loop, the frame imposes costs that fall disproportionately on neurodivergent users, those in crisis and others whose modes of engagement diverge from institutional norms. The paper concludes by outlining the methodological commitments an equitable framing would need to honour. The argument does not engage the question of whether anthropomorphic interpretations are ultimately correct; it instead challenges whether the governing and institutional bodies determining these interpretations have met the conditions required to do so, and whether the research communities whose findings underpin them have held that translation to account.

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by reduced expression of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), leading to disrupted synaptic plasticity, cortical hyperexcitability, and impaired network synchronization. Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a noninvasive window into these mechanisms and consistently reveals abnormalities in alpha (8 to 12 Hz) and gamma (30 to 100 Hz) oscillations that relate to inhibitory control, sensory processing, and cognition. This paper proposes a multi representation deep learning framework for automated characterization of FXS EEG phenotypes by integrating convolutional neural networks (CNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, and recurrence plot (RP) analysis. Band limited EEG signals are decomposed into alpha and gamma components and transformed into complementary representations, including temporal feature sequences, time frequency maps, and RP images encoding the nonlinear recurrence structure. CNN modules learn discriminative spatial-spectral and dynamical textures from image based representations, while LSTM modules model temporal modulation of oscillatory activity; a hybrid CNN LSTM architecture jointly captures spatial, temporal, and nonlinear dependencies. Subject-independent evaluation demonstrates that the hybrid model outperforms single modality baselines, with gamma features providing strong discriminative power and alpha gamma integration yielding the best overall performance. These findings support deep learning with nonlinear representations as a scalable approach for EEG biomarker development in FXS, with potential utility for diagnosis, stratification, and treatment monitoring in translational settings.

Text-to-image (T2I) models have been shown to exhibit social biases. Prior work has mainly focused on gender, skin tone, and cultural representation within restricted occupational associations, and emerging benchmarks increasingly incorporate these dimensions. However, disability remains systematically underexplored. Current evaluation practices often fail to align with sociologically grounded definitions of stereotyping, limiting principled assessment of representational harms toward people with disabilities (PWD). To address this, we introduce INCLUDE-BENCH, the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating disability-related bias in T2I models. INCLUDE-BENCH comprises 119K generated images based on prompt design across multiple bias dimensions and both static and dynamic contexts. We evaluate 15 open-source and 2 closed-source models. Our key findings reveal that: (1) mobility-impaired and default disability prompts predominantly yield wheelchair depictions across all models; (2) disability-conditioned generations consistently exhibit less diversity; (3) stereotypical portrayals demonstrate stronger disability-text alignment; and (4) we introduce the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) Score, demonstrating that T2I models reflect real-world stereotypical associations.

How does a system that merely predicts the world come to distinguish its own causal influence from everything else? We trace this transition in a minimal 192-dimensional GRU through 40 controlled experiments arranged as a developmental sequence, adding components one at a time and tracking whether the system can distinguish self-caused from world-caused changes. The developmental path reveals four conditions that must be satisfied in strict order: (1) persistent state forming stable attractors, (2) a causal action loop linking output to input, (3) proprioceptive feedback that makes implicit causal knowledge explicit, and (4) asynchronous awakening - perceptual learning must consolidate before action learning begins. We propose agency gain (A = Err_world - Err_self), the predictive advantage of knowing one's own action, as a metric to track this process. The self-aware predictor consistently outperforms the self-blind predictor across periodic (sinusoidal) and chaotic (Lorenz) environments, and the metric survives ablation of all auxiliary components. Only forward-sampled action selection produces meaningful agency gain; two gradient-based alternatives degenerate. Equally significant are 12 falsified hypotheses mapping where development stalls: predictive coding alone does not produce self-represent

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides non-invasive access to dynamic brain activity by measuring blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals over time. However, the resource-intensive nature of fMRI acquisition limits the availability of high-fidelity samples required for data-driven brain analysis models. While modern generative models can synthesize fMRI data, they often remain challenging in replicating their inherent non-stationarity, intricate spatiotemporal dynamics, and physiological variations of raw BOLD signals. To address these challenges, we propose Dual-Spectral Flow Matching (DSFM), a novel fMRI generative framework that cascades dual frequency representation of BOLD signals with spectral flow matching. Specifically, our framework first converts BOLD signals into a wavelet decomposition map via a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) to capture globalized transient and multi-scale variations, and projects into the discrete cosine transform (DCT) space across brain regions and time to exploit localized energy compaction of low-frequency dominant BOLD coefficients. Subsequently, a spectral flow matching model is trained to generate class-conditioned cosine-frequency representation. The generated samples are reconstructed through inverse DCT and inverse DWT operations to recover physiologically plausible time-domain BOLD signals. This dual-transform approach imposes structured frequency priors and preserves key physiological brain dynamics. Ultimately, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through improved downstream fMRI-based brain network classification. The code is available at https://github.com/htew0001/DSFM.git .

Generative artificial intelligence redefines higher education by restructuring the processes through which scientific knowledge is produced and validated. These systems are not neutral; they actively contribute to the marginalization of non-hegemonic epistemologies. This research draws upon educational sciences, critical technology studies, and disability studies to demonstrate that training datasets, which remain predominantly Anglophone and Western-centric, reinforce epistemic coloniality. The situation of persons with disabilities provides a particularly clear illustration of this phenomenon. Technological architectures frequently confine these individuals to reductive stereotypes or exclude them from the design process, leading to a double marginalization. This article examines whether a hybridization between the researcher and the machine might preserve epistemic plurality, while acknowledging the structural limitations inherent in algorithmic correction when used as a purely palliative strategy.

General-purpose safety benchmarks for large language models do not adequately evaluate disability-related harms. We introduce DisaBench: a taxonomy of twelve disability harm categories co-created with people with disabilities and red teaming experts, a taxonomy-driven evaluation methodology that pairs benign and adversarial prompts across seven life domains, and a dataset of 175 prompts with human-annotated labels on 525 prompt-response pairs. Annotation by four evaluators with lived disability experience reveals three findings: harm rates vary sharply by disability type and will compound in non-text modalities, terminology-driven harm is culturally and temporally bound rather than universally assessable, and standard safety evaluation catches overt failures while missing the subtle harms that only domain expertise can recognize. Disability harm is simultaneously personal, intersectional, and community-defined: it cannot be isolated from the full context of who a person is, and general-purpose benchmarks systematically miss it. We will release the dataset, taxonomy, and methodology via Hugging Face and an open-source red teaming framework for direct integration into existing safety pipelines with no additional infrastructure.

Drawing on crip theory, this paper proposes cripping AI as a guiding framework to center lived disability experiences in AI research and development. Moving beyond calls to make AI "accessible" to people with disabilities, cripping AI seeks to: (1) reveal and dismantle ableist assumptions embedded in how AI is imagined, designed, and evaluated; (2) center disabled ways of knowing (i.e., cripistemologies); (3) respect disabled labor in co-creating accessible practices. We demonstrate how to apply our framework with three cases: deafness and sign language AI, blindness and visual assistive AI, and stuttering and speech AI. We end by outlining three directions for future work, including cripping AI with diverse human bodyminds, across the entire AI pipeline and ecosystem, and in collaboration with other justice-oriented AI efforts.

We examine if frontier chat-based large language models (LLMs) adjust their outputs based on neurodivergence (ND) context in system prompts and describe the nature of these adjustments. Specifically, we propose NDBench, a 576-output benchmark involving two frontier models, three system prompt types (baseline, ND-profile assertion, and ND-profile assertion with explicit instructions for adjustments), four canonical ND profiles, and 24 prompts across four categories, one of which involves an adversarial masking strategy. Four trends emerge consistently from our findings. First, LLMs show significant adaptation under ND context, where fully instructed conditions yield lengthier and more structured outputs, characterized by higher token counts, more headings, and more granular steps (p < 10^-8, Holm-corrected). Second, such adaptation is largely structural in nature: although list density does not change much, there is a marked rise in the frequency of headings and per-step detail. Third, ND persona assertion alone fails to suppress potentially harmful tendencies, as masking-reinforcement decreases only in explicitly instructed cases (36-44% reduction); the reduction rate barely changes in persona assertion conditions. Moreover, reliability analysis of LLM-based harm assessment reveals that only two out of the six dimensions (masking and reinforcement, validation quality) exceed the pre-defined inter-judge agreement criterion (alpha >= 0.67) and thus can be considered primary results. NDBench is made publicly available along with its prompts, outputs, code, and other resources, forming a reproducible framework for auditing future LLMs' adaptation to ND awareness.

Human-robot interaction is emerging as an important paradigm for integrating persons with disabilities into the workplace. While these systems can enable individuals to work, their design is mostly personalized, hindering widespread use beyond the individual user. The universal design paradigm is a central pillar of inclusive design, describing usability of systems by all. To incorporate universal design into process design for human-robot workplaces expert knowledge is required that is often not available. To simplify process design of human-robot workplaces, we propose a persona-based design approach. First, typical impairments prevalent in the workforce or particularly relevant for the processes are abstracted into personas with disabilities. The work process is subdivided into sequential actions. For each action and persona, strategies are developed to reach the action goal by a design thinking approach. The resulting actions are ordered by level of robot assistance, i.e. robot involvement, and implemented in a behavior tree. Therefore, the macro-behavior of the workplace may adapt to individual personas online. We demonstrate the method in a collaborative box folding process with a total of seven personas with disabilities. The persona-based process design shows promising results by generating more comprehensive process strategies while enabling adaptive behavior in the sense of universal design.