CT-ΔBench: A Benchmark for Longitudinal 3D Medical Imaging Difference Reporting with Vision-Language Models

Computed tomography (CT) is widely used for clinical diagnosis and longitudinal follow-up, yet automatically generating accurate and complete radiology reports from three-dimensional (3D) CT remains challenging. Existing methods improve fine-grained correspondence between images and text by modeling anatomical regions, but remain centered on the current examination. Consequently, patient-specific longitudinal changes within individual regions remain insufficiently modeled. Meanwhile, interval changes are often distributed across multiple anatomical regions, complicating a coherent assessment of the overall longitudinal state. We propose Anatomically Localized Temporal Evidence Representation (ALTER) to address these limitations. Global Prior Integration (GPI) incorporates the prior CT and report to establish historical context for the current examination. Regional Proxy Differencing (RPD) enables each current anatomical region to retrieve a historical proxy from a single shared encoding of the prior volume and to derive localized interval evidence. Interval Change Fusion (ICF) further combines current abnormality states with region-distributed differences, converting their joint representation into change-aware soft prompts that guide report generation. ALTER achieves state-of-the-art results on most evaluation metrics across the RadGenome-ChestCT validation and CTRG-Chest-548K test sets. Code and data preprocessing details are available at https://github.com/peytonkarlie/ALTER/tree/main.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) interpretation is fundamental to clinical decision-making, requiring radiologists to integrate multi-view anatomical planes across sequential timepoints while precisely localizing interval changes. However, existing vision-language benchmarks remain confined to single-timepoint, single-view interpretation, failing to capture the temporal-spatial reasoning essential to radiologic practice. We introduce the Time-Aware Multi-View MRI Benchmark, an evaluation framework unifying multi-view anatomical input, temporal reasoning across longitudinal scans, and structured localization guidance. The benchmark comprises 3,920 expert-verified question-answer pairs derived from 890 patients across over 3,200 longitudinal MRI timepoints, drawn from seven clinical cohorts covering glioblastoma, neurodegeneration, vestibular schwannoma, and brain metastases, in open-ended, multiple-choice, and binary formats, requiring models to identify anatomical regions of maximal change, characterize progression across sequences and views, and provide structured guidance specifying boundaries, imaging features, and confounders. Experiments across 16 vision-language models reveal moderate temporal alignment but systematic failure on change direction recognition and volumetric quantification, while multi-view inputs improve spatial localization yet degrade temporal reasoning in compact architectures. Our benchmark provides a systematic framework for evaluating progression tracking, interval change localization, and temporal ordering, which are essential for clinical deployment. Code, evaluation splits, and the dataset are available at: https://github.com/wafaAlghallabi/Time-Aware-MRI.

Longitudinal chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation requires reasoning over disease evolution across multiple patient visits, yet most existing medical VQA benchmarks focus on single images or short-horizon image pairs. We introduce MI-CXR, a benchmark for standardized evaluation of Multi-Interval longitudinal reasoning over multi-visit CXR sequences, without requiring free-form report generation or additional clinical context. MI-CXR comprises five-way multiple-choice questions over five-visit patient timelines and instantiates three complementary task families: Temporal Event Localization, Interval-wise Change Reasoning, and Global Trajectory Summarization, which assess clinically grounded visual reasoning over time. Evaluating 14 state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) shows low overall performance, with an average accuracy of 29.3%, only modestly above random guessing. Using stage-wise diagnostic probing, we find that models often produce locally plausible interval descriptions but fail to enforce temporal constraints or compose evidence into globally consistent decisions over the full timeline. These findings reveal key limitations of current VLMs and establish MI-CXR as a principled benchmark for longitudinal medical reasoning. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/AIDASLab/MI-CXR