Response Magnitude

Activation steering has been used to control traits such as honesty, refusal, and sycophancy, yet supportive empathy is evaluated along multiple dimensions that need not correspond to independently controllable activation directions. Using the EPITOME framework, which decomposes supportive empathy into Emotional Reactions, Interpretations, and Explorations, we study three instruction-tuned LLMs and ask whether candidate directions derived from these labels produce distinguishable intervention effects or instead share structure, and how persona prompts interact with those directions. We find that contrastive activation addition yields a stable middle-layer intervention that consistently shifts the EPITOME proxy scores across models, moving empathy analysis beyond response-level scoring. However, the recovered directions are only partially separable: steering one direction induces off-target shifts, and hand-crafted prompting shifts the empathy profile rather than isolating a single dimension. Persona prompts substantially change EPITOME scores, but a paired activation-shift decomposition shows that the recovered subspace captures only approximately 3 percent of persona-induced squared activation-shift magnitude at layer 15. Under this EPITOME-based definition, expressed empathy is steerable but multi-axial, and controlling persona-conditioned empathy requires targeting structure beyond individual mechanism directions.

We study compute reduction in neural networks through a unified partial versus full computation view, captured by one-shot magnitude pruning in the static regime and early exit in the adaptive regime. In an asymptotic single-neuron model, we prove a concentration theorem for one-shot magnitude pruning with explicit rates. We also introduce the conditional perceptron for early exit and show that its excess generalization error decays as a power of the compute gap, with an exponent that grows to infinity as the alignment between partial and full computations tends to one. We then extend the analysis to deep networks, characterizing how pruning-induced distortions accumulate with depth and deriving a corresponding compute-accuracy tradeoff for frozen-backbone early exit under a neural network Gaussian process model. Numerical simulations corroborate the predicted scaling laws.

We introduce AdamX, a first-order optimizer that incorporates cosine similarity as an adaptive mechanism for controlling update magnitudes. The proposed method is scalable, model-agnostic, and straightforward to integrate into existing training pipelines. We further introduce a variance rectification scheme that promotes smoother optimization during the early stages of training. Overall, we provide empirical evidence that AdamX achieves competitive convergence rates across a range of benchmark datasets and architectures. Performance is evaluated in terms of the number of epochs required to reach predefined performance thresholds under a fixed hyperparameter budget. Code and Experiments available at: https://github.com/FranciscoCaldas/adamX.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate strong semantic understanding yet exhibit systematic failures during deployment. The conditions under which these failures occur, and whether they can be corrected without retraining, remain poorly understood. In this paper, we take steps toward addressing this gap. We present CorrectVLA, a framework that translates task-level natural language corrections into additive action magnitude adjustments without modifying policy weights. A human provides a single task-level correction, applied uniformly across all rollouts without per-episode intervention. In simulation, CorrectVLA recovers execution misalignment failures across both in-distribution and OOD tasks. In real-robot experiments on a UFactory xArm7 under environment shift, CorrectVLA restores near-perfect success where the base policy almost entirely breaks down, generalizing across object locations and identities. Through a taxonomy of failure modes on LIBERO-90, we find that execution misalignment failures, where the policy reaches the correct target but miscalibrates action magnitudes, represent the correctable subset, while other failure modes where semantic comprehension itself breaks down are not amenable to this approach. The approach succeeds when policies possess strategic correctness and fails when fundamental comprehension is absent, establishing a practical operational boundary for inference-time correction.

Perturbation methods explain model decisions by measuring prediction changes under altered inputs, but response magnitude tells us only how much a model reacts, not what that reaction means. The same magnitude can support the final factual-counterfactual difference, oppose it, or arise strongly along the perturbation path yet vanish at the endpoint. We therefore track how the contrast develops as paired inputs are progressively revealed, using the final contrast to interpret the trajectory. We introduce DECAF (Decomposition of Evidence, Contradiction, And Fragility), which routes aligned, opposed, and endpoint-null responses into evidence E, contradiction C, and fragility F. The decomposition preserves ordinary magnitude exactly, Abs = E + C + F, and is unique under endpoint-relative axioms. Across controlled vision and tabular settings, the three components track independently measured behavior. In a 72-model ImageNet-9 audit, we compare cases with nearly identical response magnitude but different independently measured behaviors. The largest DECAF component agrees with an observed behavior in 96.4% of cases, compared with 35.0% for magnitude alone. Changing only the reveal path increases total response by nearly 80%, yet evidence barely changes while fragility grows by more than 4x. On FunnyBirds and ImageNet-1k, short forward-only DECAF trajectories outperform the tested general-purpose attribution baselines. On a 1B-scale DINOv2 model, a short trajectory matches a strong gradient-based baseline with 4.75x lower wall time and 2.36x lower peak memory.

AI evaluation can support the wrong inference when an in-domain benchmark success does not survive distribution shift, or when the benchmark endpoint is entangled with a design factor. We study this problem in CRISPRi perturbation-effect prediction, evaluating a frozen Geneformer representation under a locked, pre-registered protocol: heads and model selection were frozen before test evaluation; the protocol required external outcome labels to remain withheld until final unblinding; and analysis-governing decisions were fixed before the evaluations they govern. In-distribution on the Virtual Cell Challenge (VCC), the frozen representation carries measurable predictive information beyond a dimension-matched random-feature control (Delta R^2 = +0.1645, 95% CI [+0.1375, +0.1920]), satisfying the pre-registered informativeness gate required before interpreting transfer. It then fails zero-shot transfer on both external screens (Spearman rho = -0.139 and -0.267), lying below that control on each. Adding a predefined magnitude block improves the representation externally (Delta rho = +0.032 and +0.143) but, under the frozen primary head, does not rescue transfer: both remain negative. A pre-registered, count-adjusted max-response secondary is positively associated with the outcome on both screens; we report it as correlational and secondary, not as a recovered magnitude signal. Finally, the VCC endpoint is strongly sample-size associated: a count-only linear model reaches R^2 = +0.4325, versus +0.2589 for the four magnitude scalars; adding those scalars to cell count improves R^2 by only +0.0017, so much of the aggregate-magnitude signal overlaps with cell count. This case study shows how locking the evaluation, harmonizing the measured endpoint, and separating primary from secondary evidence can change the inference supported by an AI benchmark.

Administering Database Management Systems (DBMS) instances requires Database Administrators (DBA) to balance performance in terms of Service Level Agreement (SLA) against resource usage, often prompting RAM over-allocation that wastes memory. We introduce MicroTune, an online RL-based buffer adjustment system that minimizes unnecessary memory allocation while ensuring SLA compliance. To identify the most effective RL core, we evaluate multiple algorithms under diverse benchmark workloads, training MicroTune on extensive traces of both external metrics (latency, throughput) and internal DBMS metrics (status variables and performance statistics). Experimental results demonstrate that MicroTune dynamically adapts buffer sizes to workload fluctuations, outperforming baselines by achieving significant memory savings with fewer SLA violations. These findings underscore the promise of reinforcement learning for adaptive resource management in DBMS environments.

Training with quantized weights can reduce costs but often results in degraded accuracy, especially when optimization is carried out in low precision, without storing high-precision copies. We identify a key failure mode: under low precision, standard optimizers can get stuck and not make progress, especially at large weight magnitudes due to coarse mantissa resolution. To overcome this, multiplicative updates have been previously proposed, in place of additive updates in standard optimizers. While successful under extremely low precision, such as under the logarithmic number system, they suffer from failures near zero and across sign changes. The failure modes of additive and multiplicative updates are therefore complementary. To exploit this, we propose M+Adam, which combines both update types: additive steps handle sign changes and small magnitudes, while multiplicative steps ensure progress at large magnitudes when additive updates are zeroed out under rounding. We prove monotone descent for M+Adam under standard smoothness assumptions. Across LLaMA-style pretraining with 60M-1B models, 1x-8x Chinchilla budgets, and using only BF16, FP8, and FP4 master weights, M+Adam consistently improves low-precision training.

One-shot pruning methods like Wanda and SparseGPT apply the same sparsity ratio to every layer of a transformer, ignoring known variation in layer importance. We propose PALS (Percentile-Aware Layerwise Sparsity), which adjusts per-layer sparsity based on the 99th percentile of activation magnitudes, bounded to $\pm 5\%$ around the target ratio. On LLaMA-2-7B at 50% sparsity, PALS achieves 10.96 WikiText-2 perplexity versus 12.92 for uniform Wanda (mean over 9 runs, $p < 0.001$). The benefit is architecture-dependent: LLaMA-3-8B shows marginal gains and Mistral-7B shows none. We also find that gradient-based allocation -- the seemingly more principled approach -- produces results worse than random, suggesting that gradient magnitude does not predict the impact of discrete weight removal. PALS adds negligible cost to the pruning pipeline and requires no fine-tuning.

The existence of adversarial attacks is often attributed to the presence of non-robust features in neural networks. While prior defenses reduce their impact via pruning, masking, or feature recalibration, we instead propose to jointly learn to amplify and attenuate these signals through a simple activation scaling mechanism. To this end, we introduce Activation Amplification and Attenuation (A3), a lightweight plug-in module that enhances adversarial robustness with minimal modifications of the activations. A3 dynamically rescales the activations using a learnable mask and a scaling factor derived from the original activation magnitudes. The influence of adversarial perturbations can be amplified or attenuated using the same learnable parameters by simply flipping the sign of the scaling operation. The amplified signals serve as negative references to construct novel contrastive and ranking loss functions. Experimental analysis shows that learning to degrade the predictions in amplification mode simultaneously improves adversarial robustness in attenuation mode. Moreover, A3 relies on only a small number of learnable parameters, with most of its behavior being determined by the scaling mechanism rather than additional network capacity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that integrating A3 into different backbones, datasets, and training methods consistently improves adversarial robustness while introducing negligible computational and memory overhead compared to existing plug-in modules. Code is available at: https://github.com/tgoncalv/A3.

Modern neural network training relies on optimizers such as Adam and Muon which act on each weight matrix as a single object. Yet every weight matrix carries two distinct quantities -- a \emph{magnitude} and a \emph{direction} -- and all optimizers stepping in the matrix as a whole couple their dynamics: the directional change from an update depends on the current magnitude, while the magnitude drifts as a byproduct of learning the direction, so neither is governed directly by the learning rate. Typical training therefore leans on surrounding recipes such as weight decay and warmup to keep learning stable at scale, though these regulate the coupling only indirectly; other recent methods instead constrain the weight to a fixed-norm sphere, but add no learnable magnitude, leaving scale control to normalization layers alone. We propose \emph{Magnitude--Direction (MD) Decoupling}, an optimizer modification that factorizes each weight into a fixed-norm direction on a hypersphere and learnable per-row and per-column magnitude gains, updated at separate learning rates, all while the model still sees a single fused weight tensor. The method is agnostic to the base optimizer and removes the need for weight decay and warmup. Across both Adam and Muon, MD Decoupling improves on well-tuned baselines, transfers the optimal LR across model width without retuning, and continues to help at scale on large Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models. Treating magnitude and direction as separately controlled quantities thus yields more predictable training dynamics and a simple, broadly applicable improvement to modern optimizers.

Oppenheim and Lim (1981) showed that natural images stay recognizable when reconstructed from their Fourier phase alone, while the magnitude carries little of their identity. We ask whether trained image classifiers reproduce this asymmetry inside their hidden layers, and we test it causally: given two images, we transplant the phase of one onto the magnitude of the other at a chosen layer and record which image the prediction follows. In PRISM2D, GFNet, and ViT-B/16 the prediction follows the phase or sign donor, and deleting all image-specific magnitude barely moves accuracy, so identity rides on phase while image-specific magnitude is largely dispensable to the readout. ResNet-50 at first seems to break the pattern, because transplanting sign after its ReLUs does nothing; a fair intervention before the ReLU reveals a strong latent sign code in the late blocks, and a DC-only control shows the readout consumes a channel-wise spatial average. Controls rule out the trivial case in which magnitude simply stops depending on the image. The architectures therefore share a phase/sign identity code but expose it in different bases, set by rectification and readout geometry, which gives a mechanistic account of the texture--shape gap between CNNs and attention models.

JEPA-family world models use a static predictor whose weights do not adapt when test-time dynamics diverge from training. We compare two mechanisms for incorporating accumulated experience into a JEPA predictor under distribution shift: operand-side injection, where a compressed experience representation is added as a residual to the predictor's hidden state (EI-JEPA), and operator-side modulation, where the same representation generates low-rank weight deltas via LoRA applied to the predictor's weights (EPM-JEPA). On a pre-registered comparison (Moving MNIST, gravity shift), EPM-JEPA (D_shift^{n=50} = 0.7848 +/- 0.0078, three seeds) differs from EI-JEPA (0.8238) by delta = 4.74% - Outcome C: a null result - by our stated criterion, a valid outcome. As a secondary, non-pre-registered observation, EPM-JEPA improves 1.90% over a no-memory baseline (0.8000), consistently across seeds, while EI-JEPA underperforms the baseline, indicating the benefit is specific to weight-level modulation. Our primary contribution is a mechanism analysis: the D_shift^{n=50} trajectory reflects three independent dynamical processes - buffer cycling, EMA target drift, and an intrinsic LoRA settling transient of +0.021 - rather than convergence to equilibrium. These findings motivate PEM-JEPA, a physics-grounded successor addressing this dynamical-peak limitation.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly described as performing at the level of human experts on knowledge economy tasks. These claims are primarily based on how LLMs perform on benchmarking tasks that measure average performance across standardized datasets. Primary limitations of many benchmarking tasks are that they often measure performance based on content directly included in LLM training data, and they frequently do not assess the reliability of LLM performance or the magnitude of LLM errors. However, in high stakes contexts, these qualities are critically important. Through a novel LLM benchmarking task that requires writing computer code to complete a data analysis task, we compare the performance of a frontier LLM against submissions from human experts and explicitly measure the variance of responses and the magnitude of errors. Our study reveals that the human experts perform better on average on a range of metrics and demonstrate less variability in performance. Our results provide evidence that LLMs do not consistently perform at the level of human experts and demonstrate the importance of measuring variance and assessing error magnitude in LLM benchmark evaluations.

Dynamic link prediction is important for modeling evolving interactions in complex systems, including social, communication, financial, and transportation networks. Classical temporal graph models capture sequential dependencies, but they may struggle to represent concurrent and rapidly changing node-edge interactions in large dynamic graphs. We propose A2QTGN (Adaptive Amplitude Quantum-Integrated Temporal Graph Network), a hybrid quantum-classical framework that combines adaptive amplitude encoding with a Temporal Graph Network backbone. The proposed mechanism represents node interaction features as quantum states and selectively refreshes amplitude embeddings based on temporal activity, preserving stable node states while emphasizing meaningful structural changes. This design reduces unnecessary quantum re-encoding and improves temporal representation for link prediction. Experiments on five Temporal Graph Benchmark datasets show that A2QTGN achieves strong predictive and ranking performance across diverse dynamic graphs. Ablation studies confirm the importance of both the quantum embedding module and the adaptive update strategy, while hardware-aware inference using a noisy backend and limited real-device execution supports the feasibility of near-term quantum-assisted temporal graph learning.

Complex reinforcement learning environments frequently employ multi-task and mixed-reward formulations. In these settings, heterogeneous reward distributions and correlated reward dimensions often destabilize the construction of scalar advantages. To address these challenges, we propose Reward-Decorrelated Policy Optimization (RDPO), a reward-processing method designed to explicitly target both failure modes. RDPO first utilizes Magnitude-Aware Quantile normalization to stabilize prompt-level advantage allocation across binary, fractional, and continuous rewards. It then applies Mahalanobis whitening within each active reward subspace to mitigate correlation redundancy prior to aggregation. When applied during the post-training of LongCat-Flash, RDPO enhances instruction following, writing quality, and robustness to hard prompts while remaining broadly competitive on reasoning and coding evaluations.

Recent evidence suggests that Adam performs robustly when its momentum parameters are tied, $β_1=β_2$, reducing the optimizer to a single remaining parameter. However, how this parameter should be set remains poorly understood. We argue that, in balanced Adam, $β$ should not be treated as a dimensionless constant: it defines a statistical memory horizon $H_β=(1-β)^{-1}$. In terms of the effective learning horizon $T_{\mathrm{ES}}$, estimated from the validation trajectory, we study the refresh count $R_β=(1-β)T_{\mathrm{ES}}$, which measures how many times Adam renews its internal statistics during the useful phase of training. Across 11 vision and language experiments, we find that choosing $β$ so that $R_β\approx1000$ selects different $β$ values depending on the training scale, yet improves robustness over the best fixed-beta baseline. Compared with the strongest fixed choice $β=0.944$, the refresh rule improves worst-case robustness, reducing the maximum relative gap in validation loss by 33.4%, while bringing all 11 runs within 1% of their validation oracle. These results suggest that the remaining hyperparameter of balanced Adam is more naturally viewed as a memory-scale variable than as a fixed constant. This provides a simple budget-aware perspective on optimizer scaling and opens a path toward treating Adam's momentum as part of the learning dynamics rather than as a static default.

Equilibrium propagation (EP) is a biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation (BP), but its effectiveness can degrade in deeper and more challenging learning settings. In parallel, dendritic neural networks have demonstrated improved performance and generalization when trained with BP, suggesting that structured, biologically inspired architectures may enhance learning. In this work, we investigate the integration of dendritic neural networks with equilibrium propagation using an advanced EP framework. We evaluate the proposed dendritic EP model on MNIST, Kuzushiji-MNIST (KMNIST), and Fashion-MNIST (FMNIST), considering both shallow and deeper architectures. Our results show that dendritic EP achieves performance comparable to standard EP on simple tasks, while providing consistent improvements on more challenging datasets and deeper models. In particular, dendritic EP significantly outperforms standard EP on KMNIST and FMNIST, and approaches the performance of dendritic networks trained with backpropagation through time.To further understand these improvements, we analyze the evolution of hidden states during the free phase. We observe that dendritic EP exhibits higher activation magnitudes and more distributed hidden-state activity compared to standard EP, indicating that dendritic structure alters the internal network dynamics. These findings suggest that incorporating dendritic structure can enhance the effectiveness of biologically plausible learning algorithms, especially in regimes where standard EP struggles. Our work highlights the importance of architectural design for improving biologically inspired training methods.

Adam has been at the core of large-scale training for almost a decade, yet the role of its two momentum parameters remains poorly understood. Recent work shows that tying $β_{1}=β_{2}$ can preserve Adam's strong performance despite collapsing two memory scales into one, raising a basic question: what becomes dynamically special when the memories are tied? We identify a concrete mechanism. In the continuous-time limit, each normalized-update coordinate decomposes into a sign component, an explicit magnitude-lag term proportional to the difference between the two memory times, and additional transition, curvature, and nonlinear ratio terms. This lag channel vanishes exactly when $β_{1}=β_{2}$, making the diagonal the unique regime in which this mismatch-induced response is structurally absent. A full-history discrete decomposition on real training gradients recovers this change in composition: tied updates are sign-dominated, whereas the lag term becomes substantial off the diagonal and leaves a comparatively small residual. Across six vision and language tasks, tied configurations also typically exhibit smoother update-norm trajectories. Overall, our results identify memory-scale mismatch as a concrete source of magnitude sensitivity in Adam and provide a mechanistic account of why tied momentum is dynamically distinctive.

This paper presents a quantitative comparison between centralised and distributed multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) architectures for controlling a soft robotic arm modelled as a Cosserat rod in simulation. Using PyElastica and the OpenAI Gym interface, we train both a global Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO) controller and a Multi-Agent PPO (MAPPO) under identical budgets. Both approaches are based on the arm having $n$ number of controlled sections. The study systematically varies $n$ and evaluates the performance of the arm to reach a fixed target in three scenarios: default baseline condition, recovery from external disturbance, and adaptation to actuator failure. Quantitative metrics used for the evaluation are mean action magnitude, mean final distance, mean episode length, and success rate. The results show that there are no significant benefits of the distributed policy when the number of controlled sections $n\le4$. In very simple systems, when $n\le2$, the centralised policy outperforms the distributed one. When $n$ increases to $4< n\le 12$, the distributed policy shows a high sample efficiency. In these systems, distributed policy promotes a stronger success rate, resilience, and robustness under local observability and yields faster convergence given the same sample size. However, centralised policies achieve much higher time efficiency during training as it takes much less time to train the same size of samples. These findings highlight the trade-offs between centralised and distributed policy in reinforcement learning-based control for soft robotic systems and provide actionable design guidance for future sim-to-real transfer in soft rod-like manipulators.