Organizations: Department of Mechanical, Industrial, and Mechatronics Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada · Aerospace Research Center, National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Montreal, QC H3T 2B2, Canada
This paper investigates two distinct approaches to the dynamic modeling of aerial continuum manipulators (ACMs): the decoupled and the coupled formulations. Both open-loop and closed-loop behaviors of a representative ACM are analyzed. The primary objective is to determine the conditions under which the decoupled model attains accuracy comparable to the coupled model while offering reduced computational cost under identical numerical conditions. The system dynamics are first derived using the Euler--Lagrange method under the piecewise constant curvature (PCC) assumption, with explicit treatment of the near-zero curvature singularity. A decoupled model is then obtained by neglecting the coupling terms in the ACM dynamics, enabling systematic evaluation of open-loop responses under diverse actuation profiles and external wrenches. To extend the analysis to closed-loop performance, a novel dynamics-based proportional-derivative sliding mode image-based visual servoing (DPD-SM-IBVS) controller is developed for regulating image feature errors in the presence of a moving target. The controller is implemented with both coupled and decoupled models, allowing a direct comparison of their effectiveness. The open-loop simulations reveal pronounced discrepancies between the two modeling approaches, particularly under varying torque inputs and continuum arm parameters. Conversely, the closed-loop experiments demonstrate that the decoupled model achieves tracking accuracy on par with the coupled model (within subpixel error) while incurring lower computational cost.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : The configuration space variables of the CR under the PCC assumption.
Fig. 2 : The frame attachment of the ACM.
Metric
Test A
Test B
Test C
Test D
NRMSE T [m]
0.0124
0.2378
0.3576
0.2464
NRMSE R [rad]
1.0404
0.2751
0.5369
0.3002
TABLE I : Comparison of coupled and decoupled model responses across open-loop tests.
Fig. 3 : Open-loop responses for various system parameters.
Fig. 4 : The xy-plane tip trace of the ACM for coupled and decoupled under the DPD-SM-IBVS law.
Fig. 5 : The joint-space velocity norm for the letter M .
Fig. 6 : The norm difference of the image feature error for the letter M .
Sep 24, 2026·Alan Royce Gabriel Samuel, Pulkit VermaRobotic Control
Department of Data Sciences and AI, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
Department of Computer Science, The University of Manchaster, U.K. · Department of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands · International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad. +1