RL for Flow Matching Models

RL: Reinforcement Learning

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Latest papers

16 papers5 papers in the last four weeks, with none the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Oct 17, 2026

Distribution-Based Regularization for Reward Fine-Tuning Diffusion and Flow Models

Reward fine-tuning is an effective way to adapt pretrained diffusion and flow-matching models to downstream objectives, but aggressive optimization often leads to mode collapse and distributional drift. Existing methods attempt to control this drift with reverse-KL regularization, implemented as an

\ell_2

penalty on the velocity field; however, this functions by indirectly constraining sampling dynamics rather than directly acting on the generated distribution. To address this, we propose DFR (Distributional Functional Rewards), which augments the task reward with a distribution-dependent, per-sample reward that acts explicitly on the generated distribution. Formally, we generalize the KL-regularized objective from expected rewards, which are linear in the model's distribution, to convex functionals of it. The first variation of this objective defines an effective, distribution-dependent reward that directly penalizes deviation from the pretrained distribution. This formulation yields additive per-sample rewards for the Fréchet distance (FD), maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), and DreamSim diversity, recovering several recently proposed rewards as special cases. Across various text-to-image fine-tuning tasks, DFR matches the peak reward of KL-tuned baselines while increasing diversity by up to 29% at equal or lower drift.

Romeo Passaro, Jeongjae Lee, Jong Chul Ye +4

University of Oxford · AITHYRA · KAIST +2

Generative Modeling Diffusion Model Alignment T2I Generation RL for Diffusion Models RL for Flow Matching Models

Oct 6, 2026

QF3: Fast Flow RL with Filtered Q-Gradients

Flow policies have become a standard policy class for learning robot behaviors from demonstrations, but reinforcement learning is still critical for improving pre-trained flow policies or learning them from scratch through interaction. We introduce QF3 (Fast Flow RL with Filtered Q-Gradients), an online off-policy RL algorithm that trains a flow policy with flow matching plus the critic's action gradient, backpropagated through a one-step prediction of the flow's output. To keep updates where the critic and this prediction are reliable, QF3 applies the critic gradient only to action dimensions that stay near the replay action. To our knowledge, QF3 is the first off-policy flow RL method to train humanoid locomotion policies from scratch and transfer them zero-shot to hardware. Paired with a high-throughput off-policy training recipe, it trains humanoid locomotion and motion-tracking policies with a 10x wall-clock speedup over FPO++, a recent on-policy flow RL method. We further apply QF3 to fine-tune pretrained flow-based manipulation policies on both ABC-Sim and Robomimic tasks. These results suggest that QF3 can both learn robot policies from scratch and refine those acquired from demonstrations. Website: https://qf3-rl.github.io/

Chung Min Kim, Brent Yi, David McAllister +7

UC Berkeley · Amazon FAR

Robotic RL RL for Legged Locomotion Off-Policy RL Flow-Based Policy Learning RL for Flow Matching Models

Oct 5, 2026

MEND: RL For Flow Models via Proximal Velocity Matching

Reward post-training of flow models either reweights the model's own samples under a KL penalty or a frozen reference, often for thousands of updates, or backpropagates the reward and moves every sample without checking that the move is worth its size. We introduce MEND, a reinforcement learning method built on proximal velocity matching. MEND caps rewards within each prompt group, so samples that already score well receive no move. Below the cap, it proposes moves along the reward gradient and accepts one only when its capped reward gain exceeds a quadratic displacement price. The model then regresses onto the resulting velocity targets, with no KL term, frozen reference model, or advantage weights. In 100 updates, MEND outperforms Flow-GRPO (about 4k updates) on five of six evaluators at the same distance to base-model images. Under an equal-budget protocol, it surpasses ReFL and DiffusionNFT at every evaluated update across four training rewards, reaching PickScore 24.03 versus 23.92 and 23.43, respectively. A 300-update three-reward run also surpasses the five-reward DiffusionNFT model on all three rewards it trains on. MEND is general and easy to adopt: it applies to any flow backbone with a differentiable reward.

Shreshth Saini, Neil Birkbeck, Yilin Wang +2

The University of Texas at Austin · Google · University of Colorado Boulder

Flow Matching RL for Image Generation Flow-Based Generative Modeling RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models

Sep 28, 2026

QAMM: Adjoint MeanFlow Matching for Few-Step Offline Reinforcement Learning

Flow policies can model rich action distributions, but their iterative sampling limits decision speed. Adjoint matching uses the critic's action gradient to improve a flow policy without backpropagating through its sampling trajectory, yet its supervision is defined for instantaneous velocities. We propose QAMM, a method that turns the critic-derived adjoint signal into supervision for MeanFlow's average velocity. The resulting policy learns finite-interval transport directly and generates actions with few network evaluations. We derive the adjoint MeanFlow target, specify its gradient boundaries, and train it with an offline actor-critic. On ten HumanoidMaze tasks, QAMM produces effective two-call policies and achieves competitive performance against strong flow-policy baselines. These results show that adjoint-based Q optimization can be combined with average-velocity learning to obtain expressive offline policies with few-step action generation.

Yuehu Gong, Shutong Ding, Mokai Pan +4

School of Data Science, Fudan University · ShanghaiTech University · Shanghai Innovation Institute

Flow Matching MeanFlow Offline RL Policy Learning Flow-Based Policy Learning RL for Flow Matching Models

Sep 26, 2026

Timestep Weighting: A Hidden Key to Effective ELBO-Based Flow-Matching RL

ELBO-based reinforcement learning offers a sampler-agnostic approach to fine-tuning flow matching models with reward feedback. Timestep weighting in ELBO-based RL has large impact on performance, and it also provides a unified view (as we show in this work) to understand prediction losses heuristically chosen in prior work, yet it remains under-researched and is often chosen to inherit pretrain configs. We investigate impacts and dynamics of timestep weighting in ELBO-based RL. We show that effective weighting depends on both the reward landscape and stage of learning. (1) Through experiments on controlled CIFAR image generation, complemented by robotics, we investigate how weighting impacts reward-driven updates across noise levels. (2) Through gradient analysis, we reveal distinct patterns of cross-noise coordination across tasks and their evolution during training. These findings motivate the hypothesis that useful weighting depends on the gap between the policy's current behavior and the behavior favored by the reward. (3) Guided by this analysis, we study simple static weighting, budgeted profile selection, and dynamic schedules that improve performance beyond conventional target choices. Our results establish timestep weighting as an important design choice for flow-matching RL and motivate further research into methods that choose and adapt it throughout learning.

Qinwei Ma, Jingzhe Shi, Simin Fan +2

College of AI, Tsinghua University · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University · EPFL +1

RL for Image Generation Adaptive Loss Weighting Flow-Based Generative Modeling RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models

Aug 6, 2026

LC-GRPO: Bridging Train-Inference Gap for Flow-Based GRPO with Langevin Correction

Flow-based generative models are typically sampled by solving a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE), whereas online reinforcement learning requires stochastic rollouts for policy exploration and optimization. Existing GRPO methods for flow models therefore replace the inference-time ODE with a stochastic differential equation (SDE) during training. Although the ODE and SDE share the same marginal distributions in continuous time, their finite-step discretizations can differ substantially. In particular, SDE rollouts often become blurry as the exploration noise increases, creating a mismatch between the samples used for reinforcement learning and those generated by the test-time ODE sampler. We introduce LC-GRPO, a flow-based GRPO framework with Langevin correction. Each rollout transition first takes an inference-aligned ODE Euler step and then applies a stochastic Langevin correction targeting the marginal distribution at the resulting timestep. The required score is recovered directly from the flow velocity, requiring no additional score model, while the resulting transition remains an isotropic Gaussian with a tractable likelihood for policy optimization. We theoretically show that, under suitable conditions, one Langevin correction step reduces the Wasserstein error of an imperfect ODE Euler step. At a matched randomness level, we further show that the proposed transition can be more accurate than the standard Euler--Maruyama discretization of the reverse SDE. Experiments on SD3.5-Medium, FLUX.1-Dev, and HunyuanVideo demonstrate that LC-GRPO consistently improves reward optimization across text-to-image and text-to-video tasks, preserves generation quality, and substantially narrows the gap between stochastic training rollouts and deterministic test-time ODE inference.

Yingqing Guo, Hui Yuan, Zijian He +2

RL for Video Generation RL for Image Generation Policy Gradient Methods Flow-Based Generative Modeling RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models

Jul 11, 2026

VINE: Taming Generative Control Policies for Reinforcement Learning

Flow-matching policies have emerged as an effective policy parameterization for robot learning. They iteratively generate actions from noise, enabling highly expressive modeling of complex and multimodal action distributions. However, prior works observed that scaling these policies with value-gradient reinforcement learning (RL) often leads to training instability. Existing methods attribute this instability to iterative generation and therefore avoid end-to-end value-gradient optimization by sacrificing iterative generation, high expressiveness, or value-gradient optimization. Contrary to prior belief, we show the instability does not stem from iterative generation itself, but from the vanilla sampling strategy originally designed for behavior cloning, which becomes brittle under value-gradient RL. Motivated by this insight, we propose VINE, an RL-oriented sampling method that enables stable end-to-end value-gradient optimization for flow-matching policies. Instead of following a single flow trajectory, VINE reconstructs a new interpolation state at every denoising step, creating a stable differentiable path for value-gradient propagation while remaining compatible with the original flow-matching denoising process. As a result, VINE preserves the expressiveness and iterative generation of flow-matching without sacrificing end-to-end value-gradient optimization. Despite performing end-to-end backpropagation through all ten denoising steps, VINE achieves stable policy improvement and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art RL methods on the OGBench offline RL benchmark and real-world robotic manipulation task. Videos are available on our website: https://agibottech.github.io/vine.

Rushuai Yang, Zhuo Han, Houlin Li +10

1AgiBot · 3Peking University · 2The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

RL for Robotics Offline RL RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models

Jun 19, 2026

ReFPO: Reflow Regularization for Flow Matching Policy Gradients

We present Reflow-regularized Flow Matching Policy Gradients (ReFPO), a simple online RL method that adds explicit Reflow regularization to FPO for efficient flow-based control. We uncover a key structural property: the gradient updates in Flow Matching Policy Gradients (FPO) can be interpreted as an implicit advantage-weighted Reflow process, providing a new geometric perspective on flow-based policy gradients. Building on this insight, ReFPO introduces an explicit geometric regularizer that can be implemented with a single line of code change without incurring additional computational overhead or auxiliary distillation stages. By synergizing advantage-guided updates with path rectification, our method reduces CFM proxy-ratio spikes, stabilizes PPO-style training, and enables high-fidelity one-step inference that often matches or exceeds multi-step performance. We experimentally demonstrate that ReFPO improves average performance and discretization robustness across GridWorld, MuJoCo Playground, and high-dimensional Humanoid Control tasks, providing a scalable and stable approach for generative policies in complex physical simulations.

Ge Wang, Yibo Peng, Fan Feng +10

Ising AI · CUHK-Shenzhen · FNii-Shenzhen

Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models

Jun 16, 2026

Reversal Q-Learning

Iterative generative modeling techniques, such as flow matching, provide powerful tools to model complex behaviors for effective offline reinforcement learning (RL). In this work, we propose a new off-policy RL algorithm that trains a flow policy based on prior data. Our idea starts from the "expanded" Markov decision process (MDP) framework, which treats individual flow refinement steps as separate actions in an MDP. To enable off-policy RL within this framework, we apply two techniques: we generate virtual on-policy trajectories (by "reversing" flows) to make this framework compatible with prior data, and we apply a bias-and-variance reduction technique to mitigate the curse of horizon in off-policy RL. We call the resulting algorithm Reversal Q-learning (RQL). RQL has several advantages over previous flow-based RL methods: it does not suffer from backpropagation through time, makes better use of the learned value function, and directly trains the full, expressive flow policy. Through our experiments on 50 challenging simulated robotic tasks, we show that RQL leads to the best average offline RL performance compared to state-of-the-art flow-based offline RL algorithms.

Aditya Oberai, Seohong Park, Sergey Levine

University of California, Berkeley.

Off-Policy RL Flow-Based Policy Learning Q-Learning Offline RL Flow-Based Generative Modeling Reinforcement Learning+2

Jun 9, 2026

Flow-DPPO: Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization for Flow Matching Models

Recent work has demonstrated that online reinforcement learning (RL) can substantially improve the quality and alignment of flow matching models for image and video generation. Methods such as Flow-GRPO and CPS cast the denoising process as a Markov Decision Process and apply PPO-style ratio clipping to enforce a trust region. However, we argue that ratio clipping is structurally ill-suited for flow models: the probability ratio between new and old policies is a noisy, single-sample estimate of the true policy divergence, leading to over-constraining in some regions of the trajectory and under-constraining in others. We propose Flow-DPPO (Flow Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization), which replaces ratio clipping with a divergence proximal constraint. A key observation is that the per-step policy in flow models is Gaussian, enabling exact and cheap computation of the KL divergence between old and new policies. Flow-DPPO employs an asymmetric divergence mask that blocks gradient updates only when they simultaneously move away from the trusted region and violate the divergence threshold. Experiments show that Flow-DPPO achieves higher rewards with better KL-proximal efficiency, alleviates catastrophic forgetting, promotes balanced multi-objective optimization, and enables stable multi-epoch training where ratio clipping degrades. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/UniRL/tree/main/FlowDPPO.

Bowen Ping, Xiangxin Zhou, Penghui Qi +3

Xi’an Jiaotong University · Tencent Hunyuan · National University of Singapore

RL for Video Generation RL for Image Generation Proximal Policy Optimization Flow-Based Generative Modeling RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models

Jun 7, 2026

Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies with Density Transport

We present an online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for fine-tuning flow-matching policies in continuous-control problems. Our key insight is to view RL-based policy improvement as a transport of action densities towards regions of high reward, which naturally aligns with the transport formulation of flow matching models. Prior methods either approximate the current or optimal policy distribution or resort to distillation, which introduces biased gradients or sacrifices multimodal modeling capacity. In contrast, our approach for RL with Density Transport, which we name RLDT, constructs a transport field from a maximum-entropy RL objective using Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD). Then, it finetunes a pretrained flow matching policy to align with this field. Training with this alignment objective is nontrivial because flow-matching policies generate actions via a multi-step process, making direct gradient-based optimization challenging. To overcome this challenge and stabilize training, we approximate policy actions from intermediate denoising steps via expected-target estimation. This allows the transport-field update to propagate into the network parameters without unstable backpropagation through time. Experimental results demonstrate that RLDT outperforms competitive baselines in reward quality and convergence speed. This performance holds across diverse continuous-control tasks, encompassing both dense and sparse rewards, as well as state- and vision-based long-horizon robot manipulation. The project webpage is https://rpfey.github.io/rldt/.

Boshu Lei, Kostas Daniilidis, Antonio Loquercio

University of Pennsylvania · Philadelphia, PA 19103

Flow Matching Robotic RL RL Fine-Tuning Stein Variational Gradient Descent RL for Flow Matching Models

May 25, 2026

AdvantageFlow: Regularized Advantage-Weighted RL in Flow Models

We present AdvantageFlow, a forward-process reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for rectified flow models. The algorithm minimizes an advantage-weighted prediction loss, which maximizes reward, regularized by the rollout policy, which convexifies the objective and makes its optimization stable. Our objective can be viewed as fitting a local reward-improving target distribution. The rollout regularization arises as a variance reduction step. We evaluate AdvantageFlow empirically on text-to-image generation with Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium and FLUX.1, and compare it to both forward- and reverse-process RL algorithms.

Branislav Kveton, Anup Rao, Subhojyoti Mukherjee +2

Adobe Research

Rectified Flow RL for Image Generation Flow-Based Generative Modeling RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models

May 11, 2026

Reinforce Adjoint Matching: Scaling RL Post-Training of Diffusion and Flow-Matching Models

Diffusion and flow-matching models scale because pretraining is supervised regression: a clean sample is noised analytically, and a model regresses against a closed-form target. RL post-training aligns the model with a reward. In image generation, this makes samples compose objects correctly, render text legibly, and match human preferences. Existing methods rely on costly SDE rollouts, reward gradients, or surrogate losses, sacrificing pretraining's regression structure. We show that the structure extends to RL post-training. Under KL-regularized reward maximization, the optimal generative process tilts the clean-endpoint distribution towards samples with higher reward and leaves the noising law unchanged. Combining this with the adjoint-matching optimality condition and a REINFORCE identity, we derive Reinforce Adjoint Matching (RAM): a consistency loss that corrects the pretraining target with the reward. At each step, we draw a clean endpoint from the current model, evaluate its reward, noise it as in pretraining, and regress. No SDE rollouts, backward adjoint sweeps, or reward gradients are required. Like the pretraining objective, RAM is simple and scales. On Stable Diffusion 3.5M, RAM achieves the highest reward on composability, text rendering, and human preference, reaching Flow-GRPO's peak reward in up to

50\times

fewer training steps.

Andreas Bergmeister, Stefanie Jegelka, Nikolas Nüsken +2

1TU Munich, MCML · 2MIT CSAIL · 3King’s College London +2

Diffusion Model Alignment Flow Matching RL for Diffusion Models RL for Generative Models RL Post-Training RL for Flow Matching Models

Apr 13, 2026

ScoRe-Flow: Complete Distributional Control via Score-Based Reinforcement Learning for Flow Matching

Flow Matching (FM) policies have emerged as an efficient backbone for robotic control, offering fast and expressive action generation that underpins recent large-scale embodied AI systems. However, FM policies trained via imitation learning inherit the limitations of demonstration data; surpassing suboptimal behaviors requires reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning. Recent methods convert deterministic flows into stochastic differential equations (SDEs) with learnable noise injection, enabling exploration and tractable likelihoods, but such noise-only control can compromise training efficiency when demonstrations already provide strong priors. We observe that modulating the drift via the score function, i.e., the gradient of log-density, steers exploration toward high-probability regions, improving stability. The score admits a closed-form expression from the velocity field, requiring no auxiliary networks. Based on this, we propose ScoRe-Flow, a score-based RL fine-tuning method that combines drift modulation with learned variance prediction to achieve decoupled control over the mean and variance of stochastic transitions. Experiments demonstrate that ScoRe-Flow achieves 2.4x faster convergence than flow-based SOTA on D4RL locomotion tasks and up to 5.4% higher success rates on Robomimic and Franka Kitchen manipulation tasks.

Xiaotian Qiu, Lukai Chen, Jinhao Li +3

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China · Shanghai Innovation Institute · Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China +1

RL for Flow Matching Models Flow-Based Policy Learning RL Control Robotic RL Reinforcement Learning RL for Generative Models

Apr 7, 2026

Discrete Flow Matching Policy Optimization

We introduce Discrete flow Matching policy Optimization (DoMinO), a unified framework for Reinforcement Learning (RL) fine-tuning Discrete Flow Matching (DFM) models under a broad class of policy gradient methods. Our key idea is to view the DFM sampling procedure as a multi-step Markov Decision Process. This perspective provides a simple and transparent reformulation of fine-tuning reward maximization as a robust RL objective. Consequently, it not only preserves the original DFM samplers but also avoids biased auxiliary estimators and likelihood surrogates used by many prior RL fine-tuning methods. To prevent policy collapse, we also introduce new total-variation regularizers to keep the fine-tuned distribution close to the pretrained one. Theoretically, we establish an upper bound on the discretization error of DoMinO and tractable upper bounds for the regularizers. Experimentally, we evaluate DoMinO on regulatory DNA sequence design. DoMinO achieves stronger predicted enhancer activity and better sequence naturalness than the previous best reward-driven baselines. The regularization further improves alignment with the natural sequence distribution while preserving strong functional performance. These results establish DoMinO as an useful framework for controllable discrete sequence generation.

Maojiang Su, Po-Chung Hsieh, Weimin Wu +4

Center for Foundation Models and Generative AI, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA · Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan · Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan +1

TV Regularization RL for Flow Matching Models RL Fine-Tuning Discrete Flow Matching

Feb 6, 2026

Alleviating Sparse Rewards by Modeling Step-Wise and Long-Term Sampling Effects in Flow-Based GRPO

Deploying GRPO on Flow Matching models has proven effective for text-to-image generation. However, existing paradigms typically propagate an outcome-based reward to all preceding denoising steps without distinguishing the local effect of each step. Moreover, current group-wise ranking mainly compares trajectories at matched timesteps and ignores within-trajectory dependencies, where certain early denoising actions can affect later states via delayed, implicit interactions. We propose TurningPoint-GRPO (TP-GRPO), a GRPO framework that alleviates step-wise reward sparsity and explicitly models long-term effects within the denoising trajectory. TP-GRPO makes two key innovations: (i) it replaces outcome-based rewards with step-level incremental rewards, providing a dense, step-aware learning signal that better isolates each denoising action's "pure" effect, and (ii) it identifies turning points-steps that flip the local reward trend and make subsequent reward evolution consistent with the overall trajectory trend-and assigns these actions an aggregated long-term reward to capture their delayed impact. Turning points are detected solely via sign changes in incremental rewards, making TP-GRPO efficient and hyperparameter-free. Extensive experiments also demonstrate that TP-GRPO exploits reward signals more effectively and consistently improves generation. Demo code is available at https://github.com/YunzeTong/TurningPoint-GRPO.

Yunze Tong, Mushui Liu, Canyu Zhao +7

1Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China · 2Taobao & Tmall Group of Alibaba, Hangzhou, China · 3Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Flow Matching Temporal Credit Assignment RL for Image Generation Flow-Based Generative Modeling RL for Generative Models RL for Flow Matching Models