Search as Computation Allocation

Intelligence under time constraints requires deciding not only how much to compute, but when computation is worth starting. We study this problem in streaming interactions, where evidence arrives incrementally and may be revised. Early computation has more time to finish but rests on incomplete evidence; waiting improves information while shrinking computational slack. We call this the information-slack dilemma. We take the evidence-dependent computational job as the unit of analysis: when to start it, what supports its result, and when that result can be committed. Advance computation is valuable only insofar as its benefits survive the costs of verification, invalidation, and recovery. This applies to grounded incremental processing and reusable preparation as well as future-dependent speculation. We propose a research agenda on computation under evolving evidence, prioritizing selective recovery under controlled evidence revisions. Evaluation should separate earlier-execution effects, deployment value against a full-input alternative, and the added value of predictive policies, while accounting for shared-resource costs. The objective is not maximal advance computation, but more trustworthy, on-time responses within a declared resource envelope.

We consider online learning problems under a partial observability model capturing situations where the information conveyed to the learner is between full information and bandit feedback. In the simplest variant, we assume that in addition to its own loss, the learner also gets to observe losses of some other actions. The revealed losses depend on the learner's action and a directed observation system chosen by the environment. For this setting, we propose the first algorithm that enjoys near-optimal regret guarantees without having to know the observation system before selecting its actions. Along similar lines, we also define a new partial information setting that models online combinatorial optimization problems where the feedback received by the learner is between semi-bandit and full feedback. As the predictions of our first algorithm cannot be always computed efficiently in this setting, we propose another algorithm with similar properties and with the benefit of always being computationally efficient, at the price of a slightly more complicated tuning mechanism. Both algorithms rely on a novel exploration strategy called implicit exploration, which is shown to be more efficient both computationally and information-theoretically than previously studied exploration strategies for the problem.

We introduce Bellman-sufficient information complexity for minimax analysis of sequential decision problems. A Bellman-sufficient state retains enough of the history to close the controlled recursion, while an index $Y=χ(Ω)$ specifies the decision-relevant information being charged. The upper bound is a log-penalized Bellman program; the lower bound is a Bellman--Fano comparison along an algorithm-dependent reference trajectory. If the two values match at a common localization scale and the stated admissibility, calibration, and growth conditions hold, they form an information-risk sandwich. UCB, E2D, and AMS/EBO control or relax the upper Bellman bracket in different ways. For the main application, we give a negative answer to a widely studied form of the GP--UCB minimax-optimality question. For every $0<α<1/4$, we construct one bounded continuous kernel whose minimax regret is $Θ(T^{1-α})$ along an infinite sequence of horizons, while two globally calibrated GP--UCB rules incur linear regret under one fixed truth. An epochwise finite-marginal action-index AIR Bellman policy, implemented through robust AIR/AMS/EBO control, attains the minimax order. The construction separates realized information from the cost of uniform optimism: many low-value directions inflate the exploration multiplier and change the trajectory. Through the canonical RKHS feature map, it also yields a finite-horizon polynomial minimax separation for the specified maximal-information-calibrated LinUCB rule. A reproducible experiment illustrates the mechanism.