cs.ROMar 10, 2026
SaveCutting the Cord: System Architecture for Low-Cost, GPU-Accelerated Bimanual Mobile Manipulation
Abstract
We present a bimanual mobile manipulator built on the open-source XLeRobot with integrated onboard compute for less than $1300. Key contributions include: (1) optimized mechanical design maximizing stiffness-to-weight ratio, (2) a Tri-Bus power topology isolating compute from motor-induced voltage transients, and (3) embedded autonomy using NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano for untethered operation. The platform enables teleoperation, autonomous SLAM navigation, and vision-based manipulation without external dependencies, providing a low-cost alternative for research and education in robotics and robot learning.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: The evolved XLeRobot platform a low-cost bimanual platform for education and research assisting an industrial robot by removing screws from an electric vehicle battery.
Fig. 2: Diverse Bimanual Manipulation Tasks. Demonstrations include pencil insertion into an electric pencil sharpener, picking up a YCB drill [ 13 ] , bimanual container opening, toaster use, screw removal from car-battery disassembly, whiteboard wiping, peg-in-hole insertion, coffee filter removal, block organization, and drawer opening.
| Platform | Compute | GPU | Untethered | DoF | Payload | Est. Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AhaRobot [ 14 ] | Mini-ITX (i5) | RTX 4060 | Yes | 16 | 1.5 kg/arm | $2k |
| Cone-E [ 5 , 15 ] | Intel NUC | — | Yes | 16 | 1.5 kg/arm | $12k |
| Mobile ALOHA [ 8 ] | Laptop (onboard) | RTX 3070 Ti | Yes | 16 | 0.75 kg/arm | $32k |
| TB3 Waffle Pi + arms [ 16 , 17 ] | Raspberry Pi 4 | — | Yes | 12 | 0.5 kg/arm | $3k |
| XLeRobot [ 11 ] | External PC | — | No | 15 | 0.8 kg | $700–1k |
| Ours | Jetson Orin | Ampere | Yes | 17 | 1.0 kg/arm | $1.2k |
TABLE I: Comparison of Dual-Arm Mobile Manipulators
| Subsystem | Component | Qty | Cost (USD) |
| Compute | NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super [ 18 ] | 1 | $249.00 |
| Compute | microSD Card | 1 | $11.23 |
| Peripherals | Anker 4-in-1 USB-C Hub | 1 | $14.99 |
| Actuation | Feetech STS-3215 Servos (12V) [ 21 ] | 17 | $271.83 |
| Actuation | Servo Wire: 50’ 3-Color | 1 | $15.97 |
| Actuation | Wonrabai Serial Bus Servo Driver Board | 2 | $21.10 |
TABLE II: System Bill of Materials (BOM)
Fig. 3: Structural composition and kinematics: (left) Robotic arm with 4-wall (black)/2-wall topology (cyan), and (right) cantilever experimental setup.
Fig. 4: Power System Architecture. (a) The logical power schematic illustrates the distribution from the Anker SOLIX C300 to the distinct motor buses and the NVIDIA Jetson controller via high-output USB-C and car outlet interfaces. (b) The hardware integration diagram shows the physical routing of power lines within the mobile manipulator chassis, supporting the Intel RealSense D435 and dual arm configurations.
| Bus Group | Torque | Accel | Load | Limit | PDU |
| ( ) * | ( ) | ( ) | (Fuse) | Constraint | |
| Bus A (Wheels/Neck) | 650 | 20 (Med) | 9.84 A | 10 A | USB-C2 Output |
| Bus B (Arms) | 450 | 40 (Soft) | 4.90 A | 5 A | DC Car Outlet |
| Jetson Orin | N/A | N/A | 2.1 A | 5 A | USB-C3 Output |
TABLE III: Firmware Saturation Settings
Fig. 5: Perception-driven manipulation pipeline. (a) Color-based segmentation and centroid detection in the camera optical frame. (b) 3D mapping and representation of the environment. (c) Final grasp execution of the target object following inverse kinematics planning.
Fig. 6: SLAM Navigation Representation. (a) “Ground truth” top down view of the laboratory (Scaniverse) and (b) corresponding 2D occupancy grid for autonomous navigation.
Fig. 7: Structural Performance Characterization. Comparison of link topologies across rigidity (top) and ultimate load capacity (bottom, ).
Fig. 8: Grasp Performance and Reliability. (a-c) Compliant mechanical adaptation. (d) Experimental results demonstrating a 98.7% success rate.
| Model | (ms) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACT | 100 | 50 | - | 36.0 0.9 | 27.8 |
| Diffusion | 20 | 10 | 10 | 539.6 0.1 | 1.8 |
| SmolVLA | 20 | 10 | 10 | 713.8 9.3 | 1.4 |
TABLE IV: Inference Benchmarks on Jetson Orin Nano (MAXN SUPER Mode)
Fig. 9: VR Teleoperation Setup: (Left) The operator interacting with the system; (Right) a detailed view of the ManipulationNet peg-in-hole board.
| Modality | Intuitiveness | Ergonomics | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| VR Controller * | 2.67 | 2.33 | 48.22 |
| Hand Tracking * | 1.33 | 1.67 | 68.30 |
| Xbox Controller Baseline | 1.50 | 3.67 | 248.73 |
TABLE V: Teleoperation Performance on High-Precision Peg-in-Hole Task ( total trials)
More in this topic
Robotics
Robotics studies the design and control of machines that perceive, move, and act in physical environments.
See all 751 papersTeleoperation of mobile bimanual manipulators requires simultaneous control of high-dimensional systems, often necessitating expensive specialized equipment. We present an open-source teleoperation framework that enables intuitive whole body control using readily available commodity hardware. Our system combines smartphone-based head tracking for camera control, leader arms for bilateral manipulation, and foot pedals for hands-free base navigation. Using a standard smartphone with IMU and display, we eliminate the need for costly VR helmets while maintaining immersive visual feedback. The modular architecture integrates seamlessly with the XLeRobot framework, but can be easily adapted to other types of mobile manipulators. We validate our approach through user studies that demonstrate improved task performance and reduced cognitive load compared to keyboard-based control.
Nori Bot: A Sub-$1,000 Floor-to-Counter Mobile Manipulator
Open-source mobile manipulators have reached 1,000 platform shares three limitations: a fixed-height workspace, reactive-only control, and no protection against the stall-induced burn-out that destroys cheap Feetech servos. We present Nori Bot, a 17-DoF dual-arm mobile manipulator at $947 (~3% the cost of comparable commercial platforms) that addresses all three: (1) a 600mm Z-axis lift on the existing servo bus for floor-to-counter reach; (2) a thin-client Raspberry Pi 4 paired with the OpenClaw proactive agent runtime so cron jobs and hooks trigger physical tasks autonomously; and (3) a software safety stack with sensorless grip-force feedback via motor current on a soft TPU finger. Code, CAD, and the skill manifest will be released.
Bimanual Manipulation Within an 8 GB Budget: Zero-Copy Sensing and Quantized ACT on an Entry-Level Jetson
Bimanual manipulation policies trained with imitation learning are typically evaluated on workstation or datacenter-class GPUs, leaving the cost of deploying them on embedded hardware largely uncharacterized. We present a bimanual SO-101 system running entirely on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super (8 GB), the entry-level tier of NVIDIA's embedded line, using a desktop GPU (RTX 3070) only for offline training, evaluated on pick-and-place of a deformable beanbag. First, we build a GStreamer capture pipeline backed by NVMM buffers that removes redundant host-device copies from three-camera sensing. Contrary to expectation, the conventional path fit the memory budget and dropped no frames; what zero-copy sensing recovers is CPU headroom (peak single-core utilization 98.0% to 77.0%) and worst-case latency (117.31 ms to 101.52 ms). Second, we train ACT and Diffusion Policy on identical demonstrations, each at its own reference budget (100k gradient steps for ACT, 200k for Diffusion Policy). ACT converges to a task-competent policy (19/20 trials) while Diffusion Policy does not converge to a usable one (0/10) even at twice the step count, which we attribute to differing convergence costs rather than an accuracy ceiling. Third, we convert ACT to TensorRT. FP16 reduces mean inference latency from 114.02 ms to 17.93 ms (6.4x) and INT8 to 12.65 ms (9.0x), with task success preserved at all three precisions (19/20, 18/20, 19/20). We report two findings not previously documented for ACT: TensorRT's general-purpose INT8 calibration quantizes the ResNet18 backbone but accepts zero of 145 transformer layers, explaining INT8's negligible size reduction over FP16 (0.9%) despite a further 28% latency gain; and the need for quantization is conditional on ACT's action-chunking configuration, feasible in full precision at n_action_steps = 100 but not at the per-step re-prediction temporal ensembling requires.