Extended Reality (XR): The Next Frontier in Education

Architectural design education relies heavily on visual ideation and representation to support collaborative learning in studio environments. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and extended reality (XR) offer new opportunities for rapid idea exploration and immersive spatial visualization. This exploratory mixed-methods classroom study investigated how GenAI-assisted multi-user XR influenced collaborative architectural conceptual design. We developed GenARch, a pipeline that integrates GenAI-based visual generation with collaborative XR environments, and deployed it in an undergraduate architectural design studio. Twenty-seven students formed seven self-selected design teams; four teams incorporated GenARch into their usual course workflow to support collaborative ideation and visualization, while three teams continued the same course workflow without GenARch. Pre- and post-intervention surveys assessed design self-efficacy, attitudes toward collaborative learning, and teamwork; a seven-member panel evaluated team design presentations; and GenARch teams participated in group interviews. The quantitative results showed larger relative declines in confidence and outcome expectancy for the GenARch condition and a positive difference-in-differences estimate for perceived conflict management, while panel-rated presentation outcomes were not significantly different between conditions. Interviews indicated complementary roles for the technologies: GenAI supported idea externalization and visual reference generation, whereas XR supported spatial, contextual, and scale-based evaluation. Students also reported challenges related to control, dimensional fidelity, shared attention, and motion comfort. These findings highlight both opportunities and limitations when GenAI and XR are incorporated into collaborative design education.

Educational technology (EdTech) platforms collect highly sensitive student data, including behavioral logs, disability records, and academic histories. However, privacy considerations are often postponed rather than treated as a foundational design requirement. We present a mixed-methods study combining 12 semi-structured interviews with EdTech professionals and a privacy policy audit of 48 platforms coded across five dimensions, with strong inter-rater reliability (mean Cohen's Kappa = 0.781). Our interviews reveal a recurring organizational pattern in which privacy is recognized as important but deferred across the product lifecycle as organizations prioritize product functionality, growth, funding, and immediate educational outcomes. Responsibility is often delegated to cloud providers, policy documents, or downstream institutions, while limited privacy-related feedback gives organizations little pressure to change these practices. The policy analysis reflects these patterns: platforms describe what data they collect relatively well but provide substantially less information about how that data is subsequently governed. Thirty-three percent make no meaningful Artificial Intelligence (AI) disclosure despite visible AI features, and 73% provide only generic accountability and breach-response language. K-12 platforms perform better on children's consent where regulation creates explicit requirements, but this advantage does not extend to AI governance or accountability. These findings suggest that meaningful improvement requires enforceable institutional and regulatory mechanisms rather than voluntary privacy commitments alone.

Ensuring that Extended Reality (XR) environments are age-appropriate is an important regulatory and safety challenge. However, current age assurance operates only at registration and cannot verify the age of the active user during a session. Face-based approaches, the dominant solution in social media and adult platforms, are impractical in XR, because they require removing the headset and taking a self-captured image, often on a mobile app. This both breaks immersion and introduces the privacy risk of sharing face pictures with third parties, which leaves XR platforms without a viable path to continuous, in-session and privacy-preserving age assurance. We propose the dorsal part of the hand as an alternative to the face, by exploiting the egocentric cameras that XR headsets inherently and naturally use to capture gesture interactions. To evaluate this, we collect an age- and sex-stratified, ethnodiverse dataset of 436 participants spanning the minor--adult boundary, captured under unconstrained lighting and orientation conditions. To characterise what is achievable with off-the-shelf methods at the minor--adult boundary, we evaluate standard neural network architectures for age assurance at the legally critical 18-year threshold. Analysis confirms performance is robust to skin-tone variation. On this dataset, the challenge-31 operating point achieves zero minor admission, making the system a viable first-stage filter for age assurance. These findings position dorsal hand morphometrics as an effective and more privacy-preserving biometric modality for in-session age assurance in XR.