cs.CLMar 30, 2026

EarlySciRev: A Dataset of Early-Stage Scientific Revisions Extracted from LaTeX Writing Traces

Authors: Léane Jourdan, Julien Aubert-Béduchaud, Yannis Chupin, Marah Baccari, Florian Boudin

Organizations: Nantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, F-44000 Nantes, France · Inria, LS2N, Nantes Université, France

Abstract

Scientific writing is an iterative process that generates rich revision traces, yet publicly available resources typically expose only final or near-final versions of papers. This limits empirical study of revision behaviour and evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for scientific writing. We introduce EarlySciRev, a dataset of early-stage scientific text revisions automatically extracted from arXiv LaTeX source files. Our key observation is that commented-out text in LaTeX often preserves discarded or alternative formulations written by the authors themselves. By aligning commented segments with nearby final text, we extract paragraph-level candidate revision pairs and apply LLM-based filtering to retain genuine revisions. Starting from 1.28M candidate pairs, our pipeline yields 578k validated revision pairs, grounded in authentic early drafting traces. We additionally provide a human-annotated benchmark for revision detection. EarlySciRev complements existing resources focused on late-stage revisions or synthetic rewrites and supports research on scientific writing dynamics, revision modelling, and LLM-assisted editing.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. AppliedScientist: Automated Scientific Revision Through Iterative AI Reviewing

    Sep 13, 2026Vidushee Vats, Karun Sharma, Shengzhi Li +1AI-Assisted Scientific ResearchAutomated Peer Review

  2. AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification

    Jul 30, 2026Haobo Li, Eunseo Jung, Wenxiao Zhao +8LLM EvaluationScholarly Peer Review