Step-Level Credit Assignment in RL

Search agents enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to iteratively retrieve and use information for complex multi-hop questions. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) offers a promising approach for post-training such agents, but its reliance on sparse, outcome-based supervision can make credit assignment difficult and limit learning efficiency. In this paper, we systematically investigate how intermediate supervision can improve reinforcement learning for search agents. We study a range of reward-shaping and credit-assignment strategies that provide learning signals from intermediate retrieval steps. Building on these insights, we develop a training framework that combines intermediate signals with final outcome rewards to improve learning from multi-step search trajectories. Experiments across multiple benchmarks under matched training conditions demonstrate improvements in aggregate search-agent performance and show that both the choice of intermediate signal and where its credit is assigned affect training behaviour. These findings show that reward design and credit assignment are important design dimensions for training effective search agents.

Policy learning drives many of the most consequential and heavily-invested applications of reinforcement learning today. Yet the core optimization problem it rests on (maximizing expected return) is notoriously non-convex, even under a direct policy parameterization, and the field has largely responded by avoiding it: optimizing convex surrogate approximations of the return under trust-region constraints (NPG, TRPO, PPO, AWR). We show that this seemingly unstructured problem is not actually structureless. In log-density-ratio coordinates $y := \log[π/π_n]$, the exact per-iteration objective, computable via per-decision importance sampling (PDIS), is a difference-of-convex-constrained difference-of-convex (DC-constrained DC) program. This structure lets us move beyond surrogate approximations: it recovers CPI, NPG, TRPO, and AWR as special cases along interpretable axes, and it opens a multi-step axis $k$ that couples consecutive decisions. We solve the per-iteration program with sequential convex programming (SCP), the standard solver for difference-of-convex problems, and give convergence guarantees under mild conditions, bridging the difference-of-convex optimization and RL literatures. Empirically, multi-step Convex-Concave RL (CCRL) wins on diagnostic MDPs where credit must propagate across a horizon (its advantage growing with the dependency length), is competitive with a tuned PPO on classic control, and on a realistic, stochastic, mid-horizon healthcare domain converges markedly faster than tuned PPO to the same near-optimal survival, with an 11.3% higher area under the training curve.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) avoids a separate critic by estimating advantages from rollout groups. For multi-turn agents, however, trajectory-level supervision provides coarse, noisy credit: terminal rewards do not locate errors and can penalize useful actions alongside mistakes. Group-in-Group Policy Optimization (GiGPO) and subsequent methods refine supervision through state-conditioned comparisons, but their credit estimates remain sensitive to downstream decisions and outcomes. We introduce RELACE, Retrospective Likelihood-based Action, a critic-free framework that integrates retrospective action assessment with state-conditioned advantage estimation. RELACE evaluates executed actions through teacher-forced likelihood scoring under both their original contexts and outcome-augmented contexts. Comparing these likelihoods yields a trajectory-normalized retrospective factor that captures outcome-dependent changes in action plausibility, rather than hindsight plausibility alone. We use this factor to reweight discounted task returns and construct local advantages by comparing weighted returns among actions from equivalent states within a task. This couples retrospective relevance with observed reward, producing fine-grained credit that complements trajectory-level GRPO supervision. Temporal smoothing and success-protecting masking further stabilize the local signal. RELACE requires neither auxiliary value nor reward models nor additional autoregressive rollouts for credit estimation. Experiments on ALFWorld and WebShop with Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct demonstrate substantial improvements over GRPO, GiGPO, and HCAPO. With the 1.5B model, RELACE achieves $96.35\%$ success on ALFWorld and $79.43\%$ on WebShop, surpassing GiGPO by $5.47$ and $5.60$ percentage points, respectively.

Training long-horizon agents to solve complex tasks requires effective supervision over extended interaction sequences. However, sparse terminal rewards obscure intermediate contributions, while on-policy distillation can lose informative teacher guidance as student-generated histories grow. To address this problem, we introduce SCAD, which organizes interactions into planning and bounded subtask execution, distills execution in local contexts, and refines planning credit through cross-rollout subtask prefix trees, with planning receiving full terminal credit and execution receiving positive terminal credit and teacher guidance. Across all evaluated benchmarks, SCAD improves macro-average accuracy over the strongest training baseline by 4.48 percentage points for text tasks and 4.19 points for multimodal tasks. SCAD effectively combines outcome-based credit assignment with teacher-guided distillation to improve planning and execution in long-horizon agents.

When training large language models with reinforcement learning, terminal rewards provide little guidance about which steps matter. Common methods for assigning step credit overlook that work built on uncorrected mistakes is wasted while independent work remains valid. With only a final success/failure reward, every step in a failed episode has zero total future reward, even when it made progress. We propose Dependency-Aware Reward Shaping (DARS), which represents task progress as predicates linked by prerequisite relations and assigns step-level credit over the dependency graph. An annotator marks which predicates each step verifies, invalidates, or repairs. Verified predicates are discounted according to graph distance from the nearest broken prerequisite, while independent predicates are unaffected. Repairs update these weights based on any errors that remain; invalidated predicates need re-verification to regain credit. A fixed potential converts these annotations into signed per-step rewards. A common reward and annotation interface allows DARS to integrate with a range of reasoning and agentic training methods, such as GiGPO and ARPO/AEPO, without changing their rollout strategies or optimizers. Across five task families and models from 1.5B to 8B, DARS improves success by up to 10 points over GiGPO trained with the same budget and harness (ALFWorld), raises the WebShop task score and Search-R1 QA accuracy, complements AEPO's entropy-based training on AIME24/25 with a Python interpreter, and exceeds OmniOPD in controlled tool-free reasoning comparisons at 1.7B and 4B. Ablations show that step-level credit, dependency attenuation, and graph topology each contribute. On ALFWorld, a distilled 8B annotator matches the API annotator, enabling DARS to run efficiently without a frontier judge. Code is available at https://github.com/JianhuiWei7/DARS.

Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful approach for training large language model agents on multi-step tasks, yet reliance on terminal outcome rewards creates two credit-assignment problems, particularly in long-horizon tasks. First, same-outcome rollout groups provide no learning signal from terminal rewards. Second, terminal rewards provide only trajectory-wide feedback, making it difficult to identify which decisions caused a failure. Recent work supplements terminal rewards with finer-grained information from trajectory analysis, such as natural-language reflections on intermediate decisions and errors. However, natural-language diagnoses are difficult to use directly for credit assignment: their error claims may be unreliable, and they do not quantify how much each error should affect learning. We propose Self-Diagnosis-guided Terminal Credit Redistribution (FAULT), which turns diagnosed errors into explicit step-level credit anchored by terminal outcomes. FAULT checks diagnostic evidence and learns relative error costs from task outcomes. During training, the policy and self-diagnoser co-evolve, while error costs are updated online from recent outcomes. On ALFWorld, FAULT recovers learning signals from same-outcome groups, reaching 95% signal coverage versus 41% for GRPO and 72% for GiGPO, while better localizing credit to specific error steps. Across two model scales, FAULT delivers strong. improvements on the long-horizon ALFWorld and WebShop tasks while remaining competitive on short-horizon Search-based QA.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet their predictions remain sensitive to task-irrelevant prompt features. We investigate this sensitivity through semifactual prompt interventions that preserve the underlying problem and its answer. Our analysis reveals substantial variation in token-level sensitivity and shows that suppressing high-drift token candidates during decoding improves reasoning accuracy without updating model weights. These findings highlight a limitation of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which assigns the same outcome-derived advantage to every response token and may reinforce potential spurious dependence alongside useful reasoning. Motivated by this observation, we introduce Semifactual Credit-Augmented Policy Optimization (SCAPO), a causally inspired variant of GRPO that incorporates semifactual stability into token-level credit assignment. SCAPO measures token probability drift for fixed responses under semifactual interventions and uses normalized stability scores to reduce advantages for relatively unstable tokens during early training, while granting no additional credit for stability alone. On Qwen3-4B-Base and Qwen3-1.7B-Base, SCAPO improves AIME 2024-2026 accuracy over GRPO by 5.63 and 4.17 percentage points, respectively. At both model scales, SCAPO achieves the best results on most evaluated mathematics benchmarks and all evaluated out-of-distribution benchmarks among the compared methods. These results suggest that semifactual stability provides an effective training signal for improving reasoning and generalization through finer-grained credit assignment in RLVR. The code is available at https://github.com/DtYXs/SCAPO.

Reinforcement learning enables large language model (LLM) agents to learn multi-step behaviors through interaction with their environments. However, rewards in many interactive tasks reflect only the final outcome, providing limited guidance on which intermediate decisions advance the task. Successful training trajectories contain intermediate states that can provide supervision for subsequent interactions. We introduce Trajectory-to-Step Policy Optimization (T2SPO), a method that uses past interaction trajectories to provide step-level feedback for policy learning. T2SPO derives remaining-distance targets from successful trajectories and pairs them with representations of the states visited along the way. Conditioned on these examples, a pretrained TabPFN regressor estimates the remaining distance to success at each state of a new rollout. Changes in this distance estimate across consecutive states yield auxiliary credit for agent steps alongside task-level supervision. As training proceeds, newly completed trajectories refresh the estimator's context, incorporating new experience without updating its parameters. Experiments with 1.5B and 7B language models on ALFWorld and WebShop show that T2SPO consistently improves overall task success over GRPO.

Value-model-free RLVR methods such as GRPO assign uniform advantages to all tokens in a rollout, ignoring that tokens contribute unequally. Recent methods use token entropy as an importance proxy but compute it globally across the batch, conflating importance with prompt difficulty and positional trends. We argue that importance should instead be measured relative to the local context of each token. We introduce proximal entropy, a local measure of token importance relative to neighboring tokens, and prove it is invariant to both confounders. Proximal Entropy Policy Optimization (PEPO) uses it to weight per-token advantages and outperforms GRPO and entropy-based baselines on mathematical reasoning across Qwen3-1.7B, Qwen3-4B, and Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct. We also show the formulation generalizes to other algorithms where substituting proximal entropy into existing methods improves, and applying it to single-stream RL succeeds where global entropy fails.

Outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) post-trains vision--language--action policies using terminal success signals, but assigns the same trajectory-level advantage to every action chunk. A failed episode can thus penalize useful early actions as if they caused the failure. Existing approaches seek finer-grained feedback through learned evaluators, adding task-specific supervision or additional model training. We explore, for the first time to our knowledge, whether physical relations across trajectories can provide action-chunk credit in embodied RL from terminal outcomes alone, without an auxiliary evaluator. The key insight is that rollouts reaching corresponding physical situations can serve as references for one another: their terminal outcomes provide evidence for assessing local progress. We introduce Physical Relations for Inferring Credit from Episodes(PRICE), with two components: (i) a physical relational graph that pools current and historical outcomes at corresponding chunk boundaries to estimate success potentials; and (ii) confidence-gated credit assignment that uses changes in these potentials to refine trajectory-level supervision. Our analysis connects oracle potential changes to the terminal-success objective and provides a finite-sample directional bound for outcome-independent evidence pools. Independent continuation tests show that PRICE's retained credits align with local progress, while experiments on LIBERO, RoboTwin 2.0, and real robots demonstrate improved task success over outcome-based baselines and faster learning.

Assigning credit to intermediate steps remains a central challenge in training Large Language Models (LLMs) on multi-step reasoning tasks with sparse terminal rewards, and actor-critic methods such as PPO address this by learning value functions to construct token-level advantages. Their effectiveness, however, hinges on reliable value estimation, a difficult task requiring the critic to both assess progress toward a correct solution and anticipate an evolving policy's future behavior; errors in either can compromise credit assignment and destabilize online training. In this paper, we revisit the standard state-only formulation of value estimation and propose $π$PPO, a self-privileged actor-critic framework. By reusing verified same-prompt rollouts as contrastive evidence, $π$PPO helps the critic assess intermediate reasoning against successful and failed attempts, while preserving standard policy optimization and the deployment interface. Experiments show that $π$PPO consistently improves value-estimation quality by a substantial margin and outperforms representative actor-critic and critic-free RLVR baselines on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks, while remaining effective even when paired with substantially smaller asymmetric critics.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a promising approach for training large language model agents. However, its uniform assignment of trajectory-level advantages to all policy tokens fails to distinguish consequential decisions from less relevant ones, obscuring which intermediate decisions contributed to success. We introduce ProVer, a framework that targets potentially pivotal decisions for fine-grained credit assignment in agentic reinforcement learning. Given a rollout group, an agentic judge contrasts successful and failed trajectories to propose a segment potentially responsible for their divergent outcomes. Rather than directly trusting the judge's assessment, ProVer verifies the proposed segment by estimating its advantage from the difference in terminal success rates between current-policy continuations sampled before and after the segment. Positive estimates are then incorporated into the GRPO advantages of policy tokens within the proposed segment. By using model judgment only to select where to verify, ProVer grounds local credit in observed outcomes without exhaustively evaluating every intermediate state. Across ALFWorld, WebShop, and SearchQA, ProVer achieves the strongest average performance at both model scales, with relative improvements over GRPO of 9.91% and 7.12% for Qwen3.5-2B and Qwen3.5-4B, respectively. Further analyses demonstrate that informed segment selection improves policy training with modest additional generation overhead, even without a frontier-scale judge model, highlighting the effectiveness and efficiency of selectively targeting pivotal decisions for fine-grained credit assignment in agentic reinforcement learning.

Object hallucination remains a major challenge for large vision-language models. While off-policy preference optimization proves to be an effective solution, on-policy reinforcement learning provides a more promising direction as it directly targets a model's current failure modes. However, we find that without fine-grained reward formulation and allocation, on-policy optimization often falls into an easy shortcut: reducing hallucinations merely by saying less---making fewer valid claims. To comprehensively resolve this, we propose a fine-grained alignment framework that couples dense reward signals at the data level with precise credit assignment at the algorithmic level. Specifically, we first construct the Dense Object Presence and Absence (DOPA) dataset to address sparse annotations that prevent valid object claims from being verified and rewarded. DOPA exhaustively annotates the deterministic presence and absence of every concept across an expanded vocabulary, significantly increasing the density of reliable reward signals during on-policy rollouts. Second, we propose Subsentence-level Credit Assignment for on-Policy Optimization (SCAPO) to prevent response-level shared advantages from allowing local hallucinations to compromise all other valid outputs within the same response. By assigning credit to each subsentence independently based on its object claims, SCAPO can precisely reinforce faithful generations and penalize hallucinations. Furthermore, we leverage the resulting faithful image descriptions as auxiliary context to transfer generative gains to discriminative tasks. Experiments demonstrate that our method produces highly informative, faithful descriptions in generative tasks while yielding clear performance gains on discriminative evaluation.

Reinforcement learning (RL) with sparse rewards is challenging because delayed outcomes provide little guidance about which intermediate computations caused success or failure. We argue that reliable credit assignment requires policy dynamics that preserve and expose credit-relevant information over time, a role we formalize as Temporal Credit Carriers (TCCs) and that spiking neural networks (SNNs) naturally fulfill through graded membrane traces and event-driven spikes. Based on this hypothesis, we propose SpikeCredit, an SNN-based framework for RL with sparse rewards that first performs task-adaptive TCC selection and then closes the loop between a fast TCC-reading pathway, where self-motion feedback constraint uses local behavior-grounded cues to constrain transition-level credit recovery, and a slow TCC-writing pathway, where credit-targeted trace alignment feeds recovered credit back into the actor to make future TCC dynamics more credit-readable. Across sparse-reward MuJoCo tasks, SpikeCredit improves Last10 return over sparse SNN baselines by +1169% on Ant, +953% on Hopper, +723% on Swimmer, and +1781% on Walker2d, and exceeds the dense-reward baseline on Swimmer by +113%. Mechanistic analyses further show substantially stronger alignment with dense rewards than the sparse SNN baseline. These results position spiking dynamics as credit-preserving substrates for sparse-reward RL.

Terminal utility evaluates a complete agentic workflow, but learning requires credit for the decisions within it. We introduce Attentive Search over Counterfactual Trees (ASCT), a framework that turns training-time multi-step search into local action credit. At actor-visited states, an auxiliary tree evaluates alternative legal actions from the same recoverable prefix. Its action-value table is centered by the frozen actor's probabilities and supplies credit for PPO on actor-sampled trajectories. This protocol connects counterfactual evaluation to policy learning while deploying the actor alone. Uniform, UCT, and cost-aware AgentUCT instantiate the framework. On HotpotQA agentic retrieval-augmented generation, all three improve mean held-out utility over trajectory-return PPO and workflow-adapted VinePPO. Across three seeds, ASCT-AgentUCT reaches 0.6187 utility versus 0.5939 for VinePPO, with gains in answer F1 and execution cost, and uses 50.3% fewer recorded auxiliary Qwen tokens. Transfer and component-description studies examine the learned policies beyond the training setting.

Group-based reinforcement learning (RL) has advanced large language models (LLMs) and is increasingly extending to agentic tasks, where sparse terminal rewards make step-level credit assignment essential. Existing methods assign credit from what follows an action in sampled rollouts, but do not explicitly capture its retrospective relation to the realized outcome. Hindsight credit assignment (HCA) instead attributes credit through the ratio of hindsight to behavior-policy probabilities, but estimating the hindsight distribution requires an auxiliary model or an extra pass. To address this estimation bottleneck, we propose GraphHCA, a model-free realization of HCA that eliminates explicit hindsight-distribution estimation. For terminal-goal tasks with deterministic transitions, Bayes' rule reduces the hindsight ratio to a ratio of behavior-policy success probabilities at consecutive states. Taking logs yields a state-wise success potential, whose increment across a transition provides step-level credit. GraphHCA estimates this potential from pooled rollouts through a discounted recursion on the induced transition graph, which admits a unique fixed point on any directed graph. The resulting step-level signal is combined with the trajectory-level advantage, requiring neither a learned hindsight model nor an extra forward pass and recovering GRPO when the step-level weight is zero. Among all compared baselines, GraphHCA achieves state-of-the-art results on ALFWorld and WebShop at both LLM scales, and on Sokoban with a vision-language agent. For example, on ALFWorld it improves overall success rate by up to 24.6 points over GRPO and by up to 4.7 points over the strongest step-level baseline.

Group-based reinforcement learning such as GRPO trains LLM agents by comparing rollouts sampled for each task, without a learned critic. In long-horizon settings, these rollouts revisit shared anchor states, offering cross-rollout evidence for step-level credit. Ideally, step-level credit should incorporate evidence beyond the realized suffixes observed at an anchor while aggregating alternative continuations according to their empirical frequencies. Visit-local averaging pools realized suffix returns at shared anchors and respects observed frequencies, but does not recursively propagate evidence across rollouts, whereas shortest-path estimators have global reach but allow a rarely observed route to dominate an anchor's value. We introduce Cross-Rollout Bellman Closure (CRBC), which merges each rollout group into a finite empirical process with absorbing success and failure boundaries and evaluates its behavior-policy Bellman fixed point with one linear solve. This fixed point uses the same empirical action and transition frequencies to propagate evidence through shared anchors and aggregate alternative continuations. Backing up the resulting state values through observed transitions yields action values, whose gain over the corresponding state value provides step-level credit. A corresponding finite-depth family recovers visit-local return averaging at zero depth and converges to the exact closure as depth increases. The normalized closure credit is combined with the trajectory-level group advantage for policy optimization, without additional environment rollouts. Across ALFWorld, WebShop, and Sokoban benchmarks with multiple model scales, CRBC consistently improves final performance and learning efficiency. For example, CRBC outperforms the strongest evaluated baseline by 5.59 percentage points on ALFWorld with Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct.

RLVR provides reliable trajectory-level credit, while OPSD offers dense supervision for token-level credit. This exposes a fundamental coupling when updating step-level credit direction and magnitude with teacher supervision, preventing steps from receiving reliable credit directions and contribution magnitudes, while making both vulnerable to teacher judgment errors and preference variance, as supported by our theoretical analysis. To separate credit direction from its contribution magnitude, we introduce \textit{Decoupled Credit Self-Distillation (DCSD)}, which theoretically decouples credit direction and magnitude into two reliable signals and uses them to calibrate privileged teacher supervision. Specifically, we design belief-margin probing to determine credit direction and marginal information gain to quantify credit magnitude, enabling step-to-token credit assignment for policy optimization. Across 11 benchmarks, DCSD achieves the best overall scores against GRPO, OPSD, RLSD, and RLCSD. Compared with base models, DCSD improves the overall score by 8.45 points on mathematical reasoning and 7.01 points on multimodal reasoning, while correcting the credit direction for 6% of tokens and yielding a 1.5$\times$ reduction in token credit magnitude.

Reinforcement learning has become an effective approach to training language model agents, but sparse and delayed outcome rewards provide limited guidance for credit assignment across long interaction sequences. Recent work on on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) offers complementary supervision by evaluating a policy's sampled responses under privileged training-time context. However, our diagnostics show that positive average agreement between outcome and hindsight feedback coexists with substantial local disagreement, raising the question of how to allocate influence between them at each decision. We introduce UniOPSD (Unified On-Policy Self-Distillation), which unifies these feedback sources through adaptive local credit arbitration. UniOPSD constructs comparable credit estimates from environmental returns and successful-peer hindsight at shared interaction anchors. Historical agreement determines the global mixing level, while current signal availability and relative precision adjust each source's influence at individual decisions. The episode-level outcome contribution is retained, and bounded token modulation refines the fused step credit for policy optimization. With Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, UniOPSD achieves ALFWorld success rates of $82.8\%$ and $83.6\%$, WebShop success rates of $75.0\%$ and $82.0\%$, and Search-QA aggregate accuracies of $45.3\%$ and $49.8\%$, respectively. On 3B WebShop, UniOPSD improves over SDAR by $7.0$ percentage points. Our code is available at https://github.com/Zenghuang-Fu/Uniopsd

Rubric-based tasks are increasingly addressed through reinforcement learning (RL), with rubric scores used as training rewards. However, these rewards typically supervise final answers without distinguishing the contributions of intermediate decisions. Many existing credit assignment methods rely on ground-truth answers to define process rewards, limiting their applicability to open-ended tasks without canonical solutions. To address this limitation, the proposed rubric-grounded credit uses task requirements as a shared reference for final answer evaluation and process supervision. The information returned by tools is assessed for the additional support it provides toward satisfying each rubric relative to that rubric's history of accepted support. By referencing these histories, credit distinguishes new support from evidence already present in the trajectory while recognizing partial support for each rubric. Dr.Credit uses rubric-grounded credit to supervise intermediate tool turns in an RL framework for deep research agents. The resulting process advantages are combined with GRPO outcome advantages to guide research decisions while retaining supervision of final-report quality. Evaluations on four in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks show that Dr.Credit outperforms the evaluated open deep research baselines on every primary metric and submetric. Meanwhile, with an 8B-parameter backbone, the trained agent achieves average performance competitive with the evaluated frontier proprietary models. Further analyses suggest more efficient evidence acquisition and higher-quality reports under limited research-turn budgets, motivating the extension of rubric-grounded process supervision to a broader range of rubric-based tasks.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) enhances reasoning in large language models (LLMs) through outcome-level feedback, yet recent approaches to finer-grained credit assignment often require auxiliary models, additional sampling, or privileged information. Although policy entropy provides a readily available signal, prioritizing uncertain positions under both reinforcement and penalization concentrates penalties where failed responses still retain alternatives for recovery, which can suppress opportunities for exploration. To address this, we introduce Entropic Advantage Policy Optimization (EAPO), an entropy-guided credit assignment method that treats success and failure asymmetrically. Specifically, motivated by the observation that success under uncertainty is less repeatable while confident failures tend to recur, EAPO couples normalized policy entropy with the sign of the response advantage to reinforce surprising success and correct repeated failure. It assigns stronger reinforcement to high-entropy decisions in successful responses and stronger penalties to low-entropy decisions in failed responses, while attenuating penalties at uncertain positions to preserve opportunities for recovery. By redistributing the response advantage across tokens, EAPO derives token-level credit directly from existing rollout signals without additional supervision. We validate EAPO on a range of reasoning tasks across both base and reasoning backbones, demonstrating that it achieves the best overall performance. We further show that EAPO promotes more effective exploration, broadening problem coverage and generating more diverse candidate answers.

Group-based reinforcement learning (RL) methods, such as GRPO and its variants, have become a leading paradigm for training reasoning and agentic large language models (LLMs). While their group-normalized advantage estimation is reliable at the response level, it becomes systematically biased at the step level, since coarse-grained trajectory-level advantages are hard to accurately reflect the contribution of individual steps (i.e, failed trajectories may contain valuable steps). Revisiting the foundational RL definition, we notice that GRPO's success on single-turn tasks stems from its advantage estimation strategy, which adheres to the basic definition: the mean reward of multiple actions sampled from the same state constitutes a credible state-value estimate. Extending the faithful estimation to step-level would in principle demand sampling multiple actions from each intermediate state, which is too costly on a per-state basis. To mitigate this issue, we propose a Graph-based Faithful sTep-level credit-assignment framework (GRAFT) that grafts all rollout trajectories into a trajectory graph, recovering node state-values via Bellman iteration on the graph, and assigning credit to each edge by the node value difference. Theoretically, the estimated step-level advantage faithfully adheres to the basic advantage definition in RL. To further ensure the reliability of step-level advantage estimation, we further propose Graph GAE, which extends GAE to the trajectory graph for reducing the impact of state-value estimation bias. Experiments across a range of multi-turn agentic benchmarks show consistent gains over GRPO and superior performance compared to recent agentic RL algorithms. Code will be available at https://github.com/xcyao00/GRAFT.

Long-horizon agentic tasks require an agent to modify an environment through a sequence of tool calls, with success determined by the final state. The standard recipe assigns a single outcome reward at the end and compares trajectories sampled for the same task. As a result, a group with no successful trajectory yields no training signal, failed attempts cannot be told apart by how close they came to completion, and turns that advance the task receive the same credit as turns that only query the environment. Prior work refines the unit of comparison from the trajectory to the step, or trains a reward model to supply intermediate signal: the former still derives its signal from final success alone, and the latter estimates it with a model. We observe that the acceptance checks that decide success can also be run on intermediate states, so progress is as verifiable as the outcome. We propose ProCredit, which turns this verified progress into credit: it reruns the acceptance checks after each turn, rewards the turn by its change in progress, and uses these rewards to assign credit both across attempts at the same task and across the turns within a trajectory. Starting from Qwen3.5 base models at three scales on AppWorld, ProCredit outperforms outcome-reward baselines and progress-based baselines in task completion rate at every scale on both test sets, exceeding the strongest outcome-reward baseline by 4.1 percentage points at 4B, and results in a second environment show the same direction of improvement. Ablations show that adding the final progress to the trajectory score alone does not improve performance: the gain comes from crediting progress to the turn where it occurs.

Large reasoning models can produce correct yet unnecessarily long reasoning traces. Existing methods improve reasoning efficiency with trajectory-level objectives or local token- and step-level signals, but rarely model inter-step semantic dependencies. This limits their ability to distinguish redundant steps from those that support later deductions, making it harder to shorten reasoning without sacrificing accuracy. We introduce RECAP (REdundancy-aware Credit Assignment via Propagation), which addresses this limitation by assigning credit where it is due based on both a step's downstream role in the reasoning structure and its contribution to solving the problem correctly. We define structural responsibility to capture the step's downstream role by measuring how strongly later reasoning depends on it, using credit propagated backward from the final-answer node through an outcome-independent, LLM-annotated semantic dependency graph. However, a step can have high structural responsibility yet steer the reasoning away from the correct solution. RECAP therefore introduces step efficacy to measure answer-directed progress through changes in gold-answer log-likelihood as each step is added. Together, these signals reshape rollout-level GRPO advantages into step-specific updates. RECAP requires neither a separately trained process reward model nor preconstructed concise trajectories. Across two 7B models and four mathematical reasoning benchmarks, RECAP improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off. On Qwen2.5-Math-7B, it improves pass@1 by 2.0-3.7 percentage points while reducing reasoning tokens by 8%-31% relative to GRPO across all four benchmarks. Analysis suggests these savings reflect fewer reasoning operations and less dead-end reasoning, rather than more compact expression.

Reinforcement learning has become a central component of large language model (LLM) post-training, yet token-level credit lacks a generally accepted mathematical definition, leaving its relationship to commonly used training signals unclear. We formulate three regularity conditions, namely Completeness, Prefix Consistency, and Neutrality, and prove that they uniquely determine token-level credit. This characterization provides a unified basis for explaining phenomena across existing algorithms and guides the development of an improved actor-critic training procedure. Through this lens, an ideal teacher in On-Policy Distillation (OPD) acts as an implicit critic, yielding an expected policy gradient proportional to that induced by token-level credit. Response-level REINFORCE Leave-One-Out (RLOO) signals match the expected policy-gradient contribution of token-level credit despite their coarser granularity. We further establish approximate credit sparsity under bounded outcome rewards and show how intermediate critic errors in Generalized Advantage Estimation (GAE) can become comparable to the underlying credit. These motivate Policy Aligned Critic Training (PACT), which adopts an Actor-then-Critic update order to apply importance sampling correction to critic training and better align the critic with the updated policy. In agentic mathematical reasoning, PACT achieves 72.87% average accuracy across four benchmarks, outperforming GRPO and PPO by 8.80 and 13.16 percentage points, respectively. On SWE-bench Verified, PACT achieves a pass rate of 67.4%, outperforming PPO, GRPO, and SAO by 2.4, 2.0, and 3.8 percentage points, respectively.

Tree-structured rollouts give critic-free reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) step-level credit: fork a chain at an intermediate point, and sibling outcome differences estimate step value. Each fork adds sampling cost, so realistic budgets typically allow only a few forks per chain. A fork placed where the outcome is already largely settled yields siblings that mostly agree and provide almost no credit signal; hence, for a given tree size, where forks are placed largely determines how much step-level RL can gain. Most existing mainstream methods place forks by structure, such as fixed lengths, midpoints, and delimiters, or by next-token entropy. We formalize fork placement as locating the \emph{pivots} of the chain's value curve, where the expected outcome turns. We propose \emph{belief-shift branching}: read the model's answer belief at candidate boundaries and fork just before the step where consecutive beliefs diverge most. Three instantiations, none needing step-level supervision, span access levels: a black-box probe, a logit-lens depth profile, and a learned activation direction, which is fit offline and therefore used only in the validation before RL training. The signal only \emph{places} forks, and the probe costs about $1\%$ of step compute on mathematics and under $5\%$ on code when it runs inside the rollout engine. In that validation, against Monte-Carlo value curves, a belief-shift signal ranks first in each of the eight model$\times$benchmark panels, ahead of entropy, structural, and LLM-judge baselines. In RL across three model families and two domains, belief-shift forking leads every mathematics aggregate, on OLMo-3-7B by $+2.6$ aggregate and $+2.9$ on AIME 2026 over the strongest baseline, and sweeps every OLMo code column, by $+6.5$ on LiveCodeBench-medium.

Long-horizon language-model agents trained with reinforcement learning oftenreceive sparse outcome rewards that do not reveal which decisions along a tra-jectory deserve credit. Episode-level advantages provide coarse trajectory-widecredit, while step-level comparisons offer finer resolution with context-dependentestimation noise. We propose Granularity-Adaptive Credit Assignment (GACA),a critic-free method that adaptively mixes episode- and step-level credit for eachdecision during policy optimization. GACA normalizes the sampled response'smean per-token negative log-likelihood (NLL) within each trajectory and uses theresulting criticality score to determine the step-specific mixture. The computationreuses rollout log-probabilities without additional training rollouts or model eval-uations. Our analysis characterizes optimal score-dependent mixing and derivesconditions linking expected NLL to a lower bound on the preferred step-levelweight. Across ALFWorld and WebShop with 1.5B and 7B backbones, GACAachieves the highest reported mean success rates among the compared methods,while introducing negligible additional computation.

Diffusion-based robot policies have become widely used in robotic manipulation, where they are typically trained with behavior cloning. However, policies trained purely from demonstrations are limited by the quality and coverage of the available data. Reinforcement learning can further improve the performance of these pretrained policies through interaction. A common approach is to use policy-gradient methods that formulate diffusion-policy fine-tuning as an outer environment MDP together with an inner denoising MDP. However, existing methods typically assign the same environment-level credit to all denoising steps used to construct an action chunk, without distinguishing which intermediate decisions contributed most to the final return. We introduce Denoising Intermediate Advantage (DIA), a policy-gradient method that learns a value function over partially denoised actions and uses it to construct a denoising level advantage for each step of the generative process. DIA combines this inner credit signal with the standard environment-level PPO advantage, providing state-dependent credit throughout the denoising chain. Across Robomimic, FurnitureBench, Franka Kitchen, and D3IL, DIA consistently improves final performance over existing diffusion-policy fine-tuning methods. Beyond final reward, DIA reaches successful states more efficiently and can shift farther from the pretrained behavior distribution, enabling it to discover more effective and efficient task-level strategies and subtask sequences that baseline methods fail to reach.

Verifiable rewards improve language models through reliable task-level feedback, but methods based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) apply a sequence-level advantage uniformly across all tokens. This coarse credit assignment reinforces or penalizes entire responses without identifying which local decisions to preserve, reinforce, or revise. Conversely, evidence-conditioned self-distillation provides denser token-level supervision, yet teacher imitation can transfer stylistic artifacts and miscalibrated confidence that destabilize training when misaligned with task success. We introduce VERPO, which converts evidence-conditioned guidance into reward-aligned token-level credit assignment while retaining the outcome objective. VERPO decomposes teacher guidance into an evidence-free reference term and signed, evidence-induced corrections at each token. A stopped controller combines selective acceptance, token-wise localization, and cost-aware scaling by balancing alignment with the local GRPO update direction against Fisher movement cost. Furthermore, we introduce Fisher Evidence Contrast (FEC), which attenuates nuisance shifts along an estimated evidence-presence direction through a regularized projection. Across five scientific reasoning and tool-use tasks, VERPO prevents optimization collapse and consistently achieves the highest multi-task average across model backbones, yielding marked improvements particularly on smaller models over strong baselines. Qualitative diagnostics confirm that token acceptance selectively targets reasoning bottlenecks consistent with local reward alignment and Fisher movement cost.

Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards works well when a task has a programmatic checker, but most long-horizon agent domains have none. We work in the outcome-blind setting, where ground-truth success signals are not available. Multi-criteria rubrics are a popular way to supply such a reward; they are scored once per trajectory, but a single scalar is a poor signal across tens of steps. We propose DRACO: Distributing Rubric-based Advantage for Credit Optimization. It generates rubrics dynamically during training to track the policy's evolving capability, scores those rubrics once per completed trajectory, and redistributes that judgment over the steps responsible for annotated rubrics to produce differentiated per-step advantages in GRPO. The redistribution is closed-form and does not introduce any trained attribution module. On AppWorld, DRACO gains 15.9 points over the base model and 5.3 points over GRPO trained with a sparse ground-truth reward, despite not using any verifiers itself. On out-of-domain Tau-Bench, it gains 5.3 points over the base model even without a frontier judge, beating both ground-truth-reward training and other rubric-based training settings. The code for DRACO is available at https://github.com/IBM/draco.