cs.CLMay 9, 2026

Language-Conditioned Visual Grounding with CLIP Multilingual

Authors: J. de Curtò, Mauro Liz, I. de Zarzà

Organizations: Department of Computer Applications in Science & Engineering, BARCELONA Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain · Estudis d’Informàtica, Multimèdia i Telecomunicació, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain · Escuela T´ecnica Superior de Ingenier´ıa (ICAI), Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA · Human centered AI, Data & Software, LUXEMBOURG Institute of Science and Technology, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Abstract

Multilingual vision-language models exhibit systematic performance gaps across languages, but the mechanism remains ambiguous: cross-language divergence could arise from the visual encoder, the text branch, or their interaction. We resolve this ambiguity through a dense multilingual CLIP probe in which the visual encoder is held identical across thirteen typologically diverse languages and only the XLM-RoBERTa text branch varies. We evaluate two CLIP architectures spanning a 7x visual-encoder scale gap (XLM-R base + ViT-B/32, ~87M visual parameters; XLM-R large + ViT-H/14, ~632M) on 11 concepts and 210 images, and quantify cross-language agreement via cluster-mask IoU, top-percentile IoU, and Spearman rank correlation against an English reference (n=2,310 paired observations per language). Three findings emerge. First, low-resource languages (Arabic, Basque, Luxembourgish) incur a structural penalty at both backbone scales (Wilcoxon HR>LR p<10^-300; cluster-mask IoU gap +0.114 at base, +0.143 at large), isolating the deficit to the text branch. Second, scaling the encoder 7x widens the gap for structural failure cases (Basque Δ=-0.056, Luxembourgish Δ=-0.076) while improving Arabic (Δ=+0.033), separating corpus-coverage from tokeniser-fertility failures. Third, peak similarity is preserved across languages (mean ratio 0.94 at large scale) while cluster-mask IoU drops sharply, identifying spatial misalignment, not signal collapse, as the dominant failure mode. At 3.4-3.9 Wh per 1,000 queries, dense-CLIP grounding is competitive with high-throughput inference budgets, positioning it as a practical substrate for energy-aware multilingual deployment.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Aug 31, 2026cs.CL

Where Do Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders Fail on Low-Resource Languages?

Recent multilingual vision--language encoders cover hundreds of languages in a single model, yet on two state-of-the-art instances retrieval on low-resource languages (LRL; e.g. Swahili) trails high-resource ones (HRL; e.g. English) by 30+30^+,pp. We ask where in the trained encoder this gap is located. Prior modality-gap and cross-lingual subspace work suggests a linear language direction at the output crowds out alignment-relevant geometry. We falsify this: LEACE drives the linear language classifier from >99%>99\% to near chance and iterated INLP to 3737--50%50\% while LRL retrieval moves within ±1.5\pm 1.5,pp and all tier means within 2.22.2,pp, tracking random controls. The linear bias is a \emph{symptom}, not the cause. Instead, the alignment-causal factor lies along the encoder's forward path: the EOS (end-of-sequence) hidden state's per-language trajectory diverges with depth. Substituting the EOS with its parallel English value three blocks before the projector lifts Swahili from 22.1%22.1\% to 69.1%69.1\% on one encoder (and reproduces on the other); three controls rule out pooled-position tautology and English specificity. A front-layer trunk that pulls each language's projection toward the parallel-content centroid corroborates the diagnosis at training time, recovering +9.6+9.6 / +17.1+17.1,pp on LRL XM3600 retrieval (1{,}000-image subset), with consistent gains across three further benchmarks while preserving HRL performance.
Donghoon Han, SungHyun Moon, Aidyn Zhakatayev +2
Vision-Language AlignmentLow-Resource LanguagesMultilingual
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026cs.CL

Disparities In Negation Understanding Across Languages In Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit affirmation bias: a systematic tendency to select positive captions ("X is present") even when the correct description contains negation ("no X"). While prior work has documented this failure mode in English and proposed solutions, negation manifests differently across languages through varying morphology, word order, and cliticization patterns, raising the question of whether these solutions serve all linguistic communities equitably. We introduce the first human-verified multilingual negation benchmark, spanning seven typologically diverse languages: English, Mandarin Chinese, Arabic, Greek, Russian, Tagalog, and Spanish. Evaluating three VLMs - CLIP, SigLIP, and MultiCLIP - we find that standard CLIP performs at or below chance on non-Latin-script languages, while MultiCLIP achieves the highest and most uniform accuracy. We also evaluate SpaceVLM, a proposed negation correction, and find that it produces substantial improvements for several languages - particularly English, Greek, Spanish, and Tagalog - while showing varied effectiveness across typologically different languages. This variation reveals that linguistic properties like morphology, script, and negation structure interact with model improvements in fairness-relevant ways. As VLMs are deployed globally, multilingual benchmarks are essential for understanding not just whether solutions work, but for whom.
Charikleia Moraitaki, Sarah Pan, Skyler Pulling +3
NegationLinguisticsImplicit BiasDisparities
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026cs.CL

Multilingual Training and Evaluation Resources for Vision-Language Models

Vision Language Models (VLMs) achieved rapid progress in the recent years. However, despite their growth, VLMs development is heavily grounded on English, leading to two main limitations: (i) the lack of multilingual and multimodal datasets for training, and (ii) the scarcity of comprehensive evaluation benchmarks across languages. In this work, we address these gaps by introducing a new comprehensive suite of resources for VLMs training and evaluation spanning five European languages (English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish). We adopt a regeneration-translation paradigm that produces high-quality cross-lingual resources by combining curated synthetic generation and manual annotation. Specifically, we build Multi-PixMo, a training corpus obtained regenerating examples from Pixmo pre-existing datasets with permissively licensed models: PixMo-Cap, PixMo-AskModelAnything, and CoSyn-400k. On the evaluation side, we construct a set of multilingual benchmarks derived translating widely used English datasets (MMbench, ScienceQA, MME, POPE, AI2D). We assess the quality of these resources through qualitative and quantitative human analyses, measuring inter-annotator agreement. Additionally, we perform ablation studies to demonstrate the impact of multilingual data, with respect to English only, in VLMs training. Experiments, comprising 3 different models show that using multilingual, multimodal examples for training VLMs aids is consistently beneficial on non-English benchmarks, with positive transfer to English as well.
Daniela Baiamonte, Elena Fano, Matteo Gabburo +3
Vision-LanguageInter-Rater VariabilityRegen
AskPDF