LLM-Assisted Annotation

Ask about this topic

Overview

This field studies how large language models can help create labels and structured metadata for text, images, audio, video, and specialized records. Common approaches include prompt and codebook design, retrieval-augmented examples, model ensembles, confidence-based review, and training smaller classifiers on generated labels. These methods can reduce annotation time and cost, especially in low-resource or domain-specific settings, but their usefulness depends on careful validation against expert judgments and downstream tasks. A central challenge is that agreement and repeatability do not guarantee valid labels: results can shift with prompts, models, task definitions, and demographic cues, so human oversight and transparent error analysis remain important.

Latest papers

CardsList

202 papers21 papers in the last four weeks, down 16% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Feb 27, 2026

TableNet A Large-Scale Table Dataset with LLM-Powered Autonomous

Table Structure Recognition (TSR) requires the logical reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) to handle complex table layouts, but current datasets are limited in scale and quality, hindering effective use of this reasoning capacity. We thus present TableNet dataset, a new table structure recognition dataset collected and generated through multiple sources. Central to our approach is the first LLM-powered autonomous table generation and recognition multi-agent system that we developed. The generation part of our system integrates controllable visual, structural, and semantic parameters into the synthesis of table images. It facilitates the creation of a wide array of semantically coherent tables, adaptable to user-defined configurations along with annotations, thereby supporting large-scale and detailed dataset construction. This capability enables a comprehensive and nuanced table image annotation taxonomy, potentially advancing research in table-related domains. In contrast to traditional data collection methods, This approach facilitates the theoretically infinite, domain-agnostic, and style-flexible generation of table images, ensuring both efficiency and precision. The recognition part of our system is a diversity-based active learning paradigm that utilizes tables from multiple sources and selectively samples most informative data to finetune a model, achieving a competitive performance on TableNet test set while reducing training samples by a large margin compared with baselines, and a much higher performance on web-crawled real-world tables compared with models trained on predominant table datasets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work which employs active learning into the structure recognition of tables which is diverse in numbers of rows or columns, merged cells, cell contents, etc, which fits better for diversity-based active learning.

Ruilin Zhang, Kai Yang

School of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, 4800 Cao’an Road, Shanghai, 201804, China

Table Structure RecognitionLLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Feb 24, 2026

Are Multimodal Large Language Models Good Annotators for Image Tagging?

Image tagging, a fundamental vision task, traditionally relies on human-annotated datasets to train multi-label classifiers, which incurs significant labor and costs. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer promising potential to automate annotation, their capability to replace human annotators remains underexplored. This paper aims to analyze the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations and to propose an effective solution that enables MLLM-based annotation to replace manual labeling. Our analysis of MLLM annotations reveals that, under a conservative estimate, MLLMs can reduce annotation cost to as low as one-thousandth of the human cost, mainly accounting for GPU usage, which is nearly negligible compared to manual efforts. Their annotation quality reaches about 50% to 80% of human performance, while achieving over 90% performance on downstream training tasks.Motivated by these findings, we propose TagLLM, a novel framework for image tagging, which aims to narrow the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations. TagLLM comprises two components: Candidates generation, which employs structured group-wise prompting to efficiently produce a compact candidate set that covers as many true labels as possible while reducing subsequent annotation workload; and label disambiguation, which interactively calibrates the semantic concept of categories in the prompts and effectively refines the candidate labels. Extensive experiments show that TagLLM substantially narrows the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations, especially in downstream training performance, where it closes about 60% to 80% of the difference.

Ming-Kun Xie, Jia-Hao Xiao, Zhiqiang Kou +3

RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Japan · Southeast University, China · China University of Mining and Technology, China +1

LLM-Assisted AnnotationMultimodal Large Language ModelsMulti-Label Classification
AskPDF
Feb 23, 2026

Can Large Language Models Replace Human Coders? Introducing ContentBench

Can low-cost large language models (LLMs) take over the interpretive coding work that still anchors much of empirical content analysis? This paper introduces ContentBench, a public benchmark suite that helps answer this replacement question by tracking how much agreement low-cost LLMs achieve and what they cost on the same interpretive coding tasks. The suite uses versioned tracks that invite researchers to contribute new benchmark datasets. I report results from the first track, ContentBench-ResearchTalk v1.0: 1,000 synthetic, social-media-style posts about academic research labeled into five categories spanning praise, critique, sarcasm, questions, and procedural remarks. Reference labels are assigned only when three state-of-the-art reasoning models (GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Claude Opus 4.1) agree unanimously, and all final labels are checked by the author as a quality-control audit. Among the 59 evaluated models, the best low-cost LLMs reach roughly 97-99% agreement with these jury labels, far above GPT-3.5 Turbo, the model behind early ChatGPT and the initial wave of LLM-based text annotation. Several top models can code 50,000 posts for only a few dollars, pushing large-scale interpretive coding from a labor bottleneck toward questions of validation, reporting, and governance. At the same time, small open-weight models that run locally still struggle on sarcasm-heavy items (for example, Llama 3.2 3B reaches only 4% agreement on hard-sarcasm). ContentBench is released with data, documentation, and an interactive quiz at contentbench.github.io to support comparable evaluations over time and to invite community extensions.

Michael Haman

Department of Humanities, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic

LLM-Assisted AnnotationLLM EvaluationText Classification
AskPDF
Feb 23, 2026

AuditoryHuM: Auditory Scene Label Generation and Clustering using Human-MLLM Collaboration

Manual annotation and clustering of audio datasets is labour intensive. We introduce AuditoryHuM, a training-free framework for the unsupervised discovery and clustering of auditory scene labels using human-Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) collaboration. Leveraging MLLMs, our framework generates contextually relevant labels for audio data. To ensure label quality and mitigate hallucinations, zero-shot learning (Human-CLAP) quantifies the alignment between generated text labels and raw audio. A targeted human-in-the-loop intervention, refines only the lowest aligned pairs. The discovered labels form an interpretable alignment vector to group audio into cohesive clusters. The framework was evaluated across three auditory scene datasets (ADVANCE, AHEAD-DS, and TAU 2019), achieving a 96.1% reduction in human labour for ADVANCE during testing. Downstream models trained on our clusters exhibit enhanced classification accuracy vs the baseline (0.79 to 0.84) in clean acoustic environments, though performance scales down in dense, complex soundscapes. The project page: https://github.com/Australian-Future-Hearing-Initiative

Henry Zhong, Jörg M. Buchholz, Julian Maclaren +2

Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia · Google Research Australia, Sydney, Australia

ClusteringLLM-Assisted AnnotationHuman-in-the-Loop AnnotationUnsupervised ClusteringAudio Understanding
AskPDF
Feb 20, 2026

"How Do I ...?": Procedural Questions Predominate Student-LLM Chatbot Conversations

Providing scaffolding through educational chatbots built on Large Language Models (LLM) has potential risks and benefits that remain an open area of research. When students navigate impasses, they ask for help by formulating impasse-driven questions. Within interactions with LLM chatbots, such questions shape the user prompts and drive the pedagogical effectiveness of the chatbot's response. This paper focuses on such student questions from two datasets of distinct learning contexts: formative self-study, and summative assessed coursework. We analysed 6,113 messages from both learning contexts, using 11 different LLMs and three human raters to classify student questions using four existing schemas. On the feasibility of using LLMs as raters, results showed moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability, with higher consistency than human raters. The data showed that 'procedural' questions predominated in both learning contexts, but more so when students prepare for summative assessment. These results provide a basis on which to use LLMs for classification of student questions. However, we identify clear limitations in both the ability to classify with schemas and the value of doing so: schemas are limited and thus struggle to accommodate the semantic richness of composite prompts, offering only partial understanding the wider risks and benefits of chatbot integration. In the future, we recommend an analysis approach that captures the nuanced, multi-turn nature of conversation, for example, by applying methods from conversation analysis in discursive psychology.

Alexandra Neagu, Marcus Messer, Peter Johnson +1

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Generative AI in EducationEducational Dialogue SystemsConversational AgentsText ClassificationLLM-as-a-JudgeLLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Feb 20, 2026

Context-Aware Mapping of 2D Drawing Annotations to 3D CAD Features Using LLM-Assisted Reasoning for Manufacturing Automation

Manufacturing automation in process planning, inspection planning, and digital-thread integration depends on a unified specification that binds the geometric features of a 3D CAD model to the geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) callouts, datum definitions, and surface requirements carried by the corresponding 2D engineering drawing. Although Model-Based Definition (MBD) allows such specifications to be embedded directly in 3D models, 2D drawings remain the primary carrier of manufacturing intent in automotive, aerospace, shipbuilding, and heavy-machinery industries. Correctly linking drawing annotations to the corresponding 3D features is difficult because of contextual ambiguity, repeated feature patterns, and the need for transparent and traceable decisions. This paper presents a deterministic-first, context-aware framework that maps 2D drawing entities to 3D CAD features to produce a unified manufacturing specification. Drawing callouts are first semantically enriched and then scored against candidate features using an interpretable metric that combines type compatibility, tolerance-aware dimensional agreement, and conservative context consistency, along with engineering-domain heuristics. When deterministic scoring cannot resolve an ambiguity, the system escalates to multimodal and constrained large-language-model reasoning, followed by a single human-in-the-loop (HITL) review step. Experiments on 20 real CAD-drawing pairs achieve a mean precision of 83.67%, recall of 90.46%, and F1 score of 86.29%. An ablation study shows that each pipeline component contributes to overall accuracy, with the full system outperforming all reduced variants. By prioritizing deterministic rules, clear decision tracking, and retaining unresolved cases for human review, the framework provides a practical foundation for downstream manufacturing automation in real-world industrial environments.

Muhammad Tayyab Khan, Lequn Chen, Wenhe Feng +1

Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (SIMTech), A*STAR, Singapore 636732, Republic of Singapore · School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798 · Advanced Remanufacturing and Technology Centre (ARTC), A*STAR, Singapore 637143, Republic of Singapore

Industrial AutomationManufacturingDocument UnderstandingLLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Feb 19, 2026

Using LLMs for Knowledge Component-level Correctness Labeling in Open-ended Coding Problems

Fine-grained skill representations, commonly referred to as knowledge components (KCs), are fundamental to many approaches in student modeling and learning analytics. However, KC-level correctness labels are rarely available in real-world datasets, especially for open-ended programming tasks where solutions typically involve multiple KCs simultaneously. Simply propagating problem-level correctness to all associated KCs obscures partial mastery and often leads to poorly fitted learning curves. To address this challenge, we propose an automated framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to label KC-level correctness directly from student-written code. Our method assesses whether each KC is correctly applied and further introduces a temporal context-aware Code-KC mapping mechanism to better align KCs with individual student code. We evaluate the resulting KC-level correctness labels in terms of learning curve fit and predictive performance using the power law of practice and the Additive Factors Model. Experimental results show that our framework leads to learning curves that are more consistent with cognitive theory and improves predictive performance, compared to baselines. Human evaluation further demonstrates substantial agreement between LLM and expert annotations.

Zhangqi Duan, Arnav Kankaria, Dhruv Kartik +1

University of Massachusetts Amherst

Programming EducationUser ModelingLLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Feb 18, 2026

Supercharging Agenda Setting Research: The ParlaCAP Dataset of 28 European Parliaments and a Scalable Multilingual LLM-Based Classification

This paper introduces ParlaCAP, a large-scale dataset for analyzing parliamentary agenda setting across Europe, and proposes a cost-effective method for building domain-specific policy topic classifiers. Applying the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP) schema to the multilingual ParlaMint corpus of over 8 million speeches from 28 parliaments of European countries and autonomous regions, we follow a teacher-student framework in which a high-performing large language model (LLM) annotates in-domain training data and a multilingual encoder model is fine-tuned on these annotations for scalable data annotation. We show that this approach produces a classifier tailored to the target domain. Agreement between the LLM and human annotators is comparable to inter-annotator agreement among humans, and the resulting model outperforms existing CAP classifiers trained on manually-annotated but out-of-domain data. In addition to the CAP annotations, the ParlaCAP dataset offers rich speaker and party metadata, as well as sentiment predictions coming from the ParlaSent multilingual transformer model, enabling comparative research on political attention and representation across countries. We illustrate the analytical potential of the dataset with three use cases, examining the distribution of parliamentary attention across policy topics, sentiment patterns in parliamentary speech, and gender differences in policy attention.

Taja Kuzman Pungeršek, Peter Rupnik, Daniela Širinić +1

∗Jožef Stefan Institute; ∗†‡Ljubljana, Slovenia · §Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb; §Zagreb, Croatia · †Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana; ∗†‡Ljubljana, Slovenia +1

Political Discourse AnalysisLLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Feb 18, 2026

Are LLMs Ready to Replace Bangla Annotators?

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated annotators to scale dataset creation, yet their reliability as unbiased annotators--especially for low-resource and identity-sensitive settings--remains poorly understood. In this work, we study the behavior of LLMs as zero-shot annotators for Bangla hate speech, a task where even human agreement is challenging, and annotator bias can have serious downstream consequences. We conduct a systematic benchmark of 17 LLMs using a unified evaluation framework. Our analysis uncovers annotator bias and substantial instability in model judgments. Surprisingly, increased model scale does not guarantee improved annotation quality--smaller, more task-aligned models frequently exhibit more consistent behavior than their larger counterparts. These results highlight important limitations of current LLMs for sensitive annotation tasks in low-resource languages and underscore the need for careful evaluation before deployment.

Md. Najib Hasan, Touseef Hasan, Souvika Sarkar

A2I Lab, School of Computing, Wichita State University

LLM-Assisted AnnotationLLM ReliabilityLanguage Model Bias EvaluationHate Speech Detection
AskPDF
Feb 17, 2026

Measuring Social Integration Through Participation: Categorizing Organizations and Leisure Activities in the Displaced Karelians Interview Archive using LLMs

Digitized historical archives make it possible to study everyday social life on a large scale, but the information extracted directly from text often does not directly allow one to answer the research questions posed by historians or sociologists in a quantitative manner. We address this problem in a large collection of Finnish World War II Karelian evacuee family interviews. Prior work extracted more than 350K mentions of leisure time activities and organizational memberships from these interviews, yielding 71K unique activity and organization names -- far too many to analyze directly. We develop a categorization framework that captures key aspects of participation (the kind of activity/organization, how social it typically is, how regularly it happens, and how physically demanding it is). We annotate a gold-standard set to allow for a reliable evaluation, and then test whether large language models can apply the same schema at scale. Using a simple voting approach across multiple model runs, we find that an open-weight LLM can closely match expert judgments. Finally, we apply the method to label the 350K entities, producing a structured resource for downstream studies of social integration and related outcomes.

Joonatan Laato, Veera Schroderus, Jenna Kanerva +3

TurkuNLP, University of Turku, Finland · Department of Biology, University of Turku, Finland · ELLIS Institute Finland

Computational Social ScienceLLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Feb 16, 2026

BETA-Labeling for Multilingual Dataset Construction in Low-Resource IR

IR in low-resource languages remains limited by the scarcity of high-quality, task-specific annotated datasets. Manual annotation is expensive and difficult to scale, while using large language models (LLMs) as automated annotators introduces concerns about label reliability, bias, and evaluation validity. This work presents a Bangla IR dataset constructed using a BETA-labeling framework involving multiple LLM annotators from diverse model families. The framework incorporates contextual alignment, consistency checks, and majority agreement, followed by human evaluation to verify label quality. Beyond dataset creation, we examine whether IR datasets from other low-resource languages can be effectively reused through one-hop machine translation. Using LLM-based translation across multiple language pairs, we experimented on meaning preservation and task validity between source and translated datasets. Our experiment reveal substantial variation across languages, reflecting language-dependent biases and inconsistent semantic preservation that directly affect the reliability of cross-lingual dataset reuse. Overall, this study highlights both the potential and limitations of LLM-assisted dataset creation for low-resource IR. It provides empirical evidence of the risks associated with cross-lingual dataset reuse and offers practical guidance for constructing more reliable benchmarks and evaluation pipelines in low-resource language settings.

Md. Najib Hasan, Mst. Jannatun Ferdous Rain, Fyad Mohammed +1

Wichita State University · Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur · Khulna University of Engineering & Technology +1

Low-Resource Language ProcessingLLM-Assisted AnnotationInformation RetrievalCross-Lingual Transfer
AskPDF
Feb 2, 2026

A Large-Scale Dataset for Molecular Structure-Language Description via a Rule-Regularized Method

Molecular function is largely determined by structure. Accurately aligning molecular structure with natural language is therefore essential for enabling large language models (LLMs) to reason about downstream chemical tasks. However, the substantial cost of human annotation makes it infeasible to construct large-scale, high-quality datasets of structure-grounded descriptions. In this work, we propose a fully automated annotation framework for generating precise molecular descriptions that preserve complete structural details at scale. Our approach builds upon and extends a rule-based chemical nomenclature parser to interpret IUPAC names and construct enriched, structural XML metadata that explicitly encodes molecular structure. This metadata is then used to guide LLMs in producing accurate natural-language descriptions. Using this framework, we curate a large-scale dataset of approximately 163163k molecule--description pairs. A rigorous validation protocol combining LLM-based and expert human evaluation on a subset of 2,0002,000 molecules demonstrates a high description precision of 98.698.6%. The proposed annotation framework is readily beneficial to broader chemical tasks that rely on structural descriptions, with the resulting dataset providing a reliable foundation for molecule--language alignment. The source code and dataset are hosted at https://github.com/TheLuoFengLab/MolLangData and https://huggingface.co/datasets/ChemFM/MolLangData, respectively.

Feiyang Cai, Guijuan He, Yi Hu +7

Clemson University · Independent Researcher · University of Delaware +1

LLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Jan 23, 2026

Standardizing Longitudinal Radiology Report Evaluation via Large Language Model Annotation

Longitudinal information in radiology reports refers to the sequential tracking of findings across multiple examinations over time, which is crucial for monitoring disease progression and guiding clinical decisions. Many recent automated radiology report generation methods are designed to capture longitudinal information; however, validating their performance is challenging. There is no proper tool to consistently label temporal changes in both ground-truth and model-generated texts for meaningful comparisons. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising annotation alternative, as they are capable of capturing nuanced linguistic patterns and semantic similarities without extensive manual intervention. They also adapt well to new contexts. In this study, we therefore propose an LLM-based pipeline to automatically annotate longitudinal information in radiology reports. The pipeline first identifies sentences containing relevant information and then extracts the progression of diseases. We evaluate and compare five mainstream LLMs on these two tasks using 500 manually annotated reports. Considering both efficiency and performance, Qwen2.5-32B was subsequently selected and used to annotate another 95,169 reports from the public MIMIC-CXR dataset. Our Qwen2.5-32B-annotated dataset provided us with a standardized benchmark for evaluating report generation models. Using this new benchmark, we assessed seven state-of-the-art report generation models. Our LLM-based annotation method outperforms existing annotation solutions, achieving 11.3% and 5.3% higher F1-scores for longitudinal information detection and disease tracking, respectively. The source code is available at https://github.com/wxinyi1996/Standardizing-Longitudinal-Chest-X-ray-Report-Evaluation-via-Large-Language-Model-Annotation.git.

Xinyi Wang, Grazziela Figueredo, Ruizhe Li +1

School of Computer Science, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom. · School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.

Medical Report GenerationLLM-Assisted AnnotationClinical Information ExtractionRadiology Report Evaluation
AskPDF
Oct 14, 2025

A large-scale pipeline for LLM-assisted corpus annotation: variation and change in the English consider construction

As natural language corpora expand at an unprecedented rate, manual annotation remains a significant methodological bottleneck in corpus linguistic work. We address this challenge by presenting a scalable pipeline for automating grammatical annotation in voluminous corpora using large language models (LLMs). Unlike previous supervised and iterative approaches, our method employs a four-phase workflow: prompt engineering, pre-hoc evaluation, automated batch processing, and post-hoc validation. We demonstrate the pipeline's accessibility and effectiveness through a diachronic case study of variation in the English evaluative consider construction (consider X as/to be/Ø Y). We annotate 143,933 'consider' concordance lines from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) via the OpenAI API in under 60 hours, achieving 98%+ accuracy on two sophisticated annotation procedures. A Bayesian multinomial GAM fitted to 44,527 true positives of the evaluative construction reveals previously undocumented genre-specific trajectories of change, enabling us to advance new hypotheses about the relationship between register formality and competing pressures of morphosyntactic reduction and enhancement. Our results suggest that LLMs can perform a range of data preparation tasks at scale with minimal human intervention, unlocking substantive research questions previously beyond practical reach, though implementation requires attention to costs, licensing, and other ethical considerations.

Cameron Morin, Matti Marttinen Larsson

Université Paris-Cité · University of Gothenburg

LLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Sep 22, 2025

Interactive In-Meeting Speaker Correction with Human Feedback

Most automatic speech processing systems operate in ``open loop'' mode without user feedback about who said what, yet human-in-the-loop workflows can potentially enable higher accuracy. We propose an LLM-assisted in-meeting speaker correction system that lets users fix speaker attribution errors through brief corrective feedback. After performing streaming ASR and diarization, the system presents concise LLM-generated summaries to help users identify important speaker errors, and it incorporates user feedback by updating the speaker-attributed transcript and adding online speaker enrollments. To make this workflow effective despite errors in speech processing, LLM analysis, and user feedback, we developed several mechanisms to identify the intended correction more precisely. Further, we built an LLM-driven user feedback simulation to evaluate the workflow reprodubilty and at scale. Applied to the AMI headset test set, our system substantially reduces the DER from a streaming baseline (Google ASR + ECAPA) by 31.99% and speaker substitution error by 52.68%. Results of a pilot usability study suggest several avenues to improve the user experience.

Xinlu He, Yiwen Guan, Badrivishal Paurana +3

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

LLM-Assisted AnnotationHuman-in-the-Loop AnnotationSpeaker DiarizationSpeaker-Attributed ASR
AskPDF
Sep 2, 2025

LLMs and their Limited Theory of Mind: Evaluating Mental State Annotations in Situated Dialogue

What if large language models could not only infer human mindsets but also expose every blind spot in team dialogue such as discrepancies in the team members' joint understanding? We present a novel, two-step framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) both as human-style annotators of team dialogues to track the team's shared mental models (SMMs) and as automated discrepancy detectors among individuals' mental states. In the first step, an LLM generates annotations by identifying SMM elements within task-oriented dialogues from the Cooperative Remote Search Task (CReST) corpus. Then, a secondary LLM compares these LLM-derived annotations and human annotations against gold-standard labels to detect and characterize divergences. We define an SMM coherence evaluation framework for this use case and apply it to six CReST dialogues, ultimately producing: (1) a dataset of human and LLM annotations; (2) a reproducible evaluation framework for SMM coherence; and (3) an empirical assessment of LLM-based discrepancy detection. Our results reveal that, although LLMs exhibit apparent coherence on straightforward natural-language annotation tasks, they systematically err in scenarios requiring spatial reasoning or disambiguation of prosodic cues.

Katharine Kowalyshyn, Matthias Scheutz

Department of Computer Science Tufts University

LLM EvaluationTheory of MindLLM-Assisted Annotation
AskPDF
Jul 29, 2025

Introducing HALC: A general pipeline for the systematic and reliable construction of prompts for automated coding with LLMs in the computational social sciences

LLMs are seeing widespread use for task automation, including automated coding in the social sciences. However, even though researchers have proposed different prompting strategies, their effectiveness varies across LLMs and tasks. Often trial and error practices are still widespread. Our study aims to fill this gap and evaluate how LLMs can be used in a systematic and transparent way to produce reliable codings in content analyses. We propose HALC-a general pipeline that allows for the systematic and reliable construction of prompts for any given coding task and model. We develop this pipeline based on current literature and findings of a prestudy investigating consistency and influencing factors of LLM codings. We also apply HALC on two other datasets covering different thematic contexts, document types, languages, and coding units to test its applicability. Based on more than three million LLM requests, our results demonstrate that the pipeline is capable of identifying prompts for reliable codings in different settings. We also discuss shortcomings and further potential for development.

Andreas Reich, Claudia Thoms, Tobias Schrimpf

LLM PromptingLLM-Assisted AnnotationComputational Social Science
AskPDF
Feb 28, 2025

AnnoCaseLaw: Legal Annotation Benchmark of Civil Negligence

Language models offer a way to scale costly, labour-intensive expert annotation, but their ability to reproduce expert judgements remains uncertain. This is particularly challenging in law, where annotators must distinguish the reasoning supporting judicial decisions from other legally relevant discussion. We present AnnoCaseLaw as a densely annotated benchmark comprising 471471 U.S. civil-negligence court opinions with more than 12,00012,000 expert highlights across five annotation categories. We evaluate proprietary frontier, open-weight, legal-specialised, and decision models on their ability to reproduce these annotations. Models perform better on Facts and Outcome than on Application of Law to Facts, Procedural History, and Relevant Precedents. On Application of Law to Facts, proprietary frontier models achieve the strongest balance of reasoning coverage and precision, while the open-weight model Gemma 4 achieves comparable Macro-F1 to proprietary frontier models at a fraction of the estimated inference cost. Our findings highlight the importance of evaluating annotation coverage and cost alongside aggregate scores when assessing the feasibility of automated legal annotation.

Rilton Franzone, Magnus Sesodia, Alina Petrova +7

University of Oxford · Thomson Reuters Labs · Vienna University of Technology +1

Legal NLPLLM-Assisted AnnotationLLM EvaluationLegal Reasoning
AskPDF
Nov 6, 2024

Harmful YouTube Video Detection: A Taxonomy of Online Harm and MLLMs as Alternative Annotators

Video platforms, used by billions globally, are criticized for exposing users to harmful content. Yet, detecting online harm remains challenging due to inconsistent approaches to what constitutes harm and limitations of human annotation. We address both challenges. Theoretically, we integrate and expand existing taxonomies and platform guidelines to multimodal contexts and develop a comprehensive taxonomy for online harm. We categorize online harm on video platforms into six content-based categories: Information, Hate and harassment, Addictive, Clickbait, Sexual, and Physical harms. Methodologically, we propose and systematically test multimodal large language models (MLLMs) as alternative annotators of harmful videos. We curate a dataset of 19,422 potentially harmful YouTube videos and annotate them using GPT-4-Turbo, non-trained crowdworkers, and trained annotators. We discuss the potential applications of MLLMs in platform content moderation and social science research, particularly in contexts where they perform comparably to human annotators in binary and multi-label classification tasks.

Claire Wonjeong Jo, Miki Wesołowska, Magdalena Wojcieszak

University of California, Davis · University of Warsaw

Video Content ModerationLLM-Assisted AnnotationMultimodal Large Language Models
AskPDF
Oct 17, 2024

Transferring Natural Language Datasets Between Languages Using Large Language Models for Modern Decision Support and Sci-Tech Analytical Systems

The decision-making process to rule R&D relies on information related to current trends in particular research areas. In this work, we investigated how one can use large language models (LLMs) to transfer the dataset and its annotation from one language to another. This is crucial since sharing knowledge between different languages could boost certain underresourced directions in the target language, saving lots of effort in data annotation or quick prototyping. We experiment with English and Russian pairs, translating the DEFT (Definition Extraction from Texts) corpus. This corpus contains three layers of annotation dedicated to term-definition pair mining, which is a rare annotation type for Russian. The presence of such a dataset is beneficial for the natural language processing methods of trend analysis in science since the terms and definitions are the basic blocks of any scientific field. We provide a pipeline for the annotation transfer using LLMs. In the end, we train the BERT-based models on the translated dataset to establish a baseline.

Dmitrii Popov, Egor Terentev, Danil Serenko +2

Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FRC CSC RAS), Moscow 119333, Russia · Faculty of Physics and Mathematics and Natural Sciences, RUDN University, Moscow 117198, Russia · Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IITP RAS), Moscow 127051, Russia +1

LLM-Assisted AnnotationLow-Resource Language ProcessingCross-Lingual Transfer
AskPDF
Oct 11, 2024

Which Demographics do LLMs Default to During Annotation?

Demographics and cultural background of annotators influence the labels they assign in text annotation -- for instance, an elderly woman might find it offensive to read a message addressed to a "bro", but a male teenager might find it appropriate. It is therefore important to acknowledge label variations to not under-represent members of a society. Two research directions developed out of this observation in the context of using large language models (LLM) for data annotations, namely (1) studying biases and inherent knowledge of LLMs and (2) injecting diversity in the output by manipulating the prompt with demographic information. We combine these two strands of research and ask the question to which demographics an LLM resorts to when no demographics is given. To answer this question, we evaluate which attributes of human annotators LLMs inherently mimic. Furthermore, we compare non-demographic conditioned prompts and placebo-conditioned prompts (e.g., "you are an annotator who lives in house number 5") to demographics-conditioned prompts ("You are a 45 year old man and an expert on politeness annotation. How do you rate {instance}"). We study these questions for politeness and offensiveness annotations on the POPQUORN data set, a corpus created in a controlled manner to investigate human label variations based on demographics which has not been used for LLM-based analyses so far. We observe notable influences related to gender, race, and age in demographic prompting, which contrasts with previous studies that found no such effects.

Johannes Schäfer, Aidan Combs, Christopher Bagdon +9

Fundamentals of Natural Language Processing, University of Bamberg, Germany

LLM PromptingLLM-Assisted AnnotationDemographic Bias in Language Models
AskPDF
Mar 26, 2024

"You are an expert annotator": Automatic Best-Worst-Scaling Annotations for Emotion Intensity Modeling

Labeling corpora constitutes a bottleneck to create models for new tasks or domains. Large language models mitigate the issue with automatic corpus labeling methods, particularly for categorical annotations. Some NLP tasks such as emotion intensity prediction, however, require text regression, but there is no work on automating annotations for continuous label assignments. Regression is considered more challenging than classification: The fact that humans perform worse when tasked to choose values from a rating scale lead to comparative annotation methods, including best-worst scaling. This raises the question if large language model-based annotation methods show similar patterns, namely that they perform worse on rating scale annotation tasks than on comparative annotation tasks. To study this, we automate emotion intensity predictions and compare direct rating scale predictions, pairwise comparisons and best-worst scaling. We find that the latter shows the highest reliability. A transformer regressor fine-tuned on these data performs nearly on par with a model trained on the original manual annotations.

Christopher Bagdon, Prathamesh Karmalker, Harsha Gurulingappa +1

Merck Data & AI Organization, Merck Group, Darmstadt, Germany · Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, University of Stuttgart, Germany · Fundamentals of Natural Language Processing, University of Bamberg, Germany +1

LLM-Assisted AnnotationEmotion Recognition
AskPDF