Authors: Liyin Chen, Nazlee Zebardast, Mengyu Wang, Tobias Elze, Jason I. Comander
Organizations: Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA · Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA · Harvard Ophthalmology AI Lab, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA · Ocular Genomics Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Abstract
Predicting disease progression from longitudinal imaging is useful for clinical decision making and trial design. Recent methods have moved toward increasing generative complexity, but the conditions under which this complexity is necessary remain unclear. We propose that generative complexity should match the entropy of the predictable component of a task's conditional posterior, with training-inference input alignment required in all regimes. Two model-light measurements, a task-entropy analysis on raw image pairs and a posterior-concentration analysis on a stochastic model, let practitioners assess the complexity a task warrants before committing to a modeling framework. We validated this framework on a fundus autofluorescence (FAF) dataset by contrasting five conditioning configurations, sharing one architecture and training set, spanning standard conditional diffusion, inference-aligned stochastic training, and deterministic regression. Training-inference alignment produced large gains (delta-SSIM +0.082, SSIM +0.086, both p < 0.001), while the choice among aligned frameworks produced no clinically meaningful difference across evaluated metrics. Across two FAF platforms, inter-visit change was dominated by time-invariant acquisition variability rather than disease progression, and the stochastic models' posteriors collapsed to an effective point, explaining the framework equivalence. We trained a deterministic Temporal Retinal U-Net (TRU) and evaluated it on 28,899 eyes across three manufacturers and two modalities (two FAF platforms and en-face SLO), with three independent cohorts evaluated zero-shot. TRU matched or exceeded three published baselines on delta-SSIM, SSIM, and PSNR. These findings show that when disease progression is slow compared with acquisition variability, a deterministic regression model matches or outperforms more complex stochastic alternatives.
The prevailing inference framework for diffusion models formulates generation fundamentally as a problem of numerical integration. This perspective casts the model as an exact estimator, neglecting the inherent statistical uncertainty of the denoising process. In this work, we propose Forward-Process Aligned Diffusion prediction (\textbf{DiFA}), a training-free framework that reframes inference-time data prediction refinement as a sequential state estimation problem. Rather than reusing past outputs solely for numerical integration, DiFA treats iterative data predictions along the reverse trajectory as correlated observations to build a forward-aligned temporal consensus. Inspired by Kalman filtering, this consensus aggregates historical predictions according to structural consistency and noise-level compatibility. To counteract the over-smoothing tendency of temporal consensus, we introduce a deviation guidance mechanism to adaptively preserve residual details. Empirically, DiFA yields significant improvements on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet across the evaluated metrics, including FID, IS, and FD-DINOv2, demonstrating that aligning inference with the forward statistical structure substantially improves generative fidelity.
Modelling how a disease progresses over time requires longitudinal imaging cohorts, which are scarce and small, whereas cross-sectional data -- one image per participant -- is abundant. Self-supervised pre-training on such data offers a way to bridge this gap, but it is unclear which strategy best supports progression modelling, or how that answer depends on the amount of labelled longitudinal data. We study this for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), pre-training encoders on the large cross-sectional NAKO cohort and predicting time to late AMD on the longitudinal AREDS dataset. We compare in-house self-supervised encoders against a general-purpose (DINOv2) and a domain-specific (RETFound) foundation model, across contrastive, masked-autoencoding, and self-distillation objectives, under frozen and fine-tuned protocols, and across labelled training sets from 100 to 32,250 examples. Which model performs best depends on how the encoder is used. When the encoder is frozen and labels are few -- the regime typical of longitudinal cohorts -- pre-trained representations reach clinically reasonable discrimination from a few hundred labelled samples, while models trained from scratch do not; this advantage fades under fine-tuning. Transfer is governed by the self-supervision objective rather than corpus scale or domain match, so that an encoder pre-trained on a modest cross-sectional cohort matches or exceeds a far larger in-domain foundation model. Together, these results offer a practical recipe for building progression models where longitudinal data is scarce: a frozen self-supervised encoder with a lightweight survival head.
Ifeoma Veronica Nwabufo, Julius Gervelmeyer, Sarah Müller +1
Generative modeling frameworks have emerged as an effective approach to capture high-dimensional image distributions from large datasets without requiring domain-specific knowledge, a capability essential for disease progression modeling. Recent generative approaches have attempted to capture progression by mapping images to a latent space and guiding representations to generate follow-up images from previous time points. However, these methods impose constraints on distribution learning, resulting in latent spaces with limited controllability for generating follow-up images without paired subject-specific longitudinal guidance. In order to enable controlled movements in the latent representational space and generate progression images from a previous time-point image without subject-specific guidance, we introduce a conditionable Diffusion Auto-encoder framework that forms a compact latent space capturing high-level semantics and providing means to control generation. Our approach leverages this latent space to condition and apply controlled shifts to the representations of previous time-point images by isolating progression and subject identity information for generating follow-up images. The shifts are implicitly guided by correlating with progression attributes and constraining to Alzheimer's disease specific regions, without paired longitudinal guidance. We validate the generations through image quality metrics, volumetric progression analysis, and downstream tasks in Alzheimer's disease datasets from different sources. This demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach for Alzheimer's progression modeling and longitudinal image generation.