cs.ROAug 7, 2025

Do Robots Really Need Anthropomorphic Hands? A Comparison of Human and Robotic Hands

Authors: Alexander Fabisch, Wadhah Zai El Amri, Chandandeep Singh, Nicolás Navarro-Guerrero

Abstract

Human manipulation skills represent a pinnacle of voluntary motor functions, requiring the coordination of many degrees of freedom and the processing of high-dimensional sensor input to achieve remarkable dexterity. Thus, this study investigates whether the human hand, with its associated biomechanical properties, sensors, and control mechanisms, is an ideal that should be strived for in robotics. Do robots need anthropomorphic hands? First, characteristics of the human hand in terms of biomechanics and perception are extracted to compare them with currently commercially available robotic hands. From this comparison, research questions are derived that connect manipulation system complexity to skill repertoire size and dexterity. These questions are addressed through a systematic literature review, analyzing the manipulation capabilities demonstrated in 125 papers published between 2019 and 2025. Although complex five-fingered hands are often considered the ultimate goal for robotic manipulators, they are not necessary for all tasks. Findings indicate that in-hand manipulation does not benefit from anthropomorphic hand design, as simpler mechanisms are sufficient; however, mechanism complexity correlates with the breadth of manipulation tasks a hand can perform. Sensor integration and intelligent manipulation strategies remain underexplored, which may be due to a misalignment with hand design: instead of replicating the number of fingers and degrees of freedom, focusing on robustness and softness would allow more intelligent control and learning to exploit environmental contacts and integrate more sensors. Finally, the article argues for standardized evaluation criteria to enable the systematic comparison of hand designs and manipulation systems.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 13, 2026cs.RO

Towards Robotic Dexterous Hand Intelligence: A Survey

Robotic dexterous hands are central to contact-rich manipulation, with rapid progress driven by advances in hardware, sensing, control, simulation, and data generation. However, existing studies are often developed under different assumptions regarding hand embodiments, sensory configurations, task settings, training data, and evaluation protocols, making systematic comparison difficult and obscuring the developmental trajectory of the field. This survey provides a holistic review of dexterous hand research from four complementary aspects. First, we present a hardware-level analysis covering actuation, transmission, perception, and representative hand designs, highlighting the key trade-offs in force capability, compliance, bandwidth, integration, and system complexity. Furthermore, we review control and learning methods for dexterous manipulation from a methodological perspective, grouping representative works by major paradigms and tracing their evolution in chronological order. In addition, we consolidate datasets, modality design, and evaluation practices, which enables methodological progress to be interpreted together with the ways in which it is trained, benchmarked, and assessed. Finally, we discuss the major limitations of current dexterous hand research and summarize the corresponding future directions. By connecting hardware analysis, methodological development, data resources, and evaluation, this survey aims to provide a structured understanding of dexterous hand research and to clarify the most important open challenges for future study.
Weiguang Zhao, Tian Liang, Xihao Guo +3
Robotic HandsEmbodiedSurveyText Modality
AskPDF
Jun 10, 2026cs.RO

Modular Anthropomorphic Hand Design via Multi-Parameter Finger Benchmarking and Selection

Designing anthropomorphic dexterous robotic hands remains challenging as the design space straddles morphology, actuation, and sensing properties, and performance metrics span both task-dependent and task-agnostic. Existing optimization methods are often unstructured or consider only a single performance metric, limiting systematic comparison and targeted refinement. While the design considerations of the entire hand are significant, the individual finger properties play a key role in dexterity. By developing a robotic hand platform where fingers can be modularly integrated into a full teleoperated hand, we propose that optimizing the fingers can significantly improve overall hand performance. This approach enables rapid screening of different finger-level prototypes through a number of quantitative benchmarks before their integration into the hand for task-level validation. Candidate finger designs (incorporating variations in joint, bone, skin, and sensor placement) are assessed using both mechanism-oriented and task-relevant metrics, which establish a quantitative link between component design and full hand embodiment. The framework is validated through the development of an anthropomorphic robotic hand with optimized fingers, demonstrating how these fingers enable performance improvements across tasks, including multi-object grasping and light bulb screwing.
Yu Zhang, Huijiang Wang, Josie Hughes
Robotic HandsHandDexterous Manipulation
AskPDF
Jun 30, 2026cs.RO

Robustness of Robotic Manipulation: Foundations and Frontiers

Humans and animals exhibit remarkable robustness in physical manipulation, yet robots remain far behind. Progress toward human-level manipulation robustness is hindered by the absence of a unified and systematic understanding: different subfields frame robustness in distinct ways, often leaving the concept ambiguous and limiting deeper analysis as well as communication across research areas. This paper presents a systematic study of manipulation robustness. We begin with a formal definition, characterizing robustness as the degree to which a manipulation system can achieve its goal in the presence of uncertainty and variation. Building on this definition, we introduce general formulations of manipulation robustness from probabilistic and control-theoretic perspectives. We then synthesize the guiding principles and concrete mechanisms of manipulation robustness across perception, planning, control, policy learning, and hardware, illustrating each mechanism through representative works, including foundational and recent studies. In addition, we revisit existing metrics and evaluation methods for quantifying manipulation robustness. Finally, we distill broader lessons for designing robust manipulation systems and discuss open problems and future directions toward achieving human-level robustness in robotic manipulation.
Yifei Dong, Zhanyi Sun, Lujie Yang +5
Robotic ManipulationReal-World Mobile Manipulation TasksDexterous ManipulationFrontiers
AskPDF