Organizations: School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Detecting water-surface targets for Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs) is challenging due to wave clutter, specular reflections, and weak appearance cues in long-range observations. Although 4D millimeter-wave radar complements cameras under degraded illumination, maritime radar point clouds are sparse and intermittent, with reflectivity attributes exhibiting heavy-tailed variations under scattering and multipath, making conventional fusion designs struggle to exploit radar cues effectively. We propose PhysFusion, a physics-informed radar-image detection framework for water-surface perception. The framework integrates: (1) a Physics-Informed Radar Encoder (PIR Encoder) with an RCS Mapper and Quality Gate, transforming per-point radar attributes into compact scattering priors and predicting point-wise reliability for robust feature learning under clutter; (2) a Radar-guided Interactive Fusion Module (RIFM) performing query-level radar-image fusion between semantically enriched radar features and multi-scale visual features, with the radar branch modeled by a dual-stream backbone including a point-based local stream and a transformer-based global stream using Scattering-Aware Self-Attention (SASA); and (3) a Temporal Query Aggregation module (TQA) aggregating frame-wise fused queries over a short temporal window for temporally consistent representations. Experiments on WaterScenes and FLOW demonstrate that PhysFusion achieves 59.7% mAP50:95 and 90.3% mAP50 on WaterScenes (T=5 radar history) using 5.6M parameters and 12.5G FLOPs, and reaches 94.8% mAP50 and 46.2% mAP50:95 on FLOW under radar+camera setting. Ablation studies quantify the contributions of PIR Encoder, SASA-based global reasoning, and RIFM.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overview of PhysFusion. The framework consists of three contribution-aligned modules: (i) PIR Encoder, where an RCS Mapper produces a compact scattering prior s and a Quality Gate predicts a point-wise reliability score g to modulate radar features under heavy-tailed reflectivity and intermittent returns; (ii) RIFM, which adopts a dual-stream radar backbone with a point-based local stream and a Transformer-based global stream equipped with SASA (Scattering-Aware Self-Attention), together with cross-stream interaction to exchange local details and global context, and performs query-level radar–image fusion; and (iii) TQA-GRU, which aggregates per-frame fused cross-modal queries over a temporal window using shared weights to obtain temporally consistent query representations. The aggregated queries are finally fed into a detection head to output 2D water-surface object detections.
Fig. 2: Illustration of the PIR Encoder with the RCS Mapper and Quality Gate. Left: raw radar returns on the water-surface plane include target points and clutter/outliers. Middle: each point pi=(xi,yi,zi,vi,RCSi) is mapped to a compact scattering prior si and a point-wise reliability score gi . Right: the scattering prior augments radar features, while the confidence gate down-weights unreliable returns (e.g., heavy-tailed or intermittent scattering), yielding a reliability-aware radar representation for subsequent encoding and fusion.
Fig. 3: Dual-stream radar backbone for radar point encoding. (a) Point-based local stream performs local graph aggregation and injects global context via a pooled summary and a lightweight context MLP, producing locality-preserving features with contextual cues. (b) Global Transformer block for radar modeling, where SASA incorporates a distance-decay prior from point coordinates to suppress spurious long-range interactions and improve global reasoning over sparse returns.
Fig. 4: Temporal Query Aggregation Module (TQA-GRU). (a) Query-level temporal aggregation over a window of radar and image features {Rt−k,It−k} , where the GRU is shared across frames and query tokens to update the hidden state hm,k . (b) Per-query GRU cell detail: ego-motion cues (translation/velocity/rotation) are embedded and linearly projected to modulate the recurrent update (ConvGRU), enabling motion-aware temporal fusion of query representations.
Fig. 5: Per-image object statistics on the training set. For each sampled image, we report the total number of labeled instances and the number of instances that satisfy a small-size criterion under the input resolution used for training.
Fig. 6: Statistics of radar attributes on WaterScenes. Joint distribution of normalized range and normalized RCS, showing non-uniform range coverage and a skewed long-tail tendency in reflectivity-related measurements.
Methods
Sensors
Hist. T a
Model Complexity
OD (2D Detection)
Speed
Params (M) ↓
FLOPs (G) ↓
mAP 50:95 ↑
mAP 50 ↑
FPS edge ↑ b
FPS gpu ↑ c
Camera-only baselines
YOLOv4-Tiny [ 32 ]
C
1
5.89
4.04
13.1
36.3
116.3
342.7
YOLOv7-Tiny [ 33 ]
C
1
6.03
33.3
37.3
65.9
28.9
120.1
YOLOX-Tiny [ 34 ]
C
1
5.04
3.79
39.4
68.0
31.8
103.1
Deformable DETR [ 28 ]
C
1
39.7
171.2
56.5
84.0
10.6
20.3
TABLE I: Main comparison on WaterScenes. “C” denotes camera, “R” denotes radar. R1 and R3 indicate using 1-frame and 3-frame radar history, respectively.
Performance
Sensor
mAP 50
mAP 50:95
Camera-only
YOLOv8-N [ 35 ]
Camera
75.2
29.9
YOLOv8-S [ 35 ]
Camera
79.1
32.9
YOLOv8-M [ 35 ]
Camera
79.5
33.1
YOLOv8-L [ 35 ]
Camera
75.6
34.0
YOLOv8-X [ 35 ]
Camera
79.7
34.3
TABLE II: Performance comparison on the FLOW dataset under different sensor settings.
Fig. 7: Per-image object statistics on the training set. For each sampled image, we report the total number of labeled instances and the number of instances that satisfy a small-size criterion under the input resolution used for training.
Exp.
PIR Encode ( s+g )
RIFM
TQA-GRU
mAP 50 ↑
mAP 50:95 ↑
Params (M) ↓
FLOPs (G) ↓
1
-
-
-
85.1
56.2
5.4
11.7
2
✓
-
-
85.3
57.6
5.5
10.2
3
-
✓
-
85.9
58.2
6.8
12.9
4
-
-
✓
86.5
58.6
6.1
14.3
5
✓
✓
-
87.9
59.1
6.1
14.8
6
✓
-
✓
88.7
58.5
5.8
13.0
TABLE III: Ablation study of PhysFusion components on WaterScenes. “ ✓ ” indicates that the corresponding module is enabled. Here the RCS prior module includes both the scattering prior s and the point-wise quality gate g . The reported values follow the same protocol as Table I .
Fig. 8: Qualitative detection results of the proposed PhysFusion framework on the WaterScenes dataset. The model successfully identifies water-surface objects under diverse conditions, including partial occlusion, background clutter, and varying illumination levels.
ID
Gate g
TQA-GRU
Hist. T
mAP 50:95 ↑
mAP 50 ↑
(1)
1
44.1
89.5
(2)
✓
1
44.2
90.8
(3)
✓
1
44.6
91.3
(4)
✓
3
45.0
92.1
(5)
✓
✓
1
45.7
93.4
(6)
✓
✓
3
46.2
94.8
TABLE IV: Ablation on the Quality Gate g and the Temporal Query Aggregation (TQA-GRU) on FLOW. R1 / R3 indicate using 1/3-frame radar history for temporal aggregation.
Fig. 9: Comparison between vision-only and radar-image fusion detection results under challenging water-surface conditions. Subfigures (a)–(c) show detection results from the vision-only variant PhysFusion-C, while (d)–(f) are results from the full multi-modal PhysFusion. Red ellipses in (a)–(c) indicate failure cases such as missed or false detections.
Fig. 10: Qualitative comparison between multi-modal YOLOv10-L (top row, a–c) and the proposed PhysFusion (bottom row, d–f) under low-light and low-visibility conditions. Subfigures (a)–(c) show detection results from the YOLOX-L-based multi-modal detector, while (d)–(f) present results from the full PhysFusion model. Red ellipses in (a)–(c) indicate missed or false detections.
Millimeter-wave (mmWave) Radar--Camera fusion improves perception under adverse illumination and weather, but its performance is sensitive to Radar--Camera extrinsic calibration: residual misalignment biases Radar-to-image projection and degrades cross-modal aggregation for downstream 2D detection. Existing calibration and auto-calibration methods are mainly developed for road and urban scenes with abundant structures and object constraints, whereas water-surface environments feature large textureless regions, sparse and intermittent targets, and wave-/specular-induced Radar clutter, which weakens explicit object-centric matching. We propose CalibFusion, a calibration-conditioned Radar--Camera fusion detector that learns implicit extrinsic refinement end-to-end with the detection objective. CalibFusion builds a multi-frame persistence-aware Radar density representation with intensity weighting and Doppler-guided suppression of fast-varying clutter. A cross-modal transformer interaction module predicts a confidence-gated refinement of the initial extrinsics, which is integrated through a differentiable projection-and-splatting operator to generate calibration-conditioned image-plane Radar features. Experiments on WaterScenes and FLOW show improved fusion-based 2D detection and robustness under synthetic miscalibration, supported by sensitivity analyses and qualitative Radar-to-image overlays. Results on nuScenes indicate that the refinement mechanism transfers beyond water-surface scenarios.
Accurate material recognition is a fundamental capability for intelligent perception systems to interact safely and effectively with the physical world. For instance, distinguishing visually similar objects like glass and plastic cups is critical for safety but challenging for vision-based methods due to specular reflections, transparency, and visual deception. While millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar offers robust material sensing regardless of lighting, existing camera-radar fusion methods are limited to closed-set categories and lack semantic interpretability. In this paper, we introduce VLMaterial, a training-free framework that fuses vision-language models (VLMs) with domain-specific radar knowledge for physics-grounded material identification. First, we propose a dual-pipeline architecture: an optical pipeline uses the segment anything model and VLM for material candidate proposals, while an electromagnetic characterization pipeline extracts the intrinsic dielectric constant from radar signals via an effective peak reflection cell area (PRCA) method and weighted vector synthesis. Second, we employ a context-augmented generation (CAG) strategy to equip the VLM with radar-specific physical knowledge, enabling it to interpret electromagnetic parameters as stable references. Third, an adaptive fusion mechanism is introduced to intelligently integrate outputs from both sensors by resolving cross-modal conflicts based on uncertainty estimation. We evaluated VLMaterial in over 120 real-world experiments involving 41 diverse everyday objects and 4 typical visually deceptive counterfeits across varying environments. Experimental results demonstrate that VLMaterial achieves a recognition accuracy of 96.08%, delivering performance on par with state-of-the-art closed-set benchmarks while eliminating the need for extensive task-specific data collection and training.
Jiangyou Zhu, He Chen
Department of Inforation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Underwater unimodal object detection faces many challenges in sensor imaging, such as optical images limited by underwater noise and visible distance, and sonar images limited by less object structural information. While, optical images have rich object structural information, and sonar images are less affected by underwater noise and have a longer visible distance. Optical (RGB modality) and sonar (Sonar modality) images have complementary information underwater. In this paper, we create an RGB-Sonar multimodal object detection dataset, RGB-Sonar Fusion (RSFusion) and propose evaluation metrics for the benchmark. And we propose the RGB-Sonar FusionDetector (RSFusionDet) with a new RGB-Sonar multimodal object detection result expression for RGB-Sonar multimodal object detection. We analyze the features of RGB and Sonar modal information, and design a Cross-Attention Fusion (CAFusion) module to fuse RGB-Sonar spatial misalignment features and Object Matching Head (OMHead) with Loss (OMLoss) to match identical objects in RGB-Sonar modalities. Our RSFusionDet achieves 76.4/48.6 AP (RGB/Sonar) for object detection and 83.4 F1-Scorematch for object matching, on RSFusion, which outperforms other object detection models. Compared with the DINO baseline, our method improves by 0.7/1.4 AP (RGB/Sonar) while simultaneously providing reliable cross-modal object matching. The code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/LEFTeyex/RSFusionDet.
Zhuoyan Liu, Yihan Wang, Bo Wang +2
National Key Laboratory of Autonomous Marine Vehicle Technology, Harbin Engineering University · Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University