Document Parsing Benchmarks

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Latest papers

15 papers1 paper in the last four weeks, against 1 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Oct 14, 2026

Read, Parse, Describe: Unified Document Parsing with Visual Element Description Generation

Document understanding systems are typically evaluated as separate components via layout analysis, optical text recognition, reading-order prediction, and image captioning. This separation leaves scientific figures, captions, and visual semantics weakly connected, and fails to measure whether a model can produce a single page-level parse that is both structurally faithful and semantically accessible. We introduce Read-Parse-Describe, a unified dataset for document parsing with visual element description generation. Given a page image, models are required to output an ordered list of layout elements containing bounding boxes, semantic labels, reading-order indices, recognized textual content, and alternative text descriptions for visual elements. The benchmark is built from 2,402 documents, comprising 18,163 continuous pages, 125,218 layout elements, and 11,338 visual instances. Besides, we further propose a plug-and-play space-awareness enhancer that reuses multi-layer visual features and injects grid-aware spatial guidance into vision-language tokens for layout-aware generation. Experiments across end-to-end VLMs and pipeline parsers show that existing systems still struggle to jointly recover reading order and visual semantics, while our enhanced model achieves strong joint performance. These results highlight the need to move beyond isolated document parsing modules toward unified models that jointly read, parse, and describe complex documents. The new dataset and code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/yufanchen96/RPD

Yuheng Chen, Yufan Chen, Zhuojun Cai +8

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · University of Alberta · Hunan University

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Document Image Understanding Document Layout Analysis Vision-Language Models

Aug 24, 2026

WildHandBench: A Benchmark for Handwritten Text Understanding that Challenges MLLMs and Humans

While the top model on OmniDocBench now reaches 96.34% overall on printed-document parsing, the ability of current models to handle challenging handwritten documents remains largely uncharacterized. Existing benchmarks focus on isolated text or formulas, overlook handwritten tables and real-world degradation, and report aggregate accuracy without explaining why models fail. We present WildHandBench, a benchmark containing 500 handwritten documents across three structures (free text, tables, formulas), four languages, and nine real-world scenarios. We introduce a Prior-Driven Error (PDE) metric that quantifies whether errors originate from language priors rather than visual evidence. Evaluating 18 state-of-the-art models together with calibrated human baselines, we find: (1) the best model achieves only 71.85% overall; (2) humans outperform all models yet the gap is narrow (77.09% vs. 71.85%); and (3) model errors are qualitatively different from human errors -- 63-91% of model errors are prior-driven versus only 49% for humans, exposing systematic reliance on language priors that conventional accuracy metrics cannot capture.

Jun Zhang, Qiao Zhao, Cheng Cui +6

Baidu Inc.

Document Understanding Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Image Understanding Multimodal Model Evaluation Linguistic Bias in Language Models

Aug 18, 2026

Code as Representation: A Compilable Parsing Paradigm for Academic Documents

Academic papers are a primary carrier of scientific knowledge, yet most of this knowledge remains locked in PDFs that are optimized for human reading rather than machine use. For Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the core challenge is not only perception, but representation: scientific pages interleave text with Structured Academic Elements (SAEs) such as tables, formulas, charts, and pseudocode, whose structure, data, and logic are poorly preserved by common surrogates like Markdown. We therefore propose Compilable Academic Document Parsing (CADP), a paradigm that reconstructs a full page as contextual \LaTeX{} plus executable Python, so that structure-preserving elements and executable chart representations can be reconstructed, recompiled, and directly verified against the source page. To support this setting, we introduce CADP-Bench, an expert-verified benchmark of full academic pages containing tightly coupled text and multiple SAE types, evaluated through a re-injection compilation protocol. We further study current capabilities using SOTA MLLMs and an exploratory multi-agent baseline that incorporates common agentic techniques. Results show that even frontier models still struggle to produce high-fidelity executable reconstructions, highlighting substantial room for improvement in structure-aware scientific document parsing. CADP-Bench is released for future research.

Rihui Jin, Jun Wang, chengyuan zhu +11

Southeast University School of Computer Science and Engineering Nanjing, Jiangsu, China · Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore · Nanjing University State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology Nanjing, Jiangsu, China +1

Document Parsing Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Layout Analysis

Aug 15, 2026

LongDocBench: Benchmarking TOC Hierarchy and Contextual Relationship Recovery in Long Documents

Parsing visual documents into machine-readable representations is fundamental to document intelligence. Existing benchmarks focus on page-level element recognition, reading order, formula recognition, and table structure. Long documents, however, also require document-level structure recovery. This includes reconstructing cross-page table-of-contents (TOC) hierarchies and identifying typed links from tables and figures to their captions, notes, and sources, often in one-to-many form. Because these structures are covered only partially or subsumed within broader parsing protocols, existing benchmarks cannot directly evaluate two key document-level tasks: Table-of-Contents Hierarchy Recovery and Contextual Relationship Recovery. To benchmark these two tasks, we introduce LongDocBench, comprising 85 real-world financial reports, textbooks, and academic papers spanning 2,582 pages, with up to 105 pages per document. It provides human-verified annotations for 3,937 heading nodes (mean node depth 3.55; maximum depth 9) and 3,258 contextual relationships annotated across 2,680 table and figure objects. We further evaluate both the downstream utility and recoverability of these structures. Long-document question-answering experiments show that human-verified TOC hierarchies and contextual relationships improve reasoning, with their combination providing complementary benefits. Meanwhile, representative document parsers remain limited on both recovery tasks despite strong page-level performance. To support further progress, we publicly release LongDocBench and its evaluation protocol and reproducible testbed for advancing document-level structure recovery in long documents.

Yuefeng Zou, Yichen Lu, Jingxiao Yang +5

Ant Group · Zhejiang University

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Document Information Extraction

Jul 3, 2026

MORE: A Multilingual Document Parsing Benchmark and Evaluation

Multilingual documents encapsulate rich regional cultures, scientific discoveries, and historical records. Parsing this content into structured, machine-readable formats is critical for unlocking global knowledge. However, existing benchmarks predominantly focus on high-resource languages like English and Chinese, creating an evaluation blind spot concerning model performance on other languages. While recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) claim support for hundreds of languages, the lack of ground truth makes it impossible to empirically verify these capabilities. To bridge this gap, we introduce MORE, a large-scale benchmark designed for multilingual document parsing evaluation. MORE distinguishes itself through three key dimensions: (1) Unprecedented Scale: It covers 149 languages, making it the most linguistically diverse benchmark to date; (2) Structural Complexity: Unlike previous works, it extends evaluation beyond plain text to include structural elements such as code blocks, tables, and catalogs; and (3) Data Authenticity: All samples are curated from real-world documents via a model-assisted, human-refined annotation pipeline. We evaluate state-of-the-art models using MORE, establishing new performance baselines for long-tail languages and validating the benchmark's effectiveness in diagnosing model capabilities in realistic, diverse scenarios. The MORE dataset will be available at https://github.com/zimoqingfeng/MORE.

Long Xu, Binghong Wu, Tinghao Yu +6

Tencent, Shenzhen, China

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Multilingual VLM Evaluation

Jun 5, 2026

RealDocBench: A Benchmark for Field-Level QA and Layout Understanding on Real-World Regulated Documents

Document parsing systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes, regulated workflows such as mortgage underwriting, financial reporting, supply-chain logistics, and clinical records. Yet most public benchmarks evaluate parsers on clean academic layouts or synthetic prose, and report a single OCR or markdown-level similarity score. Such documents and metrics correlate poorly with what downstream agents actually need: the correct value for a specific field on a messy real-world page. We introduce RealDocBench, a two-track benchmark built from real regulated documents. The QA track contains 1,356 field-level questions over 581 documents spanning four domains, where each question is paired with a typed gold_dict of key-to-value answers and parsers are scored on both per-field and strict per-question accuracy. The layout track contains 1,500 human-verified page images annotated with COCO-style bounding boxes under a nine-class public taxonomy, scored with a Hungarian matcher that includes adjacency-aware split/merge recovery. We evaluate eighteen systems, spanning commercial parsing APIs, general-purpose VLMs, and open-source OCR models, under a uniform extraction-and-scoring protocol, and report accuracy alongside per-page cost and cache-busted latency. RealDocBench exposes a wide performance spread that single-number benchmarks hide, a persistently hard medical sub-domain, and sharp cost/latency trade-offs across operating points. We release the datasets, parser adapters, and evaluation harness to support reproducible, field-level comparison of document parsing systems.

Ameya Joshi, Joon Kim, Gus Eggert +5

Extend AI

Document Parsing Benchmarks Benchmark Design Document Information Extraction Document Parsing Document QA Document Layout Analysis

May 31, 2026

Dr. DocBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Expert-Level and Difficult Document Parsing

Document parsing and recognition are fundamental capabilities for vision-language models (VLMs) and document processing systems. However, existing Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and document parsing benchmarks are increasingly limited in coverage and difficulty: many focus on common document genres or uniformly sampled pages where modern parsers already perform strongly, while offering limited annotation for expert-domain structures such as chemical formula, music notation, complex tables, and cross-page layouts. We introduce Dr. DocBench, a difficulty-aware benchmark for expert-level document parsing. Built from a large-scale multilingual book corpus, Dr. DocBench spans 52 BISAC subject domains and selects challenging documents through parser-failure-based sampling, targeting cases where multiple state-of-the-art systems struggle. It contains 4,514 annotated pages from long documents averaging around 100 pages, with 65k high-quality page- and block-level annotations for layout, reading order, hierarchical relations, and domain-specific visual contents. Evaluations of pipeline-based parsers and general-purpose VLMs show that strong performance on existing benchmarks does not transfer to our expert-level document parsing. Our analysis reveals substantial failures across subjects, content types, and structural attributes, highlighting Dr. DocBench as a comprehensive testbed for diagnosing and advancing document intelligence.

Minglai Yang, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Pengyuan Li +22

2077AI · University of Arizona · University of Southern California +8

VLM Evaluation Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Document Layout Analysis Document Image Understanding

May 21, 2026

MPDocBench-Parse: Benchmarking Practical Multi-page Document Parsing

Document parsing converts visually rich documents into machine-readable structured representations, forming a crucial foundation for information systems. Although many benchmarks have been proposed for document parsing, they remain inadequate for realistic scenarios. Existing benchmarks either focus on specific tasks or assess only single-page, text-centric settings, making them insufficient for practical multi-page parsing. Moreover, they lack fine-grained evaluation of semantic continuity, hierarchical structure recovery, and visual content preservation. To address these gaps, we propose MPDocBench-Parse, a benchmark for multi-page document parsing in real-world applications. It contains 433 manually annotated documents with 3,246 pages, covering 15 document types in English and Chinese, with diverse layout styles, and supports document-level end-to-end evaluation. We further design a comprehensive protocol for content fidelity and logical structure, covering text, table, and formula recognition, truncated text and table merging, figure extraction, reading order, and heading hierarchy recovery. Experiments show that, while existing models perform well on basic text extraction, they still suffer clear limitations in semantic continuity integration, visual content parsing, and hierarchical structure recovery. MPDocBench-Parse provides a unified foundation for advancing document parsing toward more realistic scenarios.

Bangbang Zhou, Hangdi Xing, Yifan Chen +8

University of Science and Technology of China · Tongyi Lab, Alibaba Group

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Document Layout Analysis Document Image Understanding

May 8, 2026

How Far Is Document Parsing from Solved? PureDocBench: A Source-Traceable Benchmark across Clean, Degraded, and Real-World Settings

Document parsing models are improving rapidly, but existing benchmarks are still insufficient for a comprehensive evaluation of their capabilities. We introduce PureDocBench, a benchmark with 10 domains, 66 subcategories, and 1,475 pages. Each page has matched Clean, Digital, and Real versions, covering clean renders, simulated degradation, and real capture or sharing conditions. The resulting 4,425 images have source-derived annotations for text, formulas, tables, and reading order, checked through automated validation and human review. Keeping page content and annotations fixed allows direct comparisons across image conditions. We evaluate 58 models, including pipeline-based parsers, end-to-end parsers, and general vision-language models. The best three-track average score is 79.69 out of 100, and the mean across models is 63.84. Scores drop by 3.34 points on Digital and 11.61 points on Real on average, relative to Clean. TeleOCR leads on Clean, GLM-5.3-Flash on Digital, and Gemini 3.6 Flash on Real. The benchmark dataset, source documents, generation tools, and evaluation code are publicly available at https://github.com/zhihengli-casia/PureDocBench.

Zhiheng Li, Zongyang Ma, Jiaxian Chen +12

CASIA · UCAS · Beijing Key Laboratory of Super Intelligent Security of Multi-Modal Information +6

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Document Image Understanding

Apr 9, 2026

ParseBench: A Document Parsing Benchmark for AI Agents

AI agents are changing the requirements for document parsing. What matters is semantic correctness: parsed output must preserve the structure and meaning needed for autonomous decisions, including correct table structure, precise chart data, semantically meaningful formatting, and visual grounding. Existing benchmarks do not fully capture this setting for enterprise automation, relying on narrow document distributions and text-similarity metrics that miss agent-critical failures. We introduce ParseBench, a benchmark of

{\sim}2{,}000

human-verified pages from enterprise documents spanning insurance, finance, and government, organized around five capability dimensions: tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, and visual grounding. Across 14 methods spanning vision-language models, specialized document parsers, and LlamaParse, the benchmark reveals a fragmented capability landscape: no method is consistently strong across all five dimensions. LlamaParse Agentic achieves the highest overall score at 84.9%, and the benchmark highlights the remaining capability gaps across current systems. Dataset and evaluation code are available on https://huggingface.co/datasets/llamaindex/ParseBench and https://github.com/run-llama/ParseBench.

Boyang Zhang, Sebastián G. Acosta, Preston Carlson +4

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Document Information Extraction AI Agent Benchmarks Visual Grounding

Mar 30, 2026

MDPBench: A Benchmark for Multilingual Document Parsing in Real-World Scenarios

We introduce Multilingual Document Parsing Benchmark, the first benchmark for multilingual digital and photographed document parsing. Document parsing has made remarkable strides, yet almost exclusively on clean, digital, well-formatted pages in a handful of dominant languages. No systematic benchmark exists to evaluate how models perform on digital and photographed documents across diverse scripts and low-resource languages. MDPBench comprises 3,400 document images spanning 17 languages, diverse scripts, and varied photographic conditions, with high-quality annotations produced through a rigorous pipeline of expert model labeling, manual correction, and human verification. To ensure fair comparison and prevent data leakage, we maintain separate public and private evaluation splits. Our comprehensive evaluation of both open-source and closed-source models uncovers a striking finding: while closed-source models (notably Gemini3-Pro) prove relatively robust, open-source alternatives suffer dramatic performance collapse, particularly on non-Latin scripts and real-world photographed documents, with an average drop of 17.8% on photographed documents and 14.0% on non-Latin scripts. These results reveal significant performance imbalances across languages and conditions, and point to concrete directions for building more inclusive, deployment-ready parsing systems. Source available at https://github.com/Yuliang-Liu/MultimodalOCR.

Zhang Li, Zhibo Lin, Qiang Liu +7

Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Kingsoft Office

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Image Understanding Low-Resource Language Processing Multilingual Language Model Evaluation

Mar 26, 2026

RenoBench: A Citation Parsing Benchmark

Accurate parsing of citations is necessary for machine-readable scholarly infrastructure. But, despite sustained interest in this problem, existing evaluation techniques are often not generalizable, based on synthetic data, or not publicly available. We introduce RenoBench, a public domain benchmark for citation parsing, sourced from PDFs released on four publishing ecosystems: SciELO, Redalyc, the Public Knowledge Project, and Open Research Europe. Starting from 161,000 annotated citations, we apply automated validation and feature-based sampling to produce a dataset of 10,000 citations spanning multiple languages, publication types, and platforms. We then evaluate a variety of citation parsing systems and report field-level precision and recall. Our results show strong performance from language models, particularly when fine-tuned. RenoBench enables reproducible, standardized evaluation of citation parsing systems, and provides a foundation for advancing automated citation parsing and metascientific research.

Parth Sarin, Juan Pablo Alperin, Adam Buttrick +1

Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA · Public Knowledge Project, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada · California Digital Library, University of California Office of the President, Oakland, California, USA +1

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Information Extraction

Mar 19, 2026

Beyond String Matching: Semantic Evaluation of PDF Table Extraction

Reliably extracting tables from PDFs is essential for large-scale scientific data mining and knowledge base construction, yet existing evaluation approaches rely on rule-based metrics that fail to capture semantic equivalence of table content. We present a benchmarking framework based on synthetically generated PDFs with precise LaTeX ground truth, using tables sourced from arXiv to ensure realistic complexity and diversity. As our central methodological contribution, we apply LLM-as-a-judge for semantic table evaluation, integrated into a matching pipeline that accommodates inconsistencies in parser outputs. Through a human validation study comprising over 1,500 quality judgments on extracted table pairs, we show that LLM-based evaluation achieves substantially higher correlation with human judgment (Pearson r=0.93) compared to currently used Tree Edit Distance-based Similarity (TEDS, r=0.68) and Grid Table Similarity (GriTS, r=0.70). Evaluating 21 contemporary PDF parsers across 100 synthetic documents containing 451 tables reveals significant performance disparities. Our results offer practical guidance for selecting parsers for tabular data extraction and establish a reproducible, scalable evaluation methodology for this critical task. Code and data: https://github.com/phorn1/pdf-parse-bench Metric study and human evaluation: https://github.com/phorn1/table-metric-study

Pius Horn, Janis Keuper

Institute for Machine Learning and Analytics (IMLA), Offenburg University, Offenburg, Germany · University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Information Extraction Automated Evaluation Table Structure Recognition LLM-as-a-Judge

Mar 4, 2026

Real5-OmniDocBench: A Full-Scale Physical Reconstruction Benchmark for Robust Document Parsing in the Wild

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) achieve near-perfect scores on digital document benchmarks like OmniDocBench, their performance in the unpredictable physical world remains largely unknown due to the lack of controlled yet realistic evaluations. We introduce Real5-OmniDocBench, the first benchmark that performs a full-scale, one-to-one physical reconstruction of the entire OmniDocBench v1.5 (1,355 images) across five critical real-world scenarios: Scanning, Warping, Screen-Photography, Illumination, and Skew. Unlike prior benchmark that either lack digital correspondence or employ partial sampling, our complete ground-truth mapping enables, for the first time, rigorous factor-wise attribution of performance degradation-allowing us to pinpoint whether failures stem from geometric distortions, optical artifacts, or model limitations. Our benchmark establishes a challenging new standard for the community, demonstrating that the 'reality gap' in document parsing is far from closed, and provides a diagnostic tool to guide the development of truly resilient document intelligence.

Changda Zhou, Ziyue Gao, Xueqing Wang +4

PaddlePaddle Team, Baidu Inc. · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)

VLM Evaluation Document Parsing Benchmarks Document Parsing Document Image Understanding

Feb 16, 2026

LLMStructBench: Benchmarking Large Language Model Structured Data Extraction

We present LLMStructBench, a novel benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on extracting structured data and generating valid JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) outputs from natural-language text. Our open dataset comprises diverse, manually verified parsing scenarios of varying complexity and enables systematic testing across 22 models and five prompting strategies. We further introduce complementary performance metrics that capture both token-level accuracy and document-level validity, facilitating rigorous comparison of model, size, and prompting effects on parsing reliability. In particular, we show that choosing the right prompting strategy is more important than standard attributes such as model size. This especially ensures structural validity for smaller or less reliable models but increase the number of semantic errors. Our benchmark suite is an step towards future research in the area of LLM applied to parsing or Extract, Transform and Load (ETL) applications.

Sönke Tenckhoff, Mario Koddenbrock, Erik Rodner

KI-Werkstatt / FB2, University of Applied Sciences Berlin

LLM Information Extraction Document Parsing Benchmarks Structured Output Generation LLM Evaluation LLM Prompting