Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Source Retinal Fluid Segmentation in OCT

Deep models for retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) classification report high accuracy but rarely report whether their confidence can be trusted -- a gap that matters when a wrong-but-confident reading delays sight-saving treatment. We pair a hybrid convolutional-Transformer encoder with a gradient-boosting (XGBoost) classification head and a three-part clinical safety layer: confidence calibration, out-of-distribution (OOD) rejection, and per-prediction uncertainty flagging. On four-class OCT (84,495 scans) the model reaches 95.4% accuracy while cutting calibration error twelve-fold (expected calibration error, ECE = 0.0024), so the confidence it reports tracks its true accuracy. To our knowledge this is the first OCT classifier to validate all three safety mechanisms jointly, with public weights and reproducible multi-seed evaluation.

Reliable automated analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging is crucial for diagnosing retinal disorders but faces a critical barrier: the need for expensive, labor-intensive expert annotations. Supervised deep learning models struggle to generalize across diverse pathologies, imaging devices, and patient populations due to their restricted vocabulary of annotated abnormalities. We propose an unsupervised anomaly detection framework that learns the normative distribution of healthy retinal anatomy without lesion annotations, directly addressing annotation efficiency challenges in clinical deployment. Our approach leverages a discrete latent model trained on normal B-scans to capture OCT-specific structural patterns. To enhance clinical robustness, we incorporate retinal layer-aware supervision and structured triplet learning to separate healthy from pathological representations, improving model reliability across varied imaging conditions. During inference, anomalies are detected and localized via reconstruction discrepancies, enabling both image and pixel-level identification without requiring disease-specific labels. On the Kermany dataset (AUROC: 0.799), our method substantially outperforms VAE, VQVAE, VQGAN, and f-AnoGAN baselines. Critically, cross-dataset evaluation on Srinivasan achieves AUROC 0.884 with superior generalization, demonstrating robust domain adaptation. On the external RETOUCH benchmark, unsupervised anomaly segmentation achieves competitive Dice (0.200) and mIoU (0.117) scores, validating reproducibility across institutions.

Early detection of vision-threatening conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration depends on retinal fundus image analysis, but manual assessment is slow and expert-dependent. Automated convolutional neural networks classify fundus images accurately yet act as black boxes, and existing retinal vessel segmentation methods lose discriminative power under pathology and seldom exploit attention or transformer backbones. Using the FIVES and DRIVE fundus datasets, we develop a two-pipeline framework that pairs four-class disease classification with attention- and transformer-based vessel segmentation, organised in three stages: (1) FIVES images are augmented by rotation and horizontal and vertical flips and used to fine-tune eight ImageNet-pretrained CNNs: ResNet101, DenseNet169, Xception, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, InceptionResNetV2, ResNet50, and EfficientNetB0. (2) Five gradient-based explanation methods, Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, Score-CAM, Faster Score-CAM, and Layer-CAM, are computed on the final convolutional block of each classifier and compared qualitatively across architectures. (3) Ten U-Net variants are benchmarked for vessel segmentation: TransUNet (hybrid CNN--Transformer encoder) and Attention U-Net (gated skip connections), evaluated with ResNet50V2, ResNet101V2, and ResNet152V2 backbones, along with additional Attention U-Net configurations using DenseNet backbones, and the fully transformer-based Swin-UNet. ResNet101 gives the highest classification accuracy: 94.17% (F1 0.942) $>$ 88.33% for EfficientNetB0. For segmentation, the architecture ranking is consistent on both datasets: Attention U-Net $>$ TransUNet $>$ Swin-UNet. The strongest configuration is Attention U-Net with a ResNet101V2 backbone: FIVES IoU 0.722, Dice 0.838; DRIVE IoU 0.648, Dice 0.787, lifting DRIVE IoU 60.80 $\rightarrow$ 64.83 over a prior custom U-Net.