Remote Sensing VQA

VQA: Visual Question Answering

Overview

Remote sensing VQA asks models to interpret Earth imagery and answer questions about objects, land use, spatial relationships, change over time, and measured quantities, supporting applications such as mapping and disaster monitoring. Common approaches adapt vision-language models through fine-tuning or lightweight adapters, while newer systems use localization, image tiling, retrieval, segmentation, or other tools to gather visual evidence. Benchmarks increasingly test high-resolution scenes, multiple sensors, video, temporal comparisons, and quantitative or spatial reasoning. A central challenge is making answers reliably grounded in the right image evidence: models still struggle with fine detail, numerical reasoning, and long-range or cross-view relations, while tool use and larger inputs can increase inference cost.

Latest papers

36 papers4 papers in the last four weeks, down 20% on the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Mar 16, 2026

RS-WorldModel: a Unified Model for Remote Sensing Understanding and Future Sense Forecasting

Remote sensing world models aim to both explain observed changes and forecast plausible futures, two tasks that share spatiotemporal priors. Existing methods, however, typically address them separately, limiting cross-task transfer. We present RS-WorldModel, a unified world model for remote sensing that jointly handles spatiotemporal change understanding and text-guided future scene forecasting, and we build RSWBench-1.1M, a 1.1 million sample dataset with rich language annotations covering both tasks. RS-WorldModel is trained in three stages: (1) Geo-Aware Generative Pre-training (GAGP) conditions forecasting on geographic and acquisition metadata; (2) synergistic instruction tuning (SIT) jointly trains understanding and forecasting; (3) verifiable reinforcement optimization (VRO) refines outputs with verifiable, task-specific rewards. With only 2B parameters, RS-WorldModel surpasses open-source models up to 120×\times larger on most spatiotemporal change question-answering metrics. It achieves an FID of 43.13 on text-guided future scene forecasting, outperforming all open-source baselines as well as the closed-source Gemini-2.5-Flash Image (Nano Banana).
Mar 11, 2026

UAV traffic scene understanding: A regulation embedded multi-modal network and a unified benchmark

Traffic scene understanding from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms is crucial for intelligent transportation systems due to its flexible deployment and wide-area monitoring capabilities. However, existing methods face significant challenges in real-world surveillance, as their heavy reliance on optical imagery leads to severe performance degradation under adverse illumination conditions like nighttime and fog. Furthermore, current Visual Question Answering (VQA) models are restricted to elementary perception tasks, lacking the domain-specific regulatory knowledge required to assess complex traffic behaviors. To address these limitations, we propose a novel Multi-modal Traffic Cognition Network (MTCNet) for robust UAV traffic scene understanding. Specifically, we design a Prototype-Guided Knowledge Embedding (PGKE) module that leverages high-level semantic prototypes from an external Traffic Regulation Memory (TRM) to anchor domain-specific knowledge into visual representations, enabling the model to comprehend complex behaviors and distinguish fine-grained traffic violations. Moreover, we develop a Quality-Aware Spectral Compensation (QASC) module that exploits the complementary characteristics of optical and thermal modalities to perform bidirectional context exchange, effectively compensating for degraded features to ensure robust representation in complex environments. In addition, we construct Traffic-VQA, the first large-scale optical-thermal infrared benchmark for cognitive UAV traffic understanding, comprising 8,180 aligned image pairs and 1.3 million question-answer pairs across 31 diverse types. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MTCNet significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both cognition and perception scenarios. The dataset is available at https://github.com/YuZhang-2004/UAV-traffic-scene-understanding.
Mar 10, 2026

OmniEarth: A Benchmark for Evaluating Vision-Language Models in Geospatial Tasks

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated effective perception and reasoning capabilities on general-domain tasks, leading to growing interest in their application to Earth observation. However, a systematic benchmark for comprehensively evaluating remote sensing vision-language models (RSVLMs) remains lacking. To address this gap, we introduce OmniEarth, a benchmark for evaluating RSVLMs under realistic Earth observation scenarios. OmniEarth organizes tasks along three capability dimensions: perception, reasoning, and robustness. It defines 28 fine-grained tasks covering multi-source sensing data and diverse geospatial contexts. The benchmark supports two task formulations: multiple-choice VQA and open-ended VQA. The latter includes pure text outputs for captioning tasks, bounding box outputs for visual grounding tasks, and mask outputs for segmentation tasks. To reduce linguistic bias and examine whether model predictions rely on visual evidence, OmniEarth adopts a blind test protocol and a quintuple semantic consistency requirement. OmniEarth includes 9,275 carefully quality-controlled images, including proprietary satellite imagery from Jilin-1 (JL-1), along with 44,210 manually verified instructions. We conduct a systematic evaluation of contrastive learning-based models, general closed-source and open-source VLMs, as well as RSVLMs. Results show that existing VLMs still struggle with geospatially complex tasks, revealing clear gaps that need to be addressed for remote sensing applications. OmniEarth is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/sjeeudd/OmniEarth.
Mar 3, 2026

Seeing Clearly without Training: Mitigating Hallucinations in Multimodal LLMs for Remote Sensing

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer from pronounced hallucinations in remote sensing visual question-answering (RS-VQA), primarily caused by visual grounding failures in large-scale scenes or misinterpretation of fine-grained small targets. To systematically analyze these issues, we introduce RSHBench, a protocol-based benchmark for fine-grained diagnosis of factual and logical hallucinations. To mitigate grounding-induced factual hallucinations, we further propose Relative Attention-Driven Actively Reasoning (RADAR), a training-free inference method that leverages intrinsic attention in MLLMs to guide progressive localization and fine-grained local reasoning at test time. Extensive experiments across diverse MLLMs demonstrate that RADAR consistently improves RS-VQA performance and reduces both factual and logical hallucinations. Code and data will be publicly available at: https://github.com/MiliLab/RADAR
Feb 17, 2026

EarthSpatialBench: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs on Earth Imagery

Benchmarking spatial reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has attracted growing interest in computer vision due to its importance for embodied AI and other agentic systems that require precise interaction with the physical world. However, spatial reasoning on Earth imagery has lagged behind, as it uniquely involves grounding objects in georeferenced images and quantitatively reasoning about distances, directions, and topological relations using both visual cues and vector geometry coordinates (e.g., 2D bounding boxes, polylines, and polygons). Existing benchmarks for Earth imagery primarily focus on 2D spatial grounding, image captioning, and coarse spatial relations (e.g., simple directional or proximity cues). They lack support for quantitative direction and distance reasoning, systematic topological relations, and complex object geometries beyond bounding boxes. To fill this gap, we propose EarthSpatialBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating spatial reasoning in MLLMs on Earth imagery. The benchmark contains over 325K question-answer pairs spanning: (1) qualitative and quantitative reasoning about spatial distance and direction; (2) systematic topological relations; (3) single-object queries, object-pair queries, and compositional aggregate group queries; and (4) object references expressed via textual descriptions, visual overlays, and explicit geometry coordinates, including 2D bounding boxes, polylines, and polygons. We conducted extensive experiments on both open-source and proprietary models to identify limitations in the spatial reasoning of MLLMs.
Jan 19, 2026

SQuID: A Benchmark for Quantitative Spatial Reasoning on Satellite Imagery

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) describe satellite images fluently but struggle with the quantitative spatial reasoning that remote sensing (RS) analysts perform routinely, such as counting buildings, measuring forest area in hectares and computing distances in meters. We introduce SQuID (Satellite Quantitative Intelligence Dataset), a benchmark of 2,000 questions over 587 images from four sources at 0.3 to 1.0 m ground sampling distance, covering 24 question types in three difficulty tiers. Answers are computed from curated segmentation masks or, for 50 questions, from human consensus, and numeric answers are scored against tolerance ranges informed by human annotations. SQuID also releases the reference masks behind its answers, so that modular systems can be evaluated using reference rather than predicted masks, and 75,687 training question-answer pairs on disjoint images (SQuID-Train). Among 15 evaluated systems, the best zero-shot end-to-end VLM reaches 28.1%, and RS-specialized VLMs score lower. As a baseline, we propose QASR (Quantitative Agentic Spatial Reasoning), in which an LLM writes a program that segments the image and measures the masks with geometric operators. QASR reaches 42.0%. On the 1,950 mask-derived questions, running its programs on the reference masks instead of predicted masks raises accuracy from 42.2% to 82.6%, so segmentation is its main source of error. Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-VL-7B on SQuID-Train raises its accuracy from 16.1% to 40.7%, close to QASR. Multi-condition questions (Tier 3) remain the hardest in every setting, at 62.0% for QASR with reference masks and 13.2% after fine-tuning. These results leave clear room for end-to-end models that learn metric spatial reasoning, and SQuID provides the data to train and evaluate them.