Closing the Navigation Compliance Gap in End-to-end Autonomous Driving

Autonomous driving planners are typically evaluated using aggregate metrics such as driving score, destination rate, and collision rate, which do not explicitly measure compliance with traffic rules. As a result, planners can achieve high benchmark scores while still exhibiting unsafe or illegal behaviors, limiting their applicability to real-world deployment. To address this gap, we introduce TrafficSignBench, a large-scale, traffic sign-centric benchmark for systematic and interpretable evaluation of traffic-rule compliance in autonomous driving. Our framework combines real-map-based simulation for realistic road layouts with rule-targeted procedural scenario generation for scalable and balanced coverage of underrepresented rules. We implement traffic rules corresponding to 34 traffic signs, each equipped with an automatic rule checker for detecting violations during closed-loop execution. This design yields 29,000 diverse road scenes and 29 distinct testing scenario types, enabling controlled evaluation of rule-specific planner behavior. We construct 5,800 testing scenes and demonstrate that current autonomous driving planners can exhibit poor traffic-rule compliance despite strong performance on standard evaluation metrics. To address this limitation, we transform existing planners into rule-compliant trajectory experts via explicit traffic-sign constraints, enabling scalable generation of high-quality oracle trajectories for fine-tuning.

End-to-end multi-modal planning has been widely adopted to model the uncertainty of driving behavior, typically by scoring candidate trajectories and selecting the optimal one. Existing approaches generally fall into two categories: scoring a large static trajectory vocabulary, or scoring a small set of dynamically generated proposals. While static vocabularies often suffer from coarse discretization of the action space, dynamic proposals provide finer-grained precision and have shown stronger empirical performance on existing benchmarks. However, it remains unclear whether dynamic generation is fundamentally necessary, or whether static vocabularies can already achieve comparable performance when they are sufficiently dense to cover the action space. In this work, we start with a systematic scaling study of Hydra-MDP, a representative scoring-based method, revealing that performance consistently improves as trajectory anchors become denser, without exhibiting saturation before computational constraints are reached. Motivated by this observation, we propose SparseDriveV2 to push the performance boundary of scoring-based planning through two complementary innovations: (1) a scalable vocabulary representation with a factorized structure that decomposes trajectories into geometric paths and velocity profiles, enabling combinatorial coverage of the action space, and (2) a scalable scoring strategy with coarse factorized scoring over paths and velocity profiles followed by fine-grained scoring on a small set of composed trajectories. By combining these two techniques, SparseDriveV2 achieves 92.0 PDMS and 90.1 EPDMS on NAVSIM, with 89.15 Driving Score and 70.00 Success Rate on Bench2Drive with a lightweight ResNet-34 as backbone. Code and model are released at https://github.com/swc-17/SparseDriveV2.

Many current end-to-end driving policies emit a pool of candidate trajectories and select one, which makes selection a separable component: a scorer can be retrained while the planner, its backbone, and its trajectory generator all stay frozen. However, many strong planners concentrate their proposals around safe mode, providing limited supervision near decision boundaries. In this work, we design a training dataset that provides more informative supervision for the scorer. In particular, we construct two generators that perturb the logged human trajectory along the two axes a vehicle can be displaced: laterally toward the drivable boundary and longitudinally toward a leading vehicle. The designed dataset produces more informative positive and negative samples than the base planner's proposal pool. We attach a transformer-based scorer to two frozen generative planners, DiffusionDrive and MeanFuser, and train it on the NAVSIM navtrain dataset. The results of the experiments show that we achieve 90.1 EPDMS on DiffusionDrive and 90.4 EPDMS on MeanFuser when using ResNet-34, with 0.4 and 0.3 EPDMS respectively, from the designed training dataset. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/PurdueDigitalTwin/Versatile-Scoring.