stat.MEJul 23, 2026

A Multi-Cohort Validation of Censoring-Aware Conformal Lower Predictive Bounds for Pathology Survival Models

Authors: Mingi Hong

Organizations: Independent Researcher

Abstract

Whole-slide survival models commonly provide risk rankings without calibrated statements about individual event times. We evaluate fixed-cutoff drcosarc, a post-hoc conformal wrapper for discrete-time multiple-instance learning survival heads using frozen UNI2-h representations, in an internal 18-configuration sweep across five TCGA cohorts and an external five-configuration evaluation across three CPTAC cohorts. We distinguish configuration--fold--split summaries of the inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighted (IPCW) estimate and median lower predictive bound (LPB) from a hierarchy-aware patient-ensemble estimand of the mean drcosarc--naive LPB difference. At α=0.1α=0.1, the drcosarc IPCW estimate was nearest 0.90 in KIRC, LUAD, and STAD. Patient-ensemble drcosarc--naive intervals excluded zero in KIRC, KIRP, STAD, UCEC, and CPTAC-CCRCC, but included zero in internal LUAD, CPTAC-LUAD, CPTAC-UCEC, and the internal LUSC extension. In a 20-replicate low-censoring semi-synthetic setting with known event times, drcosarc empirical coverage was 0.9129 [0.9053, 0.9207]. An exploratory analysis supported a head-error-by-censoring interaction within that data-generating process. In a two-cohort ABMIL sensitivity analysis, increasing the hazard grid to K=16K=16 raised localized marginal IPCW estimates above the prespecified 0.87 threshold and yielded positive paired LPB differences, although worst-group estimates remained below 0.87. Overall, performance was cohort dependent, and its interpretation changed with the patient-level unit, estimand, and censoring assumptions.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jun 4, 2026cs.LG

Proper Scoring Rules for Right-Censored Survival Data

Proper scoring rules provide a rigorous theoretical basis for the training and evaluation of probabilistic forecasts. However, in the presence of right censoring, the event time is only partially observed, rendering conventional scoring rules inapplicable in their standard form. We propose a framework for proper scoring of right-censored survival outcomes based on a simple idea: first, map the predictive distribution through the censoring mechanism, then apply the underlying proper score on the induced observed-data law. This yields localized scores for fixed censoring times and marginalized scores when the censoring time is random or only partially observed. The resulting construction recovers familiar right-censored likelihood and IPCW-type criteria within a coherent framework, while also yielding right-censored versions of the CRPS, pinball loss, Brier score, and energy score. We show that the marginalized score is proper under conditional independent censoring and strictly proper on the identifiable region. The same principle also leads to censored engression, a sample-based learning objective for multivariate right-censored survival modeling. In experiments, our scores correctly rank the oracle forecast across several censoring regimes, whereas forecast-dependent plug-in weighted scores can exhibit ranking reversals. Censored engression likewise substantially improves over naive training on censored outcomes.
Jef Jonkers, Glenn Van Wallendael, Luc Duchateau +1
Score FunctionLoad ForecastingPosterior
AskPDF
Feb 26, 2025stat.ML

Overcoming Dependent Censoring in the Evaluation of Survival Models

Dependent censoring occurs when the event time and censoring time are not conditionally independent given the observed covariates. This complicates survival model evaluation because widely used metrics, such as the Brier score, typically handle right-censoring using inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW). Unfortunately, IPCW is valid only when the estimated censoring distribution is independent of the event time. We propose a dependent Brier score based on an Archimedean copula and the Copula-Graphic estimator, and establish consistency and asymptotic normality of its margin-time estimator. To evaluate the metric, we introduce a semi-synthetic framework that creates realistic dependent censoring while preserving the original covariate structure and known event times. Across 12 datasets, the proposed metric reduces estimation error by 12-16% on average relative to IPCW. Source code is available at https://github.com/thecml/DependentEVAL.
Christian Marius Lillelund, Shi-ang Qi, Russell Greiner
Survival AnalysisGaussian CopulaCovariate Shift
AskPDF
Jun 18, 2026cs.LG

When Calibration Fails the Vulnerable Hospital: Federated Conformal Risk Control via Risk-Curve Shrinkage

Conformal risk control (CRC) provides distribution-free guarantees on segmentation quality by calibrating a prediction-set threshold on held-out data. In federated deployments, the standard approach pools calibration scores across sites into a single threshold. We provide the first quantification, on real multi-institutional brain tumor data (FeTS-2022, 1,251 subjects, 20 institutions), showing that this naive pooled CRC protects the average hospital but violates coverage at 40% of individual institutions, with the worst site exceeding the target false-negative rate by 7.8 percentage points. The naive alternative, per-site local CRC, largely restores coverage but inflates prediction sets by 83x, rendering them clinically useless. We propose a shrinkage-based federated CRC protocol: each site transmits only its empirical risk curve (G scalars) to a server, which computes a shrinkage-regularized threshold per site. A single hyperparameter n0 smoothly trades worst-case coverage for prediction-set efficiency; leave-one-site-out sensitivity analysis identifies n0=19, achieving 2.7/20 violations at 2.0x stretch. We further show that direct Lagrangian optimization of coverage budgets fails, concentrating risk on vulnerable hospitals, and that the finite-sample correction term is essential: removing it triples violations. The marginal CRC guarantee is preserved by construction under the stated site-mixture assumption; per-site coverage is validated across four targets with three seeds. No patient-level images, masks, or per-volume scores leave any site.
Nafis Fuad Shahid
Conformal Risk ControlOptimal Ergodic CoverageBrain Tumor ClassificationVulnerable Code
AskPDF