Perception tasks for autonomous vehicles need to work satisfactorily in adverse weather conditions. Due to lack of real-world weather datasets, weather simulations are a promising alternative. To ensure simulations closely mirror real-world weather data, it's crucial that they represent the same weather characteristics, including severity and particle positioning, across different sensors. To achieve this, we propose the Reference Dataset Alignment Method (ReDAM) for weather intensity alignment in fog and Unified-weather-edit (inspired by Weather-edit[1]) for particle positioning alignment in rain and snow. We validate both alignment methods using statistical and geometrical tests, respectively. We find that 3D detection models for non-aligned versions tend to be overly optimistic as compared to aligned versions. We also show the aligned-multi-sensor simulation's effectiveness for achieving robustness for 3D object detection task by finetuning existing sensor fusion models on it.
Robust 3D object detection under adverse weather remains a critical hurdle for autonomous driving. Despite progress with LiDAR-4D radar fusion, most methods are constrained by a closed-world assumption, implicitly requiring training and test weather to align in both type and severity. This premise fails in practice: the open-ended nature of weather, and even variations within a single type like rain, cause dramatically different LiDAR degradation patterns, leading to significant performance drops in unseen conditions. To address this, we present Dual-Critic Guided Diffusion Alignment (DCDA), a weather-agnostic framework that learns to recover degraded LiDAR features toward a clean manifold. Rather than modeling specific weather types, DCDA employs a 4D radar-conditioned diffusion process to progressively refine features, guided by two complementary critics. (i) A detection-guided critic, anchored by a pre-trained clean-weather model, ensures that the refined features retain object-level discriminability and localization accuracy. (ii) A weather adversarial critic enforces holistic distributional consistency with clean-weather representations. By aligning features through semantic and distributional constraints rather than explicit weather modeling, DCDA generalizes effectively to unseen weather types and severities without requiring paired data or weather labels. We further introduce a structured open-weather benchmark with held-out type-severity combinations and extensive experiments verify DCDA's advantages.
The performance of state-of-the-art object detectors degrades significantly under adverse weather, causing a safety-critical domain shift problem for autonomous vehicles. Recent efforts address this problem by relying on synthetic data to train the object detectors, which limits their real-world applicability. Meanwhile, pseudo-labeling is widely used for cross-dataset domain adaptation problems. However, these methods have not been exploited by weather-based domain adaptation approaches due to the noisy nature of such labels generated under harsh weather conditions. In this paper, we propose two new approaches to mitigate this weather-induced domain shift. First, we propose a Weather-Induced pseudo Label Denoising (WILD) framework that filters noisy pseudo labels generated by real data captured under adverse weather conditions. Second, we develop a novel hybrid training methodology, WILD SAM, that exploits both pseudo-label denoising and simulation-based training solutions while using real-data from the target harsh-weather domain. We validate both proposed approaches, WILD and WILD SAM, on the recently released Four Seasons dataset across rainy and snowy scenarios. Experiments show that the proposed frameworks improve Average Precision (AP) up to 13% and significantly reduce the weather-induced performance gap relative to the baseline. The code is available at: https://github.com/Kh-Hamed/WILD-SAM
Perception under adverse weather remains a critical bottleneck for reliable autonomous driving, yet existing benchmarks lack the systematic multi-modal alignments needed to evaluate robust sensor fusion. Real-world weather datasets suffer from uncontrolled collection and single-level, uncalibrated conditions, while synthetic alternatives either target camera-only restoration or lack the paired clean-and-foggy structure needed to benchmark "defog-then-detect" pipelines. We present FogDrive, a rigorously calibrated, multi-modal autonomous-driving dataset bridging data-centric engineering and robust machine learning. Built with the CARLA simulator, FogDrive contains 660 scenes (~133k fully annotated frames, 50:50 day/night) across four synchronized cameras (RGB, depth, semantic segmentation), a LiDAR and semantic-LiDAR pair, and front radar. Physically consistent fog is modeled independently on camera channels (Koschmieder model) and LiDAR channels (Beer-Lambert law) at three calibrated visibility densities (160m, 100m, 50m). Every scene ships in four matched variants (clean plus three graded fog levels) with cross-calibrated 2D and 3D bounding boxes. A semantic-segmentation-based quality audit over 8k images validates annotations at 95.1% precision and over 99% recall for vehicles within 40m. We establish baseline benchmarks with state-of-the-art architectures (TransFusion, BEVFusion, YOLOv8-m) across two paradigms: 3D multi-modal fusion and 2D image restoration. These yield critical data-centric insights: mixing multi-density fog during training tightens 3D bounding-box geometry without added data-scaling cost, while in 2D pipelines image-quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) prove poor predictors of downstream detection performance. FogDrive will be fully open-sourced alongside our data-generation framework to accelerate robust, multi-modal research.