Image Editing Evaluation

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

5 papers in the last four weeks, against 2 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 51

Oct 7, 2026cs.GR

ScribbleEdit: A Benchmark for Scribble-Only Image Editing

Scribble-based interaction provides a lightweight and intuitive way for users to specify image editing intents in interactive editing tools. However, current image editing models based on VLMs or LLMs struggle to understand and execute edits based solely on scribble inputs. To systematically study this problem, we construct a new benchmark, ScribbleEdit, that evaluates the ability of image editing models to perform image editing conditioned on scribbles. This task requires both a deep understanding of the intention of the scribble and an accurate interpretation of its spatial information. In ScribbleEdit, we design an automated data construction pipeline and introduce a dedicated evaluation protocol that explicitly measures intention alignment. Our analysis reveals that existing VLM/LLM-based editing models fail to accurately capture scribble intentions. To guide future progress on scribble-only image editing, we propose a simple yet effective soft-token baseline, which enhances the model's understanding of scribble semantics and outperforms standard image editing models on our benchmark. Our evaluation and baseline together provide a concrete foundation for assessing and improving the scribble-driven image editing.

Jie Ren, Hao Kang, Kai Guo +9

MIT · ByteDance · Michigan State University

Image Editing Image Editing Evaluation VLM Evaluation

Oct 7, 2026cs.CV

Do Image Editors Follow Depth-Dependent Blur and Aperture Response? A Rendered-Ground-Truth Pilot Audit

General image editors are asked to make a photo look as if it were taken at f/1.4, yet it is rarely checked whether the blur they add follows thin-lens optics. A physical aperture edit spreads blur across depth in thin-lens proportions and changes the blur when the aperture changes; prior evaluations check blur monotonicity, sharpness-trend correlation, effective-aperture error, or vision-language judgments, and none we found reports the two properties separately at known depths. In this pilot audit of two editors (Gemini~3.1 Flash Image and GPT-image-2.5) we compare against a rendered oracle: Blender Cycles scenes with true thin-lens depth of field, one blur-width estimator applied identically to oracle and editor outputs, and preregistered depth and aperture indices. In 24 texture scenes rendered in one three-panel geometry, accepted and measurable panels show f/1.4-to-f/2.8 width ratios,

\barσ_{1.4}/\barσ_{2.8}

, of 0.99--1.18 against 1.98--2.13 for the oracle, and ratios of pooled median Gaussian-equivalent near/far blur widths of about 1.18--1.25 (Gemini) and 0.97--1.05 (GPT-image) against 1.69--1.82. Preregistered black-box interventions show that qualitative wording changes blur strength by roughly 2--10 times, whereas a request for 2 versus 6 px changes it 1.1--1.3 times and no tested wording of the f-number meets the registered ``followed'' criterion. The depth compression appears in the original and reversed centre-focus layouts; with the focus on the near panel, the available-panel depth index reaches the registered threshold, and the aperture response stays attenuated in every layout tested. Scalar metrics adapted from published ones give oracle-like scores to synthetic editors whose proportions are compressed.

Zhihan Chen, Yuhuan Zhao, Yijie Zhu +4

Image Editing Image Editing Evaluation

Oct 5, 2026cs.CV

UniSlider: Perceptually Uniform Sliders for Continuous Image Editing

Sliders provide an intuitive interface for continuous image editing. In current generative approaches, however, the slider is simply a rescaling of the method's strength parameter, such as an adapter coefficient, a prompt weight, or an interpolation factor. This strength relates poorly to perceptual change. The image can partially revert as the slider moves, long stretches of the range produce no visible difference, and short intervals transform the image abruptly. Remapping the strength could fix this uneven pace, but only if the trajectory is monotone, which current methods do not enforce. We therefore distinguish the slider from the strength, and require perceptual distance from the input to grow linearly with the slider value. We introduce UniSlider, a lightweight LoRA trained on a few-step editing backbone so that its strength approximates this ideal slider. Few-step sampling lets us impose this objective in pixel space without intermediate ground truth, and the backbone's output is preserved at full strength. However, a low-rank adapter cannot make the strength fully uniform. Our slider is thus an inference-time remapping of the strength, obtained by adaptive sampling. Since training optmizes to make the trajectory monotone, this remapping closes the remaining gap without extra training or parameters. On a new benchmark of 300 continuous edits evaluating uniformity, monotonicity, edit fidelity, and identity preservation, UniSlider outperforms all prior methods and is preferred in a user study.

David Serrano-Lozano, Duygu Ceylan, Yannick Hold-Geoffroy +3

Computer Vision Center · Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · Adobe Research

Image Editing Evaluation Diffusion-Based Image Editing Image Editing

Oct 1, 2026cs.CV

Do MLLM Judges Judge the Edit? Auditing Bias in Image Editing Evaluation with Verified Quality Preservation

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges for instruction-based image editing and as reward signals for model training. However, systematically auditing whether these judges are influenced by cues irrelevant to editing quality is challenging because visual interventions may themselves alter the quality being evaluated. A judgment shift can therefore be attributed to bias only when the intervention is verified to preserve the underlying editing quality. To address this challenge, we introduce EditJudgeBias, a counterfactual benchmark with verified quality preservation, comprising 1,196 real editing samples and 13 cues injected across four evaluation sites. We verify quality preservation for the requested edit using calibrated multimodal validators, controls, and human inspection. We then audit five MLLM judges along three complementary dimensions: invariance to quality-preserving cues, agreement with human judgments, and stability of pairwise preferences. Importantly, observed shifts are evaluated against each judge's own zero-dose and re-query noise floors rather than against zero. Experiments show that quality-preserving cues move every judge beyond its own noise. Fabricated majority opinions increase ratings, irrelevant visual elements cause larger shifts than whole-image manipulations, and swapping candidate order reverses up to 60.9% of pairwise decisions. Edit-region cues also tend to reduce human agreement. The three measures characterize judges differently, showing that robustness cannot be captured by a single metric.

Yuan Huang, Zirui Song, Xiuying Chen

Northeastern University · Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence

VLM Robustness LLM-as-a-Judge Image Editing Evaluation Counterfactual Evaluation of VLMs LLM Auditing Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge+1

Oct 1, 2026cs.CV

VIEScore2: Unified Image Evaluation with Spatially Grounded Explanations

Existing synthetic image evaluators typically provide only a scalar quality score and do not identify the image regions that support it. We introduce VIEScore2, a unified evaluator for image generation and editing tasks with optional conditioning images. VIEScore2 represents an image as an N x N grid and jointly predicts quality scores and defect locations in a single model pass. Its text-native grid representation provides a common interface for heterogeneous spatial supervision and enables directly verifiable post-training objectives. We train on 38K examples spanning score-only, localization-only, and joint supervision across generation and editing tasks. Starting from supervised fine-tuning, we further apply GRPO to improve defect localization using rewards that combine cell-level Dice overlap, score accuracy, and output-format validity. A parameter-free parser converts the structured predictions into readable explanations. On the primary suite, VIEScore2 achieves an overall-score SRCC of 0.601, compared with 0.491 for Gemini-3-Flash, the strongest zero-shot general-purpose VLM baseline under matched inputs. For defect localization, VIEScore2 outperforms both general-purpose VLMs and specialized spatial evaluators on three of six benchmarks in per-image grid IoU and ranks among the top three on five, including datasets beyond its training sources.

Xianda Du, Max Ku, Weiming Ren +5

University of Waterloo · National Taiwan University · Nanyang Technological University +1

VLM Evaluation Image Editing Evaluation Vision-Language Grounding Image Generation Evaluation

Sep 28, 2026cs.CV

SolveEdit: Benchmarking Visual Problem Solving in Generative Models

Machine intelligence is often evaluated through abstract reasoning problems, yet many real-world problems are visual, such as arranging objects, repairing layouts, or tracing routes. Solving these problems requires understanding a scene, inferring what must change to achieve a goal, and realizing that change without disturbing unrelated content. However, existing benchmarks mainly evaluate perception, generation, or explicitly specified transformations, leaving goal-driven visual problem solving underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce SolveEpIT, a benchmark for visual problem solving through scene transformation. Given an image and a goal, a model must infer a valid transformation from the request, the scene, or a visually expressed rule, then execute it while preserving unrelated content. SoLvEEDrr contains 2,728 cases. Atomic transition contracts specify required and protected conditions, enabling SoLvEScoRE to measure completion and unintended changes without a single reference output. The strongest evaluated model achieves only57.0% SolvEScore. We further introduce SolveEdiT-PLAN, a two-stage visual planner that instantiates the transition before generation. Under matched single-generation evaluation, it improves SoLvEScoRE by 9.1 points on average across three tested generators, including a gain from 57.0% to 71.6% for GPT-Image-2, without modifying the editor.

Wenjie Shu, Yexin Liu, Harold Haodong Chen +9

ZODA · HKUST · UCAS +2

Image Editing Evaluation Visual Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning Image Editing

Sep 27, 2026cs.CV

InfoEdit: Probing Global Layout Reasoning in Infographic Editing

Multimodal foundation models edit natural photographs at production quality, yet the same models struggle with structured visual content such as infographics. Unlike photographs, infographics encode information through logical relations; editing one element often requires surrounding elements to be adapted. We refer to this global layout reasoning capability as reflow. Existing image-editing benchmarks neither provide a dedicated setting for structured visual content nor evaluate the reflow capability. We introduce InfoEdit, a novel benchmark of 1,000 infographics across eight logical-relation families, paired with 4,000 editing instructions across four editing tasks, and a reflow-aware evaluation protocol. Across eight frontier editors, only GPT-Image-2 clears 60% average success rate; most models fall below 7%, and no editor exceeds 36% on the Swap-Block task even with perfect target localization. We further show that code-level editing can match the strongest pixel-level editor, revealing complementary strengths across tasks. InfoEdit identifies reflow as a central challenge in structured visual content editing and provides a diagnostic benchmark to facilitate future progress.

Cheng Yang, Chufan Shi, Huijuan Wang +6

University of California San Diego · University of Southern California · University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign +1

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Image Editing Spatial Reasoning

Sep 22, 2026cs.CV

KwaiMind Technical Report

Commercial image editing requires product identity preservation, accurate text rendering, and user appeal alongside general editing quality. We present KwaiMind, an image editing system combining general capabilities with e-commerce specialization. An agent-based data engine maintains approximately 1.8 million high-quality editing pairs. Built on a multimodal diffusion transformer, KwaiMind undergoes continued pre-training and supervised fine-tuning, followed by preference optimization and online reinforcement learning. A general-purpose vision-language judge and specialized rewards for click-through rate (CTR), text rendering, and product consistency guide specialized policies, which are consolidated through on-policy distillation. We introduce Ecom-Bench, covering 11 commercial editing tasks with task-specific visual evaluation and CTR-based ranking. KwaiMind achieves the strongest overall scores among evaluated open-source editors on ImgEdit, GEdit, both language splits of REDEdit, and Ecom-Bench visual quality, and the highest aggregate CTR ranking score among compared systems. Offline, CTR-guided optimization increases the proportion of generated images whose predicted CTR exceeds that of the original product image from 12.16% to 37.41%. In an online A/B experiment, CTR-based selection of product main images yields an approximately 2.44% relative increase in actual CTR. These results demonstrate the value of domain-specific data and reward-driven alignment for commercial image editing.

Boheng Zhang, Fan Yang, Jia Sun +14

KwaiMind Team, Kuaishou Group

Image Editing Evaluation Diffusion-Based Image Editing Image Editing RL for Image Editing

Sep 1, 2026cs.CV

GenScale: A Benchmark for Relative Object Scale in Image Generation and Editing

Modern image generation and editing systems can produce photorealistic, prompt-aligned images, but still often render familiar objects at implausible relative sizes. To measure this failure mode, we introduce GenScale, a benchmark and evaluation protocol for real-world relative object scale in image generation and editing. GenScale contains 900 image-level entries and 1,643 pairwise anchor-target scale relations across common-object generation, human-product generation with metric dimensions, and scale correction from failed generations. We further design a human-calibrated ordinal judge for scalable pairwise scale evaluation. Last but not the least, we introduce Rescale, a model-agnostic post-processing agent for localized scale correction without modifying the source generator. Experiments reveal that state-of-the-art image generators and editors cannot reliably observe relative scale yet, while Rescale consistently improves scale plausibility across generated and edited images. Together, GenScale establishes relative object scale as a distinct, measurable, and actionable capability for image generation systems.

Lingxiao Li, Max Whitton, Ledell Wu +1

Boston University · Creatify AI

Image Editing Evaluation Image Generation Image Generation Evaluation Image Editing

Aug 10, 2026cs.CV

SI-Edit: Toward Sketch-Instruction Guided Local Image Editing with Pixel-Level Precision

Despite rapid advances in generative models, achieving pixel-level precision in sketch-based image editing remains a persistent challenge, particularly for fine-grained local deformations. This gap stems primarily from the critical shortage of high-quality, publicly available benchmark datasets that jointly provide geometric constraints and semantic instructions. To address this issue, we first introduce SI-Data, a high-quality dataset specifically designed for instruction-guided local sketch editing. We develop an automated pipeline leveraging Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to synthesize comprehensive quadruplets comprising original images, local geometric sketches, semantic instructions, and corresponding edited images. By providing both reliable spatial anchors and explicit semantic intent, SI-Data uniquely enables collaborative spatial-semantic learning. Building upon this, we propose a collaborative framework called SI-Edit that integrates semantic instructions with precise geometric constraints. Furthermore, to address the lack of standardized evaluation, we establish a comprehensive set of metrics designed to measure both structural fidelity (e.g., sketch-to-edge alignment) and semantic adherence. Experimental results demonstrate that SI-Edit provides more reliable structural control than baselines for sketch-based image editing, and achieves precise, pixel-level local refinements aligned with user intent. The data and code are released on the project page.

Weixin Ye, Wei Wang, Hongguang Zhu +1

Institute of Information Science, Beijing Jiaotong University Visual Intelligence + X International Joint Laboratory Beijing, China · City University of Macau Macau, Macau · Meitu Inc Beijing, China

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Image Editing

Aug 3, 2026cs.CV

Localize, Don't Beautify: Client-Side Control of Image-Editing APIs for Cosmetic Surgery Previews

Ask a commercial image editor to preview a cosmetic procedure and it will often change more of the face than the request names: a nose edit can also smooth skin or alter lighting. Existing methods for confining an edit to one region require access to the model's internals, which a public editing API does not expose. We ask how much control is possible from the client side alone. In a pilot benchmark, six commercial editing configurations and one mask-based inpainting model perform facelift-style jaw-neck and rhinoplasty edits at three levels of client-side control: the prompt alone; cutting the edited region out of the response and pasting it back onto the original photograph through a landmark-derived mask (a masked composite); and asking the model itself to inpaint inside the mask where supported. Of 210 attempted edits, 196 could be scored. ArcFace cosine measures identity preservation; a CIELAB pixel-change ratio measures how much change lands inside the requested region rather than a protected facial zone. On the 12 frontal faces the regional metric could score, the masked composite improved localization over the paired prompt-only output by a median of 0.446 (95% face-clustered bootstrap interval 0.421-0.457) while changing the requested region about as much. Editors differed in edit strength versus identity retention, and the one inpainting model we tested did not beat the simple composite. Against each face's input-to-postoperative baseline, no editor moved its outputs closer to the postoperative photograph in identity-embedding terms. This is a study of control, not clinical accuracy: no surgeons rated the outputs, and each condition was generated once. Within that scope, keeping a surgical preview inside its intended region needs no access to the model; a mask and composite on the client enforce it across every editor tested, at low provider cost.

Sukhrobbek Ilyosbekov

Northeastern University

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Image Editing

Aug 3, 2026cs.CV

MIEScore: Human-Aligned Evaluation for Multi-Source Image Editing

Recent advances in unified multimodal models have significantly improved text-guided image editing abilities. In particular, models such as Nano-Banana-Pro and GPT-Image-2 demonstrate emerging capabilities in multi-source image editing (MIE), including tasks such as object synthesis, person-background composition, and cross-image style fusion. However, existing benchmarks and image editing assessment (IEQA) methods remain primarily focused on single-image editing tasks and largely overlook the more challenging setting of MIE. This highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive and human-aligned benchmark for MIE. To this end, we introduce MIE-Bench, the first large-scale multiple image editing benchmark with fine-grained human preference annotations. Specifically, MIE-Bench includes 3,000 editing instances across 16 tasks, each involving more than two source images and an editing prompt, together with 36K edited images produced by 12 state-of-the-art editing models and over 108K mean opinion scores (MOSs) covering visual quality, instruction following, and attribute preservation. Based on MIE-Bench, we propose MIEScore, a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based evaluation model enhanced with skill optimization and multi-dimensional supervised fine-tuning, to provide human-aligned feedback for MIE. Extensive experiments show that MIEScore achieves state-of-the-art performance in aligning with human preferences and generalizes well across other IEQA datasets. Both the dataset and the model are available at https://github.com/IntMeGroup/MIEScore.

Zitong Xu, Huiyu Duan, Xinyun Zhang +7

Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd · University of Electronic and Science Technology of China

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Multimodal Model Evaluation

Aug 1, 2026cs.CV

MDTD-ArtIR: Benchmarking Image Editing and Restoration Models for Art Image Restoration under Texture-Overlay Degradations

Restoring severely degraded visual media still remains a formidable challenge, as existing methods often hallucinate unnatural textures and contents, struggle with preserving color and texture, or fail to leverage partially retained image information. Existing restoration benchmarks assume known degradation operators and fail to capture the complex characteristics of artistic damage such as cracks, stains, and color/texture deviation. We introduce a controlled benchmark for blind restoration of semantic, semi-transparent image media degradations, accompanied by a new, publicly open degradation alpha texture mask dataset MDTD-Art. We present a new dataset and benchmark evaluating state-of-the-art universal restoration models against image editing and vision-language models across varying mask opacity levels. Our experiments demonstrate that image editing models consistently outperform specialized restoration architectures for arbitrary degradations, with performance gains amplified by structured prompt engineering emphasizing detail preservation and structural consistency. These findings position recoverable semantic information and prompt controllability as critical factors in art image restoration.

Mridula Vijendran, Shuang Chen, Hubert P. H. Shum

Department of Computer Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

Image Editing Evaluation Image Restoration

Aug 1, 2026cs.CV

Image-Space Rule Discovery

Can image-editing models discover visual rules in image space and complete problem-solving end-to-end? We tackle this question in the spirit of a human worksheet test (e.g., an IQ test), using problems that require models to read image-based instructions, recognize the problem, infer the answer, bind it to the correct destination, control output count, suppress unnecessary edits, and preserve the input and format. We introduce WISRD, a Worksheet Image-Space Rule Discovery benchmark with 11 core tasks under eight information conditions, spanning localized marking, filling, copying, counting, and no-edit suppression, together with four supplementary reasoning-stress probes for multi-step spatial manipulation, abstract pattern reasoning, logical inference, and constraint-based problem solving. We identify three key findings as follows. (i) Among the frontier image-editing models evaluated, Nano Banana Pro achieves the highest score. On the shared V0--V3 no-reference subset, the Auto-Strict proxy pass rates are 48.7% for Nano Banana Pro, 13.4% for Qwen-Image-Edit, 11.5% for FLUX.2 Klein 4B API, 11.3% for FLUX.2 Klein 4B open-weight, and 0.0% for InstructPix2Pix. (ii) Analysis reveals that current image-editing models can partially rely on rendered in-image instructions even when the external prompt is absent or merely generic. (iii) In small supplementary diagnostics, Nano Banana Pro achieves 70.0% on 4-by-4 Sudoku and 22.9% on public RAVEN pattern-discovery items in image space.

Misora Sugiyama, Toya Oyama, Hirokatsu Kataoka

The University of Tokyo · National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) · Visual Geometry Group, University of Oxford

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing

Jul 31, 2026cs.CV

Evaluation-Verification Reward for Consistent Multi-Reference Image Editing

While recent image editing models have made rapid progress, multi-reference editing remains challenging, particularly in maintaining visual consistency across references and ensuring overall visual harmony. Reinforcement learning has proven highly effective for text-to-image generation and single-image editing, but its extension to multi-reference editing is hindered by the absence of suitable reward models that capture multi-image relational constraints. Moreover, naively using multimodal large language models(MLLMs) as zero-shot evaluators faces a key tension between hallucination-prone long-form reasoning and the limited deductive power of short-form judgments. We address these issues with a Multi-dimensional Evaluation-Verification Reward(EVR). EVR decomposes evaluation into distinct visual criteria; for each criterion, an MLLM Evaluator generates multiple candidate hypotheses, and a Verifier grounds each claim in concrete visual evidence to accept or reject it, producing reliable and fine-grained reward signals. Together with a scalable data pipeline, our method enables RL fine-tuning of off-the-shelf editors without architectural changes. Extensive experiments show substantial gains over the base Qwen-Image-Edit, improving consistency and harmony to match or surpass NanoBanana.

Yingmao Miao, Pengfei Zhang, Xiaochen Lv +5

Xi’an Jiaotong University · DreamX Team, Alibaba Group · Shanghai Jiaotong University

Image Editing Evaluation Multimodal Reward Modeling Image Editing RL for Image Editing

Jul 30, 2026cs.CV

MPIE-Bench: Benchmarking Anatomically Plausible Multi-Person Interaction Editing

Text-to-image and personalized editing models now synthesize high-fidelity single-subject images with ease. Yet placing multiple named people into shared contact actions such as embrace, carry, or grapple still exposes major failures: fused limbs, invented extremities, and interpenetrating bodies. Existing evaluations largely overlook these anatomical and geometric issues, and VLM-as-a-judge checklists often saturate on Interaction while the errors remain obvious to humans. We introduce MPIE-Bench, a 2,500-sample benchmark of video-mined editing triplets spanning 405 scenes, 14 interaction categories, and four contact densities (C0-C3). We also propose MPIE-Eval, whose two new axes score contact-time geometry from a frozen public multi-person mesh reconstruction. Anatomy asks whether every human-like mass is explained by a complete set of reconstructed bodies, and Interaction asks whether the penetration and surface distance between those bodies match the contact the instruction asked for. Across ten editors, mesh Anatomy tops out at 0.65 and mesh Interaction at 0.72 on two different models, so no single editor is strong on both, while VLM checklists rate the same images above 0.95. A five-rater study confirms that both axes track human judgement more closely than a zero-shot VLM judge, and the rankings hold under ablation of every weight and threshold.

Jiajia Lin, Mingxuan Du, Tuowen Zhou +2

University of Science and Technology of China, 2Metastone Technology, Beijing, China · Work done during the internship at Metastone.

Image Editing Evaluation

Jul 29, 2026cs.CV

VETO: Towards Protecting Images From Frontier AI Editing

The rise of powerful, accessible image-editing models such as FLUX.2 has brought high-fidelity editing within broad reach. Their capabilities now extend beyond localized modifications to extracting and recontextualizing objects and identities in entirely new scenes. By allowing prompt and generation tokens to attend directly to reference-image tokens, modern models blur the boundary between conventional editing and text-to-image synthesis. This expanded generative freedom also broadens the space of potential misuse, as harmful transformations are no longer confined to a predictable set of localized edits. Existing anti-edit defenses are designed to disrupt the semantic bottleneck of the reference-image encoding in legacy diffusion pipelines. However, newer editors distill reference information through joint-attention blocks, thereby often circumventing these protections. We therefore introduce VETO, a subtle anti-edit cloak that disrupts this inner mechanism through which modern models read the source image. Additionally, as existing editing benchmarks leave comprehensive recontextualizations largely untested, we introduce VetoBench, which evaluates defenses not only on conventional localized edits but also on broader contextual shifts. Across two contemporary editing models and three benchmarks, VETO consistently outperforms existing defenses while providing a stronger protection-fidelity trade-off.

Jonas Grebe, Hossein Shakibania, Tobias Braun +2

TU Darmstadt & hessian.AI, Germany · Zuse School ELIZA

Image Editing Evaluation Adversarial Examples Diffusion-Based Image Editing

Jul 28, 2026cs.CV

Instruction-based Image Editing: A Survey on Data, Models, Evaluation, and Applications

Instruction-based Image Editing (IIE) aims to transform a given image into a new one based on textual instructions. Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have accelerated progress toward practical ``one-sentence image editing" systems. This survey presents a systematic taxonomy and comprehensive review of IIE research, structured around five core dimensions: (1) task definition and hierarchical categorization of editing operations, (2) methodologies for training data construction, (3) architectural evolution from GAN-based to diffusion and autoregressive paradigms, (4) standardized evaluation metrics and benchmark development, and (5) introduction of commercial solutions. Our analysis shows critical technological milestones across model generations. We further propose a Comprehensive, in-Depth, and Diagnostic benchmark for IIE task (CDD-IIE Bench), which can rigorously assess the multiple aspects of model performance. Through empirical comparisons of open-source solutions, we highlight their respective capabilities and limitations. Finally, we discuss future research directions to advance the field.

Xianghao Zang, Zijian Jiang, Jiarong Cheng +8

Institute of Artificial Intelligence (TeleAI), China Telecom, Beijing, China.

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing

Jul 22, 2026cs.CV

RS-RIE-Bench: Benchmarking Reasoning-Guided Remote Sensing Image Editing

Remote sensing image editing aims to modify remote sensing images according to natural language instructions while preserving geographic rules and sensor observation characteristics. Existing benchmarks mainly target natural images or general visual scenes, and thus may not fully capture the reasoning, regional control, and sensor-consistency abilities required in remote sensing editing. To fill this gap, we introduce RS-RIE-Bench, the first benchmark for reasoning-guided remote sensing image editing. RS-RIE-Bench organizes tasks into three categories: temporal reasoning, causal reasoning, and spatial reasoning. These categories capture temporal evolution, causal consequence, and spatial imaging consistency in remote sensing scenes. The evaluation protocol covers three dimensions: target region plausibility, non-target region preservation, and image quality consistency. We further demonstrate the feasibility of MLLM-based evaluation through cross-judge consistency analysis and stratified expert review. Systematic evaluation on eight open-source and closed-source image editing models shows that current models still have clear limitations in reasoning-guided remote sensing editing. Even the strongest model achieves only 24.28% overall accuracy under the strict joint-satisfaction criterion, while the mean relaxed joint-4 success rate across all eight models is 32.23%. Causal reasoning and spatial reasoning remain especially challenging, and several open-source models are close to zero in some categories. These results show that RS-RIE-Bench can effectively reveal the limitations of current models in geographic reasoning, regional control, and sensor-consistent generation. It also provides a standardized benchmark and a clear research direction for future remote sensing intelligent editing models.

Zihan Qin, Boao Xu, Zhao Dong +4

School of Artificial Intelligence, Optics and Electronics (iOPEN), Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China. · Xi’an Modern Control Technology Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, China. · Lanzhou Institute of Physics, Lanzhou 730000, China. +2

Image Editing Evaluation Remote Sensing Benchmarks Image Editing

Jul 21, 2026cs.AI

Vector-Bench: Can Models Surgically Edit SVG Code?

Instruction-based vector editing requires two capabilities: making a requested change and leaving everything else alone. The second is easy to miss when an output is judged only as a raster image. We introduce Vector-Bench, a compact, difficult benchmark of 40 SVG repair tasks. Each task pairs a corrupted SVG program with an author-written visual instruction, a hidden target program, 5.05 annotated repairs on average, and an average of 60.55 protected objects. Instructions describe visible defects without exposing element identifiers, coordinates, color codes, or path data. We define a deterministic binary specification reward: requested repairs use attribute-aware perceptual tolerances, while unrequested rendering- or application-relevant structure must remain semantically unchanged and the result must be a valid SVG. Canonical target equality and stricter source fidelity are retained as diagnostics. Validity-gated repair progress, a near-complete tier, and valid-output Unintended Change Rate (UCR) explain partial outcomes. We evaluate 34 model endpoints (25 listed as open-weight, 5 inexpensive controls, and 4 frontier closed endpoints) over 1360 requests. The strongest endpoint reaches only 15.0% full specification success, despite 43.7% mean repair progress, showing that apparent repair progress and specification-faithful editing remain substantially different. All prompts, outputs, scoring code, costs, and per-task reports are released.

Yug Aditi Gupta, Prannay Hebbar

Theta Labs · Warping

Image Editing Evaluation Image Editing

Jul 11, 2026cs.CV

ChartSync: A Benchmark for Visuo-Logical Cascading Chart Editing

Generative image editing models struggle with structured statistical charts when data modifications require geometric synchronization. We formalize this task as Visuo-Logical Cascading Editing (VLCE). However, existing methods remain confined to localized text substitutions and struggle with dependency-aware cascading updates. To systematically evaluate this capability, we introduce ChartSync, an expert-validated benchmark constructed via a programmatic rendering pipeline that guarantees deterministic visuo-logical coupling for the ground truth. ChartSync comprises 870 triplets across 9 chart categories and 4 task types, including 235 geometry-coupled VLCE instances that specifically test cascading text-to-geometry synchronization. We further evaluate these instances via a two-tier framework combining objective visual metrics with a vision-language model judge paradigm to assess low-level fidelity alongside multimodal comprehension and reasoning. Evaluating 14 image editing models and one code-mediated pipeline reveals a nuanced capability gap: most open-source models suffer severe drops in geometric synchronization, while only two frontier proprietary models show emerging VLCE capability, with their residual errors mainly involving semantic isolation and background corruption. Our detailed error analysis deconstructs these failure paradigms to identify core meta-abilities for guiding future multimodal architectures. The ChartSync dataset and code are publicly released at https://github.com/kaka-yjk/ChartSyncCodebase.

Jiakang Yu, Yixuan Chai, Tianci Wang +7

1Jianghan University · †Work done during an internship at HiThink Research. · 2HiThink Research +3

Data Visualization Image Editing Evaluation Image Editing

Jul 8, 2026cs.CV

Making Implicit Preservation Intent Explicit in Conversational Image Editing

Conversational image editing requires preserving not only visible content, but also content that temporarily disappears across turns. When newly added or modified content occludes a previously visible region, that region should reappear if it was never semantically changed. However, existing systems often fail to recover such occluded-but-unchanged content, producing inconsistent or hallucinated results. We introduce OCCUR-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for temporal preservation in conversational image editing. OCCUR-Bench provides diverse occlusion-and-revelation scenarios with historical restoration references, enabling evaluation of faithful restoration rather than plausible regeneration. We also propose ReSpec, a training-free framework that makes implicit preservation explicit by pairing restoration-aware instructions with historical visual references. Given an editing history, ReSpec identifies what should persist, selects the historical image state that provides missing visual evidence, and conditions an in-context editor on the resulting instruction and reference image. Experiments show that ReSpec improves restoration fidelity and temporal consistency on OCCUR-Bench, highlighting the need to ground preservation in editing history rather than only the current image.

Soomin Han, Jihyung Ahn, Bumsoo Kim +1

Sogang University · Korea University · Chung-Ang University

Image Editing Evaluation Image Editing

Jul 1, 2026cs.CV

GMO-E $^2$ DIT: Grounded Multi-Operation Editing for E-Commerce Images

Real-world e-commerce image editing often requires multiple, localized, and auditable operations rather than global restyling. This compositional nature poses a dual challenge: models must precisely apply all requested edits to the correct regions while preserving unmodified content, even under ambiguous instructions. Existing one-shot editors conflate intent resolution, spatial grounding, and synthesis into a single step, frequently resulting in partial execution failures, which is unacceptable for commercial scenarios. To address this, we introduce GMO-E

^2

DIT, an agentic editing framework that couples a Vision-Language Model (VLM) with a mask-conditioned image editor to tackle structured multi-turn task completion. Given an underspecified instruction, the VLM agent constructs a region-grounded edit agenda, effectively decoupling cognitive reasoning from generative rendering. The framework then executes sub-programs via operation-aware masks and references, utilizing a reflection-driven loop to inspect intermediate results and determine the subsequent state. This iterative mechanism reliably preserves safe partial progress, retries unfinished operations, and recovers from errors. Furthermore, we develop a unified data pipeline providing aligned supervision for planning, execution, and reflection, alongside EComEditBench, a comprehensive benchmark for instruction-driven evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GMO-E

^2

DIT achieves competitive performance compared to strong closed-source models, yielding superior instruction accuracy and edit fidelity over existing baselines.

Zipeng Guo, Xiaoan Liu, Lichen Ma +9

Wuhan University · Xi’an Jiaotong University · Sun Yat-sen University

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Tool-Using Vision-Language Agents Image Editing

Jun 26, 2026eess.IV

Envisage: Diffusion-Based Rhinoplasty Goal Visualization with Mask-Decomposed Evaluation

Localized generative editing needs localized evaluation: full-image identity metrics are structurally confounded under hard-composited edits. We present Envisage, a FLUX.1-Fill inpainting reference pipeline for rhinoplasty goal visualization from a single frontal photograph. The pipeline combines 8 rhinoplasty clinical presets (the released framework also includes 8 blepharoplasty and 8 rhytidectomy presets), MediaPipe masks, and hard-mask compositing. The composite preserves outside-mask pixels by construction, so full-face identity scores are dominated by copied pixels rather than by the diffusion backbone. Because full-face identity metrics cannot grade localized edits, we introduce SurgicalScore, a mask-decomposed 0-1 protocol scoring edit direction, edit magnitude, masked LPIPS, realism, and outside-mask preservation; SS_raw assigns 0.919 [0.918, 0.920] to a perfect-predictor control , anchoring the ceiling. On N=211, the paired ArcFace gain (output-to-GT minus input-to-GT) is negative for all methods (Envisage -0.048 smallest, vs. ICEdit -0.139, Kontext -0.242, InstructPix2Pix -0.294; p < 1e-4), with external validation on a 457-pair ASPS/PCA corpus showing a larger negative gap. With SurgicalScore, Envisage achieves the highest score (0.599 [0.579, 0.619]) and leads on both metrics, but the all-negative ArcFace gap shows that full-face identity is poorly aligned with localized surgical accuracy under hard compositing. A 5-seed GT-oracle (an upper bound, not a deployable result) reduces the residual ArcFace gap by 73% (-0.054 to -0.015), with positive output-to-GT gain on 33.9% of cases, indicating candidate-space headroom for a learned ranker. For localized edits, progress should be measured with edit-region fidelity rather than full-face identity metrics. We release Envisage, SurgicalScore, preset definitions, and matched split manifests.

Mudit Agarwal, Amit D. Bhrany

University of Washington · Seattle, WA, USA · Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery +1

Image Editing Evaluation Image Inpainting Diffusion-Based Image Editing

Jun 25, 2026cs.CV

Do Image Editing Models Understand Lighting?

While recent advancements in generative image editing models have achieved stunning visual fidelity, it remains an open question whether these systems possess an intrinsic knowledge of real-world lighting. Existing benchmarks typically evaluate high-level plausibility of perceptual light transport on curated internet imagery, using VLMs or human judgement, or they rely on synthetically generated datasets. In this work, we introduce the 3D-anchored Light Probe (3DLP) benchmark, for which we have captured a new high-fidelity HDR dataset of real-world lighting changes. The dataset consists of 1K image pairs of diverse indoor scenery in which light probes are physically turned on and off. To allow for a granular performance analysis, we annotated specific image regions such as cast shadows or metallic surfaces. With this data, we evaluate a range of state-of-the-art image editing models by measuring how well their light probe edits align with reality. The evaluation uses two new scores to compensate for AI-generated photographic effects, such as adjusted white balance. Our results show that the overall performance of models differs considerably, with differences slightly less pronounced for specular highlights. The best image editing models are remarkably consistent with real-world physics, however, they still leave room for improvement. We observe that image regions that receive less light from the light probe are more prone to errors for all models. Furthermore, building on their success in evaluating macroscopic lighting plausibility, we test VLMs on our task but find that they are unsuitable for pixel-level light transport analysis. We will make the benchmark, together with the real-world dataset, publicly available to encourage future research on this topic.

Tim Küchler, Johann-Friedrich Feiden, Matthias Nießner +1

Heidelberg University · Zuse School ELIZA · Technical University of Munich

Image Editing Evaluation Image Relighting

Jun 25, 2026cs.CV

PhyEditBench: A Real-World Multi-Stage Benchmark for Physics-Aware Image Editing

While instruction-based image editing, enabled by multi-modal generative models, has advanced significantly, existing benchmarks lack a comprehensive evaluation of physics-based reasoning, a critical capability for handling real-world scenarios. To address this, we introduce PhyEditBench, a benchmark designed to assess the physical understanding of editing models. Guided by a hierarchical taxonomy, we establish 4 primary classes and 12 subclasses. It comprises 238 high-quality, high-resolution, real-world instances meticulously extracted from videos to capture authentic physical dynamics, alongside 35 synthetic Anti-Physics instances. Our empirical analysis of current SOTA editing methods exposes substantial limitations in their physics-based reasoning. We further propose a training-free baseline named PhyWorld that uses test-time scaling and a latent reduction strategy. PhyWorld outperforms comparable models and suggests that the video generation process can effectively serve as a reasoning mechanism for image editing. The project page is available at https://github.com/Previsior/PhyEditBench.

Shengbin Guo, Shaokang He, Chaoyue Meng +4

Nanjing University · SDU · HRBEU +2

Image Editing Evaluation Image Editing

Jun 17, 2026cs.CV

ProductConsistency: Improving Product Identity Preservation in Instruction-Based Image Editing via SFT and RL

Recent advances in instruction-based image editing have enabled models to perform complex visual edits from natural language instructions. However, in product-centric scenarios where preserving product features, branding, and textual elements are critical, current open and closed source models often struggle to maintain this fine-grained object identity. This issue is further compounded by the lack of datasets for instruction-based product image editing with text fidelity constraints, leaving it largely treated as an implicit capability of instruction-based image editing models. In this work, we introduce the ProductConsistency dataset which is designed to improve product-centric image editing. Our approach includes a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) dataset of 87k samples for product editing, a reinforcement learning (RL) dataset with 869 unique product images, and a new benchmark dataset, the ProductConsistency Benchmark, to allow rigorous and standardized evaluation of editing models. To guide RL training, we propose a Cyclic Consistency reward that enforces semantic preservation of product identity by using caption similarity between the original product description and captions generated from the edited image. We fine-tune both Qwen-Image-Edit-2511 and Flux.1-Kontext-dev using our dataset and demonstrate consistent improvements over baseline models in OCR and Perceptual metrics, and MLLM-based evaluations as well, indicating stronger product consistency, text rendering, and overall visual quality; with the Qwen-Image-Edit-2511 model achieving a 5x reduction in the character error rate. The code and pipeline is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ProductConsistency-6FCC/README.md

Mukund Khanna, Raj Singh Yadav, Kunal Singh

Fractal Analytics

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Image Editing RL for Image Editing

Jun 17, 2026cs.CV

Taming I2V models for Image HOI Editing: A Cognitive Benchmark and Agentic Self-Correcting Framework

Current image editing methods excel at static attributes but fail at complex Human-Object Interactions (HOI), a critical challenge unaddressed by existing benchmarks that conflate HOI with static attributes, relying on global metrics incapable of simultaneously assessing dynamic interaction validity and entangled human-object pair preservation. Thus, we first introduce HOI-Edit, a comprehensive benchmark with three progressive cognitive levels, which features an automated metric HOI-Eval that reliably evaluates instance-level interaction by letting VLM Q&A after thinking with images containing grounded Human-Object pairs. Considering the task's essence of remodeling dynamic relationships, we benchmark Image-to-Video (I2V) models, finding them inherently suited for dynamic editing due to their temporal generation capabilities. Crucially, beyond superior performance, this capability provides a "replay of the failure process," offering unique diagnosability into why errors occur. We thus propose SCPE (Self-Correcting Process Editing), a novel, agentic self-correcting framework that constrains the generation of I2V models through iteratively refined prompts, enabling the generated videos to more accurately present the target HOI. Extracted frames from these videos are the final editing results. On HOI-Edit, SCPE achieves performance competitive with state-of-the-art (SOTA) editing models like Nano Banana on interaction. Code is available at https://github.com/oceanflowlab/HOI-Edit.

Jiayi Gao, Qingchao Chen, Yuxin Peng +1

Wangxuan Institute of Computer Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China · National Institute of Health Data Science, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Image-to-Video Generation Image Editing Evaluation

Jun 14, 2026cs.CV

An Extensive Benchmark for Single-round and Multi-round Instruction-based Image Editing

In recent years, there have been notable advancements in the area of instruction-based image editing (IIE), which focuses on the automatic alteration of input images using a model. Nevertheless, assessing the effectiveness of these editing models poses a considerable challenge due to the intricate nature of instructions and the wide variety of edits. To tackle this problem, one urgent task in this domain is the development of a robust evaluation framework that can precisely gauge the quality of editing outcomes and offer valuable benchmarks to guide future improvements. To address this challenge, we present a comprehensive evaluation benchmark named I2EBench2.0, designed for single-round and multi-round assessment of IIE models. I2EBench2.0 has four key features: 1) Evaluation Across Single and Multi-rounds: I2EBench2.0 simultaneously evaluates both single-round and multi-round instruction-based edits, assessing the precision and consistency of the edits. 2) Extensive Evaluation Criteria: I2EBench2.0 encompasses a broad range of criteria, evaluating both high-level and low-level aspects of each IIE model. Specifically, it incorporates 16 dimensions for single-round evaluations and 7 for multi-round evaluations. 3) Alignment with Human Judgment: To ensure our benchmark aligns with human evaluation, we conducted a comprehensive user study for each criterion. 4) Research-driven Insights: By analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of current IIE models across all 16 single-round and 7 multi-round dimensions, we provide critical insights aimed at directing future research in this area. We tested eight recently developed IIE models using I2EBench2.0 and derived academic insights through meticulous comparison and analysis. The related code, dataset, and images generated by all IIE models are available on GitHub: https://github.com/cocoshe/I2EBench.

Yiwei Ma, Ke Ye, Weihuang Lin +4

Key Laboratory of Multimedia Trusted Perception and Efficient Computing, Ministry of Education of China, Xiamen University, 361005, Fujian, P.R. China. · National University of Singapore, 119077, Singapore.

Image Editing Evaluation Text-Guided Image Editing Image Editing

Jun 5, 2026cs.GR

On the Controllability-Fidelity Frontier in Diffusion Editing

Diffusion-based generative models enable powerful image editing capabilities, but achieving precise control while maintaining fidelity and safety remains challenging. We present a comprehensive theoretical and empirical study of controllable diffusion-based image editing, analyzing the trade-offs between adherence to user intent, preservation of non-target content, and output quality. Our work spans text- and mask-guided edits, point/drag manipulation, and inversion-based pipelines. We derive mathematical formulations of editing objectives and analyze dynamics of noise injection, score guidance, and inversion error. We provide theoretical bounds on reconstruction error, stability under repeated edits, and locality of changes. We propose algorithmic frameworks (with pseudocode) for mask-localized and instruction-guided editing, and present extensive experiments comparing state-of-the-art methods (e.g.\ TF-ICON \cite{lu2023tficone}, DragFlow \cite{zhou2025dragflow}, InstructPix2Pix \cite{brooks2023instructpix2pix}, UltraEdit \cite{zhao2024ultraedit}) on multiple tasks and metrics (FID, identity similarity, CLIP alignment, artifact scores, etc). Our results reveal key failure modes, such as identity drift, prompt sensitivity, and compositional errors. We also discuss ethical considerations in image editing, including misuse risks, bias, consent, and concept erasure techniques (e.g.\ MACE \cite{lu2024mace}, ANT \cite{li2025ant}, EraseAnything \cite{gao2024eraseanything}) as safeguards. We conclude with best practices and future directions for responsible, high-fidelity diffusion-based editing.

Yi Hu, Leying Yi, Emily Davis +1

Xidian University

Diffusion Model Inversion Diffusion Model Guidance Image Editing Evaluation Diffusion-Based Image Editing Image Editing