Uncertainty as a Planning Signal: Multi-Turn Decision Making for Goal-Oriented Conversation
Authors: Xinyi Ling, Ye Liu, Reza Averly, Xia Ning
Organizations: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University · Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University · Translational Data Analytics Institute, The Ohio State University
Goal-oriented conversational systems require making sequential decisions under uncertainty about the user's intent, where the algorithm must balance information acquisition and target commitment over multiple turns. Existing approaches address this challenge from different perspectives: structured methods enable multi-step planning but rely on predefined schemas, while LLM-based approaches support flexible interactions but lack long-horizon decision making, resulting in poor coordination between information acquisition and target commitment. To address this limitation, we formulate goal-oriented conversation as an uncertainty-aware sequential decision problem, where uncertainty serves as a guiding signal for multi-turn decision making. We propose a Conversation Uncertainty-aware Planning framework (CUP) that integrates language models with structured planning: a language model proposes feasible actions, and a planner evaluates their long-term impact on uncertainty reduction. Experiments on multiple conversational benchmarks show that CUP consistently improves success rates while requiring fewer interaction turns. Further analysis demonstrates that uncertainty-aware planning contributes to more efficient information acquisition and earlier confident commitment.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Problem Formulation
Figure 2: The overview of CUP framework.
Dataset
#Conv.
#Attr.
Avg. Words per Conv.
Candidate Pool Size
Beauty
772
8
481.2
3,392
Fashion
826
8
403.1
4,034
Home
372
9
199.3
1,180
Inspired
98
6
279.3
17,731
Table 1: Dataset statistics. #Conv. is the number of conversations. #Attr. is the number of attributes associated with candidates.
Model
Method
Beauty
Fashion
Home
Inspired
SR(%)
avgT
SR(%)
avgT
SR(%)
avgT
SR(%)
avgT
SBERT
11.14
4.82
15.86
4.79
18.82
4.73
11.22
4.85
Qwen3-4B
Direct Prompting
37.05
4.18
37.65
4.13
41.92
4.05
32.65
4.22
CoT
38.47
4.11
39.23
4.05
48.39
3.88
45.92
4.01
LLM-planning
44.30
4.72
41.53
4.70
51.34
4.65
48.98
4.73
UoT
51.68
4.67
49.52
4.80
59.68
4.69
59.18
4.70
Table 2: Overall Performance
Figure 3: Ablation results on four datasets.
Variant
Beauty
Fashion
Home
Inspired
CUP -Random
53.4
50.6
57.3
52.0
CUP -1Step
65.2
65.6
70.4
76.5
CUP -NoEIG
72.7
74.5
75.0
81.6
CUP
82.1
83.4
84.1
89.8
Table 3: Multi-step search vs. uncertainty signal.
Figure 4: Dominance ratio of the target candidate.
Figure 5: Uncertainty Decrease Ratio.
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 6: Case study of CUP framework.
Method
Beauty
Fashion
Home
Inspired
Prompt-MCTS ( Yu et al., 2023 )
49.5
48.2
58.6
55.1
INTENT-SIM ( Zhang and Choi, 2025 )
47.5
48.6
50.8
48.0
CUP (ours)
82.1
83.4
84.1
89.8
Appendix
Table 4: Head-to-head comparison against two additional training-free baselines on Qwen3-4B ( T=5 ). Success rate (%).
Initialization of b0
Beauty
Fashion
Home
Inspired
Cosine similarity (default, Eq. 1 )
82.1
83.4
84.1
89.8
Uniform
79.3
80.1
79.2
89.8
Appendix
Table 5: Belief-initialization ablation on Qwen3-4B. Success rate (%).