Federated Learning
Overview
Federated learning studies how multiple devices or institutions can train models collaboratively while keeping data local, for example across hospitals, phones, or companies. A common approach, FedAvg, aggregates local model updates; related methods use personalization or client clustering, split learning, model compression, and lightweight adapters such as LoRA. Differential privacy and secure aggregation can limit exposure of updates, while robust aggregation and client-selection methods address malicious participants and uneven data or resources. The central challenge is balancing accuracy and fairness across heterogeneous clients with privacy, security, communication cost, and reliable evaluation; keeping data local alone does not guarantee privacy or strong performance.
Latest papers
961 papers112 papers in the last four weeks, up 1% on the four weeks before. 0.6% of all new papers.
No More Guessing: a Verifiable Gradient Inversion Attack in Federated Learning
FedGUI: Benchmarking Federated GUI Agents across Heterogeneous Platforms, Devices, and Operating Systems
Cooperate to Compete: Strategic Data Generation and Incentivization Framework for Coopetitive Cross-Silo Federated Learning
Exploiting Correlations in Federated Learning: Opportunities and Practical Limitations
Asynchronous Probability Ensembling for Federated Disaster Detection
On-Orbit Space AI: Federated, Multi-Agent, and Collaborative Algorithms for Satellite Constellations
Secure and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning
Rethinking the Personalized Relaxed Initialization in the Federated Learning: Consistency and Generalization
client-drift'' problem, which is caused by the inconsistent optimum across local clients. However, till now it still lacks solid theoretical analysis to explain the impact of this local inconsistency. To alleviate the negative impact of client drift'' and explore its substance in FL, in this paper, we first propose an efficient FL algorithm FedInit, which allows employing the personalized relaxed initialization state at the beginning of each local training stage. Specifically, FedInit initializes the local state by moving away from the current global state towards the reverse direction of the latest local state. Moreover, to further understand how inconsistency disrupts performance in FL, we introduce the excess risk analysis and study the divergence term to investigate the test error in FL. Our studies show that optimization error is not sensitive to this local inconsistency, while it mainly affects the generalization error bound. Extensive experiments are conducted to validate its efficiency. The proposed FedInit method could achieve comparable results compared to several advanced benchmarks without any additional training or communication costs. Meanwhile, the stage-wise personalized relaxed initialization could also be incorporated into several current advanced algorithms to achieve higher generalization performance in the FL paradigm.