Posterior Sampling

Recent momentum

emerging

4 papers in the last 28 days · 0.1% of indexed attention

Twelve weeks of publication activity for this topic as it is defined today.

Weekly history

Recent digests

What was published in this topic, kept on the site without email delivery.

Period ending 2026-09-21

2 new papers

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Posterior Sampling.

Period ending 2026-09-07

1 new paper

A weekly snapshot of new work published in Posterior Sampling.

65 papers

Latest in Posterior Sampling

Nov 23, 2025cs.CV

Jacobian-Aware Posterior Sampling for Inverse Problems

Diffusion models provide powerful generative priors for solving inverse problems by sampling from a posterior distribution conditioned on corrupted measurements. Existing methods primarily follow two paradigms: direct methods, which approximate the likelihood term, and proximal methods, which incorporate intermediate solutions satisfying measurement constraints into the sampling process. Under standard Gaussian approximations and locally-linear measurements, we demonstrate that these approaches differ fundamentally in their treatment of the diffusion denoiser's Jacobian within the likelihood term. While this Jacobian encodes critical prior knowledge of the data distribution, training-induced non-idealities can degrade performance in zero-shot settings. In this work, we bridge direct and proximal approaches by proposing a principled Jacobian-Aware Posterior Sampler (JAPS). JAPS leverages the Jacobian's prior knowledge while mitigating its detrimental effects through a corresponding proximal solution, requiring no additional computational cost. Additionally, we integrate our guidance into DDIM sampling, with a corrected conditional factor that has been missing in previous works. Our method enhances reconstruction quality across diverse linear and nonlinear noisy imaging tasks, outperforming existing diffusion-based baselines in perceptual quality while maintaining or improving distortion metrics.
Liav Hen, Tom Tirer, Raja Giryes +1
Sep 23, 2025stat.ML

A Gradient Flow Approach to Solving Inverse Problems with Latent Diffusion Models

Solving ill-posed inverse problems requires powerful and flexible priors. We propose leveraging pretrained latent diffusion models for this task through a new training-free approach, termed Diffusion-regularized Wasserstein Gradient Flow (DWGF). Specifically, we formulate the posterior sampling problem as a Wasserstein gradient flow in the latent space of an expected negative log posterior objective, regularized by a Kullback-Leibler divergence to the diffusion prior. We demonstrate the performance of our method on standard benchmarks using StableDiffusion (Rombach et al., 2022) as the prior.
Tim Y. J. Wang, O. Deniz Akyildiz
Jun 26, 2025stat.ML

Spherical Cauchy Variational Autoencoders: Heavy Angular Tails and Exact KL Evaluation

Heavy-tailed posteriors are routine in Euclidean variational autoencoders, where the Student family relaxes the Gaussian without new machinery. The sphere has had no comparable option. Von Mises-Fisher distribution needs modified Bessel functions and a rejection sampler, and Power Spherical buys its closed forms by forcing the density to vanish at the antipode. We develop the spherical Cauchy distribution as a hyperspherical posterior that needs neither compromise. Stereographic projection carries it to a multivariate Student law, and a Möbius transformation turns a uniform spherical draw into an exact posterior sample from inner products, norms, and scalar arithmetic. The same transformation settles the regularizer. Evaluating the density along the sampling map reduces the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to the uniform prior to a scalar expectation whose expansion terminates in every even ambient dimension, leaving one logarithm and a polynomial with finitely many correction terms. Odd dimensions admit certified truncation of value and gradient, the KL is increasing and convex in concentration, and the same function gives the pairwise KL. At matched modal curvature it has broader angular tails and a smaller KL penalty than both alternatives, so equal local precision costs less regularization. In dimension 128 the fused evaluator runs 1.5 times faster per latent-layer step than Power Spherical and 4.2 times faster than robust von Mises-Fisher on CPU, with factors of 1.6 and 5.4 on CUDA. Across five paired seeds it attains the lowest MNIST reconstruction loss at every tested dimension and lowers held-out viewpoint-gap negative log-likelihood on smallNORB by 3.6 percent.
Lukas Sablica, Kurt Hornik
Apr 2, 2025cs.LG

Bifidelity Parameter Estimation Using Conditional Diffusion Models

We present a bifidelity method for uncertainty quantification of parameter estimates in complex systems, leveraging generative models trained to sample the target conditional distribution. In the Bayesian inference setting, traditional parameter estimation methods rely on repeated simulations of potentially expensive forward models to determine the posterior distribution of the parameter values, which may result in computationally intractable workflows. Furthermore, methods such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) necessitate rerunning the entire algorithm for each new data observation, further increasing the computational burden. Hence, we propose a novel method for efficiently obtaining posterior distributions of parameter estimates for high-fidelity models given data observations of interest. The method first constructs a low-fidelity, conditional generative model capable of amortized Bayesian inference and hence rapid posterior density approximation over a wide-range of data observations. When higher accuracy is needed for a specific data observation, the method employs adaptive refinement of the density approximation. It uses outputs from the low-fidelity generative model to refine the parameter sampling space, ensuring efficient use of the computationally expensive high-fidelity solver. Subsequently, a high-fidelity, unconditional generative model is trained to achieve greater accuracy in the target posterior distribution. Both low- and high- fidelity generative models enable efficient sampling from the target posterior and do not require repeated simulation of the high-fidelity forward model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on several numerical examples, including cases with multi-modal densities, as well as an application in plasma physics for a runaway electron simulation model.
Caroline Tatsuoka, Minglei Yang, Dongbin Xiu +1
Date pendingmath.NA

Deep learning methods for inverse problems using connections between proximal operators and Hamilton-Jacobi equations

Inverse problems are important mathematical problems that seek to recover model parameters from noisy data. Since inverse problems are often ill-posed, they require regularization or incorporation of prior information about the underlying model or unknown variables. Proximal operators, ubiquitous in nonsmooth optimization, are central to this because they encode priors and yield efficient iterative algorithms. They have also recently become key to modern machine learning methods, e.g., plug-and-play methods with learned denoisers and deep neural architectures for learning priors of proximal operators. The latter was developed partly due to recent work characterizing proximal operators of nonconvex priors as subdifferentials of convex potentials. In this work, we propose to leverage connections between proximal operators and Hamilton--Jacobi partial differential equations (HJ PDEs) to develop deep learning architectures for learning the prior. In contrast to other existing methods, we learn the prior directly without recourse to inverting the prior after training. We present numerical results in dimensions up to 6464, where the recovered prior is evaluated in a single forward pass.
Oluwatosin Akande, Gabriel P. Langlois, Akwum Onwunta