cs.ROMar 9, 2026

An Open-Source Robotics Research Platform for Autonomous Laparoscopic Surgery

Authors: Ariel Rodriguez, Lorenzo Mazza, Martin Lelis, Rayan Younis, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Martin Wagner, Stefanie Speidel

Organizations: Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, NCT/UCC Dresden, a partnership between DKFZ, MF UKD, TUD, HZDR Dresden, Germany · Cluster of Excellence-CeTI, TUD, Germany · Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD, Germany

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Autonomous robot-assisted surgery demands reliable, high-precision platforms that strictly adhere to the safety and kinematic constraints of minimally invasive procedures. Existing research platforms, primarily based on the da Vinci Research Kit, suffer from cable-driven mechanical limitations that degrade state-space consistency and hinder the downstream training of reliable autonomous policies. We present an open-source, robot-agnostic Remote Center of Motion (RCM) controller based on a closed-form analytical velocity solver that enforces the trocar constraint deterministically without iterative optimization. The controller operates in Cartesian space, enabling any industrial manipulator to function as a surgical robot. We provide implementations for the UR5e and Franka Emika Panda manipulators, and integrate stereoscopic 3D perception. We integrate the robot control into a full-stack ROS-based surgical robotics platform supporting teleoperation, demonstration recording, and deployment of learned policies via a decoupled server-client architecture. We validate the system on a bowel grasping and retraction task across phantom, ex vivo, and in vivo porcine laparoscopic procedures. RCM deviations remain sub-millimeter across all conditions, and trajectory smoothness metrics (SPARC, LDLJ) are comparable to expert demonstrations from the JIGSAWS benchmark recorded on the da Vinci system. These results demonstrate that the platform provides the precision and robustness required for teleoperation, data collection and autonomous policy deployment in realistic surgical scenarios.

Figures & tables

Fig. 2: The platform is built with modularity and scalability at its core, with inter-component communication abstracted through ROS topics to remain hardware-agnostic. This architecture allows input devices and robot actuators to be readily exchanged, and new modalities can be incorporated by simply implementing the corresponding nodes or C++ modules. In teleoperation mode, the operator’s input device supplies target position commands to the robot controller, while stereoscopic 3D visualization is rendered for the operator through the Meta Quest headset. During policy deployment, the control signal is instead generated by the autonomous policy, which interfaces with the ROS ecosystem through a ZMQ-based server–client architecture, keeping model inference decoupled from the broader system. [ 22 , 23 ]
Fig. 4: Immersive stereoscopic visualization through the Meta Quest headset running Endomersion [ 17 ] showing the surgical workspace captured by the endoscope. Only the left eye view is shown; the right eye receives the corresponding stereo pair to enable depth perception.
Fig. 5: Representative frames from datasets collected using the platform: (a) Needle Driving, (b) Pick and Place, (c) Thread in Hole, (d) Endoscope Guidance, and Bowel Grasping and Retraction (BGR) across (e) phantom, (f) ex vivo , and (g) in vivo settings.
Fig. 6: Trajectory smoothness comparison using SPARC (left) and Log Dimensionless Jerk (right) metrics, where values closer to zero indicate smoother motion. Our robot testbed produces progressively less smooth trajectories from phantom to in vivo, consistent with increasing difficulty for the Bowel Grasping and Retraction task. All three conditions yield comparable trajectory smoothness metrics to the JIGSAWS Knot Tying dataset recorded on the da Vinci surgical system. All signals downsampled to 5 Hz for fair comparison.
Fig. 7: Remote Center of Motion (RCM) deviation across experimental conditions. Mean deviation (left) and worst-case maximum deviation (right) remain sub-millimeter across all conditions, with phantom ( x~=0.035\tilde{x}=0.035 mm), ex vivo ( x~=0.052\tilde{x}=0.052 mm), and in vivo ( x~=0.079\tilde{x}=0.079 mm) showing a progressive increase consistent with greater tissue interaction complexity.
More in this topic

Laparoscopic Surgery

See all 21 papers

Explore similar work

CardsList

  1. A Unified Benchmark for RCM-Constrained Visual Servoing: Modeling-Controller Interaction and Robustness Analysis in Laparoscopic Robots

    Jun 22, 2026Jing Zhang, Mengtang LiRobotic ControlRobotics Simulation

    School of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China

  2. SurgLAT: Surgical Latent Attention Tracking for Depth-Aware Robotic Laparoscope Control

    Aug 8, 2026Rulin Zhou, Qiujie Song, Yujie Ma +10Surgical Video UnderstandingVision-Based Robot Control

    Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute, Shen Zhen 518055, China · College of Mechatronics and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China +2

  3. Control Architecture and experimental validation of a Novel Surgical Robotic Instrument

    Apr 7, 2026Doina Pisla, Ionut Zima, Calin Vaida +7Surgical RoboticsRobotic Control

    CESTER · CESTER, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, European University of Technology, EU, Technical Sciences Academy of Romania, Bucharest, Cluj-Napoca, Romania · CESTER, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, European University of Technology, EU, Cluj-Napoca, Romania +2