Figurative Language Understanding

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

This field studies how meaning changes when language is not meant literally, including metaphor, idiom, proverb, simile, and pun interpretation in text and images. Approaches range from contextual classifiers and span-level contrastive learning to linguistically guided annotation, semantic retrieval, knowledge graphs, and multimodal reasoning benchmarks. Recent work tests these methods across languages, cultures, conversational settings, and tasks such as detection, translation, explanation, and image grounding. Models can perform well on familiar patterns yet still favor literal readings, miss cultural cues, or give explanations unsupported by the input, especially for low-resource languages and multimodal content.

Latest papers

45 papers4 papers in the last four weeks, up 33% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Apr 20, 2026

Exploring Concreteness Through a Figurative Lens

Static concreteness ratings are widely used in NLP, yet a word's concreteness can shift with context, especially in figurative language such as metaphor, where common concrete nouns can take abstract interpretations. While such shifts are evident from context, it remains unclear how LLMs understand concreteness internally. We conduct a layer-wise and geometric analysis of LLM hidden representations across four model families, examining how models distinguish literal vs figurative uses of the same noun and how concreteness is organized in representation space. We find that LLMs separate literal and figurative usage in early layers, and that mid-to-late layers compress concreteness into a one-dimensional direction that is consistent across models. Finally, we show that this geometric structure is practically useful: a single concreteness direction supports efficient figurative-language classification and enables training-free steering of generation toward more literal or more figurative rewrites.

Saptarshi Ghosh, Tianyu Jiang

University of Cincinnati

Figurative Language Understanding LLM Interpretability Representation Geometry in Language Models Language Model Probing

Apr 19, 2026

More Than Meets the Eye: Measuring the Semiotic Gap in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Anchorage

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at photorealistic generation, yet often struggle to represent abstract meaning such as idiomatic interpretations of noun compounds. To study whether high visual fidelity interferes with idiomatic compositionality under visual abstraction, we introduce DIVA, a controlled benchmark that replaces high-fidelity visual detail with schematic iconicity by generating paired, sense-anchored visualizations for literal and idiomatic readings. We further propose Semantic Alignment Gap (

Δ

), an architecture-agnostic metric that quantifies divergence between literal and idiomatic visual grounding. We additionally introduce a directional signed bias

b(t)

to separately measure the direction and strength of literal preference. Evaluating 8 recent VLMs, we reveal a consistent Literal Superiority Bias: model scale alone does not resolve literal preference, and increased visual fidelity is associated with weaker symbolic alignment, suggesting cognitive interference from hyper-realistic imagery. Our findings suggest that improving compositional understanding requires iconographic abstraction of visual input and anchoring interpretation and generation in intended meaning.

Wei He

IDSAI, University of Exeter Exeter, UK

VLM Evaluation Figurative Language Understanding Vision-Language Models VLM Interpretability Vision-Language Grounding

Apr 15, 2026

Learning the Cue or Learning the Word? Analyzing Generalization in Metaphor Detection for Verbs

Metaphor detection models achieve strong benchmark performance, yet it remains unclear whether this reflects transferable generalization or lexical memorization. To address this, we analyze generalization in metaphor detection through RoBERTa, the shared backbone of many state-of-the-art systems, focusing on English verbs using the VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. We introduce a controlled lexical hold-out setup where all instances of selected target lemmas are strictly excluded from fine-tuning, and compare predictions on these Held-out lemmas against Exposed lemmas (verbs seen during fine-tuning). While the model performs best on Exposed lemmas, it maintains robust performance on Held-out lemmas. Further analysis reveals that sentence context alone is sufficient to match full-model performance on Held-out lemmas, whereas static verb-level embeddings are not. Together, these results suggest that generalization is primarily driven by "learning the cue" (transferable contextual patterns), while "learning the word" (verb-specific memorization) provides an additive boost when lexical exposure is available.

Sinan Kurtyigit, Sabine Schulte im Walde, Alexander Fraser

School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich · Institute for Natural Language Processing, University of Stuttgart

Figurative Language Understanding Memorization in Language Models

Apr 14, 2026

MetFuse: Figurative Fusion between Metonymy and Metaphor

Metonymy and metaphor often co-occur in natural language, yet computational work has studied them largely in isolation. We introduce a framework that transforms a literal sentence into three figurative variants: metonymic, metaphoric, and hybrid. Using this framework, we construct MetFuse, the first dedicated dataset of figurative fusion between metonymy and metaphor, containing 1,000 human-verified meaning-aligned quadruplets totaling 4,000 sentences. Extrinsic experiments on eight existing benchmarks show that augmenting training data with MetFuse consistently improves both metonymy and metaphor classification, with hybrid examples yielding the largest gains on metonymy tasks. Using this dataset, we also analyze how the presence of one figurative type impacts another. Our findings show that both human annotators and large language models better identify metonymy in hybrid sentences than in metonymy-only sentences, demonstrating that the presence of a metaphor makes a metonymic noun more explicit. Our dataset is publicly available at: https://github.com/cincynlp/MetFuse.

Saptarshi Ghosh, Tianyu Jiang

University of Cincinnati

Figurative Language Understanding

Apr 12, 2026

When Meaning Isn't Literal: Exploring Idiomatic Meaning Across Languages and Modalities

Idiomatic reasoning, deeply intertwined with metaphor and culture, remains a blind spot for contemporary language models, whose progress skews toward surface-level lexical and semantic cues. For instance, the Bengali idiom \foreignlanguage{bengali}{\char"0986\char"0999\char"09CD\char"0997\char"09C1 \char"09B0 \char"09AB\char"09B2 \char"099F\char"0995} (angur fol tok,

grapes are sour''): it encodes denial-driven rationalization, yet naive models latch onto the literal fox-and-grape imagery. Addressing this oversight, we present

Mediom,'' a multilingual, multimodal idiom corpus of 3,533 Hindi, Bengali, and Thai idioms, each paired with gold-standard explanations, cross-lingual translations, and carefully aligned text--image representations. We benchmark both large language models (textual reasoning) and vision-language models (figurative disambiguation) on Mediom, exposing systematic failures in metaphor comprehension. To mitigate these gaps, we propose ``HIDE,'' a Hinting-based Idiom Explanation framework that leverages error-feedback retrieval and targeted diagnostic cues for iterative reasoning refinement. Collectively, Mediom and HIDE establish a rigorous test bed and methodology for culturally grounded, multimodal idiom understanding embedded with reasoning hints in next-generation AI systems.

Sarmistha Das, Shreyas Guha, Suvrayan Bandyopadhyay +3

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, India · School of Information Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand

Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Figurative Language Understanding Cross-Lingual Reasoning in Language Models Multimodal Reasoning Cross-Cultural Language Model Evaluation

Apr 11, 2026

Computational Implementation of a Model of Category-Theoretic Metaphor Comprehension

In this study, we developed a computational implementation for a model of metaphor comprehension based on the theory of indeterminate natural transformation (TINT) proposed by Fuyama et al. We simplified the algorithms implementing the model to be closer to the original theory and verified it through data fitting and simulations. The outputs of the algorithms are evaluated with three measures: data-fitting with experimental data, the systematicity of the metaphor comprehension result, and the novelty of the comprehension (i.e. the correspondence of the associative structure of the source and target of the metaphor). The improved algorithm outperformed the existing ones in all the three measures.

Fumitaka Iwaki, Miho Fuyama, Hayato Saigo +1

School of Science and Technology, Tokyo Denki University · College of Letters, Ritsumeikan University · ZEN University

Figurative Language Understanding Computational Cognitive Modeling

Apr 9, 2026

Floating or Suggesting Ideas? A Large-Scale Contrastive Analysis of Metaphorical and Literal Verb-Object Constructions

Metaphor pervades everyday language, allowing speakers to express abstract concepts via concrete domains. While prior work has studied metaphors cognitively and psycholinguistically, large-scale comparisons with literal language remain limited, especially for near-synonymous expressions. We analyze 297 English verb-object pairs (e.g., float idea vs. suggest idea) in ~2M corpus sentences, examining their contextual usage. Using five NLP tools, we extract 2,293 cognitive and linguistic features capturing affective, lexical, syntactic, and discourse-level properties. We address: (i) whether features differ between metaphorical and literal contexts (cross-pair analysis), and (ii) whether individual VO pairs diverge internally (within-pair analysis). Cross-pair results show literal contexts have higher lexical frequency, cohesion, and structural regularity, while metaphorical contexts show greater affective load, imageability, lexical diversity, and constructional specificity. Within-pair analyses reveal substantial heterogeneity, with most pairs showing non-uniform effects. These results suggest no single, consistent distributional pattern that distinguishes metaphorical from literal usage. Instead, differences are largely construction-specific. Overall, large-scale data combined with diverse features provides a fine-grained understanding of metaphor-literal contrasts in VO usage.

Prisca Piccirilli, Alexander Fraser, Sabine Schulte im Walde

Institute for Natural Language Processing (IMS), University of Stuttgart, Germany · Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany · Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Germany

Corpus Linguistics Figurative Language Understanding

Apr 9, 2026

Contextualising (Im)plausible Events Triggers Figurative Language

This work explores the connection between (non-)literalness and plausibility at the example of subject-verb-object events in English. We design a systematic setup of plausible and implausible event triples in combination with abstract and concrete constituent categories. Our analysis of human and LLM-generated judgments and example contexts reveals substantial differences between assessments of plausibility. While humans excel at nuanced detection and contextualization of (non-)literal vs. implausible events, LLM results reveal only shallow contextualization patterns with a bias to trade implausibility for non-literal, plausible interpretations.

Annerose Eichel, Tonmoy Rakshit, Sabine Schulte im Walde

Institute for Natural Language Processing, University of Stuttgart

Figurative Language Understanding Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models

Mar 24, 2026

I Came, I Saw, I Explained: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs on Figurative Meaning in Memes

Internet memes represent a popular form of multimodal online communication and often use figurative elements to convey layered meaning through the combination of text and images. However, it remains largely unclear how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine and interpret visual and textual information to identify figurative meaning in memes. To address this gap, we evaluate eight state-of-the-art generative MLLMs across three datasets on their ability to detect and explain six types of figurative meaning. In addition, we conduct a human evaluation of the explanations generated by these MLLMs, assessing whether the provided reasoning supports the predicted label and whether it remains faithful to the original meme content. Our findings indicate that all models exhibit a strong bias to associate a meme with figurative meaning, even when no such meaning is present. Qualitative analysis further shows that correct predictions are not always accompanied by faithful explanations.

Shijia Zhou, Saif M. Mohammad, Barbara Plank +1

MaiNLP, Center for Information and Language Processing, LMU Munich, Germany · Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany · National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada

Figurative Language Understanding Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Model Evaluation Faithfulness of Language Model Explanations

Mar 24, 2026

Span Modeling for Idiomaticity and Figurative Language Detection with Span Contrastive Loss

The category of figurative language contains many varieties, some of which are non-compositional in nature. This type of phrase or multi-word expression (MWE) includes idioms, which represent a single meaning that does not consist of the sum of its words. For language models, this presents a unique problem due to tokenization and adjacent contextual embeddings. Many large language models have overcome this issue with large phrase vocabulary, though immediate recognition frequently fails without one- or few-shot prompting or instruction finetuning. The best results have been achieved with BERT-based or LSTM finetuning approaches. The model in this paper contains one such variety. We propose BERT- and RoBERTa-based models finetuned with a combination of slot loss and span contrastive loss (SCL) with hard negative reweighting to improve idiomaticity detection, attaining state of the art sequence accuracy performance on existing datasets. Comparative ablation studies show the effectiveness of SCL and its generalizability. The geometric mean of F1 and sequence accuracy (SA) is also proposed to assess a model's span awareness and general performance together.

Blake Matheny, Phuong Minh Nguyen, Minh Le Nguyen

Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Ishikawa, Japan.

Figurative Language Understanding Contrastive Learning

Mar 11, 2026

Interpretable Chinese Metaphor Identification via LLM-Assisted MIPVU Rule Script Generation: A Comparative Protocol Study

Metaphor identification is a foundational task in figurative language processing, yet most computational approaches operate as opaque classifiers offering no insight into why an expression is judged metaphorical. This interpretability gap is especially acute for Chinese, where rich figurative traditions, absent morphological cues, and limited annotated resources compound the challenge. We present an LLM-assisted pipeline that operationalises four metaphor identification protocols--MIP/MIPVU lexical analysis, CMDAG conceptual-mapping annotation, emotion-based detection, and simile-oriented identification--as executable, human-auditable rule scripts. Each protocol is a modular chain of deterministic steps interleaved with controlled LLM calls, producing structured rationales alongside every classification decision. We evaluate on seven Chinese metaphor datasets spanning token-, sentence-, and span-level annotation, establishing the first cross-protocol comparison for Chinese metaphor identification. Within-protocol evaluation shows Protocol A (MIP) achieves an F1 of 0.472 on token-level identification, while cross-protocol analysis reveals striking divergence: pairwise Cohen's kappa between Protocols A and D is merely 0.001, whereas Protocols B and C exhibit near-perfect agreement (kappa = 0.986). An interpretability audit shows all protocols achieve 100% deterministic reproducibility, with rationale correctness from 0.40 to 0.87 and editability from 0.80 to 1.00. Error analysis identifies conceptual-domain mismatch and register sensitivity as dominant failure modes. Our results demonstrate that protocol choice is the single largest source of variation in metaphor identification, exceeding model-level variation, and that rule-script architectures achieve competitive performance while maintaining full transparency.

Weihang Huang, Mengna Liu

University of Birmingham Birmingham, UK · Guangdong University of Foreign Studies Guangzhou, China

Figurative Language Understanding Interpretable ML LLM-Assisted Annotation

Feb 20, 2026

PolyFrame at MWE-2026 AdMIRe 2: When Words Are Not Enough: Multimodal Idiom Disambiguation

Multimodal models struggle with idiomatic expressions due to their non-compositional meanings, a challenge amplified in multilingual settings. We introduced PolyFrame, our system for the MWE-2026 AdMIRe2 shared task on multimodal idiom disambiguation, featuring a unified pipeline for both image+text ranking (Subtask A) and text-only caption ranking (Subtask B). All model variants retain frozen CLIP-style vision--language encoders and the multilingual BGE M3 encoder, training only lightweight modules: a logistic regression and LLM-based sentence-type predictor, idiom synonym substitution, distractor-aware scoring, and Borda rank fusion. Starting from a CLIP baseline (26.7% Top-1 on English dev, 6.7% on English test), adding idiom-aware paraphrasing and explicit sentence-type classification increased performance to 60.0% Top-1 on English and 60.0% Top-1 (0.822 NDCG@5) in zero-shot transfer to Portuguese. On the multilingual blind test, our systems achieved average Top-1/NDCG scores of 0.35/0.73 for Subtask A and 0.32/0.71 for Subtask B across 15 languages. Ablation results highlight idiom-aware rewriting as the main contributor to performance, while sentence-type prediction and multimodal fusion enhance robustness. These findings suggest that effective idiom disambiguation is feasible without fine-tuning large multimodal encoders.

Nina Hosseini-Kivanani

University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg · Radio Télévision Luxembourg (RTL), Luxembourg

Figurative Language Understanding Multimodal Understanding

Feb 18, 2026

When Semantic Overlap Is Not Enough: Cross-Lingual Euphemism Transfer Between Turkish and English

Euphemisms substitute socially sensitive expressions, often softening or reframing meaning, and their reliance on cultural and pragmatic context complicates modeling across languages. In this study, we investigate how cross-lingual equivalence influences transfer in multilingual euphemism detection. We categorize Potentially Euphemistic Terms (PETs) in Turkish and English into Overlapping (OPETs) and Non-Overlapping (NOPETs) subsets based on their functional, pragmatic, and semantic alignment. Our findings reveal a transfer asymmetry: semantic overlap is insufficient to guarantee positive transfer, particularly in low-resource Turkish-to-English direction, where performance can degrade even for overlapping euphemisms, and in some cases, improve under NOPET-based training. Differences in label distribution help explain these counterintuitive results. Category-level analysis suggests that transfer may be influenced by domain-specific alignment, though evidence is limited by sparsity.

Hasan Can Biyik, Libby Barak, Jing Peng +1

Montclair State University

Cross-Lingual Transfer Figurative Language Understanding Low-Resource Language Processing

Jan 29, 2026

MasalBench: A Benchmark for Contextual and Cross-Cultural Understanding of Persian Proverbs in LLMs

In recent years, multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) have become an inseparable part of daily life, making it crucial for them to master the rules of conversational language in order to communicate effectively with users. While previous work has evaluated LLMs' understanding of figurative language in high-resource languages, their performance in low-resource languages remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce MasalBench, a comprehensive benchmark for assessing LLMs' contextual and cross-cultural understanding of Persian proverbs, which are a key component of conversation in this low-resource language. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art LLMs on MasalBench and find that they perform well in identifying Persian proverbs in context, achieving accuracies above 0.90. However, their performance drops considerably when tasked with identifying equivalent English proverbs, with the best model achieving 0.79 accuracy. Our findings highlight the limitations of current LLMs in cultural knowledge and analogical reasoning, and they provide a framework for assessing cross-cultural understanding in other low-resource languages. MasalBench is available at https://github.com/kalhorghazal/MasalBench.

Ghazal Kalhor, Behnam Bahrak

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran · Tehran Institute for Advanced Studies, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

Cross-Cultural Language Model Evaluation Figurative Language Understanding Cultural Knowledge in Language Models Low-Resource Language Processing

Jan 14, 2026

Representational Similarity Alignment of Figurative Language in Humans and Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) often produce judgments similar to those of humans, but their interpretation of figurative language remains unclear. We compared human participants and four instruction-tuned LLMs (GPT-4, Gemma-2-9B, Llama-3.2, and Mistral-7B) on their ratings of 240 dialogue-based sentences spanning six linguistic traits: conventionality, sarcasm, funny, emotion, idiomacy, and Gen Z slang. While humans and LLMs were strongly aligned at the surface level, differences emerged in representational similarity patterns, particularly in idiomacy and Gen Z slang. GPT-4 showed the closest alignment to humans, though all models differed at the representational level, suggesting that similar outputs may arise from different underlying language representations. We also examined the relationship between model scale and representational similarity using the Gemma model series (Gemma-2-9B-IT, Gemma-3-27B-IT, and Gemma-4-31B-IT), and found that representational similarity patterns were largely unaffected by model size.

Samhita Bollepally, Aurora Sloman-Moll, Takashi Yamauchi +1

Figurative Language Understanding LLM Evaluation Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models