AI-Generated Figures in Academic Publishing: Policies, Tools, and Practical Guidelines

Modern multimodal generators can now produce scientific figures at near-publishable quality, creating a new challenge for visual forensics and research integrity. Unlike conventional AI-generated natural images, scientific figures are structured, text-dense, and tightly aligned with scholarly semantics, making them a distinct and difficult detection target. However, existing AI-generated image detection benchmarks and methods are almost entirely developed for open-domain imagery, leaving this setting largely unexplored. We present the first benchmark for AI-generated scientific figure detection. To construct it, we develop an agent-based data pipeline that retrieves licensed source papers, performs multimodal understanding of paper text and figures, builds structured prompts, synthesizes candidate figures, and filters them through a review-driven refinement loop. The resulting benchmark covers multiple figure categories, multiple generation sources and aligned real--synthetic pairs. We benchmark representative detectors under zero-shot, cross-generator, and degraded-image settings. Results show that current methods fail dramatically in zero-shot transfer, exhibit strong generator-specific overfitting, and remain fragile under common post-processing corruptions. These findings reveal a substantial gap between existing AIGI detection capabilities and the emerging distribution of high-quality scientific figures. We hope this benchmark can serve as a foundation for future research on robust and generalizable scientific-figure forensics. The dataset is available at https://github.com/Joyce-yoyo/SciFigDetect.

Text-to-image and multimodal generative models are increasingly used to produce scientific figures such as mechanism diagrams, experimental-design schematics, conceptual frameworks, and graphical abstracts. Yet existing image-generation benchmarks (e.g., GenEval, T2I-CompBench, DPG-Bench) evaluate natural images and measure compositionality, object counting, or photorealism. None of them measure what makes a generated scientific figure usable: correct and legible text labels, faithful depiction of entities and their relations, coherent diagrammatic structure, and adherence to disciplinary drawing conventions. We introduce SciDraw-Bench, a benchmark of 32 structured scientific-figure generation tasks spanning eight figure types and ten disciplines, where each task pairs a natural-language prompt with a machine-checkable specification of required labels, relations, components, conventions, and negative constraints. We propose a four-dimensional evaluation protocol: Text Fidelity (OCR-based label recall and character error rate), Semantic Correctness (vision-language-model judging against the specification), Structural Quality, and Convention Adherence, together with a meta-evaluation protocol and a preliminary inter-judge reliability analysis (human-rating validation is ongoing). We evaluate a domain-specific system, SciDraw AI, against representative general-purpose text-to-image models, and outline a code-to-figure baseline as a planned extension. In a pilot over all eight figure types, the domain-specific system substantially outperforms the general-purpose baselines on every dimension and figure type, with the largest gaps on semantic correctness and convention adherence; text fidelity remains the hardest dimension for all systems.

High-quality methodology figures are central to scientific communication, yet they remain difficult and time-consuming to create. Such figures must distill a method's components and information flow into a clear, revisable diagram as the paper evolves. Existing methodology diagram automation systems typically face a trade-off between editability and visual quality: TikZ- or SVG-based methods produce editable structured outputs but often lack the richness of human-designed figures, while image-generation models produce polished raster outputs that are difficult to revise. We introduce SciFig, an end-to-end multi-agent framework for generating visually rich and fully editable methodology figures from scientific text. SciFig decomposes figure generation into planning, layout synthesis, component rendering, and iterative refinement, producing XML figures that can be edited in standard diagramming tools and refined through human or VLM feedback. We also introduce SciFig-Bench, a human-verified benchmark of 435 author-drawn methodology figures from 37 arXiv domains and 15 top-tier AI/ML venues, and SciFig-Eval, a four-axis evaluation protocol for measuring figure quality. Across seven single-agent and agentic baselines, SciFig achieves the best performance on all four SciFig-Eval axes and generates editable figures in about 10 minutes on average. Qualitative examples further show that SciFig can generalize beyond methodology figures to teaser diagrams and statistical plots. Dataset and code are available at: https://shramanpramanick.github.io/SciFig/.