VitaTouch: Property-Aware Vision-Tactile-Language Model for Robotic Quality Inspection in Manufacturing
Authors: Junyi Zong, Qingxuan Jia, Meixian Shi, Tong Li, Jiayuan Li, Zihang Lv, Gang Chen, Fang Deng
Organizations: School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China. · Zhongguancun Academy, Beijing 100094, China. · School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China. · School of AI, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China · Beijing Key Laboratory of Lightweight Intelligent System, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Quality inspection in smart manufacturing requires identifying intrinsic material and surface properties beyond visible geometry, yet vision-only methods remain vulnerable to occlusion and reflection. We propose VitaTouch, a property-aware vision-tactile-language model for material-property inference and natural-language attribute description. VitaTouch uses modality-specific encoders and a dual Q-Former to extract language-relevant visual and tactile features, which are compressed into prefix tokens for a large language model. We align each modality with text and explicitly couple vision and touch through contrastive learning. We also construct VitaSet, a multimodal dataset with 186 objects, 52k images, and 5.1k human-verified instruction-answer pairs. VitaTouch achieves the best performance on HCT and the overall TVL benchmark, while remaining competitive on SSVTP. On VitaSet, it reaches 88.89% hardness accuracy, 75.13% roughness accuracy, and 54.81% descriptor recall; the material-description task further achieves a peak semantic similarity of 0.9009. With LoRA-based fine-tuning, VitaTouch attains 100.0%, 96.0%, and 92.0% accuracy for 2-, 3-, and 5-category defect recognition, respectively, and delivers 94.0% closed-loop recognition accuracy and 94.0% end-to-end sorting success in 100 laboratory robotic trials. More details are available at the project page: https://vitatouch.github.io/
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overview of VitaTouch. Left: three-stage training pipeline. Stage 1 performs cross-modal alignment via dual Q-Formers with InfoNCE and PTM losses. Stage 2 builds a property-reasoning multimodal model with fused V–T tokens in frozen Vicuna-7B. LoRA-based defect adaptation is then conducted over progressively finer-grained defect label spaces using few-shot labeled samples per category. Right: tactile sensing complements vision for property reasoning and defect recognition under visually ambiguous conditions.
Fig. 2: VitaSet overview (Ours + AnyTouch GelSight-only). Aligned RGB observations and paired GelSight tactile readings across objects, with controlled-vocabulary annotations and dataset statistics under a unified schema.
Fig. 3: VitaTouch model architecture. VitaTouch employs a dual-branch vision-tactile design with modality-specific encoders and Q-Formers. The Q-Formers distill learnable queries into vision-tactile prefix tokens , which are prepended to text embeddings and fed into a frozen Vicuna-7B decoder. Training proceeds in three stages: Stage 1 aligns cross-modal embeddings via frozen encoders; Stage 2 establishes the perception-to-language pathway for property reasoning; Stage 3 adapts the model for few-shot defect recognition using LoRA while freezing the backbone.
Model
Modalities
Score
Vision
Tactile
Language
SSVTP
HCT
TVL
LLaVA-1.5 7B
✓
-
✓
3.64
3.55
3.56
LLaVA-1.5 13B
✓
-
✓
3.55
3.63
3.62
ViP-LLaVA 7B
✓
-
✓
2.72
3.44
3.36
ViP-LLaVA 13B
✓
-
✓
4.10
3.76
3.80
LLaMA-Adapter
✓
-
✓
2.56
3.08
3.02
TABLE I: Comparison on the TVL benchmark. VitaTouch achieves the best performance on HCT and TVL, and remains competitive on SSVTP.
Fig. 4: VitaSet validation performance of VitaTouch across training epochs. (a) Multi-task validation trends for hardness accuracy, roughness accuracy, descriptor recall, and mean task score. (b) Comparison of strict exact-match descriptor recall and semantic similarity for the material-property descriptor task. Stars ( ⋆ ) mark the best epoch for each metric.
Method
Hardness Acc.
Roughness Acc.
Descriptor Recall
Mean Task Score
Vision only (Qwen-2.5-VL)
73.81%
61.11%
32.28%
55.73%
Tactile only (Octopi)
68.25%
58.20%
8.40%
44.95%
VitaTouch (Without Stage 1)
84.80%
72.50%
17.46%
58.25%
VitaTouch (Ours)
88.89%
75.13%
54.81%
72.95%
TABLE II: Comparison of the full VitaTouch model, a no-Stage-1 variant, and unimodal settings on VitaSet across tasks.
Fig. 5: Ablation results on the VitaSet dataset across tasks. Each variant removes one key stage from the full model, demonstrating the necessity of explicit alignment and multimodal fusion for robust multi-task property learning.
Defect Categories
Train Samples per Category
Vision-only (Qwen-2.5-VL)
Tactile-only (Octopi)
VitaTouch (V+T)
2
5
70.0%
60.0%
90.0%
2
15
76.7%
66.7%
96.7%
2
50
82.0%
77.0%
100.0%
3
5
66.7%
66.7%
85.0%
3
15
75.6%
73.3%
88.9%
3
50
86.7%
81.3%
96.0%
TABLE III: LoRA-based defect adaptation results under different numbers of defect categories and labeled training samples per category. The vision-only and tactile-only baselines are built on Qwen-2.5-VL and Octopi, respectively.
Metric
Result
Number of closed-loop trials
100
Closed-loop recognition accuracy
94.0%
End-to-end sorting success rate
94.0%
Single-GPU inference latency (p50)
278 ms/sample
Single-GPU inference latency (mean)
633 ms/sample
TABLE IV: Quantitative results of the real-robot closed-loop sorting validation.
Fig. 6: Closed-loop robotic inspection and sorting demonstration. A Franka manipulator grasps the object, acquires observations from an external RGB camera and the GelSight Mini tactile sensor during interaction, performs defect-status inference using VitaTouch, and places the object into the corresponding defect or normal container.
Junyi Zong received the B.Eng. degree in Energy and Power Engineering from Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, in 2023. He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in Control Science and Engineering at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China. His research interests include multimodal large models, embodied intelligence, and robotic dexterous manipulation.
Table 11
Qingxuan Jia received the B.S. degree in mechanical design and manufacturing from Shandong University of Technology, China, in 1986, the M.S. degree in mechanics in 1991, and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical design and theory in 2005 from Beihang University, China. He is currently a Professor with the School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China. His research interests include intelligent robotic technology, robotic manipulation, and system integration.
Table 12
Meixian Shi received the B.Eng. degree in Internet of Things Engineering from Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China, in 2025. She is currently pursuing the M.S. degree at the School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China. Her research interests include vision-language-action models, embodied control, and robotic manipulation.
Table 13
Tong Li received the B.S. degree in engineering mechanics from Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, China, in 2010, and the Ph.D. degree in mechatronic engineering from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT), Beijing, China, in 2016. He then worked as a Research Associate with the Aerospace Information Research Institute (AIR), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, until 2020. He is currently an Associate Professor with the School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, BUPT. His research interests include tactile sensors, intelligent robotic technology, and multi-sensor information fusion.
Table 14
Jiayuan Li received the B.S. degree in control science and engineering from Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2021, and the M.Eng. degree in computer control and automation from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, in 2024. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering at Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. His research interests include large language models, planning, combinatorial optimization, and continual learning.
Table 15
Zihang Lv received the B.Eng. degree in Automation from the School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China, in 2024. He is currently pursuing the M.S. degree in Control Science and Engineering at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China. His research interest is robotic manipulation.
Table 16
Gang Chen received the B.S. degree in mechanical design, manufacture and automation from Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology (BIPT), Beijing, China, in 2004 and the Ph.D. degree in mechatronic engineering from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT), Beijing, China, in 2011. He is currently a Professor with the School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, BUPT. His research interests include space robotics, motion planning, and control methods.
Table 17
Fang Deng (Fellow, IEEE) received the B.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in control science and engineering from Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2004 and 2009, respectively. He is currently a Professor with the School of AI, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, and also with Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai, China. He serves as the Executive Vice President of both the Graduate School and the School of AI of Beijing Institute of Technology, and as the Director of the Beijing Key Laboratory of Lightweight Intelligent System. His research interests include swarm intelligence, autonomous sensor networks, and smart wearable devices.
Robots need touch to manipulate objects safely and reliably, as many properties, such as softness, texture, and contact stability, are hard to infer from vision alone. However, vision-based tactile sensors yield different observations of the same material due to variations in optics, elastomer properties, and illumination, leading to poor generalization when trained on a single or multiple sensors. We propose a language-guided distillation framework for learning sensor-robust tactile representations. Language encodes high-level semantic properties of touch (e.g., rough, soft, slippery) that remain invariant across sensing hardware, providing a natural sensor-agnostic supervisory signal. We construct a 39K-sample touch-language dataset with human-annotated material labels and train a tactile encoder to align sensor-specific tactile images with language embeddings in a shared semantic space. We evaluate our approach for few-shot learning and cross-sensor transfer and benchmark it on six existing tactile datasets. Our method achieves 95% accuracy in the 100-shot setting, improves cross-sensor transfer by an average of 13.3% accuracy, and yields up to 19% accuracy gains across six existing tactile datasets. These results demonstrate that language-guided distillation enables scalable and hardware-agnostic tactile representation learning. Code and dataset are available at https://mashood3624.github.io/Language_Tactile/
Mashood M. Mohsan, Muhayy Ud Din, Binzhao Xu +2
Khalifa University Center for Autonomous Robotic Systems (KUCARS), Khalifa University, UAE
Accurate perception of object hardness is essential for safe and dexterous contact-rich robotic manipulation. Here, we present TactEx, an explainable multimodal robotic interaction framework that unifies vision, touch, and language for human-like hardness estimation and interactive guidance. We evaluate TactEx on fruit-ripeness assessment, a representative task that requires both tactile sensing and contextual understanding. The system fuses GelSight-Mini tactile streams with RGB observations and language prompts. A ResNet50+LSTM model estimates hardness from sequential tactile data, while a cross-modal alignment module combines visual cues with guidance from a large language model (LLM). This explainable multimodal interface allows users to distinguish ripeness levels with statistically significant class separation (p < 0.01 for all fruit pairs). For touch placement, we compare YOLO with Grounded-SAM (GSAM) and find GSAM to be more robust for fine-grained segmentation and contact-site selection. A lightweight LLM parses user instructions and produces grounded natural-language explanations linked to the tactile outputs. In end-to-end evaluations, TactEx attains 90% task success on simple user queries and generalises to novel tasks without large-scale tuning. These results highlight the promise of combining pretrained visual and tactile models with language grounding to advance explainable, human-like touch perception and decision-making in robotics.
Felix Verstraete, Lan Wei, Wen Fan +1
Department of Bioengineering, Imperial-X Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
For robots manipulating open-world objects, tactile representations must generalize to unseen materials. We introduce RCT (Robotic Contact Tactile), a robot-collected touch-vision-language dataset with 29,279 tactile frames from full robot presses on 122 industrial reference materials in 7 categories, recorded with three DIGIT sensors at multiple contact positions. RCT preserves each press as a contact sequence, enabling held-out evaluation across materials, categories, sensors, contact positions, and contact sequences. Frames from one press are strongly correlated: frame-random splits can place near-duplicate observations of the same physical interaction in both training and test. With the encoder held fixed, removing contact-sequence overlap reduces tactile-to-text Recall@1 by 17.7 percentage points. When materials are additionally held out at training time, performance drops sharply, leaving held-out-material Recall@1 at 25.1 +/- 6.1% averaged over three held-out draws. The public TVL/HCT split shows the same structure: every test contact sequence appears in training, and raw-pixel nearest neighbors recover the correct sequence in 98.3% of cases. Uniformly sampling a press improves contrastive training, and RCT-trained embeddings improve category probes on unseen materials. RCT makes contact-sequence-aware, held-out-material evaluation reproducible and exposes novel-material generalization as a central challenge for robotic tactile perception. The RCT dataset is open-sourced at https://faerber-lab.github.io/RCT/