Benchmarking Empirical and Learning-Based Approaches for Feedforward Steering Control in Autonomous Racing

Accurate modeling of nonlinear vehicle dynamics is essential for high-speed autonomous racing, where controllers operate at the handling limits. Model-based methods are interpretable but rely on simplifying assumptions, while purely learned models capture nonlinearities yet often lack physical consistency, generalization, and adaptability to changing operating conditions. This paper presents DynSSM, a physics-aware state-space memory framework that combines learned temporal representations with a structured vehicle dynamics model. The proposed approach integrates state-space sequence modeling and recurrent encoders to capture long- and short-term dynamic behavior. It simultaneously adapts tire and vehicle-dynamics parameters within bounded ranges to preserve physical plausibility. A residual correction mechanism compensates for remaining unmodeled dynamics while preserving the underlying physics-based structure. DynSSM is evaluated on both simulated small-scale racing data and real-world full-scale autonomous Indy racecar data. When evaluated on an unseen real-world track, DynSSM reduces one-step prediction RMSE by up to $27.2\%$ in longitudinal velocity, $73.9\%$ in lateral velocity, and $88.8\%$ in yaw rate compared with the state-of-the-art (\sota{}) baselines. Component-wise ablation studies demonstrate the importance of temporal memory, parameter adaptation, and residual correction for predictive performance and robustness. Further, closed-loop simulations using nonlinear model predictive control demonstrate that DynSSM remains feasible across the evaluated tracks and achieves up to a 13.2% reduction in one-lap completion time compared with \sota{} baselines. These results indicate that combining temporal memory, bounded physics-guided parameter adaptation, and residual correction provides an accurate, interpretable, and control-ready dynamics model for autonomous racing.

This paper presents a Model Predictive Control-based motion planning and control pipeline for autonomous car racing capable of adapting to different driving contexts, such as overtaking, nominal driving, and countersteering. A Cost Blending state machine manages the identification of different driving contexts and the selection of their predefined weights to be applied to the Model Predictive Planning (MPP) and Control (MPC) modules. The two optimization-based solutions share the same problem formulation and model, differing only in horizon length, rate, tuning, and in their open-loop versus closed-loop approach to maximize the effectiveness of their interaction. The work is validated on the fully autonomous open-wheel racecar Superformula EAV-25, with a lap time achieved that is within 2% of the best human driver reference. The results demonstrate the capability of the solution in driving at the limit of handling, smoothly executing overtaking maneuvers, and quickly reacting to high oversteering conditions to recover the vehicle stability.

We present a modular framework to benchmark new and existing methods for trajectory planning and control in high-acceleration maneuvers that push autonomous driving to the limits. Our framework includes time-optimal raceline generation, online time-optimal velocity replanning, geometric path tracking controllers, and a new model-structured neural network (MS-NN) to learn the inverse dynamics for steering control. We deploy our framework on a 1:10-scale RoboRacer platform, using two circuits. Through several ablations with cautious and aggressive racelines, we study the performance of single modules and their combinations. We show that our MS-NN significantly improves tracking accuracy, decreases steering oscillations, and is physically interpretable. Moreover, online velocity replanning improves lap times by compensating for execution errors, and enables the vehicle to safely reach higher speeds and accelerations. To support future research, our code, datasets, videos and results are publicly available at https://roboracer-benchmark.github.io/planning_control_benchmark/.