Response time of lateral predictive coding and benefits of modular structures

We study the topology of learned representations in predictive coding networks (PCNs), a neuro-inspired bidirectional architecture, using a quantitative layer-wise persistent homology analysis. We train well-performing PCNs on a synthetic classification dataset ($\geq 99.9\%$ test accuracy) and on MNIST ($\geq 95\%$ test accuracy), and measure how topological features change across layers for different architectures and activation functions. We find that smaller PCNs collapse connected components across layers earlier than larger models (Spearman $\unicode{x1D70C} \in [0.72, 0.79]$ across activations), with model size measured as the sum of hidden-layer widths. We also observe a strong negative correlation ($\unicode{x1D70C} = -0.58$) between the depth at which simplification occurs and reconstruction error; i.e., architectures that simplify later reconstruct better. Finally, a seed-level bootstrap comparison across architectures and activations shows that PCNs consistently collapse connected components later than matched MLPs, with an average difference of $3.6$ layers. These results suggest that persistent homology offers a useful quantitative lens on the compression--reconstruction tradeoff in PCNs, and that both model capacity and the recurrent, bidirectional dynamics of predictive coding inference shape when this tradeoff is resolved across layers.

Local learning methods offer an alternative to end-to-end backpropagation, but their unstructured local objectives can produce weak feature learning in deep networks. We study whether the order of hidden-state optimization can address this limitation. We propose a boundary-first inference schedule that partitions a model into chunks, first coordinates hidden states at chunk boundaries, and then refines representations within each chunk. We instantiate this schedule in predictive coding networks (PCNs), a local-learning framework in which hidden activities and prediction errors are explicitly exposed during inference. On CIFAR-10, the resulting boundary-first predictive-coding instantiation improves accuracy over standard predictive coding by $9.77\%$ under a standard parametrization and by $5.51\%$ under a $μ$-parametrization. Diagnostic analyses further show more non-trivial early-layer updates, lower initial-to-final CKA, and more diverse layerwise gradients, consistent with stronger feature learning. These results support boundary-first, chunk-based inference as a practical design principle for predictive-coding training and motivate its study in broader local-learning systems.

Predictive Coding (PC) is an influential account of cortical learning. Much of recent work has focused on comparing PC to Backpropagation (BP) to find whether PC offers any advantages. Small scale experiments show that PC enables learning that is more sample efficient and effective in many contexts, though a thorough theoretical understanding of the phenomena remains elusive. To address this, we quantify the efficiency of learning in BP and PC through a metric called ``target alignment'', which measures how closely the change in the output of the network is aligned to the output prediction error. We then derive and empirically validate analytical expressions for target alignment in Deep Linear Networks. We show that learning in PC is more efficient than BP, which is especially pronounced in deep, narrow and pre-trained networks. We also derive exact conditions for guaranteed optimal target alignment in PC and validate our findings through experiments. We study full training trajectories of linear and non-linear models, and find the predicted benefits of PC persist in practice even when some assumptions are violated. Overall, this work provides a mechanistic understanding of the higher learning efficiency observed for PC over BP in previous works, and can guide how PC should be parametrised to learn most effectively.