Mapping data literacy trajectories in K-12 education

Open datasets play a crucial role in three research domains that intersect data science and education: learning analytics, educational data mining, and artificial intelligence in education. Researchers in these domains apply computational methods to analyze data from educational contexts, aiming to better understand and improve teaching and learning. Providing open datasets alongside research papers supports reproducibility, collaboration, and trust in research findings. It also provides individual benefits for authors, such as greater visibility, credibility, and citation potential. Despite these advantages, the availability of open datasets and the associated practices within the learning analytics research communities, especially at their flagship conference venues, remain unclear. We surveyed available datasets published alongside research papers in learning analytics. We manually examined 1,125 papers from three flagship conferences (LAK, EDM, and AIED) over the past five years. We discovered, categorized, and analyzed 172 datasets used in 204 publications. Our study presents the most comprehensive collection and analysis of open educational datasets to date, along with the most detailed categorization. Of the 172 datasets identified, 143 were not captured in any prior survey of open data in learning analytics. We provide insights into the datasets' context, analytical methods, use, and other properties. Based on this survey, we summarize the current gaps in the field. Furthermore, we list practical recommendations, advice, and 8-item guidelines under the acronym PRACTICE with a checklist to help researchers publish their data. Lastly, we share our original dataset: an annotated inventory detailing the discovered datasets and the corresponding publications. We hope these findings will support further adoption of open data practices in learning analytics communities and beyond.

In this technical report, we present the Educational Data Mining Automated Research System (EDM-ARS), a domain-specific multi-agent pipeline that automates end-to-end educational data mining (EDM) research. We conceptualize EDM-ARS as a general framework for domain-aware automated research pipelines, where educational expertise is embedded into each stage of the research lifecycle. As a first instantiation of this framework, we focus on predictive modeling tasks. Within this scope, EDM-ARS orchestrates five specialized LLM-powered agents (ProblemFormulator, DataEngineer, Analyst, Critic, and Writer) through a state-machine coordinator that supports revision loops, checkpoint-based recovery, and sandboxed code execution. Given a research prompt and a dataset, EDM-ARS produces a complete LaTeX manuscript with real Semantic Scholar citations, validated machine learning analyses, and automated methodological peer review. We also provide a detailed description of the system architecture, the three-tier data registry design that encodes educational domain expertise, the specification of each agent, the inter-agent communication protocol, and mechanisms for error-handling and self-correction. Finally, we discuss current limitations, including single-dataset scope and formulaic paper output, and outline a phased roadmap toward causal inference, transfer learning, psychometric, and multi-dataset generalization. EDM-ARS is released as an open-source project to support the educational research community.

Undergraduate computer science is governed by international curricular guidelines revised about once a decade, yet programs lack a reliable, reproducible way to measure how completely they cover the current guidelines and how that coverage shifts when the guidelines are restructured. We address this with a human-in-the-loop pipeline that measures a program's coverage of an external body of knowledge, applied longitudinally to one accredited BSc in Computer Science against Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013) and 2023 (CS2023). The pipeline represents the program and each guideline as structured corpora, generates candidate course-to-knowledge-unit matches by semantic retrieval, and confirms them through human judgment under an explicit coverage definition. Of seven benchmarked retrievers, a reciprocal-rank-fusion ensemble was strongest, and a reputed long-context model underperformed a small sentence model, so retriever choice must be measured. Both maps were validated by an independent second rater (Cohen's kappa 0.64 for CS2023, 0.69 for CS2013). The program covers 49.7% of CS2023 and 50.9% of CS2013 knowledge units, near-constant across a decade. Extending the same retrieve-then-confirm design to competency articulation and cognitive depth shows that the program articulates the competency for ~88% of covered units under each guideline, yet delivers it at the recommended depth for 76% of present units under CS2023 against 95% under CS2013, a gap reflecting the newer guideline's raised expectations, not the program. The longitudinal comparison separates persistent structural gaps (parallel and distributed computing, foundations of programming languages, systems fundamentals), uncovered against both guidelines and ABET, from differences that reflect the standard's evolution. The instrument is reusable and available from the authors on request.