Multimodal Model Evaluation

Ask about this topic

Overview

Multimodal model evaluation studies whether systems can perceive, reason over, and generate content using combinations of text, images, audio, video, documents, and structured signals. Researchers build task-specific benchmarks and assess outputs with human judgments, programmatic checks, structured rubrics, and measures of evidence grounding, calibration, and safety. Controlled tests such as modality ablations, counterfactual inputs, and robustness checks help reveal shortcuts and failures that aggregate accuracy can hide. A central challenge is showing that a correct answer reflects reliable use of the relevant evidence, while keeping evaluations reproducible, representative, and comparable across settings.

Latest papers

CardsList

772 papers87 papers in the last four weeks, up 28% on the four weeks before. 0.5% of all new papers.

Oct 20, 2025

From Charts to Code: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Multimodal Models

We introduce Chart2Code, a new benchmark for evaluating the chart understanding and code generation capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). Chart2Code is explicitly designed from a user-driven perspective, capturing diverse real-world scenarios and progressively increasing task difficulty. It consists of three levels: Level 1 (Chart Reproduction) reproduces charts from a reference figure and user query; Level 2 (Chart Editing) involves complex modifications such as changing chart types or adding elements; and Level 3 (Long-Table to Chart Generation) requires models to transform long, information-dense tables into faithful charts following user instructions. To our knowledge, this is the first hierarchical benchmark that reflects practical chart2code usage while systematically scaling task complexity. In total, Chart2Code contains 2,023 tasks across 22 chart types, paired with multi-level evaluation metrics that assess both code correctness and the visual fidelity of rendered charts. We benchmark 25 state-of-the-art (SoTA) LMMs, including both proprietary and the latest open-source models such as GPT-5, Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL3/3.5, MiMo-VL, and Seed-1.6-VL. Experimental results demonstrate that even the SoTA model GPT-5 averages only 0.57 on code-based evaluation and 0.22 on chart-quality assessment across the editing tasks, underscoring the difficulty of Chart2Code. We anticipate this benchmark will drive advances in multimodal reasoning and foster the development of more robust and general-purpose LMMs. Our code and data are available on Chart2Code.

Jiahao Tang, Henry Hengyuan Zhao, Lijian Wu +8

CSU-JPG, Central South University · National University of Singapore · Nanyang Technological University

Data VisualizationChart-to-Code GenerationCode GenerationCode Generation EvaluationMultimodal Foundation ModelsChart Understanding+2
AskPDF
Oct 10, 2025

LM Fight Arena: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models via Game Competition

Existing benchmarks for large multimodal models (LMMs) often fail to capture their performance in real-time, adversarial environments. We introduce LM Fight Arena (Large Model Fight Arena), a novel framework that evaluates LMMs by pitting them against each other in the classic fighting game Mortal Kombat II, a task requiring rapid visual understanding and tactical, sequential decision-making. In a controlled tournament, we test six leading open- and closed-source models, where each agent operates controlling the same character to ensure a fair comparison. The models are prompted to interpret game frames and state data to select their next actions. Unlike static evaluations, LM Fight Arena provides a fully automated, reproducible, and objective assessment of an LMM's strategic reasoning capabilities in a dynamic setting. This work introduces a challenging and engaging benchmark that bridges the gap between AI evaluation and interactive entertainment.

Yushuo Zheng, Tongrui Ye, Zicheng Zhang +3

Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China · Shanghai AI Lab, Shanghai, China · Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Multimodal Large Language ModelsAI Agent BenchmarksMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
Oct 2, 2025

What MLLMs Learn about When they Learn about Multimodal Reasoning

Evaluation of multimodal reasoning models is typically reduced to a single accuracy score, implicitly treating reasoning as a unitary capability. We introduce MathLens, a benchmark of textbook-style geometry problems that exposes this assumption by operationally decomposing performance into perception, reasoning, and multimodal-specific components. Each problem is derived from a symbolic specification and accompanied by visual diagrams, text-only variants, multimodal questions, and targeted perceptual probes, enabling controlled measurement of each component. Using this decomposition, we show that common training strategies are associated with systematically different capability profiles that are invisible under aggregate accuracy. Across the models we study, reinforcement learning primarily improves perceptual grounding and robustness to diagram variation, while our analysis suggests that textual SFT yields gains through reflective reasoning. In contrast, as perception and reasoning improve, a growing fraction of remaining errors fall outside these components and are categorized as multimodal-specific. These results suggest that apparent progress in multimodal reasoning reflects shifting balances among subskills rather than uniform advancement, motivating evaluation beyond scalar accuracy.

Jiwan Chung, Neel Joshi, Pratyusha Sharma +2

Microsoft Research AI Frontiers · Yonsei University · Seoul National University

Multimodal ReasoningMultimodal Model EvaluationMultimodal Spatial ReasoningRL for Language Model ReasoningVisual Grounding
AskPDF
Sep 29, 2025

NeMo: Needle in a Montage for Video-Language Understanding

Recent advances in video large language models (VideoLLMs) call for new evaluation protocols and benchmarks for video-language understanding. Inspired by the needle in a haystack test widely used by LLMs, we introduce a novel task of Needle in a Montage (NeMo), which is designed to assess the temporal understanding capabilities of advanced VideoLLMs. Specifically, the proposed task focuses on two fundamental abilities critical for temporal understanding, i.e., retrieval-style long-context recall and temporal grounding. To generate video question answering data for our task, we develop a scalable automated data generation pipeline that facilitates high-quality data synthesis. Built upon the proposed pipeline, we present NeMoBench, a video-language benchmark centered on our task. Specifically, our full set of NeMoBench features 31,378 automatically generated question-answer (QA) pairs from 13,486 videos with various durations ranging from seconds to hours. Experiments demonstrate that our pipeline can reliably and automatically generate high-quality evaluation data, enabling NeMoBench to be continuously updated with the latest videos. We evaluate 20 state-of-the-art models on our benchmark, providing extensive results and key insights into their capabilities and limitations. Our project page is available at: https://lavi-lab.github.io/NeMoBench.

Zi-Yuan Hu, Shuo Liang, Duo Zheng +10

The Chinese University of Hong Kong · Phoenix TV · Stanford University +2

Temporal Video GroundingVideo-Language Model EvaluationVideo QALong-Video UnderstandingMultimodal Model EvaluationTemporal Video Understanding
AskPDF
Sep 25, 2025

Automotive-ENV: Benchmarking Multimodal Models in Automotive Cockpit Environments

Multimodal models have demonstrated strong capabilities in web, desktop, and mobile GUI environments, but their performance in automotive cockpit systems remains largely unexplored. In-vehicle GUIs introduce unique challenges beyond traditional GUI interaction, including vehicle-state reasoning, implicit intent understanding, and safety-critical decision making. To address this gap, we introduce Automotive-ENV, an interactive benchmark for evaluating multimodal models in automotive cockpit environments. Built on Android Automotive OS, Automotive-ENV combines cockpit-screen interaction with vehicle-state signals and deterministic state-based evaluation. The benchmark contains 420 carefully constructed tasks covering routine cockpit operation and safety-critical scenarios. Unlike prior GUI benchmarks that rely on action matching or LLM-based judging, Automotive-ENV evaluates model behavior through reproducible validators over UI states, vehicle signals, and safety-related conditions. We benchmark representative general-purpose multimodal models and GUI-specialized vision-language models on Automotive-ENV. Experimental results show that current models remain far from reliable in automotive environments, with substantial performance degradation in implicit and safety-critical tasks. Further analysis reveals consistent failure modes in safety-aware reasoning, vehicle-control understanding, and implicit hazard recognition. We release Automotive-ENV, together with tasks, validators, and evaluation tools, to support future research on automotive multimodal systems.

Junfeng Yan, Biao Wu, Meng Fang +1

Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Sydney, Australia · University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Multimodal Model EvaluationHuman-Computer Interaction
AskPDF
Sep 23, 2025

The Platonic Universe: Do Foundation Models See the Same Sky?

We investigate when foundation models converge towards shared representations, and how this convergence depends on model capacity, training regime, and model architecture. We take a `science-for-AI' approach, using astronomy as an experimental instrument to test the Platonic Representation Hypothesis and its Aristotelian refinement against an external physical reference. The historical success of astrophysics is evidence that a compact, modality-invariant description of galaxy observables exists, and so representation convergence toward reality should be measurable against the physical parameters astronomers already use. Given this framework, we evaluate eleven foundation model families (spanning classification, self-distillation, joint-embedding prediction, autoencoding, vision-language pre-training, and astro-specific architectures from O\mathcal{O}(10M)→O{\to}\mathcal{O}(10B) parameters) on crossmatched JWST, HSC, and Legacy imagery, and DESI spectroscopy. All models are evaluated frozen, with no astronomy-specific fine-tuning. We probe redshift, stellar mass, and sSFR via linear probes, and local (MKNN) and global (CKA) embedding geometry within families, between modalities, and across architectures. We find that physics performance scales predictably with capacity; probe directions align consistently with expected astrophysical correlations and selection effects; and local (not global) embedding alignment tracks physics performance, including between DESI spectra and HSC imagery---modalities that share essentially no low-level statistics. Our results support the ARH over the strict PRH, demonstrate astronomy's value as an experimental framework for neural representation learning, and suggest that astro-foundation models can build on general-purpose pre-trained architectures, capitalizing on the broader open machine learning community's already-spent computational investment.

UniverseTBD, :, Trinidad Borrell +11

Independent Researcher · AstroAI · Harvard-Smithsonian CfA +4

Cross-Modal AlignmentMultimodal Model EvaluationRepresentation AlignmentPlatonic Representation Hypothesis
AskPDF
Sep 18, 2025

Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Spoken Sarcasm Detection

Sarcasm detection remains challenging because sarcastic intent often depends on information across text, speech, and vision. We systematically evaluate large language models (LLMs) and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) for sarcasm detection on English (MUStARD++) and Chinese (MCSD), considering both feature-extraction settings and direct classification. In the feature-extraction settings, audio provides the strongest unimodal performance on both datasets, while multimodal fusion shows dataset-dependent benefits. In direct classification, Qwen2.5-Omni achieves the strongest zero-shot performance among the evaluated models, with further substantial gains after fine-tuning. Error analysis further shows that additional modalities can both correct and introduce errors, highlighting the need for selective multimodal integration.

Zhu Li, Xiyuan Gao, Yuqing Zhang +2

University of Groningen, The Netherlands

MLLM EvaluationSarcasm DetectionMultimodal Model EvaluationModality Reliance in Multimodal ModelsAudio-Language Model Evaluation
AskPDF
Sep 11, 2025

Measuring Epistemic Humility in Multimodal Large Language Models

Hallucinations in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), where a model generates content inconsistent with the input image, pose significant risks in real-world applications. Existing hallucination benchmarks primarily test recognition, i.e., whether a model can select the correct answer among distractors. They overlook another capability that is essential for trustworthy AI: recognizing when none of the provided options is supported by the image and declining to commit to a false choice. We present HumbleBench, a hallucination benchmark that evaluates this false-option rejection behavior, a directly observable facet of epistemic humility, through multiple-choice questions that always include a "None of the above" (NOTA) option. HumbleBench is built from the Panoptic Scene Graph dataset: its object and relation annotations, together with candidate attribute cues, are used to prompt GPT-4-Turbo to generate questions, which are then manually verified, yielding 22,831 questions on object, relation, and attribute hallucinations. We evaluate 27 MLLMs, including general-purpose, reasoning-oriented, and proprietary models, and complement standard accuracy with NOTA-aware metrics, diagnostic stress tests, and a human evaluation. Even the strongest models select NOTA for only about half of the questions in which it is correct, cautious prompting shifts models toward NOTA without improving their ability to detect unsupported options, and humans reject unsupported options considerably more reliably than all evaluated models. These results show that recognition accuracy alone is insufficient for assessing hallucination robustness. Our code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/maifoundations/HumbleBench.

Bingkui Tong, Jiaer Xia, Sifeng Shang +1

Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, United Arab Emirates. · Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.

VLM HallucinationMultimodal Large Language ModelsMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
Aug 24, 2025

Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning

Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI, aiming to endow machines with the human-like ability to decompose visual scenes, ground intermediate concepts, and perform multi-step logical inference. While early surveys focus on monolithic vision-language models or general multimodal reasoning, a dedicated synthesis of the rapidly expanding compositional visual reasoning literature is still missing. We fill this gap with a comprehensive survey spanning 2023 to 2025 that systematically reviews 260+ papers from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, etc.). We first formalize core definitions and describe why compositional approaches offer advantages in cognitive alignment, semantic fidelity, robustness, interpretability, and data efficiency. Next, we trace a five-stage paradigm shift: from prompt-enhanced language-centric pipelines, through tool-enhanced LLMs and tool-enhanced VLMs, to recently minted chain-of-thought reasoning and unified agentic VLMs, highlighting their architectural designs, strengths, and limitations. We then catalog 60+ benchmarks and corresponding metrics that probe compositional visual reasoning along dimensions such as grounding accuracy, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and high-resolution perception. Drawing on these analyses, we distill key insights, identify open challenges (e.g., limitations of LLM-based reasoning, hallucination, a bias toward deductive reasoning, scalable supervision, tool integration, and benchmark limitations), and outline future directions, including world-model integration, human-AI collaborative reasoning, and richer evaluation protocols. By offering a unified taxonomy, historical roadmap, and critical outlook, this survey aims to serve as a foundational reference and inspire the next generation of compositional visual reasoning research.

Fucai Ke, Joy Hsu, Zhixi Cai +10

Monash University · Stanford University · University of Washington +3

Compositional ReasoningVisual ReasoningVLM ReasoningMultimodal CoT ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
Aug 19, 2025

VMMU: A Vietnamese Multitask Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark

We introduce VMMU, a Vietnamese Multitask Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark designed to evaluate how vision-language models (VLMs) interpret and reason over visual and textual information beyond English. VMMU consists of 2.5k multimodal questions across 7 tasks, covering a diverse range of problem contexts, including STEM problem solving, data interpretation, rule-governed visual reasoning, and abstract visual reasoning. All questions require genuine multimodal integration, rather than reliance on text-only cues or OCR-based shortcuts. We evaluate a diverse set of state-of-the-art proprietary and open-source VLMs on VMMU. Despite strong Vietnamese OCR performance, proprietary models achieve only 66% mean accuracy. Further analysis shows that the primary source of failure is not OCR, but instead multimodal grounding and reasoning over text and visual evidence. Code and data are available at https://vmmu-bench.github.io/

Vy Tuong Dang, An Vo, Emilio Villa-Cueva +4

KAIST · MBZUAI

VLM EvaluationMultimodal ReasoningMultilingual VLM EvaluationVision-Language GroundingVisually Grounded ReasoningMultimodal Foundation Models+2
AskPDF
Aug 11, 2025

VGGSounder: Audio-Visual Evaluations for Foundation Models

The emergence of audio-visual foundation models underscores the importance of reliably assessing their multi-modal understanding. The VGGSound dataset is commonly used as a benchmark for evaluation audio-visual classification. However, our analysis identifies several limitations of VGGSound, including incomplete labelling, partially overlapping classes, and misaligned modalities. These lead to distorted evaluations of auditory and visual capabilities. To address these limitations, we introduce VGGSounder, a comprehensively re-annotated, multi-label test set that extends VGGSound and is specifically designed to evaluate audio-visual foundation models. VGGSounder features detailed modality annotations, enabling precise analyses of modality-specific performance. Furthermore, we reveal model limitations by analysing performance degradation when adding another input modality with our new modality confusion metric.

Daniil Zverev, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Ameya Prabhu +3

Technical University of Munich, MCML · University of Tübingen · Tübingen AI Center +1

Audio-Visual UnderstandingMultimodal ClassificationMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
Jun 11, 2025

Evidence-Grounded Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning and Evaluation Benchmark in Complex Urban Scenes

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance in benign scenarios, their cognitive reliability deteriorates significantly in complex scenes under adverse conditions. In these settings, models often rely on implicit inference without sufficient visual evidence, leading to a disconnect between perception and reasoning. Meanwhile, existing outcome-oriented benchmarks evaluate only final predictions and fail to diagnose failures in the underlying reasoning process. To address this gap, the authors propose AD2-Bench, which introduces a Hierarchical Visual Diagnosis framework that decomposes reasoning into a structured Chain of Evidence (CoE). This fine-grained diagnosis reveals that robust multimodal reasoning fundamentally depends on accurate evidence acquisition. Building on this perspective, the authors formulate reasoning from a probabilistic viewpoint and identify two primary causes of reasoning failure: Spatial Ambiguity, where models fail to distinguish target objects from background clutter, resulting in localization errors; and Semantic Uncertainty, where degraded visual features lead to incorrect semantic interpretation, resulting in understanding errors. To overcome these evidence deficiencies, they further propose Evidence-grounded Visual Reasoning (EGVOR), which replaces implicit reasoning with the explicit generation of Evidence Atoms - structured spatial-semantic triplets that enforce tight alignment between localization and semantic understanding. The model is trained through a hierarchical curriculum that progresses from reflective supervision construction to reinforcement learning, where reducing reasoning variance is explicitly rewarded. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EGVOR substantially improves reasoning stability under adverse conditions, providing a more robust framework for trustworthy multimodal cognition.

Zhaoyang Wei, Bowen Jiang, Xumeng Han +6

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(UCAS) · Tencent CDG

Multimodal GroundingMultimodal RobustnessMultimodal ReasoningMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
Jun 8, 2025

Lingshu: A Generalist Foundation Model for Unified Multimodal Medical Understanding and Reasoning

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding common visual elements, largely due to their large-scale datasets and advanced training strategies. However, their effectiveness in medical applications remains limited due to the inherent discrepancies between data and tasks in medical scenarios and those in the general domain. Concretely, existing medical MLLMs face the following critical limitations: (1) limited coverage of medical knowledge beyond imaging, (2) heightened susceptibility to hallucinations due to suboptimal data curation processes, (3) lack of reasoning capabilities tailored for complex medical scenarios. To address these challenges, we first propose a comprehensive data curation procedure that (1) efficiently acquires rich medical knowledge data not only from medical imaging but also from extensive medical texts and general-domain data; and (2) synthesizes accurate medical captions, visual question answering (VQA), and reasoning samples. As a result, we build a multimodal dataset enriched with extensive medical knowledge. Building on the curated data, we introduce our medical-specialized MLLM: Lingshu. Lingshu undergoes multi-stage training to embed medical expertise and enhance its task-solving capabilities progressively. Besides, we preliminarily explore the potential of applying reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards paradigm to enhance Lingshu's medical reasoning ability. Additionally, we develop MedEvalKit, a unified evaluation framework that consolidates leading multimodal and textual medical benchmarks for standardized, fair, and efficient model assessment. We evaluate the performance of Lingshu on three fundamental medical tasks, multimodal QA, text-based QA, and medical report generation. The results show that Lingshu consistently outperforms the existing open-source multimodal models on most tasks ...

Weiwen Xu, Hou Pong Chan, Long Li +15

LASA Team · DAMO Academy, Alibaba Group

Medical Report GenerationMultimodal PretrainingMultimodal QAMultimodal ReasoningMedical VLMsMultimodal Foundation Models+2
AskPDF
May 29, 2025

A Survey of Generative Categories and Techniques in Multimodal Generative Models

Multimodal generative models (MGMs) have rapidly expanded beyond text generation to encompass images, music, video, human motion, and 3D objects. This survey categorises six primary text-conditioned generative modalities and examines how four techniques, namely self-supervised learning, mixture of experts, reinforcement learning from human feedback, and chain-of-thought prompting, are adapted across them, distinguishing shared mechanisms from experimentally supported benefits. We organise evaluation around faithfulness, compositionality, and robustness, and interpret evidence within each study's protocol. Selected within-study comparisons reported in the reviewed literature support four findings: preference gains need not improve text relevance, and reward optimisation can reduce within-prompt diversity; intermediate plans require tests of their realisation in final outputs; expert granularity changes the mechanism and its storage, computation, and runtime costs; and gains against an optimisation score need confirmation outside that scoring path. We further analyse trustworthiness risks, including bias, privacy leakage, and misuse of generated media, and examine the evidence for mitigation strategies.

Longzhen Han, Awes Mubarak, Almas Baimagambetov +2

School of Architecture, Technology and Engineering, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, BN2 4GJ, United Kingdom · University of Khorfakkan, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

Multimodal GenerationMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
May 26, 2025

Multiplicity is an Inevitable and Inherent Challenge in Multimodal Learning

Multimodal learning has seen remarkable progress, particularly with large-scale pre-training across various modalities. Most current approaches are built on the assumption of a deterministic one-to-one alignment between modalities. However, this oversimplifies real-world multimodal relationships, where their nature is inherently many-to-many. The many-to-many property, or multiplicity, is not a side-effect of noise or annotation error, but an inevitable outcome of intra-modal variability, representational asymmetry, and task-dependent ambiguity in multimodal tasks. We argue that multiplicity is a fundamental bottleneck that affects all stages of the multimodal learning pipeline: from data construction to model training and evaluation benchmarks. By formalizing its causes and consequences, we demonstrate how ignoring multiplicity leads to training uncertainty, unreliable evaluation, and degraded dataset quality. This position paper calls for new research directions on multimodal learning, including multiplicity-aware learning frameworks and dataset construction and evaluation protocols.

Sanghyuk Chun, Olga Russakovsky

1Princeton University

Cross-Modal AlignmentMultimodal Model EvaluationMultimodal Learning
AskPDF
May 23, 2025

MMMG: a Comprehensive and Reliable Benchmark for Multitask Multimodal Generation

Automatically evaluating multimodal generation presents a significant challenge, as automated metrics often struggle to align with human evaluation, especially for complex tasks that involve multiple modalities. We present MMMG, the first benchmark to bring the verifiable-task paradigm to multimodal generation, spanning 4 modality combinations (image, audio, interleaved text and image, interleaved text and audio). As few multimodal outputs can be checked by programs alone, MMMG targets tasks that are either verifiable or near-verifiable: by providing references, and constraining model judges with explicit rubrics. We keep tasks challenging for generation models while enabling reliable automatic evaluation through a combination of models and programs. MMMG encompasses 55 tasks (including 31 newly developed ones), each with a carefully designed evaluation pipeline, and 1288 instructions to systematically assess reasoning, controllability, and other key capabilities of multimodal generation models. Extensive validation demonstrates that MMMG is highly aligned with human judgment, achieving an average agreement of 94.4%. Benchmarking results on 29 models reveal that even though the state-of-the-art model, GPT Image, achieves 70.7% accuracy for image generation, it falls short on interleaved generation. Furthermore, results suggest considerable improvement space in audio generation, highlighting an important future direction.

Jihan Yao, Yushi Hu, Wenyuan Wang +10

University of Washington · Allen Institute for AI

Multimodal GenerationMultimodal Model EvaluationMLLM Evaluation
AskPDF
May 23, 2025

FullFront: Benchmarking MLLMs Across the Full Front-End Engineering Workflow

Front-end engineering involves a complex workflow where engineers conceptualize designs, translate them into code, and iteratively refine the implementation. While recent benchmarks primarily focus on converting visual designs to code, we present FullFront, a benchmark designed to evaluate Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across the full front-end development pipeline. FullFront assesses three fundamental tasks that map directly to the front-end engineering pipeline: Webpage Design (conceptualization phase), Webpage Perception QA (comprehension of visual organization and elements), and Webpage Code Generation (implementation phase). Unlike existing benchmarks that use either scraped websites with bloated code or oversimplified LLM-generated HTML, FullFront employs a novel, two-stage process to transform real-world webpages into clean, standardized HTML while maintaining diverse visual designs and avoiding copyright issues. Extensive testing of state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals significant limitations in page perception, code generation (particularly for image handling and layout), and interaction implementation. Our results quantitatively demonstrate performance disparities across models and tasks, and highlight a substantial gap between current MLLM capabilities and human expert performance in front-end engineering. The FullFront benchmark and code are available in https://github.com/Mikivishy/FullFront.

Haoyu Sun, Huichen Will Wang, Jiawei Gu +2

Tongji University · Shanghai AI Laboratory · University of Washington +1

Software EngineeringWeb Application GenerationSoftware Engineering BenchmarksCode GenerationMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
May 22, 2025

Redemption Score: A Multi-Modal Evaluation Framework for Image Captioning via Distributional, Perceptual, and Linguistic Signal Triangulation

Evaluating image captions requires cohesive assessment of both visual semantics and language pragmatics, which is often not entirely captured by most metrics. As such metrics increasingly guide model development, benchmarking, and system optimization in multimodal AI, inaccuracies in evaluation can misrepresent true progress. We introduce Redemption Score(RS), a novel evaluation framework for multi-modal generation by triangulating three complementary signals: (1) Mutual Information Divergence (MID) for global image-text distributional alignment, (2) DINO-based perceptual similarity of cycle-generated images for visual grounding, and (3) LLM Text Embeddings for contextual text similarity against human references. A calibrated fusion of these signals allows RS to offer a more holistic assessment. On the Flickr8k benchmark, RS achieves a Kendall-ττ of 58.42, outperforming most prior methods and demonstrating superior correlation with human judgments without requiring task-specific training. Our framework provides a more robust and nuanced evaluation by thoroughly examining both the visual accuracy and text quality together, with consistent performance across Conceptual Captions and MS COCO.

Ashim Dahal, Ankit Ghimire, Saydul Akbar Murad +1

University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA · School of Business & Technology, Emporia State University, Emporia, KS, USA

Image CaptioningImage Captioning EvaluationMultimodal Model Evaluation
AskPDF
May 18, 2025

MMS-VPR: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Street-Level Visual Place Recognition Dataset and Evaluation Benchmark for Dense Pedestrian Environments

Existing visual place recognition (VPR) datasets predominantly rely on vehicle-mounted imagery, offer limited multimodal diversity, and underrepresent dense pedestrian street scenes, particularly in non-Western urban contexts. We present MMS-VPR, a challenging fine-grained multimodal benchmark for pedestrian-level place recognition in dense urban environments. MMS-VPR comprises 110,529 images and 2,527 video clips across 208 fine-grained location classes within a ∼\sim70,800 m2^2 urban district in Chengdu, China, with adjacent classes separated by as little as 10-20 m. Unlike large-area VPR datasets, MMS-VPR elevates difficulty through visual ambiguity: repetitive storefronts, dense occlusion, and rapid viewpoint changes. Field data were collected in 2024 following a systematic multi-direction, dual-perspective protocol; social media imagery spans seven years (2019-2025), providing long-term appearance change across 31,726 geolocated photographs. Each location features day-night coverage, multiple viewing angles, and multimodal annotations including GPS coordinates, timestamps, semantic text, and an explicit spatial graph with space syntax enrichments. We release MMS-VPRlib, a unified benchmarking platform consolidating 22 baselines spanning shallow ML, CNN, Transformer, graph neural network (GNN), and multimodal architectures under a standardized, reproducible pipeline. Controlled modality ablations show that video temporal features are the most powerful single modality (+15.8% accuracy over image-only), semantic text provides superior coarse retrieval (R@5 = 0.988 alone), and full multimodal fusion achieves 0.981 accuracy, a +19.2% gain over image-only, while graph-structured modeling provides additional signal in fine-grained structural subsets. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Yiwei-Ou/MMS-VPR and the benchmark at https://github.com/yiasun/MMS-VPRlib.

Yiwei Ou, Xiaobin Ren, Ronggui Sun +3

The University of Auckland · Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen

Visual Place RecognitionMultimodal Model EvaluationMultimodal Sensor Fusion
AskPDF
May 16, 2025

HumaniBench: A Human-Centric Framework for Large Multimodal Models Evaluation

Although recent large multimodal models (LMMs) show impressive progress on vision language tasks, their alignment with human centered (HC) principles such as fairness, ethics, inclusivity, empathy, and robustness is often overlooked. Existing LMM benchmarks are largely accuracy-agnostic. We present HumaniBench, a unified framework for characterizing HC alignment across realistic, socially grounded visual contexts. It contains 32,000 expert-verified image-question pairs from real-world news imagery, each mapped to one or more HC principles through explicit metrics. Comparing 15 state of the art LMMs reveals consistent trade -offs: proprietary systems lead on ethics, reasoning, and empathy, while open-source models show superior visual grounding and resilience. All models show persistent gaps in fairness and multilingual inclusivity. Chain-of-thought prompting and test-time scaling yield 8to 12 % gains on several HC dimensions. HumaniBench enables fine-grained analysis of alignment trade-offs not captured by conventional multimodal benchmarks. https://vectorinstitute.github.io/humanibench/

Shaina Raza, Aravind Narayanan, Vahid Reza Khazaie +6

Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada · University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA

Algorithmic FairnessMultimodal Large Language ModelsMultimodal Foundation ModelsMultimodal Model EvaluationMultimodal UnderstandingMLLM Evaluation
AskPDF
Feb 13, 2025

ZeroBench: An Impossible Visual Benchmark for Contemporary Large Multimodal Models

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) exhibit shortfalls when interpreting images and, by some measures, have poorer spatial cognition than young children or animals. Despite this, they attain high scores on many popular visual benchmarks, with headroom rapidly eroded by model progress. This creates a need for difficult benchmarks that remain relevant for longer. We introduce ZeroBench - a lightweight visual reasoning benchmark curated using adversarial filtering to be "impossible" for frontier LMMs at its original release, with initial SotA scores of 0% pass@1 and pass^5. We track progress on ZeroBench over the subsequent year, observing SotA reaching 6% pass^5 and 19% pass@5, indicating the potential longevity of the benchmark. We evaluate 46 LMMs on ZeroBench, compare performance to a human baseline, analyse strengths and weaknesses, chart a year of progress in visual capabilities, and publicly release ZeroBench at https://zerobench.github.io.

Jonathan Roberts, Mohammad Reza Taesiri, Ansh Sharma +31

University of Cambridge

Visually Grounded ReasoningVLM ReasoningMultimodal UnderstandingVisual ReasoningMultimodal Foundation ModelsMultimodal Model Evaluation+1
AskPDF
Jul 16, 2024

VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Models

We present VLMEvalKit: an open-source toolkit for evaluating large multi-modality models based on PyTorch. The toolkit aims to provide a user-friendly and comprehensive framework for researchers and developers to evaluate existing multi-modality models and publish reproducible evaluation results. In VLMEvalKit, we implement over 450+ large multi-modality model configurations, including both proprietary APIs and open-source models, and support 330+ benchmarks across diverse multi-modal benchmarks. By implementing a single interface, new models can be easily added to the toolkit, while the toolkit automatically handles the remaining workloads, including data preparation, distributed inference, prediction post-processing, and metric calculation. VLMEvalKit has also evolved to a broader evaluation suite spanning video/audio, document understanding, GUI grounding, spatial reasoning, safety, scientific reasoning, and multi-turn dialogue. Based on the evaluation results obtained with the toolkit, we host the OpenVLM Leaderboard, a comprehensive leaderboard to track the progress of multi-modality learning research. The toolkit is released on https://github.com/open-compass/VLMEvalKit and is actively maintained.

Haodong Duan, Xinyu Fang, Junming Yang +41

VLM EvaluationLLM EvaluationMultimodal Foundation ModelsMultimodal Model EvaluationMultimodal UnderstandingMLLM Evaluation
AskPDF