DENALI: A Dataset Enabling Non-Line-of-Sight Spatial Reasoning with Low-Cost LiDARs

LiDARs are being increasingly deployed for consumer imaging in handheld, wearable, and robotic applications. These sensors can capture the time-of-flight of light at picosecond resolution, which in principle, enables them to capture information about objects hidden from their field of view. While such non-line-of-sight (NLOS) imaging capabilities have been shown on research-grade LiDARs, they are challenging to achieve on consumer devices due to poor signal quality resulting from low laser power, low spatial resolution, and object and camera motion. Inspired by burst photography and synthetic aperture radar, we propose a multi-frame fusion strategy to overcome these challenges and demonstrate NLOS imaging on consumer LiDAR. We first introduce the motion-induced aperture sampling model to unify the effects of object shape, object motion, and camera motion under a single measurement model. Using this model, we demonstrate several NLOS capabilities on a smartphone-grade LiDAR: (1) 3D reconstruction, (2) single and multi-object tracking, and (3) camera localization using hidden objects. Previously, NLOS imaging capabilities were largely restricted to bulky and expensive research-grade hardware that requires extensive setup and calibration. Our results represent a shift towards plug-and-play NLOS imaging, where anyone can image hidden objects with off-the-shelf hardware ($<100) and no additional setup. We believe that democratization of such capabilities will advance consumer applications of NLOS imaging.

Imaging objects hidden outside the direct line of sight expands the effective field of view and is critical for applications such as autonomous driving and robotic perception. Despite impressive progress in time-of-flight (ToF)-based non-line-of-sight (NLOS) imaging, real-world deployment remains challenging because practical measurements are often collected over spatially limited, arbitrarily shaped relay regions-conditions that violate the planar-wall and dense-sampling assumptions made by most existing methods. To address these limitations, we propose a LOS-guided NLOS imaging pipeline that imposes no geometric assumptions on the relay surface and naturally supports both confocal and non-confocal configurations. Our method represents the hidden scene using 3D Gaussian primitives and couples them with an efficient, differentiable transient rendering model, enabling end-to-end optimization directly from measured transients. We validate our approach on real-world measurements from both a public dataset and a custom-built capture system. Across settings, our method achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction fidelity under spatially limited, sparsely sampled conditions, and significantly outperforms existing methods on complex, arbitrary relay surface geometries.

Consumer depth sensors such as the LiDAR scanner on recent iPhones provide metric range, but their useful range is short and their returns are sparse. We present DH-Active, a lightweight, training-free geometry back-end that treats the sensor as a metric ruler rather than the sole source of depth. Near-field returns anchor the metric relative pose of two views through PnP; visually trackable samples without a valid depth return are then triangulated under that pose. A parallax/reprojection gate abstains wherever the geometry is ill-conditioned, leaving an explicit hole and a selective score instead of forcing an estimate. The measured core front end, including spiral sampling, sparse back-projection, and hole taxonomy but excluding preprocessing and multi-view recovery, runs at 1.11 ms median latency on CPU (OpenCV using 14 threads), about 38 times faster than a DINOv2-L visual branch on GPU in our timing setup. Across two iPhone captures and the public TUM RGB-D and ARKitScenes benchmarks, held-out depth is recovered at 1.4 to 6.7 percent median relative error. In a controlled ARKitScenes protocol that uses only returns within 2 m to set scale and an independent laser scan as ground truth, DH-Active achieves 64.2 percent scene-median coverage of evaluable far-field candidates at 13.4 percent scene-median relative error; direct triangulation from the device trajectory is not usable. We also report the alternatives that failed in our tests: single-frame defocus, classical focus-stack depth, defocus-LiDAR fusion, point-to-point ICP over a good visual-inertial track, and attention-to-holes resampling. A 1.26 B learned model remains more accurate after oracle scale alignment. The contribution here is narrower: metric sparse depth, explicit abstention, zero learned parameters, and near-millisecond CPU cost.