Towards a Systematic Risk Assessment of Deep Neural Network Limitations in Autonomous Driving Perception

Safety is a fundamental requirement for autonomous driving, yet existing end-to-end driving models still lack explicit risk-aware learning capacities. Existing rule-based risk models provide interpretable safety priors, yet their absolute risk scores depend on handcrafted functions, coefficients, and thresholds. Learning-based risk representations reduce part of this manual design, but their supervision often relies on occupancy-derived labels or heuristic cost values, which may not capture ego-conditioned planning risk. In this paper, we propose DRiF, a data-driven risk-field framework for safer end-to-end autonomous driving. DRiF learns a shared BEV feature with static map segmentation, dynamic risk prediction, and vehicle planning. For dynamic risk learning, DRiF converts rule-based safety priors into pairwise risk labels, and trains the risk field to preserve relative risk ordering instead of regressing handcrafted absolute scores. Experiments on Bench2Drive show that DRiF achieves competitive overall performance, with consistent improvements in driving score, success rate, and collision-related metrics. These results establish relative risk supervision as an effective way to connect explicit safety structure with end-to-end planning. The data and code will be publicly available.

The ability to accurately assess and anticipate risks in safety-critical scenarios is crucial for autonomous driving systems. While existing research has made progress in collision prediction, accurately quantifying risk levels from monocular vision inputs remains challenging due to the complex dynamics of multi-agent interactions and the inherent uncertainty in real-world environments. To address these challenges, we present NSF-HRPT, a novel framework that combines learning-based perception with structured reasoning for quantitative risk assessment. Our approach features a Neural Semantic Field (NSF) that learns to model scene semantics, trajectory predictions, and probabilistic Time-to-Collision (TTC) distributions from simulation data. During inference, the pre-trained NSF serves as a prior for our Hierarchical Risk Perception Tree (HRPT), which enables efficient parallel computation and spatial reasoning about multi-agent risks. Additionally, we introduce a Sim2Real enhancement strategy that improves real-world applicability without retraining by incorporating priors from foundation models. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on synthetic benchmarks and delivers competitive, near-state-of-the-art results on real-world datasets for both TTC estimation accuracy and risk localization precision. The proposed method provides an effective solution for real-time risk awareness from monocular camera inputs.

Aggregate metrics may not fully reflect performance in insufficiently examined high-risk driving conditions. We propose RISC (Risk-Informed Slice Coverage), a practical protocol for risk-guided stress testing and coverage-qualified evaluation. Risk-guided stress testing directs a finite audit budget toward risk-relevant sub-datasets, called risk slices, while coverage-qualified evaluation reports results together with explicit statements about which slices are sufficiently or insufficiently covered. The protocol translates safety concerns into machine-readable risk slices, uses lightweight signals to tag candidate data, selects a compact audit set by risk, and qualifies the results using coverage evidence. An LLM can optionally support this process by surfacing relevant but potentially overlooked conditions during test planning, thereby helping engineers not to forget the obvious. RISC is model-agnostic and can be applied to perception modules, driving models, and other autonomous-driving subsystems. We instantiate the protocol for monocular pedestrian perception using 1,000 frames from the Zenseact Open Dataset, image statistics, and a YOLO-based detector proxy. In this proof-of-concept study, risk-guided selection increases critical failure discovery from 34.0% under random sampling to 98.5%. RISC provides a lightweight, assurance-oriented evaluation layer that complements scenario categorization, coverage assessment, and broader testing-and-verification workflows.