HaReCAP: Habitual-action Grounding for Recursive Large Language Model Agents

Recursive large language model (LLM) agents solve long-horizon tasks through decomposition, execution, and environmental feedback. Yet after producing an atomic subtask, they often invoke the same large model again to translate a familiar instruction into an executable action. We observe that high-level planning is task-specific, whereas leaf-level action grounding recurs across tasks and can be checked against environment-admitted actions. We introduce LeafSkill, an external reuse layer that retrieves semantically related grounding experience, binds action templates to current objects and admissible actions, and uses a lightweight 1.7B selector to choose a bound action or defer the unchanged subtask to the original agent. Skills remain outside the model parameters, allowing a frozen selector to use post-training additions. Under lexical and syntactic paraphrases, exact matching retrieves none of the reference actions, while semantic retrieval preserves 96.0% and 97.0% candidate coverage; the frozen selector adopts 97.34% of unseen skill types. On an independent confirmation set of 200 Robotouille tasks, LeafSkill completes 137 tasks versus 121 for ReCAP (68.5% vs. 60.5%, exact McNemar p=.0259). On the 106 tasks completed by both, it reduces Qwen3.5-27B tokens by 14.42% and calls by 14.08%. A separate held-out repeat yields a consistent 9.0-point success gain and 18.98% token reduction. Reusable leaf grounding can thus improve task completion while reducing host-model inference without replacing high-level planning.

Recursive language models (RLMs) showed that recursion over model calls is an effective strategy for long-context reasoning, and production coding agents have begun to write code that spawns subagents at scale, most recently in Anthropic's dynamic workflows. We name and study the pattern between these two lines of work, where the recursive unit is a full agent harness with filesystem tools, code execution, and planning rather than a model call with no tools. We call this the Recursive Agent Harness (RAH) and frame it as harness recursion, the code-first extension to the model recursion of RLMs. A parent agent generates and runs an executable script that spawns subagent harnesses in parallel for fine-grained workloads and uses structured function calls for small subtasks. We provide a controlled evaluation on long-context reasoning. With the backbone held fixed at GPT-5 to match the published Codex and RLM baselines, RAH improves the Codex coding-agent baseline from 71.75% to 81.36% on Oolong-Synthetic (199 samples, 13 context-length buckets up to 4M tokens), a gain attributable to the harness rather than the model. With a stronger backbone, Claude Sonnet 4.5, the same design reaches 89.77%.

Autoregressive robot video world models based on discrete visual tokens remain unreliable over long rollout horizons. Retaining the entire generated history does not necessarily improve prediction quality. We investigate a possible memory-role conflict in Full Context decoding: persistent scene information, recent visual-action states, and stale generated history compete for attention despite their different predictive roles. This perspective motivates ReCAP (Receding Context with Anchor Preservation), a training-free context-scheduling method for long-horizon robot video world models. ReCAP keeps the pretrained tokenizer, world model, and visual decoder frozen. It preserves the initial scene anchor and a contiguous window of recent complete visual-action blocks while evicting older generated history. The schedule preserves within-block structure and temporal order, requires no additional modules or parameter updates, and bounds active-context growth independently of rollout length. We evaluate ReCAP on RT-1, BridgeV2, LIBERO-90, and CALVIN using frozen autoregressive world models. Across evaluated environments and horizons, ReCAP improves visual fidelity, action-conditioned consistency, and robot structure preservation relative to Full Context. On BridgeV2, it reduces LPIPS by 63.3%. In the system benchmark at H=64, it reduces the logical KV footprint by 73.3% and p50 latency by 6.51%. Attention analyses show increased attention to retained recent states, while history interventions associate larger amounts of stale context with higher prediction error. These observations are consistent with the memory-role-conflict hypothesis, although they do not isolate it from context-length and position-handling effects. Our results support inference-time context scheduling as a practical approach to improving long-horizon robot video prediction and computational efficiency without retraining.