What Breaks Embodied AI Security:LLM Vulnerabilities, CPS Flaws,or Something Else?

Embodied Artificial Intelligence (Embodied AI) integrates perception, cognition, planning, and interaction into agents that operate in open-world, safety-critical environments. As these systems gain autonomy and enter domains such as transportation, healthcare, and industrial or assistive robotics, ensuring their safety becomes both technically challenging and socially indispensable. Unlike digital AI systems, embodied agents must act under uncertain sensing, incomplete knowledge, and dynamic human-robot interactions, where failures can directly lead to physical harm. This survey provides a comprehensive and structured review of safety research in embodied AI, examining attacks and defenses across the full embodied pipeline, from perception and cognition to planning, action and interaction, and agentic system. We introduce a multi-level taxonomy that unifies fragmented lines of work and connects embodied-specific safety findings with broader advances in vision, language, and multimodal foundation models. Our review synthesizes insights from over 500 papers spanning adversarial, backdoor, jailbreak, and hardware-level attacks; attack detection, safe training and robust inference; and risk-aware human-agent interaction. This analysis reveals several overlooked challenges, including the fragility of multimodal perception fusion, the instability of planning under jailbreak attacks, and the trustworthiness of human-agent interaction in open-ended scenarios. By organizing the field into a coherent framework and identifying critical research gaps, this survey provides a roadmap for building embodied agents that are not only capable and autonomous but also safe, robust, and reliable in real-world deployment.

Embodied Large Language Models (LLMs) enable AI agents to interact with the physical world through natural language instructions and actions. However, beyond the language-level risks inherent to LLMs themselves, embodied LLMs with real-world actuation introduce a new vulnerability: instructions that appear semantically benign may still lead to dangerous real-world consequences, revealing a fundamental misalignment between linguistic security and physical outcomes. In this paper, we introduce Blindfold, an automated attack framework that leverages the limited causal reasoning capabilities of embodied LLMs in real-world action contexts. Rather than iterative trial-and-error jailbreaking of black-box embodied LLMs, Blindfold adopts an Adversarial Proxy Planning strategy: it compromises a local surrogate LLM to perform action-level manipulations that appear semantically safe but could result in harmful physical effects when executed. Blindfold further conceals key malicious actions by injecting carefully crafted noise to evade detection by defense mechanisms, and it incorporates a rule-based verifier to improve the attack executability. Evaluations on both embodied AI simulators and a real-world 6DoF robotic arm show that Blindfold achieves up to 53% higher attack success rates than SOTA baselines, highlighting the urgent need to move beyond surface-level language censorship and toward consequence-aware defense mechanisms to secure embodied LLMs.

Embodied AI systems are increasingly deployed in open-world environments, yet ensuring their reliability remains a fundamental challenge. Drawing on discussions from the AAAI'26 Bridge Program on "Making Embodied AI Reliable with Testing and Formal Verification", this article argues that reliability in embodied AI is inherently a lifecycle assurance problem arising from uncertainty, human interaction, and emergent behaviors across tightly coupled system components. We identify three complementary directions toward reliable embodied AI: (1) trustworthy scenario-based testing supported by validated specifications and meaningful coverage metrics, (2) compositional verification enabled by structured symbolic representations of system behavior and environmental context, and (3) runtime assurance mechanisms capable of adapting to uncertainty and distribution shifts during deployment. Rather than treating these approaches independently, we advocate integrated assurance workflows that connect testing, verification, and runtime adaptation through shared neuro-symbolic representations and continuous feedback across the system lifecycle. Such integration provides a foundation for building trustworthy embodied AI systems that can operate safely and reliably in complex real-world environments.