Material Driven HRI Design: Aesthetics as Explainability

Haptic technologies have advanced rapidly, yet exploration of robotic touch remains dominated by replicating realistic environmental cues or hand gestures, which narrows the design space and risks social resistance. This paper argues for alternatives: grounded in the notion of "otherness" from human-robot interaction (HRI), we propose treating robotic touch's inherent otherness as a design quality. Instead of being a limitation in pursuing realism, otherness can be embraced to elicit ambiguity and provoke alternative interpretations, fostering expressive and evocative robotic touch design. To develop this perspective, we analyze inspirational art and design precedents and four design research cases through a reflective Research through Design (RtD) approach. Through this analysis, we articulate a set of design languages structured around why otherness matters for touch meaning-making, how it can be shaped through design strategies, and where it can be embedded within robotic touch systems. We conclude by reflecting on the tensions and risks involved in designing robotic touch with otherness in mind.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for verbal interaction in social robots, yet prompt design in human-robot interaction (HRI) remains underspecified. As a result, robots may present hallucinated capabilities, unclear behavioural boundaries, and misleading personas. This paper develops a framework for prompt design in LLM-based robots and introduces a structured prompt template comprising eight functional components through which robot behaviour can be specified, bounded, and adapted. The framework is grounded in a review of prior LLM-based HRI work and complemented by survey and discussion data from HRI experts gathered at the Robo-Identity workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2025 (N=27). The qualitative findings highlight limited legibility of robot personality, the need for user adaptation, and strong ethical concerns about safety, deception, and governance. Based on these findings, we present prompting guidelines accompanied by proof-of-concept template as a structured design and reporting aid for HRI research. We argue that prompt design should be treated as a socio-technical problem rather than a minor implementation detail, requiring explicit capability boundaries, transparent behavioural assumptions, and context-sensitive safeguards to support reliable and interpretable HRI.

As robots increasingly enter the workforce, human-robot interaction (HRI) must address how implicit social biases influence user preferences. This paper investigates how users rationalize their selections of robots varying in skin tone and anthropomorphic features across different occupations. By qualitatively analyzing 4,146 open-ended justifications from 1,038 participants, we map the reasoning frameworks driving robot color selection across four professional contexts. We developed and validated a comprehensive, multidimensional coding scheme via human--AI consensus ($κ= 0.73$). Our results demonstrate that while utilitarian Functionalism is the dominant justification strategy (52%), participants systematically adapted these practical rationales that align with existing racial and occupational stereotypes. Furthermore, we reveal that bias frequently operates beneath conscious rationalization: exposure to racial stereotype primes significantly shifted participants' color choices, yet their spoken justifications remained masked by standard affective or task-related reasoning. We also found that demographic backgrounds significantly shape justification strategies, and that robot shape strongly modulates color interpretation. Specifically, as robots become highly anthropomorphic, users increasingly retreat from functional reasoning toward Machine-Centric de-racialization. Through these empirical results, we provide design implications to help reduce the perpetuation of societal biases in future workforce robots.