RAG-based question-answering (QA) in specialist domains faces a cold-start problem: lack of evaluative benchmarks and absence of labeled data for post-training. We present DoRA (Domain-oriented RAG Assessment), a novel benchmark construction and evaluation framework using only a small set of specialist domain documents. DoRA systematically generates synthetic QA training and evaluation datasets with auditable evidence across five domain-specific intents. To mitigate same-pipeline circularity, DoRA's training and test splits use different LLM families (Claude Sonnet for training; GPT-4o for test) drawn from disjoint seed-document corpora. Instantiated on 40 defense-related documents (written in English), DoRA yields ~6.6K curated instances. Compared against 8 LLM baselines over a benchmark of 1,259 samples, a LoRA-adapted Llama3.1-8B trained on the synthetic training set consistently improves performance over 6 coverage and faithfulness metrics, especially reducing hallucination by more than half under the default GTE retrieval setting, with gains persisting across alternative retrievers and prompting-based baselines. Defense-domain expertise is incorporated in three stages of our evaluation: (a) determining the quality of the synthetic QA generated by DoRA, (b) ascertaining the reliability of LLM-as-judge scores, and (c) evaluating the generalization of the QA pipeline on completely human-written QA examples. We position DoRA as a practical framework for specialist-domain RAG under domain shift, with defense as a high-stakes case study.
Existing QA benchmarks typically assume distinct documents with minimal overlap, yet real-world retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems operate on corpora such as financial reports, legal codes, and patents, where information is highly redundant and documents exhibit strong inter-document similarity. This mismatch undermines evaluation validity: retrievers can be unfairly undervalued even when they retrieve documents that provide sufficient evidence, because redundancy across documents is not accounted for in evaluation. On the other hand, retrievers that perform well on standard benchmarks often generalize poorly to real-world corpora with highly similar and redundant documents. We present RARE (Redundancy-Aware Retrieval Evaluation), a framework for constructing realistic benchmarks by (i) decomposing documents into atomic facts to enable precise redundancy tracking and (ii) enhancing LLM-based data generation with CRRF. RAG benchmark data usually requires multiple quality criteria, but LLMs often yield trivial outputs. CRRF scores criteria separately and fuses decisions by rank, improving the reliability of generated data. Applying RARE to Finance, Legal, and Patent corpora, we introduce RedQA, where a strong retriever baseline drops from 66.4% PerfRecall@10 on 4-hop General-Wiki to 5.0-27.9% PerfRecall@10 at 4-hop depth, revealing robustness gaps that current benchmarks fail to capture. RARE enables practitioners to build domain-specific RAG evaluations that faithfully reflect real-world deployment conditions.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful approach for enhancing large language models' question-answering capabilities through the integration of external knowledge. However, when adapting RAG systems to specialized domains, challenges arise from distribution shifts, resulting in suboptimal generalization performance. In this work, we propose TTARAG, a test-time adaptation method that dynamically updates the language model's parameters during inference to improve RAG system performance in specialized domains. Our method introduces a simple yet effective approach where the model learns to predict retrieved content, enabling automatic parameter adjustment to the target domain. Through extensive experiments across six specialized domains, we demonstrate that TTARAG achieves substantial performance improvements over baseline RAG systems. Code available at https://github.com/sunxin000/TTARAG.
Defense is a knowledge-intensive domain that requires precise understanding of specialized terminology, doctrinal concepts, operational procedures, and evolving military events. Although recent work has explored language technologies for military applications, existing efforts remain fragmented: they are often task-specific, rely on limited adaptation pipelines, or lack comprehensive defense-domain evaluation. In this paper, we present SALUTE, an end-to-end framework for benchmarking and adapting LLMs for the defense domain. SALUTE integrates Salute-Corpus, a curated corpus from open-access U.S. military doctrine and government documents; Salute-Conv, a grounded instruction dataset from doctrinal sources and decade-long defense news; Salute-Pref, a defense-aware preference dataset; and Salute-Bench, a rigorously filtered benchmark for evaluating defense-domain understanding and reasoning over doctrine and defense news. Based on these resources, we train Salute-LLM through multi-stage post-training with continual pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and preference alignment. Extensive experiments show that Salute-LLM achieves strong defense-domain performance while retaining competitive general capabilities, demonstrating the effectiveness of SALUTE as an end-to-end framework for defense-domain LLM adaptation.