Class-Specific Branch Attention for Mitigating Gradient Interference under Class Imbalance

Numerous studies on Boosting attempt to mitigate classification bias caused by class imbalance. However, existing studies have yet to explore the collaborative optimization of imbalanced learning and model training. This constraint hinders further performance improvements. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a collaborative optimization Boosting model of multiclass imbalanced learning. By integrating the density factor and the confidence factor, this model implements a noise-resistant weight update mechanism alongside a dynamic sampling strategy. Rather than functioning as independent components, these modules are tightly integrated to orchestrate weight updates, sample region partitioning, and region-guided sampling. Thus, this study proposes the collaborative optimization of imbalanced learning and model training. Extensive experiments on 40 public imbalanced datasets demonstrate that the proposed model significantly outperforms seven state-of-the-art baselines. The code and datasets for this paper are available at: https://github.com/ChuantaoLi/DARG.

Class imbalance in deep neural networks (DNNs) has witnessed a rapid increase in research attention in recent years. However, the varying accounts of the reasons behind the poor performance of DNN on imbalance data in pertinent literature shows that little is known about how this agelong phenomenon impacts the performance of DNNs. A better understanding of this problem is crucial to developing effective DNN-based imbalance methods. Thus, this study systematically investigates the impact of class imbalance on the learning dynamics of DNN by monitoring the learning pattern of DNN models on both the majority and minority classes of datasets of varying imbalance ratios. Experimental findings shows that as against learning from balanced datasets where DNN learns the classes similarly, class imbalance has severe deteriorating impact on the performance of DNN, driving the model to underfit the minority class samples in the early training epochs while simultaneously learning only the majority class. Although DNN ultimately learns the minority samples, learning in this manner only results in learnt minority representations that are non-generalizable at test phase because they are merely overfitted to keep the overall training loss as low as possible.

Models trained on long-tailed data using standard softmax tend to exhibit higher training error and a larger generalisation gap for classes with fewer training samples. We characterise this class-wise disparity as the preference issue and quantify it using a new metric, the model imbalance level $I$. To understand this issue, we analyse how imbalanced training data adversely affects class-wise gradients under standard softmax training. This paper then develops a finite-data Generalised Balanced Softmax (GBS) framework for analysing and mitigating the preference issue. The framework uses the training-time logit adjustment $z_{nc}+β\log|N_c|$, which is algebraically identical to the training-time logit-adjusted loss of Menon et al. (2021) when $τ=β$. The case $β=1$ also coincides with Balanced Softmax and with the unit adjustment supported by the Fisher-consistency argument under the true data distribution, corresponding to an idealised infinite-data setting. Building on this existing loss family, this paper uses a heuristic power-law assumption to motivate the adjustable coefficient and studies how $β$ affects trained models. Across the evaluated long-tailed benchmarks, $β=1$ does not attain the highest average testing recall on most datasets, showing that a different coefficient can be preferable when training on finite data. The selected values of $β$ reduce $I$ and improve average testing recall relative to the $β=1$ reference, while retaining negligible computational overhead and compatibility with existing representation-learning frameworks.