Neural Representation Geometry

Whether artificial neural networks organize information comparably to the human brain remains unclear. Prior brain--AI alignment studies are constrained by specific inputs and tasks, limiting cross-modal comparison. Here we introduce a brain--model topological alignment space, mapping Transformer attention topology onto human intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) to enable task-free, modality-agnostic comparison. Analyzing 151 Transformer-based models with 62,480 attention head graphs, we observe a continuous arc-shaped distribution reflecting varying alignment. Models optimized for global semantics aligned with higher-order ICNs, while local-detail models aligned with sensory ICNs. Non-intuitive findings include reduced alignment in DINOv2 compared to its predecessors and a counterintuitive scaling inversion in distilled DeiT models, while fine-tuning and instruction tuning had limited effect. Alignment scores showed no significant correlation with ImageNet accuracy (r = 0.266, p = 0.156). This work offers a quantitative framework for comparing the organizational principles of artificial and biological systems.

This paper presents DINO-SLAM, a DINO-informed design strategy to enhance implicit (Neural Radiance Field -- NeRF) and explicit representations (Gaussian Splatting -- GS) in SLAM systems through the more comprehensive semantics understanding enabled by DINO. This latter alone, however, lacks proper 3D geometry understanding, allowing only for marginal improvements. Therefore, we rely on a Scene Geometry Encoder (SGE) to enrich DINO features into geometry-aware DINO features (geoDINO), to better understand those geometric relationships that vanilla DINO features fail to capture. Building upon it, we propose two foundational paradigms for NeRF and GS SLAM systems integrating geoDINO features. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, our DINO-informed pipelines achieve superior performance on the Replica, ScanNet, and TUM datasets.