LoV3D: Grounding Cognitive Prognosis Reasoning in Longitudinal 3D Brain MRI via Regional Volume Assessments
Organizations: School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK · School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China · Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
Abstract
Longitudinal brain MRI is essential for characterizing the progression of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease assessment. However, current deep-learning tools fragment this process: classifiers reduce a scan to a label, volumetric pipelines produce uninterpreted measurements, and vision-language models (VLMs) may generate fluent but potentially hallucinated conclusions. We present LoV3D, a pipeline for training 3D vision-language models, which reads longitudinal T1-weighted brain MRI, produces a region-level anatomical assessment, conducts longitudinal comparison with the prior scan, and finally outputs a three-class diagnosis (Cognitively Normal, Mild Cognitive Impairment, or Dementia) along with a synthesized diagnostic summary. The stepped pipeline grounds the final diagnosis by enforcing label consistency, longitudinal coherence, and biological plausibility, thereby reducing the risks of hallucinations. The training process introduces a clinically-weighted Verifier that scores candidate outputs automatically against normative references derived from standardized volume metrics, driving Direct Preference Optimization without a single human annotation. On a subject-level held-out ADNI test set (479 scans, 258 subjects), LoV3D achieves 93.7% three-class diagnostic accuracy (+34.8% over the no-grounding baseline), 97.2% on two-class diagnosis accuracy (+4% over the SOTA) and 82.6% region-level anatomical classification accuracy (+33.1% over VLM baselines). Zero-shot transfer yields 95.4% on MIRIAD (100% Dementia recall) and 82.9% three-class accuracy on AIBL, confirming high generalizability across sites, scanners, and populations. Code is available at https://github.com/Anonymous-TEVC/LoV-3D.
Figures & tables
| Method | DX (%) | F 1 | Region (%) | AD/CN (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification baselines | |||||
| Liu et al. [ 17 ] ‡ | — | — | — | — | 91.1 |
| Lian et al. [ 15 ] ‡ | — | — | — | — | 90.3 |
| Zhang et al. [ 28 ] ‡ | — | — | — | — | 93.2 |
| ResNet-50 (ours) ∗ | 58.9 | 58.1 | .461 | — | 87.8 |
| 3D medical VLM baselines | |||||
| Diagnosis | Report Quality | Clinical Safety | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage | Acc | F 1 | Region | BLEU-4 | ROUGE-L | F.Abn | F.Sev | |
| 1a (projector) | 89.1 | 88.0 | .851 | 79.7 | .431 | .635 | 7.2 | 6.3 |
| 1b (+ LoRA) | 93.3 | 92.5 | .905 | 81.6 | .354 | .558 | 7.1 | 4.1 |
| 2 (+ DPO) | 93.7 | 93.3 | .911 | 82.6 | .584 | .763 | 5.0 | 2.2 |
| Dataset | Method | Classes | Subjects | Acc (%) | Bal. Acc (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIRIAD | Yee et al. [ 27 ] | 2 | 69 | — | 95.7 |
| Lu et al. [ 19 ] | 2 | 69 | 93.6 | 94.9 | |
| LoV3D (ours) | 2 | 69 | 95.4 | 93.2 | |
| AIBL | Lteif et al. [ 18 ] | 3 | 661 | 73.4 | — |
| Batool et al. [ 2 ] | 3 | 661 | 76.4 | 61.4 | |
| LoV3D (ours) | 3 | 621 | 82.9 | 74.2 |
Longitudinal Medical Image Analysis
Longitudinal medical image analysis studies how scans change over time to track disease, predict outcomes, and guide clinical decisions.
See all 100 papers